Dirichlet form

In potential theory (the study of harmonic function) and functional analysis, Dirichlet forms generalize the Laplacian (the mathematical operator on scalar fields). Dirichlet forms can be defined on any measure space, without the need for mentioning partial derivatives. This allows mathematicians to study the Laplace equation and heat equation on spaces that are not manifolds, for example, fractals. The benefit on these spaces is that one can do this without needing a gradient operator, and in particular, one can even weakly define a "Laplacian" in this manner if starting with the Dirichlet form.

Definition

When working on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$, the "classical" Dirichlet form is given by:

$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u,v)=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}\nabla u(x)\cdot \nabla v(x)\;dx}$$

where one often discusses ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u):={\mathcal {E}}(u,u)=\|\nabla u\|_{2}^{2}}$ which is often referred to as the "energy" of the function ${\displaystyle u(x)}$.

More generally, a Dirichlet form is a Markovian closed symmetric form on an L²-space. ^[1] In particular, a Dirichlet form on a measure space ${\displaystyle (X,{\mathcal {A}},\mu )}$ is a bilinear function

$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}:D\times D\to \mathbb {R} }$$

such that

1. ${\displaystyle D}$ is a dense subset of ${\displaystyle L^{2}(\mu )}$.
2. ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}}$ is symmetric, that is ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u,v)={\mathcal {E}}(v,u)}$ for every ${\displaystyle u,v\in D}$.
3. ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u,u)\geq 0}$ for every ${\displaystyle u\in D}$.
4. The set ${\displaystyle D}$ equipped with the inner product defined by ${\displaystyle (u,v)_{\mathcal {E}}:=(u,v)_{L^{2}(\mu )}+{\mathcal {E}}(u,v)}$ is a real Hilbert space.
5. For every ${\displaystyle u\in D}$ we have that ${\displaystyle u_{*}=\min(\max(u,0),1)\in D}$ and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u_{*},u_{*})\leq {\mathcal {E}}(u,u)}$.

In other words, a Dirichlet form is nothing but a non negative symmetric bilinear form defined on a dense subset of ${\displaystyle L^{2}(X,\mu )}$ such that 4) and 5) hold.

Alternatively, the quadratic form ${\displaystyle u\mapsto {\mathcal {E}}(u,u)}$ itself is known as the Dirichlet form and it is still denoted by ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}}$, so ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u):={\mathcal {E}}(u,u)}$.

Harmonic functions

Functions that minimize the energy given certain boundary conditions are called harmonic, and the associated Laplacian (weak or not) will be zero on the interior, as expected.

For example, let ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}}$ be standard Dirichlet form defined for ${\displaystyle u\in H^{1}(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$ as

$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u)=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}|\nabla u|^{2}\;dx}$$

Then a harmonic function in the standard sense, i.e. such that ${\displaystyle \Delta u=0}$, will have ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u)=0}$ as can be seen with integration by parts.

As an alternative example, the standard graph Dirichlet form is given by:

$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}_{G}(u,v)=\sum _{x\sim y}((u(x)-u(y))(v(x)-v(y))}$$

where ${\displaystyle x\sim y}$ means they are connected by an edge. Let a subset of the vertex set be chosen, and call it the boundary of the graph. Assign a Dirichlet boundary condition (choose real numbers for each boundary vertex). One can find a function that minimizes the graph energy, and it will be harmonic. In particular, it will satisfy the averaging property, which is embodied by the graph Laplacian, that is, if ${\displaystyle u_{G}(x)}$ is a graph harmonic then

$${\displaystyle \Delta _{G}u_{G}(x)=\sum _{y\sim x}(u_{G}(y)-u_{G}(x))=0}$$

which is equivalent to the averaging property

$${\displaystyle u_{G}(x)={\frac {1}{|\{y:y\sim x\}|}}\sum _{y\sim x}u_{G}(y).}$$

Technically, such objects are studied in abstract potential theory, based on the classical Dirichlet's principle. The theory of Dirichlet forms originated in the work of BeurlingandDeny ( 1958 , 1959 ) on Dirichlet spaces.

Integral kernels

Another example of a Dirichlet form is given by

$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u)=\iint _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}\times \mathbb {R} ^{n}}(u(y)-u(x))^{2}k(x,y)\,dx\,dy}$$

where ${\displaystyle k:\mathbb {R} ^{n}\times \mathbb {R} ^{n}\to \mathbb {R} }$ is some non-negative symmetric integral kernel.

If the kernel ${\displaystyle k}$ satisfies the bound ${\displaystyle k(x,y)\leq \Lambda |x-y|^{-n-s}}$, then the quadratic form is bounded in ${\displaystyle {\dot {H}}^{s/2}}$. If moreover, ${\displaystyle \lambda |x-y|^{-n-s}\leq k(x,y)}$, then the form is comparable to the norm in ${\displaystyle {\dot {H}}^{s/2}}$ squared and in that case the set ${\displaystyle D\subset L^{2}(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$ defined above is given by ${\displaystyle H^{s/2}(\mathbb {R} ^{n})}$. Thus Dirichlet forms are natural generalizations of the Dirichlet integrals

$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}(u)=\int (A\nabla u,\nabla u)\;dx,}$$

where ${\displaystyle A(x)}$ is a positive symmetric matrix. The Euler-Lagrange equation of a Dirichlet form is a non-local analogue of an elliptic equations in divergence form. Equations of this type are studied using variational methods and they are expected to satisfy similar properties. ^{[2] [3] [4]}

References

1. Fukushima, M, Oshima, Y., & Takeda, M. (1994). Dirichlet forms and symmetric Markov processes. Walter de Gruyter & Co, ISBN   3-11-011626-X
2. Barlow, Martin T.; Bass, Richard F.; Chen, Zhen-Qing; Kassmann, Moritz (2009), "Non-local Dirichlet forms and symmetric jump processes", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 361 (4): 1963–1999, arXiv: math/0609842 , doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-08-04544-3, ISSN   0002-9947, S2CID   14411096
3. Kassmann, Moritz (2009), "A priori estimates for integro-differential operators with measurable kernels", Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 34 (1): 1–21, doi:10.1007/s00526-008-0173-6, ISSN   0944-2669, S2CID   122914875
4. Caffarelli, Luis; Chan, Chi Hin; Vasseur, Alexis (2011), "Regularity theory for parabolic nonlinear integral operators", Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 24 (3): 849–869, doi: 10.1090/S0894-0347-2011-00698-X , ISSN   0894-0347

• Beurling, Arne; Deny, J. (1958), "Espaces de Dirichlet. I. Le cas élémentaire", Acta Mathematica , 99 (1): 203–224, doi: 10.1007/BF02392426 , ISSN   0001-5962, MR   0098924
• Beurling, Arne; Deny, J. (1959), "Dirichlet spaces", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 45 (2): 208–215, Bibcode:1959PNAS...45..208B, doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.2.208 , ISSN   0027-8424, JSTOR   90170, MR   0106365, PMC   222537 , PMID   16590372
• Fukushima, Masatoshi (1980), Dirichlet forms and Markov processes, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 23, Amsterdam: North-Holland, ISBN   978-0-444-85421-6, MR   0569058
• Jost, Jürgen; Kendall, Wilfrid; Mosco, Umberto; Röckner, Michael; Sturm, Karl-Theodor (1998), New directions in Dirichlet forms, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 8, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, p. xiv+277, ISBN   978-0-8218-1061-3, MR   1652277 .
• "Abstract potential theory", Encyclopedia of Mathematics , EMS Press, 2001 [1994]