Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala

Last updated
Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala
International Court of Justice Seal.svg
Court International Court of Justice
Full case nameDispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v. Bolivia)

Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v. Bolivia) is a case at the International Court of Justice. In the case, Chile petitioned the Court to declare the Silala River an "international watercourse whose use by Chile and Bolivia is governed by customary international law." [1] Chile presented the case in 2016 while the Bolivian case against Chile, Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean , was still ongoing. [2] According to France 24 the case came as a surprise. [2]

Bolivia's position is that the waters of the Silala flow into Chile through artificial channels, while Chile claims that it is an international river. [3]

Within the context of the Bolivian demand for sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean Bolivian President Evo Morales has threatened to reduce the flow into Chile and charge Chile for the use of its water. [2] [4]

On December 1st, 2022, the ICJ delivered its judgment in the case. It found that the 'parties agree with respect to the legal status of the Silala River', and therefore the Court was not called upon to give a decision. [5] [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Bolivia</span> Overview of relations

Bolivia traditionally has maintained normal diplomatic relations with all hemispheric states except Chile. Foreign relations are handled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, headed by the Chancellor of Bolivia, Rogelio Mayta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atacama Desert border dispute</span> Border dispute between Bolivia and Chile

The Atacama Desert border dispute was a dispute between Bolivia and Chile from 1825 to 1879 for the territories of the Atacama Coast due to the different views of both countries of the territory inherited from the Spanish Empire. During the dispute, both countries signed Treaties in 1866 and 1874. The dispute occurred prior to the War of the Pacific, which settled the dispute in favor of Chile. Due to the surrender of land by Bolivia, the Puna de Atacama dispute was generated between Chile and Argentina and was settled in 1899.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aconcagua River</span> River in northern Chile

The Aconcagua River is a river in Chile that rises from the conflux of two minor tributary rivers at 1,430 metres (4,690 ft) above sea level in the Andes, Juncal River from the east and Blanco River from the south east. The Aconcagua river flows westward through the broad Aconcagua valley and enters the Pacific Ocean near the city of Concon, 20 kilometres (12 mi) north of Valparaíso.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gulf of Fonseca</span> Gulf of the Pacific Ocean in El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua

The Gulf of Fonseca, a part of the Pacific Ocean, is a gulf in Central America, bordering El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beagle conflict</span> Border dispute between Chile and Argentina

The Beagle conflict was a border dispute between Chile and Argentina over the possession of Picton, Lennox and Nueva islands and the scope of the maritime jurisdiction associated with those islands that brought the countries to the brink of war in 1978.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guayana Esequiba</span> Disputed territory in South America

Guayana Esequiba, sometimes also called Esequibo or Essequibo, is a disputed territory of 159,500 km2 (61,600 sq mi) west of the Essequibo River that is administered and controlled by Guyana but claimed by Venezuela. The boundary dispute was inherited from the colonial powers and has been complicated by the independence of Guyana from the United Kingdom in 1966.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chilean–Peruvian maritime dispute</span> Overview of the maritime dispute between Chile and Peru

Perú v. Chile was a public international law case concerning a territorial dispute between the South American republics of Peru and Chile over the sovereignty of an area at sea in the Pacific Ocean approximately 37,900 square kilometres (14,600 sq mi) in size. Peru contended that its maritime boundary delimitation with Chile was not fixed, but Chile claimed that it holds no outstanding border issues with Peru. On January 16, 2008, Peru brought forth the case to the International Court of Justice at The Hague, the Netherlands, which accepted the case and formally filed it as the Case concerning maritime delimitation between the Republic of Peru and the Republic of Chile - Perú v. Chile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Argentina–Chile relations</span> Bilateral relations

International relations between the Republic of Chile and the Argentine Republic have existed for decades. The border between the two countries is the world's third-longest international border, which is 5,300 km (3,300 mi) long and runs from north to south along the Andes mountains. Although both countries gained their independence during the South American wars of liberation, during much of the 19th and the 20th century, relations between the countries were chilly as a result of disputes over the border in Patagonia. Despite this, Chile and Argentina have never been engaged in a war with each other. In recent years, relations have improved. Argentina and Chile have followed quite different economic policies. Chile has signed free trade agreements with countries such as China, the United States, Canada, South Korea, as well as European Union, and it's a member of the APEC. Argentina belongs to the Mercosur regional free trade area. In April 2018, both countries suspended their membership from the UNASUR.

Territorial disputes of Nicaragua include the territorial dispute with Colombia over the Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina and Quita Sueño Bank. Nicaragua also has a maritime boundary dispute with Honduras in the Caribbean Sea and a boundary dispute over the Rio San Juan with Costa Rica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colombia–Nicaragua relations</span> Bilateral relations

Colombia–Nicaragua relations entail the diplomatic relations between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Nicaragua. The relationship between the two Hispanic American countries has evolved amid conflicts over the San Andrés y Providencia Islands located in the Caribbean sea close to the Nicaraguan shoreline and the maritime boundaries covering 150,000 km2 that included the islands of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina and the banks of Roncador, Serrana, Serranilla and Quitasueño as well as the 82nd meridian west which Colombia claims as a border but which the International Court has sided with Nicaragua in disavowing. The sea around the archipelago has been under Colombian control since 1931 when a treaty was signed during US occupation of Nicaragua, giving Colombia control over the area. Both nations are members of the Association of Caribbean States, Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, Organization of American States, Organization of Ibero-American States and the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beagle Channel arbitration</span>

On 22 July 1971 Salvador Allende and Alejandro Lanusse, the Presidents of Chile and Argentina, signed an arbitration agreement. This agreement related to their dispute over the territorial and maritime boundaries between them, and in particular the title to the Picton, Nueva and Lennox islands near the extreme end of the American continent, which was submitted to binding arbitration under the auspices of the United Kingdom government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guyana–Venezuela relations</span> Bilateral relations

Guyana–Venezuela relations include diplomatic, economic and other interactions between the neighboring countries of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Silala River</span> River in Bolivia, Chile

The Silala or Siloli is an international river arising from springs in Bolivia, and flowing naturally into Chile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canal Mauri</span> Canal in Peru and Chile

Canal Mauri is a canal in Peru and Chile. It transfers water from the Mauri River watershed and transfers it into the Caplina River for irrigation purposes. An earlier canal Canal Uchusuma was constructed in the early 19th century and was replaced by the Canal Mauri. This canal collects water from several tributaries of the Mauri River and diverts it through Chilean territory into the Quebrada Vilavilani, a tributary of the Caplina River; from there it is later diverted for irrigation purposes in the Tacna region.

<i>Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean</i> International law case by Bolivia against Chile (decided in 2018)

Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean was a case at the International Court of Justice. In the case, Bolivia petitioned the Court for a writ of mandamus obligating Chile to negotiate with Bolivia to restore Bolivia's access to the Pacific Ocean, which it had lost to Chile in 1879 during the War of the Pacific. In 2018, the court rejected Bolivia's arguments, finding that Chile was under no such obligation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charaña Accords</span> Unrealized 1975 treaty

The Charaña Accord, also known as the Hug of Charaña or the Act of Charaña, is the name given to an unrealized treaty that was discussed between the dictators of Bolivia and Chile, Hugo Banzer and Augusto Pinochet respectively. These discussions took place mostly on the Bolivian train station of Charaña on February 8, 1975, and included the brief reestablishment of diplomatic relations between the two nations which had been severed on 1962 because of the Atacama border dispute which was to be solved via a Chilean proposal for the exchange of territories between Bolivia and Chile, with the former receiving a corridor to the Pacific Ocean which would provide it with access to the sea and Chile receiving an equivalent amount of territory from Bolivia along its border with Chile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bolivia–Chile border</span> International border

The Bolivia–Chile border is an international border of South America. It separates Bolivia from Chile along Cordillera Occidental on the western edge of the Altiplano Plateau. There is an ongoing dispute about the nature of Silala River and Chile's use of its waters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chilean–Peruvian territorial dispute</span>

The Chilean–Peruvian territorial dispute is a territorial dispute between Chile and Peru that started in the aftermath of the War of the Pacific and ended significantly in 1929 with the signing of the Treaty of Lima and in 2014 with a ruling by the International Court of Justice. The dispute applies since 2014 to a 37,610 km2 territory in the Chile–Peru border, as a result of the maritime dispute between both states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">José Mendieta</span> Bolivian politician (born 1958)

José Félix Mendieta Villarroel is a Bolivian politician and trade unionist who served as a member of the Chamber of Deputies from Cochabamba, representing circumscription 28 from 2010 to 2015.

References

  1. Application, June 6, 2016
  2. 1 2 3 "Chile reforzó en La Haya sus argumentos en disputa con Bolivia por aguas del río Silala". France 24 (in Spanish). 2022-04-11. Retrieved 2022-05-08.
  3. "7 disputas entre países latinoamericanos que deben resolverse ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia de La Haya". BBC News Mundo (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-11-16.
  4. "Chile y Bolivia alegaron en La Haya por las aguas del Silala". Swissinfo (in Spanish). 2022-04-01. Retrieved 2022-05-08.
  5. "ICJ declines to issue decision in Chile-Bolivia river dispute". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 2022-12-03.
  6. ICJ, 'Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v. Bolivia)', Judgment of 1 December 2022 (merits).