District of Columbia School Reform Act of 1995

Last updated

District of Columbia School Reform Act of 1995
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Other short titlesOmnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996
Enacted bythe 104th United States Congress
Citations
Public law Pub. L.   104–134 (text) (PDF)
Statutes at Large 110  Stat.   1321-107
Legislative history

The District of Columbia School Reform Act of 1995 was passed by the United States Congress. Since Washington, D.C., is a semi-autonomous non-state, Congress has jurisdiction over the city and passed the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996. Title I amended the D.C. School Reform Act in 1995, making charter schools part of the public-education system in Washington. [1] Unlike the states, the District of Columbia had relatively little opposition to charter schools from politicians and the public; what opposition existed (from the Washington Teachers' Union) was not firmly entrenched due to controversy within the union. A strong advocate in getting the act passed was the advocacy group Friends of Choice in Urban Schools (FOCUS), which continues to lobby for charter schools in the district. [2] The act created the District of Columbia Public Charter School Board (PCSB) as the city's second, independent authorizer of public charter schools in the city (the first is the District of Columbia Board of Education). Board members are nominated by the mayor of Washington, D.C., and approved by the DC Council. In 2006, the D.C. Board of Education voted to relinquish its charter-authorizing authority. [1]

Contents

According to the D.C. Public Charter School Board's website,

The PCSB regularly evaluates D.C. public charter schools for academic results, compliance with applicable local and federal laws and fiscal management, and holds them accountable for results. The PCSB can close charter schools that fail to meet the goals established in the charter agreement between the PCSB and the school. [1]

Congress mandated that the District of Columbia adopt charter schools to pressure the city's public schools to improve and to give parents more options for public education. [3]

D.C. Public Charter School Board membership

As of May 2019, members of the PCSB are Rick Cruz (chair), Saba Bireda (vice-chair), Steve Bumbaugh (Treasurer), Ricarda Ganjam (Secretary), Naomi Shelton, and Lea Crusey. Website: https://www.dcpcsb.org/our-people

Conflict between DCPS and PCSB

During the early 2000s there was a conflict between the D.C. Public Schools (DCPS) and the Public Charter School Board over whether or not to convert a number of empty DCPS buildings into charter schools. DCPS was reluctant to surrender buildings it claimed could be used in the future. Meanwhile, DCPS faced financial pressure to use the surplus buildings for commercial purposes. Due to the poor reputation of DCPS and the influence of advocates for charter schools such as FOCUS, many buildings were converted into charter schools. [2] Public charter schools have become increasingly popular in the District of Columbia, with 27, 953 students enrolled in the city's charter schools for the academic year 2010–2011 compared with 3,514 students for the academic year 1998–1999. [4]

Charter school performance

Students in Washington's charter schools outperform their public school counterparts, as shown by standardized tests and the District's tests in reading and mathematics. [5] The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) found that in 2003, D.C. charter schools had lower scores in reading and mathematics than public schools; however, charter-school students outperformed public-school students in both subjects in 2005 and 2007. [3] [6] Some attribute charter schools' relative success in the district to their ability to "tap into private donors, bankers and developers [which] has made it possible to fund impressive facilities, expand programs, and reduce class sizes". [5]

Charter schools have been particularly successful in educating children from low-income families, who comprise two-thirds of the District's public-school student population. [5] This success has been attributed to charter schools' ability to experiment with a variety of educational approaches and their reliance on strategies known to help poor children academically: longer school days, summer and Saturday classes, parental involvement and a "cohesive, disciplined culture among staff members". [5] District of Columbia records show that charter schools have better attendance and higher graduation rates than public schools, and teachers at charter schools are more likely to be considered "highly qualified" than teachers at public schools. [5]

Charter schools report annually to their chartering boards on their academic progress and finances. Charters are recognized for 15 years before renewal, although charters may be revoked at any point if there is financial mismanagement. Failure to achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for five years may also result in revocation of the charter. [7]

Charter school funding

Charter schools are publicly funded (receiving a sum per pupil) and are open to any resident of the District of Columbia. The estimated budget for 2011 in D.C. was $9.46 billion. About 20 percent ($1.99 billion) was earmarked for public education. [8] The education budget was divided into several sectors, including public schools, charter schools and special-education transportation. [9] Proponents of charter schools contend that the per-pupil funding system creates competition for DCPS schools; if public schools do not perform well and enrollment decreases, they will lose money. [2] As of 2008, a charter school in the District received $11,879 in tax dollars for each elementary student enrolled: $8,770 to match per-pupil academic spending in the regular public schools, and a $3,109 facility allotment to help pay for buildings. Charter schools receive more in per-pupil allotments for older students. [5] With relative financial autonomy, charter schools with over 300 students may find that their funding exceeds their costs; many successful charters have budget surpluses. There is a correlation between top-performing charter schools and extra funding; schools with the largest budget surpluses have ranked at the top in test scores. [5] Charter schools also receive funding from bank loans and from a congressionally created panel, the D.C. Public Charter School Credit Enhancement and Direct Loan Funds Committee, which also provides private loans to developers who build charter schools. [5]

Charter-school teachers are not unionized; pay and benefits are determined by the schools. [7]

Charter-school admissions

Charter schools are required to use a lottery system if they receive more applicants than they have space for, and charters are free to make their own rules for expelling students. [5] One such lottery is depicted in the film Waiting for "Superman" which depicts the lottery system at the SEED school in Washington (one of the city's highest-performing charter schools, and its only charter boarding school). Charter schools do not have to follow DCPS rules and guidelines; they are considered independent, although they must follow the guidelines and directives set forth by the PCSB (which are often the product of an agreement—or charter—between a charter school and the PCSB). [5]

Impact

The (relative) academic success of charter schools has changed public education in the city, which has been regarded as having one of the most troubled school districts in the U.S. As of 2008, enrollment in "traditional" public schools decreased 42 percent since 1996; the growth in charter-school enrollment accounts for nearly the entire decline. [5] The District of Columbia is now one of the largest charter-school districts in the country. [5]

Controversy

Not all charter schools in the city are (or have been) effective. The PCSB closes charter schools every year, while other failing charters are absorbed by higher-performing charter schools. During its fifteen-year history, the Public Charter School Board has been criticized for conflicts of interest and a lack of accountability on the part of board members; some officials who oversee charters have been involved in making private financial loans to the schools. [10]

Opponents of charter schools argue that the PCSB should close more low-performing schools, or provide more support to struggling schools. In 2005, out of the thirty-four charter schools in DC only four made Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) in reading and mathematics as mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act. [11] According to data published by the PCSB, only five out of eighteen charter high schools in D.C. made AYP in reading and math. [12]

Another criticism is that charter schools encourage re-segregation in public schools. In an effort to give all students an opportunity for a good education, many charter schools are located in inner-city areas (and, therefore, serve mostly minority students). Even in racially diverse communities, charter schools do not reflect the demographic diversity of the community. Opponents of charter schools contend that they are returning education to the era of "separate, but equal". [13] Some opponents of charter schools argue that the de facto segregation propagated by Washington's charter schools will result in fewer opportunities for low-income and minority students to interact with people from diverse backgrounds, hindering their preparedness for higher education and the job market. [14]

Related Research Articles

School choice is a term for education options that allow students and families to select alternatives to public schools. It is the subject of fierce debate in various state legislatures across the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charter schools in the United States</span> Taxation-funded privately-run schools

Charter schools in the United States are primary or secondary education institutions that are public schools which are publicly funded and operate independently, rather than being overseen by local school districts. Charter schools have a contract with local school districts or other authorizing bodies which allow them to operate. These contracts, or charters, are how charters schools bear their name. They are funded with public tax dollars, though they also fundraise independently. Charter schools are subject to fewer rules than traditional state schools in exchange for greater accountability. Proponents argue that they are meant to serve underserved communities that wish to have alternatives to their neighborhood school. Charters are run as either non-profit or for-profit institutions. However, there are some for-profit management organizations that hold charters, though these are only allowed in Arizona. Only non-profit charters can receive donations from private sources, just the same as traditional public schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secondary education in the United States</span> Last seven years of statutory formal education before higher level education

Secondary education is the last six or seven years of statutory formal education in the United States. It culminates with twelfth grade. Whether it begins with sixth grade or seventh grade varies by state and sometimes by school district.

Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution prohibits segregated public schools in the District of Columbia. Originally argued on December 10–11, 1952, a year before Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling was reargued on December 8–9, 1953, and was unanimously decided on May 17, 1954, the same day as Brown. The Bolling decision was supplemented in 1955 with the second Brown opinion, which ordered desegregation "with all deliberate speed". In Bolling, the Court did not address school desegregation in the context of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which applies only to the states, but rather held that school segregation was unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court observed that the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution lacked an Equal Protection Clause, as in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, the Court held that the concepts of equal protection and due process are not mutually exclusive, establishing the reverse incorporation doctrine.

In the U.S. education system, magnet schools are public schools with specialized courses or curricula. Normally a student will attend an elementary school, and this also determines the middle school and high school they attend, unless they move. "Magnet" refers to how magnet schools accept students from multiple different schools in the area, pulling students out of the normal progression of schools. Attending them is voluntary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">No Child Left Behind Act</span> 2002 United States education reform law; repealed 2015

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) was a U.S. Act of Congress that reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act; it included Title I provisions applying to disadvantaged students. It supported standards-based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals could improve individual outcomes in education. The Act required states to develop assessments in basic skills. To receive federal school funding, states had to give these assessments to all students at select grade levels.

The District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) is the local public school system for Washington, D.C. It is distinct from the District of Columbia Public Charter Schools (DCPCS), which governs public charter schools in the city.

School Without Walls High School (SWW) is a small public magnet high school in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C. It is colloquially referred to by students and faculty as "Walls." The school is based on a concept in urban education that encourages students to "use the city as a classroom," which is the origin of its name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jackson-Reed High School</span> Public school in Washington, D.C., United States

Jackson-Reed High School is a public high school in Washington, D.C. It serves grades 9 through 12 as part of the District of Columbia Public Schools. The school sits in the Tenleytown neighborhood, at the intersection of Chesapeake Street and Nebraska Avenue NW. It primarily serves students in Washington's Ward 3, but nearly 30% of the student body lives outside the school's boundaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duval County Public Schools</span> Public school district in the United States

Duval County Public Schools (DCPS) is the public school district that serves the families and children residing in the urban, suburban, and rural areas of the City of Jacksonville and Duval County, Florida. As of 2015, the district had an enrollment of over 129,000 students, making it the 21st largest school district in the United States, and the 6th largest school district in Florida. The district's 196 schools are traditional neighborhood and magnet schools, charter schools, and alternative schools, all of which serve students of various needs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cranberry Area School District</span> School district in Pennsylvania

The Cranberry Area School District is a small, rural, public school district which serves the residents of Cranberry Township, Pinegrove Township and Rockland Township in Venango County, Pennsylvania. Cranberry Area School District encompasses approximately 155 square miles (400 km2). According to 2000 federal census data, it serves a resident population of 9,698. In 2009, the per capita income of district residents was $16,307, while the median family income was $39,203 a year. In the Commonwealth, the median family income was $49,501 and the United States median family income was $49,445, in 2010. Per school district officials, in school year 2007-08 the Cranberry Area School District provided basic educational services to 1271 pupils through the employment of 115 teachers, 77 full-time and part-time support personnel, and 7 administrators. In 2006, the 1,308 student population was 98% white, 1% black, 1% Asian, Native American <0.1% and <0.2% Hispanic. The Cranberry Area School District received more than $9 million in state funding, for school year 2007-08.

The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) is a consortium featuring two states, the District of Columbia, the Department of Defense Educational Activity, and the Bureau of Indian Education, that work to create and deploy a standard set of K–12 assessments in Mathematics and English, based on the Common Core State Standards.

Latin American Montessori Bilingual Public Charter School is a public charter school in Washington, D.C. It operates in two buildings in the Northwest and Northeast quadrants of the city: one on 14th Street in Northwest's Sixteenth Street Heights and one at the corner of Perry Street and South Dakota Avenue in Northeast's Brookland neighborhood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia Public Charter School Board</span> School authority of the U.S. capital

The District of Columbia Public Charter School Board is the regulatory authority and sole authorizer of all public charter schools in Washington, D.C.. It provides oversight to 69 independently-run nonprofits and 135 public charter schools which educate more than 45,000 students living in every ward of the city. The Board is tasked with approving, monitoring, and evaluating schools, creating policies and conditions to empower educators to do their best work, and actively engaging families, schools, and communities to inform decision-making.

A charter school is a school that receives government funding but operates independently of the established state school system in which it is located. It is independent in the sense that it operates according to the basic principle of autonomy for accountability, that it is freed from the rules but accountable for results.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School segregation in the United States</span> Racial separation in schools

School segregation in the United States was the separation of students based on their ethnicity. Segregation laws were dismantled in the late 1960s by the U.S. Supreme Court. Segregation was practiced in the north and segregation continued longstanding exclusionary policies in much of the South after the Civil War. School integration in the United States took place at different times in different areas and often met resistance. Jim Crow laws codified segregation. These laws were influenced by the history of slavery and discrimination in the US. Secondary schools for African Americans in the South were called training schools instead of high schools in order to appease racist whites and focused on vocational education. After the ruling of Brown v. Board of Education, which banned segregated school laws, school segregation took de facto form. School segregation declined rapidly during the late 1960s and early 1970s as the government became strict on schools' plans to combat segregation more effectively as a result of Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. Voluntary segregation by income appears to have increased since 1990. Racial segregation has either increased or stayed constant since 1990, depending on which definition of segregation is used. In general, definitions based on the amount of interaction between black and white students show increased racial segregation, while definitions based on the proportion of black and white students in different schools show racial segregation remaining approximately constant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia State Board of Education</span>

The District of Columbia State Board of Education (SBOE) is an independent executive branch agency of the Government of the District of Columbia, in the United States. The SBOE provides advocacy and policy guidance for the District of Columbia Public Schools, and works with the Chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools and the District of Columbia State Superintendent of Education. Charter schools are overseen by the District of Columbia Public Charter School Board.

Carlos Rosario International Public Charter School is a charter school for adults in Washington D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antwan Wilson</span> American teacher and school administrator

Antwan Wilson is an American teacher and school administrator. He was appointed the Superintendent of the Oakland Unified School District in Oakland, California, in 2014, and resigned effective February 2017. On December 20, 2016, he was confirmed as Chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools in Washington, D.C. He began his new position on February 1, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia International School</span> Charter school in Washington, D.C., United States

District of Columbia International School (DCI) is a public charter school in Washington, DC. It offers an International Baccalaureate education to students in grades 6 to 12. Each student learns in a partial language immersion program in Spanish, French or Chinese

References

  1. 1 2 3 Washington D.C. Public Charter School Board. "About the Board". DCPCSB Website. DCPCSB. Archived from the original on 5 October 2011. Retrieved 11 October 2011.
  2. 1 2 3 Lacireno-Paquet, Natalie; Holyoke, Thomas T. (2007). "Moving Forward of Sliding Backward: The Evolution of Charter School Policies in Michigan and the District of Columbia". Educational Policy. 21 (1): 185. doi:10.1177/0895904806296903. S2CID   154590304.
  3. 1 2 Keating, Dan; V. Dion Haynes (10 June 2007). "Can D.C. Schools Be Fixed?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 8 October 2011.
  4. ↑ D.C. Public Charter School Board. "Enrollment and Demographics". DCPCSB. Archived from the original on 5 October 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dan Keating; Theola Labbé-DeBose (15 December 2008). "Charter Schools Make Gains on Tests". The Washington Post. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
  6. ↑ The Washington Post (15 December 2008). "How Charter Schools Fare". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 October 2011.
  7. 1 2 http://test.focusdc.org/archiveslaws/schoolReformAct.html%5B%5D
  8. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 2011-10-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  9. ↑ "District of Columbia school system - Sunshine Review". Archived from the original on 20 December 2010. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
  10. ↑ Kravitz, Derek; April Witt (16 December 2008). "Tighter Control of Charters is Urged". The Washington Post. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
  11. ↑ Robelen, E.W. (2006). "At age 10, Booming D.C. Charters 'Feel Growing Pains'". Education Week. 26 (9). ProQuest   202713147.
  12. ↑ D.C. Public Charter School Board. "AYP Status by School 2010". D.C. Public Charter School Board. Archived from the original on 1 September 2011. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
  13. ↑ Hewitt, Paul M.; Robert Maranto (2011). "Debating Charter Schools". School Administrator. 68 (7): 27.
  14. ↑ Frankenberg, E.; et al. (2011). "Choice Without Equity: Charter School Segregation". Education Policy Analysis Archives. 19 (1): 1–92. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v19n1.2011 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.