Double Exposure | |
---|---|
![]() Theatrical release poster | |
Directed by | William Byron Hillman |
Written by | William Byron Hillman |
Produced by |
|
Starring |
|
Cinematography | R. Michael Stringer |
Edited by | Lawrence Bridges |
Music by | Jack Goga |
Production company | Greyhill Productions |
Distributed by | Crown International Pictures |
Release date |
|
Running time | 95 minutes [2] |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Double Exposure is a 1982 American horror film written and directed by William Byron Hillman, co-produced by Michael Callan, and starring Callan, Joanna Pettet, James Stacy, and Seymour Cassel. [3] It is a loose remake of the 1974 film The Photographer , [4] which was also written and directed by Hillman, produced by Deming, and starring Callan. The film follows a photographer who starts to experience dreams in which he murders the models he photographs.
The film was shot in early 1981. According to Cleavon Little, "all the actors got points in the project instead of real big salaries." [5]
Double Exposure was given a regional limited release, opening in Indianapolis, Indiana on August 27, 1982, [1] and in Lafayette, Indiana on September 3. [6] It subsequently opened in Birmingham, Alabama on October 29, 1982. [7] The film continued to screen regionally in the United States through the fall of 1982 in several cities, including Grand Junction, Colorado, [8] Portland, Oregon, [9] and Tallahassee, Florida. [10] It opened in Roanoke, Virginia on January 14, 1983. [11]
Scorpion Releasing issued Double Exposure on DVD on February 12, 2012. [12]
In April 2017, Double Exposure was restored in 2K and released on DVD and Blu-ray by Vinegar Syndrome, [4] [13] [14] both as a standard edition release and as a limited edition release with a slipcover. [15]
Mike Mayo of The Roanoke Times panned the film as "cliched, chaotic, pretentious, confusing, and boring." [11] Ted Mahar of The Oregonian felt that the film's pacing was clunky, writing: "It's curious and slightly depressing to see Little and Pettet grinding away in this minor offering." [9]
Lee Pfeiffer of Cinema Retro called the film "generally engrossing and well-made", though he wrote that the film's "ending veers into cliched 'woman in jeopardy' territory and the final few frames of the movie, in which the killer is unveiled, boasts some fine acting but disintegrates into a confusing and frustrating scenario in the last hectic seconds." [4]
Paul Mavis of DVD Talk praised the film for its "exceptional" cinematography and music. [12]