The Dueling Dinosaurs are a fossil specimen originating from the Hell Creek Formation of Montana, United States, discovered in 2006. It consists of the articulated skeletons of a Nanotyrannus lancensis [1] and Triceratops horridus individual associated in a sandstone block. This fossil remained obscure for decades due to a lengthy legal dispute over property rights to the specimen, which has since been resolved as the specimen resides in the North Carolina Museum of Natural Science. The "dueling" inference comes from the numerous injuries sustained by both dinosaurs, including a tooth from the tyrannosaur embedded within the Triceratops, although it is not known whether they were actually buried fighting one another. [2] In addition to being an extremely rare paleontological discovery, the Dueling Dinosaur fossil provides significant insight into the behavior and biology of both species in life. [3] [4] [5]
The Dueling Dinosaurs specimen was discovered in 2006 by ranchers Clayton Phipps, Mark Eatman, and Chad O'Connor in Montana. Two different ranching families, the Seversons and the Murrays, owned the land on which the fossils were found. Phipps enlisted the help of CK Preparations, run by preparator Chris Morrow and paleoartist Katie Busch, to prepare the specimen. Upon first inspection, the two dinosaurs were assumed to have died while locked in combat, but subsequent analyses have questioned if the preserved postures formed as a result of the burial process. [6] [7] [8]
The Dueling Dinosaurs remained obscure until 2011, when a marketing campaign, including a dedicated website, was launched by the ranchers (with the assistance of commercial paleontologist Pete Larson) to sell them to a prospective buyer. The ranchers unsuccessfully tried to sell the fossil to several museums, including the Smithsonian and the Museum of the Rockies. With no buyers, the fossils were slated to be sold to a private collector instead. In 2013, Larson presented a poster about the tyrannosaur (also referred to as "Bloody Mary", specimen number BHI 6437) at the annual Society of Vertebrate Paleontology meeting, pronouncing it as a potential specimen of the debated tyrannosaur genus " Nanotyrannus ". This presentation was met with significant controversy and ethical complaints, due to the opposition surrounding publishing on privately owned specimens. Shortly afterwards, the specimens went on sale, including auctioning at Bonhams, but no purchase was made. [9] [10] [11]
In 2016, Lindsay Zanno of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences reached out to Phipps, starting negotiations to purchase the fossil, with funds being raised through the private nonprofit Friends of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences. However, legal issues over the rightful ownership of the fossils slowed these negotiations: the Seversons had most of the control over mineral rights on Murray land, and whether fossils could be considered minerals (in which case the Seversons would have rights to it) was disputed. Although a previous court had ruled in favor of the Murrays, in November 2018 judges ruled in favor of the Seversons and that fossils could legally be considered minerals in Montana, angering many paleontologists. However, the case was appealed to the Montana Supreme Court in 2020, who ruled that fossils could not be considered minerals, allowing for the Museum of Natural Sciences to acquire the fossils. The resolution to this dispute is significant for all paleontological discoveries as it set a precedent for all fossils unearthed within or outside of Montana. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]
Scientific examination of the Dueling Dinosaurs is currently ongoing at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences. The usage of non-destructive scientific instruments, such as CT scans, is expected to reveal more information on this fossil. The specimen has been considered one of the best-preserved and most complete fossils of both species of Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus (the latter being over 98% complete), [20] and contains skin impressions, and potentially internal organs, stomach contents, and proteins. [21] [22] [23] In 2025 Lindsay Zanno and James Napoli proposed that the "Bloody Mary" tyrannosauroid skeleton was not a juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex as previously assumed, but a fully grown Nanotyrannus lancensis . The researchers determined that the individual was around twenty years old when it died, with fewer vertebrae and more teeth than T. rex. [1]
A recent discovery that was made using a high-precision U-Pb zircon dating analysis determined the age of the fossil to be approximately 66 million years old. This places the Dueling Dinosaurs near the Cretaceous Paleogene boundary. More discoveries like this are expected to be yielded by the museum. [24]
The specimens were officially revealed to the public in April 2024 after the lengthy legal dispute, in a ribbon-cutting ceremony led by then-state governor Roy Cooper. [25] The fossil is in the possession of and being studied by the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences. [26] The preparation laboratory is open for public viewing to give insight to how fossils are curated, and is the centerpiece of the paleontology wing of the museum. [27]
For a long time, paleontologists, artists, and filmmakers made several depictions of Tyrannosaurus rex pitted against Triceratops. The diet of a Tyrannosaurus is indicated by studying bitten bones and coprolites (feces). However, there is no direct evidence Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops ever fought. Furthermore, a lot of Triceratops only had traces indicating scavenging. Yet healed injuries on either a Tyrannosaurus or Triceratops would be a clear sign of a fight. [28] A juvenile Tyrannosaurus has a bite force of 5,641 newtons compared to the 35,000 newtons of a full-grown adult. Paleontologists use this information to confirm juveniles do not crush bone, but that comes with growth and development, advancing their bite power and strengthening their jaws. Therefore, Tyrannosaurus bite force rises in strength and power in correspondence to its size and weight with age. [29] The presence of holes on the frill revealed evidence of what could have been interspecific combat or predation attempt injuries. Chemical analysis indicated the injuries on the bones had healed. [30]
The legal battle over the Dueling Dinosaurs fossil is also significant for the paleontological community. It ultimately resulted in legislation that benefits paleontologists and the scientific community. This is especially significant for the state of Montana, which boasts a large abundance of high-quality fossils that will greatly expand paleontological knowledge if the fossils are received by the scientific community rather than private collections.[ citation needed ]
The Dueling Dinosaurs are considered one of the most significant fossils ever recovered from the Hell Creek Formation due to their high percentage of completeness, exceptional preservation, and articulation. The way in which these two species were fossilized provides an immense amount of insight into the behaviors of the Nanotyrannus and Triceratops.[ citation needed ]