Endoscopic carpal tunnel release

Last updated
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Specialty orthopedic surgery

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) refers to a method of performing carpal tunnel surgery using an endoscope or an arthroscopic device to provide visualization of the anatomic structures.

Contents

Endoscopic techniques for carpal tunnel release involve one or two smaller incisions (less than half inch each) through which instrumentation is introduced including a synovial elevator, probes, knives, and an endoscope used to visualize the underside of the transverse carpal ligament. [1] [ unreliable medical source? ] The endoscopic methods do not divide the subcutaneous tissues or the palmar fascia to the same degree as the open method does. [2] Many studies have been done to determine whether the perceived benefits of a limited endoscopic or arthroscopic release are significant.

Many surgeons have embraced limited incision methods. It is considered to be the procedure of choice for many of these surgeons with respect to idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Supporting this are the results of some of the previously mentioned series that cite no difference in the rate of complications for either method of surgery. Thus, there has been broad support for either surgical procedure using a variety of devices or incisions.

The procedure

For ECTR or any carpal tunnel release surgery while there are many different blades and techniques the primary goal is to release the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) that overlies and compresses the median nerve within the carpal tunnel. It is this compression on the median nerve that leads to the characteristic 'pins and needles' paresthesia in the thumb, index, long and ring fingers. The primary benefit of endoscopic releases versus traditional open carpal tunnel release is often perceived to be the smaller incision size. ECTR incisions are commonly less than 1 cm (0.39 in) compared to a 2–4 in (51–102 mm) longitudinal incision with a traditional carpal tunnel release. However, the incision size is not the only factor that differentiates the two methods. The principle behind the endoscopic release is that the Palmar aponeurosis, a thick tough layer of tissue that lines the palm, is not divided with endoscopic methods. In addition, the endoscopic methods offer less dissection and interruption of tissue planes than the open methods because the endoscopic methods do not divide the subcutaneous tissues or the palmar fascia to the same degree as the open method does. [3] Thus, a more rapid recovery is generally touted with ECTR as the normal skin above the TCL is not incised. Surgery, either open or endoscopic is a way to treat Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A meta-analysis supports the conclusion that endoscopic carpal tunnel release is favored over the open carpal tunnel release in terms of a reduction in scar tenderness and increase in grip and pinch strength at a 12-week follow-up [4]

The use of an endoscope to release the carpal tunnel was first described in 1989 by Okutsu et al.[ non-primary source needed ] [5] Here a flexible clear plastic tube was used with a standard endoscope to identify the transverse carpal ligament and release it with a retrograde knife.

Variations

Many variations of the endoscopic or arthroscopic methods have been described, each with its own unique apparatus and surgical protocol.

The two more common and popular devices were referred to early on as the Chow device and the 3M Agee device. The Chow device is a two-portal device, while the 3M Agee endoscopic carpal tunnel release system is a single-portal device. The Chow device was produced by Dyonics and early papers documented its success. It was heralded by its corporate manufacturer as a breakthrough in carpal tunnel surgery. The Agee 3M device used a single, transverse incision in the area of the proximal wrist flexion crease. The Chow two-portal or two-incision device has had other manifestations, and the Agee device was bought by MicroAire Surgical Instruments. Both methods are still in use today.

Additional modifications in technique for a smaller or limited incision have been accompanied by many variations of knives, rasps and tubes through which these instruments and the imaging arthroscope or endoscope are passed. Despite the many manifestations of these devices they are all either a single or two portal system. Athrex, Brown-Instratek, Linvatek and other manufacturers modified the original one or two portal systems for endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Most of these methods utilize an endoscope to visualize the under surface of the transverse carpal ligament while others simply rely on instrumentation that allows for a smaller incision and instrumentation that aids in guiding the surgeon's modified blade or knife. Lastly, several years later a distal portal or single incision in the distal palm was advocated by a group from Louisville.

Effectiveness

Many studies have been done to determine whether the perceived benefits of a limited endoscopic or arthroscopic release are truly significant. One prospective, randomized, multi-center study found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the secondary quantitative outcome measurements. However, the open technique resulted in more tenderness of the scar than did the endoscopic method. A prospective randomized study using the MicroAire system was conducted in 2002 by Trumble and Diao et al. and revealed that good clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are achieved more quickly when the endoscopic method of carpal tunnel release is used. Their study concluded that single-portal Endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery is a safe and effective method of treating carpal tunnel syndrome. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications or the cost of surgery between the two groups. However, the open technique resulted in greater scar tenderness during the first three months after surgery as well as a longer time until the patients could return to work. [6]

Safety

It has been shown in recent literature that there is a learning curve for a hand surgeon who begins to use an endoscopic technique to release the transverse carpal ligament. [7] However this same recent study also showed no significant morbidity associated with the endoscopic method.

Research

Brown et al. conducted a prospective, randomized, multi-center study and found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to secondary quantitative outcome measurements. [8] However, the open technique resulted in more tenderness of the scar than the endoscopic method. A prospective randomized study done in 2002 by Trumble revealed that good clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are achieved more quickly with the endoscopic method. Single-portal endoscopic surgery is a safe and effective method of treating carpal tunnel syndrome. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications or the cost of surgery between the two groups. However, the open technique caused greater scar tenderness during the first three months after surgery, and a longer time before the patients could return to work. [9] In addition, in patients without workers compensation issues, the single-incision endoscopic carpal tunnel release led to less palmar tenderness and a quicker return to work compared to the two-incision endoscopic carpal tunnel release [10]

Despite these views, some surgeons have suggested that in their own hands endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been associated with a higher incidence of median nerve injury, and for this reason, it has been abandoned at several centers in the United States. At the 2007 meeting of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, a former advocate of endoscopic carpal tunnel release, Thomas J. Fischer, MD, retracted his advocacy of the technique, based on his own personal assessment that the benefit of the procedure (slightly faster recovery) did not outweigh the risk of injury to the median nerve. Contrary to this one or any one opinion of any individual surgeon it has been shown that while there is a learning curve for a hand surgeon who begins to use an endoscopic technique to release the transverse carpal ligament no significant safety issues or morbidity associated with the endoscopic method exist. [11] The use of endoscopic carpal tunnel release has continued to spread around the world and clinical and nerve electrophysiological states are significantly improved at the long-term follow-up after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. [12] A meta-analysis supports the conclusion that endoscopic carpal tunnel release is favored over the open carpal tunnel release in terms of a reduction in scar tenderness and increase in grip and pinch strength at a 12-week follow-up [13] [14]

A study comparing the open method and endoscopic method resulted in a longer interval until the patient could return to work (median, twenty-eight days, compared with fourteen days for the open-release and endoscopic-release groups). [15]

A recent study regarding outcome of Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has shown that clinical and nerve electrophysiological states are significantly improved at the long-term follow-up after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. [16] Further evidence supports that carpal tunnel release done endoscopically offers benefits in the early post operative period beyond that of open carpal tunnel syndrome. This came in the form of level 1 evidence as a meta-analysis that supports the conclusion that endoscopic carpal tunnel release is favored over the open carpal tunnel release in terms of a reduction in scar tenderness and increase in grip and pinch strength at a 12-week follow-up [17]

Related Research Articles

Carpal tunnel syndrome Medical condition

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the collection of symptoms and signs associated with median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel. Most CTS is related to idiopathic compression of the median nerve as it travels through the wrist at the carpal tunnel (IMNCT). Idiopathic means that there is no other disease process contributing to pressure on the nerve. As with most structural issues, it occurs in both hands, and the strongest risk factor is genetics.

Laparoscopy Minimally invasive operations within the abdominal or pelvic cavities

Laparoscopy is an operation performed in the abdomen or pelvis using small incisions with the aid of a camera. The laparoscope aids diagnosis or therapeutic interventions with a few small cuts in the abdomen.

Endoscopy Procedure used in medicine to look inside the body

An endoscopy is a procedure used in medicine to look inside the body. The endoscopy procedure uses an endoscope to examine the interior of a hollow organ or cavity of the body. Unlike many other medical imaging techniques, endoscopes are inserted directly into the organ.

Arthroscopy Medical procedure

Arthroscopy is a minimally invasive surgical procedure on a joint in which an examination and sometimes treatment of damage is performed using an arthroscope, an endoscope that is inserted into the joint through a small incision. Arthroscopic procedures can be performed during ACL reconstruction.

Cholecystectomy Surgical removal of the gallbladder

Cholecystectomy is the surgical removal of the gallbladder. Cholecystectomy is a common treatment of symptomatic gallstones and other gallbladder conditions. In 2011, cholecystectomy was the eighth most common operating room procedure performed in hospitals in the United States. Cholecystectomy can be performed either laparoscopically, or via an open surgical technique.

Minimally invasive procedure Surgical technique that limits size of surgical incisions needed

Minimally invasive procedures encompass surgical techniques that limit the size of incisions needed and so lessen wound healing time, associated pain and risk of infection. Surgery by definition is invasive and many operations requiring incisions of some size are referred to as open surgery, in which incisions made can sometimes leave large wounds that are painful and take a long time to heal. Minimally invasive procedures have been enabled by the advance of various medical technologies. An endovascular aneurysm repair as an example of minimally invasive surgery is much less invasive in that it involves much smaller incisions than the corresponding open surgery procedure of open aortic surgery. This minimally invasive surgery became the most common method of repairing abdominal aortic aneurysms in 2003 in the United States.

Rhytidectomy Type of cosmetic surgery

A facelift, technically known as a rhytidectomy, is a type of cosmetic surgery procedure used to give a more youthful facial appearance. There are multiple surgical techniques and exercise routines. Surgery usually involves the removal of excess facial skin, with or without the tightening of underlying tissues, and the redraping of the skin on the patient's face and neck. Exercise routines tone underlying facial muscles without surgery. Surgical facelifts are effectively combined with eyelid surgery (blepharoplasty) and other facial procedures and are typically performed under general anesthesia or deep twilight sleep.

The mini-maze procedures are cardiac surgery procedures intended to cure atrial fibrillation (AF), a common disturbance of heart rhythm. They are procedures derived from the original maze procedure developed by James Cox, MD.

Flexor retinaculum of the hand A thickened fascia over the carpal tunnel

The flexor retinaculum is a fibrous band on the palmar side of the hand near the wrist. It arches over the carpal bones of the hands, covering them and forming the carpal tunnel.

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery Surgery to enlarge the paranasal sinus drainage pathways

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a minimally invasive procedure which uses nasal endoscopes to enlarge the nasal drainage pathways of the paranasal sinuses to improve sinus ventilation and allow access of topical medications. This procedure is generally used to treat inflammatory and infectious sinus diseases, including chronic rhinosinusitis that do not respond to drugs, nasal polyps, some cancers, and decompression of eye sockets/optic nerve in Graves ophthalmopathy.

Recurrent branch of the median nerve

The recurrent branch of the median nerve is the branch of the median nerve which supplies the thenar muscles. It is also occasionally referred to as the thenar branch of the median nerve, or the thenar muscular branch of the median nerve.

Laminotomy

A laminotomy is an orthopaedic neurosurgical procedure that removes part of the lamina of a vertebral arch in order to relieve pressure in the vertebral canal. A laminotomy is less invasive than conventional vertebral column surgery techniques, such as laminectomy because it leaves more ligaments and muscles attached to the vertebral column intact and it requires removing less bone from the vertebra. As a result, laminotomies typically have a faster recovery time and result in fewer postoperative complications. Nevertheless, possible risks can occur during or after the procedure like infection, hematomas, and dural tears. Laminotomies are commonly performed as treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and herniated disks. MRI and CT scans are often used pre- and post surgery to determine if the procedure was successful.

Single-port laparoscopy (SPL) is a recently developed technique in laparoscopic surgery. It is a minimally invasive surgical procedure in which the surgeon operates almost exclusively through a single entry point, typically the patient's navel. Unlike a traditional multi-port laparoscopic approach, SPL leaves only a single small scar.

Endoscopic vessel harvesting (EVH) is a surgical technique that may be used in conjunction with coronary artery bypass surgery. For patients with coronary artery disease, a physician may recommend a bypass to reroute blood around blocked arteries to restore and improve blood flow and oxygen to the heart. To create the bypass graft, a surgeon will remove or "harvest" healthy blood vessels from another part of the body, often from the patient's leg or arm. This vessel becomes a graft, with one end attaching to a blood source above and the other end below the blocked area, creating a "conduit" channel or new blood flow connection across the heart.

Trans-umbilical breast augmentation (TUBA) is a type of breast augmentation in which breast implants are placed through an incision at the navel rather than the chest.

The TESSYS method is a minimally-invasive, endoscopic spinal procedure for the treatment of a herniated disc. It was a further development of the YESS method by the Dutch Dr Thomas Hoogland in the Alpha Klinik in Munich in 1989 and was first called THESSYS. The procedure involves performing a small foramenotomy and removal of soft tissue compressing the nerve root.

Carpal tunnel surgery

Carpal tunnel surgery, also called carpal tunnel release (CTR) and carpal tunnel decompression surgery, is a surgery in which the transverse carpal ligament is divided. It is a surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and recommended when there is constant numbness, muscle weakness, or atrophy, and when night-splinting no longer controls intermittent symptoms of pain in the carpal tunnel. In general, milder cases can be controlled for months to years, but severe cases are unrelenting symptomatically and are likely to result in surgical treatment.Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: a critical review of the literature Approximately 500,000 surgical procedures are performed each year, and the economic impact of this condition is estimated to exceed $2 billion annually.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery is a minimally invasive technique used mainly in neurosurgery and otolaryngology. A neurosurgeon or an otolaryngologist, using an endoscope that is entered through the nose, fixes or removes brain defects or tumors in the anterior skull base. Normally an otolaryngologist performs the initial stage of surgery through the nasal cavity and sphenoid bone; a neurosurgeon performs the rest of the surgery involving drilling into any cavities containing a neural organ such as the pituitary gland. The use of endoscope was first introduced in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery by R Jankowsky, J Auque, C Simon et al. in 1992 G.

Endoscopic ear surgery(EES) is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional ear surgery and is defined as the use of the rigid endoscope, as opposed to a surgical microscope, to visualize the middle and inner ear during otologic surgery. During endoscopic ear surgery the surgeon holds the endoscope in one hand while working in the ear with the other. To allow this kind of single-handed surgery, different surgical instruments have to be used. Endoscopic visualization has improved due to high-definition video imaging and wide-field endoscopy, and being less invasive, EES is gaining importance as an adjunct to microscopic ear surgery.

Thread carpal tunnel release

Thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) is a minimally-invasive procedure of performing carpal tunnel release using a piece of surgical dissecting thread as a dividing element. This is instead of using a scalpel as in the situation of open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR).

References

  1. "Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery". YouTube .
  2. Agee, JM; et al. (1992). "Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study". The Journal of Hand Surgery. 17 (6): 987–995. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(09)91044-9. PMID   1430964.
  3. Agee, JM; et al. (1992). "Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study". The Journal of Hand Surgery. 17 (6): 987–995. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(09)91044-9. PMID   1430964.
  4. Thoma, Achilleas M.D., M.Sc.; Veltri, Karen M.Sc., Ph.D.; Haines, Ted M.D., M.Sc.; Duku, Eric M.Sc. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:October 2004 - Volume 114 - Issue 5 - pp 1137-1146
  5. Okutsu, Ichiro; Ninomiya, Setsuo; Takatori, Yoshio; Ugawa, Yoshikazu (1989). "Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome". Arthroscopy. 5 (1): 11–8. doi:10.1016/0749-8063(89)90084-4. PMID   2706046.
  6. Trumble, Thomas E.; Diao, Edward; Abrams, Reid A.; Gilbert-Anderson, Mary M. (2002). "Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 84-A (7): 1107–15. doi:10.2106/00004623-200207000-00003. PMID   12107308. S2CID   30683586.
  7. Beck, John D., Deegan JH, Rhoades D and Klena JC, "Results of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Relative to Surgeon Experience With the Agee Technique." Journal of Hand Surgery 36:1, pp 61-64, Jan 2011. http://www.jhandsurg.org/article/S0363-5023(10)01268-2/abstract
  8. Brown, RA; Gelberman, RH; Seiler Jg, 3rd; Abrahamsson, SO; Weiland, AJ; Urbaniak, JR; Schoenfeld, DA; Furcolo, D (1993). "Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 75 (9): 1265–75. doi:10.2106/00004623-199309000-00002. PMID   8408148.
  9. Trumble, Thomas E.; Diao, Edward; Abrams, Reid A.; Gilbert-Anderson, Mary M. (2002). "Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release : a prospective, randomized trial". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 84-A (7): 1107–15. doi:10.2106/00004623-200207000-00003. PMID   12107308. S2CID   30683586.
  10. Palmer, DH; Paulson, JC; Lane-Larsen, CL; Peulen, VK; Olson, JD (1993). "Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a comparison of two techniques with open release". Arthroscopy. 9 (5): 498–508. doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80396-2. PMID   8280321.
  11. Beck, John D., Deegan JH, Rhoades D and Klena JC, "Results of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Relative to Surgeon Experience With the Agee Technique." Journal of Hand Surgery 36:1, pp 61-64, Jan 2011. http://www.jhandsurg.org/article/S0363-5023(10)01268-2/abstract
  12. Jin Cheon, Sang; Pill Moon, Kyu; Min Lim, Jong (Dec 2011). "Long-Term Changes of the Clinical and Nerve Electrophysiological Findings after Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release". J Korean Orthop Assoc. 46 (6): 457–463. doi: 10.4055/jkoa.2011.46.6.457 .
  13. Thoma, Achilleas M.D., M.Sc.; Veltri, Karen M.Sc., Ph.D.; Haines, Ted M.D., M.Sc.; Duku, Eric M.Sc. In addition, in patients without workers compensation issues, the single-incision endoscopic carpal tunnel release leads to less scar tenderness and a quicker return to work compared to the two-incision endoscopic carpal tunnel release <ef>Palmer, DH; Paulson, JC; Lane-Larsen, CL; Peulen, VK; Olson, JD (1993). "Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a comparison of two techniques with open release". Arthroscopy. 9 (5): 498–508. doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80396-2. PMID   8280321.
  14. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2004; Volume 114 - Issue 5 - pp 1137–1146
  15. Agee, JM; et al. (1992). "Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study". The Journal of Hand Surgery. 17 (6): 987–995. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(09)91044-9. PMID   1430964.
  16. Jin Cheon, Sang; Pill Moon, Kyu; Min Lim, Jong (Dec 2011). "Long-Term Changes of the Clinical and Nerve Electrophysiological Findings after Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release". J Korean Orthop Assoc. 46 (6): 457–463. doi: 10.4055/jkoa.2011.46.6.457 .
  17. Thoma, Achilleas M.D., M.Sc.; Veltri, Karen M.Sc., Ph.D.; Haines, Ted M.D., M.Sc.; Duku, Eric M.Sc. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:October 2004 - Volume 114 - Issue 5 - pp 1137-1146

Further reading