Factory model school

Last updated

"Factory model schools", "factory model education", or "industrial era schools" are ahistorical [1] [2] terms that emerged in the mid to late-20th century and are used by writers and speakers as a rhetorical device by those advocating changes to education systems. Generally speaking, when used, the terms are referencing characteristics of European education that emerged in the late 18th century and then in North America in the mid-19th century that include top-down management, outcomes designed to meet societal needs, age-based classrooms, the modern liberal arts curriculum, and a focus on producing results. The phrase is typically used in the context of discussing what the author has identified as negative aspects of public (or government-funded) schools. As an example, the "factory model of schools are 'designed to create docile subjects and factory workers.'" [3] The phrases are also used to incorrectly suggest the look of American education hasn't changed since the 19th century. [4] [5] Educational historians describe the phrase as misleading and an inaccurate representation of the development of American public education. [6] [7] [8] Education historian Sherman Dorn offers:

Contents

the [factory model school] myth exits because teaching and schooling is risk-averse, and because we argue based on metaphors: schools as factories, teachers as armies, schools as malls... knowing the accurate history frees us from the idea that schools cannot change. They can, and we are not the first generation to try. Nor will we be the last. [9]

History of the terms

The first public use of the term "factory model schools" to describe K-12 education was Dr. Howard Lamb in a speech in September, 1972. The Greenville News reported: "The educational institutions are producing teachers for the 1920 factory model schools, Lamb said." [10] Previously, Theresa Jablonski, in a 1970, editorial in the News Herald (Franklin, Pennsylvania), referenced "factory model of education" to describe college classrooms. Although it's likely that neither Jablonski or Lamb originated the term, their usage represents the terms' first appearance in the media.

The phrase has been used by education leaders, including Marilyn Roth of the National Education Association in 1987. [11] In a 1989 piece in The Phi Delta Kappa, "The Horse is Dead", [12] Dr Leslie A. Howard connected the term to Horace Mann's experiences in Prussia in 1843 but offered no references or evidence for the connection. Howard's piece was cited in numerous educational philosophy and theory texts in the 1980s and 1990s. Al Shanker, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, referenced the concept in a 1989 speech, "The Revolution that is Overdue: From Information Factory to Learning and Teaching in Restructuring Schools." [13] Ted Dintersmith, author of What School Could Be: Insights and Inspiration from Teachers across America (2018), used the term in a graphic to describe the evolution of the American education system. In the graphic, "factory model" is connected to the year 1893 (the year the NEA Committee of Ten published their final report) and the goal of training "factory workers." The Committee of Ten report makes no mention of factories or factory workers. Authors will also draw connections between child-labor laws, factories, and the spread of tax-funded schools and compulsory education laws such as Seth Godin in his 2004 book Stop Stealing Dreams.

John Taylor Gatto's 2001 book The Underground History of American Education linked the "factory school" model to a number of cultural ills and also connected Mann to Prussian factories. Gatto's text has been cited by multiple non-fiction books on education, including The End of Average by Todd Rose (2015) and Schools on Trial by Nikhil Goyal (2016), both of which use the phrase to advocate a particular set of changes. Gatto does not explain how he reached the conclusion Mann wanted schools that worked like, or looked like, factories.

As a metaphor

In some cases, authors have used the term "factory model" as a metaphor. [14] [15] As a modern example, the animation and text of Sir Ken Robinson's TED Talk compares students in schools to materials in a factory and references children's "date of manufacturing" as a sorting mechanism. The clearest example of this in historical writing is in the research of Raymond E. Callahan, especially in Education and the Cult of Efficiency (1962). [16] Callahan explored the relationship between public education and the emerging concept of Scientific Management in the 1910s and included quotes by school leaders who spoke of children as the "raw goods" schools were meant to mold into something better. The most prolific user of this analogy was Ellwood Patterson Cubberley. He saw the logical, methodical approach of scientific management as a way for public education to adapt to influxes of children entering the system and to ensure the best outcomes. Cubberley wrote numerous guides for school administrators as well as a history book and was one of the most widely read educational authors of the 1910s and 1920s. He frequently used the metaphor of school as a factory:

Our schools are, in a sense, factories, in which the raw products (children) are to be shaped and fashioned into products to meet the various demands of life. The specifications for manufacturing come from the demands of twentieth-century civilization, and it is the business of the school to build its pupils according to the specifications laid down. [17]

A theory that informed school leaders during this period was the work of Frederick Taylor. His approach to time management was known as Taylorism and it influenced multiple aspects of American society, including education. An example of its adoption in the home are the experiences of Lillian and Frank Gilbreth, whose scientific approach to parenting was described in their son's book Cheaper By the Dozen. In schools, this philosophical approach - that any problem could be solved by breaking it down into smaller units and considering time costs - was used in a variety of ways. For example, a group of English teachers in 1913 aggregated how much time they spent grading papers and used their findings to appeal to school leaders for more time to grade and provide feedback. [18]

While teachers would use Taylorism to their advantage and to plead their case, they also spoke up against it and its impact on their work. In 1903, Margaret Haley chided school administrators for failing to recognize teachers' hard work and a tendency toward "factory-izing education" and "making the teacher an automaton, a mere factory hand, whose duty it is to carry out mechanically and unquestioningly the ideas and orders of those clothed with the authority of position." [19] Haley used quotations around the phrase "factory-izing education" in her speech, suggesting she saw it as a metaphor, and not a direct comparison. Additionally, some educational historians in the modern era question the popularity of Taylorism in schools and suggest it may not be as widespread as is led to be believed. Likewise, the framework of "social engineering" and "scientific management" needs to be better situated within critical race theory and studies of gender, race, and disability. [20]

Although the phrase "factory model" didn't become a part of educational discourse until the 1980s, David B. Tyack, a leader in the field of educational history, provided a context for it in his history of American urban education, The One Best System (1974). "Just as eighteenth-century theologians could think of God as a clock-maker without derogation, so the social engineers searching for new organizational forms used the words 'machine' and 'factory' without investing them with the negative associations they evoke today." [21] Larry Cuban, another education historian, connects the metaphor to a particular mindset around the purpose of education. [22] In Pillars of the Republic, Common Schools and American Society, 1780-1860, Carl Kaestle (1983) offers: [23]

Schools thus became in some respects like factories, but not necessarily because they were mimicking factories, or preparing children to work in factories. Rather, both the workplace and the schools, as well as other nineteenth-century institutions, were partaking of the same ethos of efficiency, manipulation, and mastery. (p. 69)

The concept has also been used at the federal government level. In 1993, David Osborn, a consultant at The Public Strategies Group and an advisor to the Clinton White House, used the concept in his essay "Reinventing Government." In effect, he used the factory model argument to advocate for a voucher style approach to public education. [24]

Critiques of the terms

Setting aside that school leaders around the turn of 20th century used factories as a metaphor and not a philosophical foundation, there are at least two problems with the terms.

Users of the phrase generally point to two documents as evidence for their use of the claim: Horace Mann's reports in the 1840s and the 1892 Committee of Ten Report. Mann presented his thoughts following his trip to Prussia in a report to the Massachusetts Board of Education. He filed several reports and his 7th annual report, published in January 1844, focused on his experiences in Europe, including Prussia. [25] [26] In the Seventh Annual Report of the Secretary of the Board, Mann - the Secretary of the Board of Education at the time - does not mention Prussian factories. [26] In fact, he denounced the Prussian education system's ability to foster blind obedience to authority in this report, stating; [26]

... if Prussia can pervert the benign influences of education to the support of arbitrary power, we surely can employ them for the support and perpetuation of republican institutions. A national spirit of liberty can be cultivated more easily than a national spirit of bondage; and if it may be made one of the great prerogatives of education to perform the unnatural and unholy work of making slaves, then surely it must be one of the noblest instrumentalities for rearing a nation of freemen. If a moral power over the understandings and affections of the people may be turned to evil, may it not also be employed for good?

— Horace Mann, Seventh Annual Report of the Secretary of the Board of Education, p. 23

While this alone is insufficient to refute claims that a factory model mentality currently exists and has previously informed the development of American schools, it does challenge claims made by authors like Taylor Gatto that Mann was eager to replicate a model of education that would train children to work in factories. Likewise, the final report by the National Education Association's Committee of Ten makes no reference to factory skills or to modeling schools after factories, [27] a claim that is often found in books that advocate a dramatic change to American public education (e.g., Most Likely to Succeed (2015), by Tony Wagner and Ted Dintersmith).

Factories that existed around the time of Mann and the spread of the common school movement don't resemble factories in the way we think of them today. The most in-depth look at the discrepancy between the phrase and the actual look of schools and factories in the 1840s is The Invented History of 'The Factory Model of Education' by Audrey Watters. [28] Even though historians have taken different perspectives [29] on the influence of merchants and manufacturers on the rise of the Common School movement, there is a consensus that the focus of education for most of American history, especially at the primary levels, has been about general knowledge and citizenship, not the specific skills required for factory work. [30]

Facilities

Bauhaus Dessau Workshop Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1987-0204-305, Dessau, Bauhaus.jpg
Bauhaus Dessau Workshop
Crow Island School, constructed 1940 Crow Island School (8626471252).jpg
Crow Island School, constructed 1940

"Factory model classrooms" is also a term used by architects to describe a particular approach to design. Unlike the single-room schoolhouse in which all students of all ages are in the same space, "factory model classrooms" tend to be of a similar size and configuration, 800-900 square feet, with approximately 28-35 students of about the same age. [31] As single-room schools became larger, this model was replicated, with the classrooms created as a series of boxes, often along a long double-loaded corridor (with classrooms on each side). [32] This approach to school design is also described as "cells and bells" by architects and at the high school level is frequently used in conjunction with departmental model schools. [33]

Efficiency in design was a key determinant of school design as early as the 1920s, with John Joseph Donovan's 1921 seminal School Architecture: Principles and Practices, calling for schools to be "tested in the abstract for efficiency and adequacy." [34] One example of this type of efficient design is the Bauhaus in Dessau, Germany. [35]

"Cells and bells": double-loaded school corridor with concrete block walls 300 Corridor, Inside.jpg
"Cells and bells": double-loaded school corridor with concrete block walls

This "cells and bells" model became a common approach to design but was not universal. The Crow Island School, which opened in 1940 in Illinois, was designed to support a progressive education and personalized model while also using aesthetics and forms that would soon become part of the modern or International Style. Some school architects would copy the look of Crow Island, but not the philosophical approach. [36]

The primary design impetus of many American schools following an increase in enrollment due to the arrival of Baby Boomers in school was to renovate unsafe or overcrowded facilities, remove inadequate temporary classrooms, commonly referred to as "portables," and accommodate as many children as possible. In some places, schools experimented with innovative approaches to school design, but the "cells and bells" model is the most common. [37]

Related Research Articles

Education reform is the name given to the goal of changing public education. The meaning and education methods have changed through debates over what content or experiences result in an educated individual or an educated society. Historically, the motivations for reform have not reflected the current needs of society. A consistent theme of reform includes the idea that large systematic changes to educational standards will produce social returns in citizens' health, wealth, and well-being.

Progressive education, or educational progressivism, is a pedagogical movement that began in the late 19th century and has persisted in various forms to the present. In Europe, progressive education took the form of the New Education Movement. The term progressive was engaged to distinguish this education from the traditional curricula of the 19th century, which was rooted in classical preparation for the early-industrial university and strongly differentiated by social class. By contrast, progressive education finds its roots in modern, post-industrial experience. Most progressive education programs have these qualities in common:

A teaching method is a set of principles and methods used by teachers to enable student learning. These strategies are determined partly by the subject matter to be taught, partly by the relative expertise of the learners, and partly by constraints caused by the learning environment. For a particular teaching method to be appropriate and efficient it has to take into account the learner, the nature of the subject matter, and the type of learning it is supposed to bring about.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horace Mann</span> American educational reformer and politician

Horace Mann was an American educational reformer, slavery abolitionist and Whig politician known for his commitment to promoting public education, he is thus also known as The Father of American Education. In 1848, after public service as Secretary of the Massachusetts State Board of Education, Mann was elected to the United States House of Representatives (1848–1853). From September 1852 to his death in 1859, he served as President of Antioch College.

Language education – the process and practice of teaching a second or foreign language – is primarily a branch of applied linguistics, but can be an interdisciplinary field. There are four main learning categories for language education: communicative competencies, proficiencies, cross-cultural experiences, and multiple literacies.

Special education is the practice of educating students in a way that accommodates their individual differences, disabilities, and special needs. This involves the individually planned and systematically monitored arrangement of teaching procedures, adapted equipment and materials, and accessible settings. These interventions are designed to help individuals with special needs achieve a higher level of personal self-sufficiency and success in school and in their community, which may not be available if the student were only given access to a typical classroom education.

A common school was a public school in the United States during the 19th century. Horace Mann (1796–1859) was a strong advocate for public education and the common school. In 1837, the state of Massachusetts appointed Mann as the first secretary of the State Board of Education where he began a revival of common school education, the effects of which extended throughout America during the 19th century.

In the American education system, a superintendent or superintendent of schools is an administrator or manager in charge of a number of public schools or a school district, a local government body overseeing public schools. All school principals in a respective school district report to the superintendent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prussian education system</span> Overview of the education system in Prussia

The Prussian education system refers to the system of education established in Prussia as a result of educational reforms in the late 18th and early 19th century, which has had widespread influence since. The Prussian education system was introduced as a basic concept in the late 18th century and was significantly enhanced after Prussia's defeat in the early stages of the Napoleonic Wars. The Prussian educational reforms inspired similar changes in other countries, and remain an important consideration in accounting for modern nation-building projects and their consequences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Wirt (educator)</span> American educationalist

William Albert Wirt was a superintendent of schools in Gary, Indiana. Wirt developed the Gary Plan for the more efficient use of school facilities, a reform of the Progressive Movement that was widely adopted in over 200 cities by 1929.

The history of education in the United States covers the trends in formal education in America from the 17th century to the early 21st century.

Ellwood Patterson Cubberley was an American educator, a eugenicist, and a pioneer in the field of education management. He spent most of his career as a professor and later served as the first dean of the Stanford University Graduate School of Education in California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crow Island School</span> United States historic place

Crow Island School in Winnetka, Illinois, is an elementary school operated by Winnetka Public Schools. It is significant for its progressive philosophy and its International Style architecture. The design of its building was a collaboration between the Chicago firm of Perkins, Wheeler and Will and Eliel and Eero Saarinen. It currently serves kindergarten through fourth grade students. The school was established in 1940-41. Sebastian Hinton's prototype "jungle gym" was located here, having been moved from Horace Mann School in 1940 and then relocated to the Winnetka Historical Society in 2010. The school was awarded the Twenty-five Year Award by the American Institute of Architects in 1971. It was declared a National Historic Landmark in 1990. In celebration of the 2018 Illinois Bicentennial, Crow Island School was selected as one of the Illinois 200 Great Places by the American Institute of Architects Illinois component.

Student-directed teaching is a teaching technology that aims to give the student greater control, ownership, and accountability over his or her own education. Developed to counter institutionalized, mass, schooling, student-directed teaching allows students to make their own choices while they learn in order to make education much more meaningful, relevant, and effective.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">21st century skills</span> Skills identified as being required for success in the 21st century

21st century skills comprise skills, abilities, and learning dispositions identified as requirements for success in 21st century society and workplaces by educators, business leaders, academics, and governmental agencies. This is part of an international movement focusing on the skills required for students to prepare for workplace success in a rapidly changing, digital society. Many of these skills are associated with deeper learning, which is based on mastering skills such as analytic reasoning, complex problem solving, and teamwork, which differ from traditional academic skills as these are not content knowledge-based.

School organizational models are methods of structuring the curriculum, functions, and facilities for schools, colleges, and universities. The organizing of teaching and learning has been structured since the first educational institutions were established. With greater specialization and expertise in a particular field of knowledge, and a gathering of like-minded individuals, instructors clustered into specialized groups, schools, and eventually departments within larger institutions. This structure spread rapidly during the 19th and 20th centuries with factory model schools and their "assembly-line" method of standardized curriculum and instructional methods. Beginning with the progressive educational movement in the early-mid 20th century, and again with similar trends in the late 20th and early 21st century, alternative models structured towards deeper learning, higher retention, and 21st century skills developed. The organizational models of schools fall into several main categories, including: departmental, integrative, project-based, academy, small learning communities, and school-within-a-school.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning environment</span> Term in education

The term learning environment can refer to an educational approach, cultural context, or physical setting in which teaching and learning occur. The term is commonly used as a more definitive alternative to "classroom", but it typically refers to the context of educational philosophy or knowledge experienced by the student and may also encompass a variety of learning cultures—its presiding ethos and characteristics, how individuals interact, governing structures, and philosophy. In a societal sense, learning environment may refer to the culture of the population it serves and of their location. Learning environments are highly diverse in use, learning styles, organization, and educational institution. The culture and context of a place or organization includes such factors as a way of thinking, behaving, or working, also known as organizational culture. For a learning environment such as an educational institution, it also includes such factors as operational characteristics of the instructors, instructional group, or institution; the philosophy or knowledge experienced by the student and may also encompass a variety of learning cultures—its presiding ethos and characteristics, how individuals interact, governing structures, and philosophy in learning styles and pedagogies used; and the societal culture of where the learning is occurring. Although physical environments do not determine educational activities, there is evidence of a relationship between school settings and the activities that take place there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning space</span> Physical setting for a learning environment

Learning space or learning setting refers to a physical setting for a learning environment, a place in which teaching and learning occur. The term is commonly used as a more definitive alternative to "classroom," but it may also refer to an indoor or outdoor location, either actual or virtual. Learning spaces are highly diverse in use, configuration, location, and educational institution. They support a variety of pedagogies, including quiet study, passive or active learning, kinesthetic or physical learning, vocational learning, experiential learning, and others. As the design of a learning space impacts the learning process, it is deemed important to design a learning space with the learning process in mind.

Most Likely to Succeed is a 2015 feature-length documentary produced by Ted Dintersmith and Tony Wagner and directed by Greg Whiteley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexander James Inglis</span> American author and educator

Alexander James Inglis was an American author and educator who was instrumental in promoting the "new American" secondary education at the beginning of the 20th century. His scholarship largely shaped modern public schools and continues to be influential.

References

  1. ↑ Strauss, Valerie (2015-10-10). "American schools are modeled after factories and treat students like widgets. Right? Wrong". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2018-03-04.
  2. ↑ Schneider, Jack (2019-01-28). "Betsy DeVos Is Fabricating History to Sell a Bad Education Policy". The New Republic. ISSN   0028-6583 . Retrieved 2019-01-28.
  3. ↑ The Relationship School, David Brooks, NY Times, March 22, 2012. Retrieved 2017-02-17
  4. ↑ "Betsy DeVos insists public schools haven't changed in more than 100 years. Why she's oh so wrong". The Washington Post. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on 2019-10-25. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  5. ↑ Schneider, Jack (September 7, 2017). "The false narrative behind a glitzy live television show about school reform". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2017-09-07.
  6. ↑ "How the "industrial era schools" myth is a barrier to helping education today". shermandorn.com. 10 March 2018. Retrieved 2018-03-12.
  7. ↑ "Being careless with education history". shermandorn.com. 4 September 2011. Retrieved 2018-03-04.
  8. ↑ Strauss, Valerie. "Analysis | No, public schools are not modeled after factories. Here's why Betsy DeVos keeps saying they are". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2020-12-16.
  9. ↑ Dorn, Sherman; Gamson, David, eds. (2024). 23 myths about the history of American schools: what the truth can tell us, and why it matters. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. ISBN   978-0-8077-6927-0.
  10. ↑ Robinson, Gretchen (September 16, 1972). "Greenville School System Lauded for Work in Human Relations Area". The Greenville News.
  11. ↑ Carter, Dan (October 16, 1987). "Montana's 'archaic' school system needs radical change, teachers told". The Montana Standard.
  12. ↑ Hart, Leslie A. (Nov 1989). "The Horse Is Dead". Phi Delta Kappan. 71 (3): 237–42.
  13. ↑ Shanker, Al. (1989) Speech. "The Revolution that is Overdue: From Information Factory to Learning and Teaching in Restructuring Schools." Retrieved March 3, 2018.
  14. ↑ "Schools as Factories: Metaphors That Stick". Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice. 2014-05-08. Retrieved 2019-02-03.
  15. ↑ Marshall, Hermine H. (1990). "Beyond the Workplace Metaphor: The Classroom as a Learning Setting". Theory into Practice. 29 (2): 94–101. doi:10.1080/00405849009543438. ISSN   0040-5841. JSTOR   1476906.
  16. ↑ Callahan, Raymond E. (1962). Education and The Cult of Efficiency. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  17. ↑ Cubberley, Elwood P.: "Public School Administration", 1916, quoted in The 'Business' of Reforming American Schools, Education Week, September 30, 1998. Retrieved 2019-10-23
  18. ↑ Report on the cost and labor of English teaching by a committee of the Modern Language Association of America and the National Council of Teachers of English. Lawrence, Kan.?. 1913.
  19. ↑ Hoffman, Nancy (1981). Woman's "true" Profession: Voices from the History of Teaching. Feminist Press. ISBN   9780912670720.
  20. ↑ Fallace, Thomas; Fantozzi, Victoria (2013-04-01). "Was There Really a Social Efficiency Doctrine? The Uses and Abuses of an Idea in Educational History". Educational Researcher. 42 (3): 142–150. doi:10.3102/0013189X13484509. S2CID   145737868.
  21. ↑ Tyack, David B. (1974). The One Best System. Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press. pp. 41–42.
  22. ↑ "Schools as Factories: Metaphors That Stick". Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice. 2014-05-08. Retrieved 2019-05-28.
  23. ↑ Kaestle, Carl (2011-04-01). Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780-1860. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN   9781429931717.
  24. ↑ Schneider, Jack (January 30, 2024). "Where did the myth of "public schools were modeled on factories" come from?".
  25. ↑ Mr. Mann's Seventh Annual Report: Education in Europe. 1844.
  26. 1 2 3 Massachusetts Board of Education (January 1844). Seventh Annual report of the Board of Education Together with the Seventh Annual Report of the Secretary of the Board. Archived by UMass Amherst Libraries. Boston: Dutton and Wentworth, State Printers.
  27. ↑ Studies, National Educational Association (U S. ) Committee of Ten on Secondary School (1893). Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies [appointed at the Meeting of the National Educational Association July 9, 1892: With the Reports of the Conferences Arranged by this Committee and Held December 28-30, 1892. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  28. ↑ "The Invented History of 'The Factory Model of Education'". Hack Education. 25 April 2015. Retrieved 2018-03-04.
  29. ↑ Rethinking the History of American Education | W. Reese | Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. ↑ Neem, Johann (2018-03-07). "A time for school choice? If so, let's make sure we ask the right questions". Brookings. Retrieved 2018-03-12.
  31. ↑ How to Break Free of Our 19th-Century Factory-Model Education System, Joel Rose, The Atlantic, May 9, 2012. Retrieved 2016-03-26
  32. ↑ Upitis, Rena (2004-12-01). "School Architecture and Complexity". Complicity. 1 (1). doi: 10.29173/cmplct8713 .
  33. ↑ Liberated Spaces: Purposeful School Design Says Goodbye to Cells and Bells, Jennifer Lewington, in Education Canada. Retrieved 2016-03-26
  34. ↑ John Joseph Donovan, School Architecture: Principles and Practices, MacMillan, 1921. P.22. Retrieved 2016-03-26
  35. ↑ Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History, and Meaning, Leland M. Roth and Amanda Roth Clark, Westview Press, 2013, P.575. ISBN   0813349036. Retrieved 2016-03-26
  36. ↑ Why Don't All Schools Look Like This?, Zach Mortice, The Atlantic CityLab, October 29, 2015. Retrieved 2016-03-27
  37. ↑ Tackling the Crime of School Design, book excerpt from Rena Upitis, P.6, DesignShare, February 26th, 2007. Retrieved 2016-03-26
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.