Fedotova and Others v. Russia

Last updated

Fedotova and Others v. Russia
Decided 13 July 2021
Case40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14
ChamberThird
Language of proceedings English
Nationality of parties Russian
Ruling
Violation of Article 8
President
Paul Lemmens
Judges
Instruments cited
European Convention on Human Rights
Case opinions
MajorityLemmens, joined by Serghides, Dedov, Elósegui, Seibert-Fohr, Roosma
ConcurrenceZünd, joined by Lemmens

Fedotova and Others v. Russia (application numbers 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/14) was a case submitted by six Russian nationals to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

Contents

It was decided on 13 July 2021 in which the Third Chamber ruled unanimously that Russia's refusal to provide any legal recognition to same-sex couples violated the applicants' human rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [1]

Following the decision, the Russian government requested on 12 October 2021 that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. The referral was accepted by the court on 22 November 2021. The Grand Chamber upheld the ruling on 17 January 2023. [2] By this time, Russia had already been expelled by the Council of Europe due to the invasion of Ukraine and had ceased to be part of the European Convention on Human Rights. [3]

Background

Irina Fedotova at her marriage ceremony in Moscow in 2009 Lesbianmarriageinmoscowmay2009.jpg
Irina Fedotova at her marriage ceremony in Moscow in 2009

The ECtHR has previously addressed same-sex relationships. In 2010, in the case Schalk and Kopf v. Austria , same-sex couples were recognized as a family unit but there was no obligation on Austria to legally recognize their relationship. In 2013, Vallianatos and Others v. Greece , the court found it was discriminatory for Greece to recognize opposite-sex partnerships but not same-sex ones. In the 2015 case Oliari and Others v. Italy the court found that Italy's lack of any form of legal recognition to same-sex couples breached the applicants' human rights. [4] However, Oliari included elements that reduced its generalizability to other Council of Europe countries. [5] [6] [7]

The case Fedotova and Others reached the ECtHR through joining three separate applications filed by six Russian nationals who lived in same-sex relationships, the first filed by Irina Fedotova and her partner Irina Shipitko in 2010. The other couples, Mr D. Chunusov and Mr Y. Yevtushenko and Ms I. Shaykhraznova and Ms Y. Yakovleva, filed their cases with the ECtHR in 2014. The couples attempted to obtain marriage licenses but were refused. They did not make a complaint under Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to marriage, but rather Article 8, which protects private and family life, as well as Article 14, which prohibits discrimination in the exercise of Convention rights. [1] [7]

Decision

The Third Chamber ruled on 13 July 2021 that Russia "had an obligation to ensure respect for the applicants' private and family life by providing a legal framework allowing them to have their relationships acknowledged," and it rejected the Russian government's argument about public disapproval of same-sex unions, finding that "access to rights for a minority could not be dependent on the acceptance of the majority." [8]

Referring to the 2020 amendments to the Constitution of Russia which define marriage as a legal union of one man and one woman, the court stated that Russia could give same-sex couples "access to formal acknowledgment of their couples' status in a form other than marriage" which would not conflict with the "traditional understanding on marriage" that prevails in Russia. [8]

The Grand Chamber upheld the ruling of the Third Chamber on 17 January 2023. It held by fourteen votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. [2]

Reactions

After the initial 2021 Third Chamber decision, the chairman of the State Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin, suggested that the ECtHR judges should resign because of the decision. [9] [10] Dmitri Bartenev, one of Fedotova's lawyers, wrote after the verdict in 2021 that it was unlikely Russia would implement it, but that it was possible to do so without any constitutional changes. [11] The head of Russia's delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), Pyotr Tolstoy, said that Russia would not leave the Council of Europe without a "more serious cause". [9] [12] However, in 2022, Russia, having been expelled from the Council of Europe on 16 March 2022 due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, [13] ceased to be a party to the ECHR on 16 September 2022 in accordance with article 58. [14]

At Oxford Human Rights Hub, Stephanos Stavros commented that the judgement "appears to capitalise on the respondent Government's reluctance to mount a real defence" and hypothesizes that it might represent a return to a more activist approach by the court. [15] In Völkerrechtsblog, Eva Maria Bredler regretted that the court did not consider Article 14, which prohibits discrimination in the exercise of Convention rights. However, she stated that pending cases filed by same-sex couples against Poland would give the court a chance to elaborate on Article 14, [5] [16] e.g. Andersen v. Poland. [17] Natalia Zviagina, director of Amnesty International's Moscow office, said that the "landmark decision underlines that the Russian government is on the wrong side of history". [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Convention on Human Rights</span> International treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe

The European Convention on Human Rights is an international convention to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe. Drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe, the convention entered into force on 3 September 1953. All Council of Europe member states are party to the convention and new members are expected to ratify the convention at the earliest opportunity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Court of Human Rights</span> Supranational court established by the Council of Europe

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), also known as the Strasbourg Court, is an international court of the Council of Europe which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The court hears applications alleging that a contracting state has breached one or more of the human rights enumerated in the convention or its optional protocols to which a member state is a party. The court is based in Strasbourg, France.

Positive obligations in human rights law denote a State's obligation to engage in an activity to secure the effective enjoyment of a fundamental right, as opposed to the classical negative obligation to merely abstain from human rights violations.

Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence", subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society". The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe.

Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits torture, and "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".

Article 3 – Prohibition of torture

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights is a provision of the European Convention which protects the right to a fair trial. In criminal law cases and cases to determine civil rights it protects the right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal within reasonable time, the presumption of innocence, right to silence and other minimum rights for those charged in a criminal case.

Bulgaria does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. Though these issues have been discussed frequently over the past few years, no law on the matter has passed the National Assembly. In September 2023, the European Court of Human Rights ordered the government to establish a legal framework recognizing same-sex unions.

Russia does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions for same-sex couples. Since 2020, the Russian Constitution has explicitly outlawed same-sex marriage. Statutory Russian laws also contain provisions forbidding same-sex marriages.

Moldova does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. The Constitution of Moldova defines marriage as being between "a husband and a wife".

Armenia does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. The legal status of foreign same-sex marriages is unclear. On 3 July 2017, the Ministry of Justice reportedly stated that all marriages performed abroad are valid in Armenia, including marriages between people of the same sex. Article 143 of the Armenian Family Code states that Armenia recognizes foreign marriages as long as they conform with the legality of the territory where they were performed and contains no explicit prohibition of same-sex marriages. On the other hand, article 152 restricts the application of foreign law incompatible with the domestic public order. As of 2023, no instances of foreign same-sex marriage registrations are known. In 2019, Minister of Justice Rustam Badasyan said that the government does not recognize same-sex marriages.

Von Hannover v Germany [2004] was a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights in 2004. The Court ruled that German law breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latvian Human Rights Committee</span>

Latvian Human Rights Committee is a non-governmental human rights organization in Latvia. It is a member of international human rights and anti-racism NGOs FIDH, AEDH. Co-chairpersons of LHRC are Vladimir Buzayev and Natalia Yolkina. According to the authors of the study "Ethnopolitics in Latvia", former CBSS Commissioner on Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Ole Espersen "had visited LHRC various times and had used mostly the data of that organisation in his views on Latvia".

Schalk and Kopf v Austria is a case decided in 2010 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in which it was clarified that the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) does not oblige member states to legislate for or legally recognize same-sex marriages.

X and Others v. Austria, Application No. 19010/07, was a human rights case that was decided in 2013 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The case concerned whether the Government of Austria had discriminated against Austrian citizens who were in same-sex relationships because the wording of the Austrian Civil Code did not permit unmarried same-sex couples access to legally granted second-parent adoptions, whereas it was available to unmarried heterosexual couples.

Zakharov v. Russia was a 2015 court case before the European Court of Human Rights involving Roman Zakharov and the Russian Federation. The Court ruled that Russia's legal provisions governing communications surveillance did not provide adequate safeguards against arbitrariness or abuse, and that therefore a violation took place of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Oliari and Others v. Italy is a case decided in 2015 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in which the Court established a positive obligation upon member states to provide legal recognition for same-sex couples.

Bayev and Others v. Russia was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activists—Nikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyev—alleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. On 20 June 2017, the court ruled that the applicants' freedom of expression had been compromised. The only dissent was from Dmitry Dedov, the judge elected with respect to Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Olga Alexandrovna Sadovskaya</span> Russian lawyer and human rights activist

Olga Alexandrovna Sadovskaya is a Russian lawyer, human rights activist, deputy head, and head of the International Legal Protection Department of the Crew Against Torture, a Russian human rights organization specializing in investigations of torture cases. Since 2004, she has been a co-author of alternative reports to the UN Committee Against Torture. Since 2018, she has been a member of the Board of the World Organization Against Torture. Since 2021, she has been a member of the Board of the Conference of International NGOs of the Council of Europe. Since 2022, she has been a member of the Council of Russian Human Rights Defenders.

References

  1. 1 2 "HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights". hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
  2. 1 2 "Grand chamber judgement" (PDF). euractiv.ro. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
  3. ↑ "Russia ceases to be party to the European Convention on Human Rights - Portal". 6 January 2024. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 7 February 2024.
  4. ↑ Simsek, Cilem (21 September 2016). "Is there a positive obligation on Russia to legalise same-sex unions under the European Convention on Human Rights? The communicated case of Fedotova and Shipitko v. Russia". Voelkerrechtsblog. doi:10.17176/20180522-183115 . Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  5. 1 2 Bredler, Eva Maria (21 August 2021). "Article 14 ECHR in the Closet". Völkerrechtsblog. doi:10.17176/20210821-112550-0 . Retrieved 26 September 2021.
  6. ↑ Ragone, Sabrina; Volpe, Valentina (2016). "An Emerging Right to a "Gay" Family Life? The Case Oliari v. Italy in a Comparative Perspective". German Law Journal. 17 (3): 451–485. doi:10.1017/S2071832200019830. S2CID   157819478.
  7. 1 2 Poppelwell-Scevak, Claire (5 October 2021). "Here we go again? Is Fedotova and Others just splitting hairs when it comes to same-sex couples?". Strasbourg Observers. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
  8. 1 2 3 "European court urges Russia to acknowledge same-sex unions". AP NEWS. 13 July 2021. Retrieved 26 September 2021.
  9. 1 2 Savelev, Ilia (18 August 2021). "Political Homophobia and European Court of Human Rights: Russia Is Called to Protect Same-Sex Unions". www.jurist.org. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  10. ↑ "Володин предложил судьям ЕСПЧ уйти в отставку из-за призыва к РФ признать однополые браки". ТАСС. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  11. ↑ Bartenev, Dmitri (16 July 2021). "Will Russia Yield to the ECtHR?". Verfassungsblog. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  12. ↑ "Толстой считает, что России не следует покидать Совет Европы из-за решения ЕСПЧ". ТАСС. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  13. ↑ "The Russian Federation is excluded from the Council of Europe - Portal - www.coe.int".
  14. ↑ "Russia ceases to be party to the European Convention on Human Rights - Portal - www.coe.int".
  15. ↑ Stavros, Stephanos (31 August 2021). "MA v Denmark and Fedotova and Others v Russia: Judicial Activism in Protecting the Right to Family Life? | OHRH". Oxford Human Rights Hub. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  16. ↑ On Poland same-sex relationship cases see: "Commissioner publishes observations on the absence of legal recognition of same-sex relationships in Poland". Commissioner for Human Rights. 13 November 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2021.
  17. ↑ "HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights". ECHR. Retrieved 21 July 2022.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.