Freedom of the press in Hong Kong is the right to gather, report on, publish and issue news, protected under the Hong Kong Basic Law. [1] [2] [3]
Hong Kong residents shall have freedom of speech, of the press and of publication; freedom of association, of assembly, of procession and of demonstration; and the right and freedom to form and join trade unions, and to strike.
— Hong Kong Basic Law, Article 27
Multiple media groups were no longer able to publish or issue news after the passing and implementation of the 2020 Hong Kong national security law.
This is a historical list of Hong Kong's rankings and scores in RSF's World Press Freedom Index and Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA)'s Press Freedom Index.
Year | RSF Ranking | Total no. of assessed areas | RSF Score [4] | HKJA Score, Public | HKJA Score, Journalists [5] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | 18 | 139 | N/A | (Not Assessed) | |
2007 | 61 | 169 | |||
2013 | 58 | 179 | 73.84 | 49.4 | 42 |
2017 | 73 | 70.54 | 47.1 | 40.3 | |
2018 | 70 | 180 | 70.96 | 45 | 40.9 |
2019 | 73 | 70.35 | 41.9 | 36.2 | |
2020 | 80 | 69.99 | 42.6 | 32.1 | |
2021 | 80 | 69.56 | 42 | 26.2 | |
2022 | 148 | 41.64 | 41.4 | 25.7 | |
2023 | 140 | 44.86 | 42.2 | 25 | |
2024 | 135 | 43.06 |
Hong Kong ranked the 70th out of all 180 surveyed areas in April 2018, a rating significantly better than that of China Mainland's (176th) and slightly worse than Taiwan’s (42nd). [6] The report attributed Hong Kong's rating to low and infrequent violence against journalists, rising prominence of online journalism, their recognition by the Hong Kong government, and organized resistance to Beijing's influence of said journalistic medias.
Rank declined slightly to the 73rd place in 2019, attributed by the report to "leading traditional media [receiving] pressure to comply with Beijing’s dictates," [7] [8] citing Victor Mallet's visa controversy and the passing of 2019 Hong Kong Extradition Bill as events threatening journalistic freedom and independence. [9]
Hong Kong Journalists Association gave a score of 32.1 to journalistic freedom in 2020, the lowest of all scores since its first assessment in 2013. [10]
Hong Kong suffered the worst decline amongst all assessed areas in 2022’s Press Freedom ranking, dropping to the 148th place from previous year's 80th.[ citation needed ]
One of the early record of government prosecution against the media is the 1858 suing of W. Jarrant, the owner of newspaper The Friend Of China, for alleged defamation.[ citation needed ]
The government banned news articles with anti-Qing sentiment in 1907 - Qing being the imperial and feudalist government of China at the time.
Censorship departments were set up against newspapers publishing in Chinese language during the Canton-Hong Kong strike in 1925.
The Communist Party's newspaper 香港小日报lit. 'Hong Kong Daily Tabloids' was seized twice in 1929 and 1930 during the Chinese Civil War, eventually ceasing its publication. [11]
Anti-Japanese sentiments and its related phrases were censored after outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937. Chinese phrases including lit. ' Japs ', 'enemies', and 'traitors' were also censored on a keyword basis. Censorships were loosened after the end of the World War II.
In its annual report published on July 29 [2018], the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) denounces a new fall in press freedom and places the responsibility on Beijing and pro-Chinese factions.
While the islands of press independence are under attack, the Chinese system of total news control is increasingly serving as a model for other anti-democratic regimes such as Singapore (151st), [... Brunei (152nd) and] Thailand (136th). Similarly, censorship has become the norm in [...] Hong Kong (73rd), where the leading traditional media now receive pressure to comply with Beijing's dictates.
新聞從業員部分的指數為32.1分[...]主要原因是在多項問題的分數上均出現顯著跌幅,包括批評特區政府及中央政府時有所顧慮的情況、是否有足夠法例確保新聞記者採訪時可以順利獲取所需資訊、傳媒發揮監察的功效以及立場取態的多元化程度[Journalists' perceived [freedom] score is 32.1 [,] largely due to major drops in multiple indexes: [increased] concerns and anxiety when criticizing the [Hong Kong and PRC] government, insufficient legal protection [...], self-censorship by publishers, and insufficient diversity / pluralism on point of views.]