Freedom on the Net

Last updated

Freedom on the Net is an annual report providing analytical reports and numerical ratings regarding the state of Internet freedom for countries worldwide, published by the American non-profit research and advocacy group Freedom House. [1] The countries surveyed represent a sample with a broad range of geographical diversity and levels of economic development, as well as varying levels of political and media freedom.

Contents

Methodology

The surveys ask a set of questions designed to measure each country's level of Internet and digital media freedom, as well as the access and openness of other digital means of transmitting information, particularly mobile phones and text messaging services. Results are presented for three areas: [2] p.31

The results from the three areas are combined into a total score for a country (from 100 for "Most Free" to 0 for "Least Free") and countries are rated as "Free" (100 to 70), "Partly Free" (69 to 40), or "Not Free" (39 to 0) based on the totals. [2] p.31

Results

Starting in 2009 Freedom House has produced eleven editions of the report. [1] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] There was no report in 2010. The reports generally cover the period from June through May.

Freedom on the Net Survey Results
 2009 [1] 2011 [3] 2012 [4] 2013 [5] 2014 [6] 2015 [7] 2016 [8] 2017 [9] 2018 [10] 2019 [12] 2020 [13]
Countries1537476065656565656565
Free  4 (27%)  8 (22%)14 (30%)17 (29%)19 (29%)18 (28%)17 (26%)16 (25%)15 (23%)15 (23%)15 (23%)
Partly free  7 (47%)18 (49%)20 (43%)29 (48%)31 (48%)28 (43%)28 (43%)28 (43%)30 (46%)29 (45%)28 (43%)
Not free  4 (27%)11 (30%)13 (28%)14 (23%)15 (23%)19 (29%)20 (31%)21 (32%)20 (31%)21 (32%)22 (34%)
Improvedn/a  5 (33%)11 (31%)12 (26%)12 (18%)15 (23%)34 (52%)32 (49%)19 (29%)n/a23 (35%)
Declinedn/a  9 (60%)17 (47%)28 (60%)36 (55%)32 (49%)14 (22%)13 (20%)26 (40%)n/a26 (40%)
No changen/a  1   (7%)  8 (22%)  7 (15%)17 (26%)18 (28%)17 (26%)20 (31%)20 (31%)n/a16 (25%)

2020 results

Freedom on the Net 2020 [2]
  Free ·  Partly free ·  Not free
CountryScore
Flag of Iceland.svg  Iceland 95
Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia 94
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada 87
Flag of Germany.svg  Germany 80
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom 78
Flag of France.svg  France 77
Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia 76
Flag of Georgia.svg  Georgia 76
Flag of Italy.svg  Italy 76
Flag of the United States.svg  United States 76
Flag of Armenia.svg  Armenia 75
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan 75
Flag of Argentina.svg  Argentina 71
Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary 71
Flag of South Africa.svg  South Africa 70
Flag of Kenya.svg  Kenya 67
Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia 66
Flag of South Korea.svg  South Korea 66
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 64
Flag of Tunisia.svg  Tunisia 64
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil 63
Flag of Angola.svg  Angola 62
Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico 61
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine 61
Flag of Malawi.svg  Malawi 60
Flag of Nigeria.svg  Nigeria 60
Flag of Zambia.svg  Zambia 59
Flag of Malaysia.svg  Malaysia 58
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador 57
Flag of Kyrgyzstan.svg  Kyrgyzstan 56
Flag of Uganda.svg  Uganda 56
Flag of Singapore.svg  Singapore 54
Flag of Lebanon.svg  Lebanon 52
Flag of Morocco.svg  Morocco 52
Flag of Sri Lanka.svg  Sri Lanka 52
Flag of India.svg  India 51
Flag of Libya.svg  Libya 50
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia 49
Flag of Jordan.svg  Jordan 49
Flag of The Gambia.svg  The Gambia 49
Flag of Zimbabwe.svg  Zimbabwe 46
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia 43
Flag of Bangladesh.svg  Bangladesh 42
Flag of Rwanda.svg  Rwanda 39
Flag of Azerbaijan.svg  Azerbaijan 38
Flag of Belarus.svg  Belarus 38
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand 35
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey 35
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan 32
Flag of Myanmar.svg  Myanmar 31
Flag of Russia.svg  Russia 30
Flag of Sudan.svg  Sudan 30
Flag of Bahrain.svg  Bahrain 29
Flag of Ethiopia.svg  Ethiopia 29
Flag of the United Arab Emirates.svg  United Arab Emirates 29
Flag of Venezuela.svg  Venezuela 28
Flag of Uzbekistan.svg  Uzbekistan 27
Flag of Egypt.svg  Egypt 26
Flag of Pakistan.svg  Pakistan 26
Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg  Saudi Arabia 26
Flag of Cuba.svg  Cuba 22
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 22
Flag of Syria.svg  Syria 17
Flag of Iran.svg  Iran 15
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  China 10

Comparison with Other Datasets

Several other organizations measure internet freedom, such as the V-Dem Institute, Access Now, and the OpenNet Initiative. [14] [15] [16] [17] V-Dem's Digital Society project measures a range of questions related to internet censorship, misinformation online, and internet shutdowns using surveys of experts. [15] Access Now maintains an annual list of internet shutdowns, throttling, and blockages as part of the #KeepItOn project. [14] The OpenNet Initiative formerly kept data on internet censorship of particular websites. [17] Freedom on the Net's report covers a range of concepts that the other datasets do not, such as new legislation passed, but lacks the country coverage of other datasets. [2] [16]

Expert surveys such as Freedom House and V-Dem have been found to be more prone to false positives (they are more likely to find uncorroborated instances of censorship). [18] While remote sensing such as the kind done by Access Now and OpenNet Initiative are more likely to be prone to false negatives (they may miss some instances of real censorship). [19]

The Millennium Challenge Corporation used the Key Internet Controls portion of the Freedom on the Net report to inform its country selection process until 2020 when this report was replaced with data on internet shutdowns from Access Now. [20] [21]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of information</span> Freedom of a person or people to publish and consume information

Freedom of information is freedom of a person or people to publish and consume information. Access to information is the ability for an individual to seek, receive and impart information effectively. This sometimes includes "scientific, indigenous, and traditional knowledge; freedom of information, building of open knowledge resources, including open Internet and open standards, and open access and availability of data; preservation of digital heritage; respect for cultural and linguistic diversity, such as fostering access to local content in accessible languages; quality education for all, including lifelong and e-learning; diffusion of new media and information literacy and skills, and social inclusion online, including addressing inequalities based on skills, education, gender, age, race, ethnicity, and accessibility by those with disabilities; and the development of connectivity and affordable ICTs, including mobile, the Internet, and broadband infrastructures".

In Iran, censorship was ranked among the world's most extreme in 2023. Reporters Without Borders ranked Iran 177 out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index, which ranks countries from 1 to 180 based on the level of freedom of the press. Reporters Without Borders described Iran as “one of the world’s five biggest prisons for media personnel" in the 40 years since the revolution. In the Freedom House Index, Iran scored low on political rights and civil liberties and has been classified as 'not free.'

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship in India</span> Overview of Internet censorship in India

Internet censorship in India is done by both central and state governments. DNS filtering and educating service users in suggested usages is an active strategy and government policy to regulate and block access to Internet content on a large scale. Measures for removing content at the request of content creators through court orders have also become more common in recent years. Initiating a mass surveillance government project like Golden Shield Project is an alternative that has been discussed over the years by government bodies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship</span> Legal control of the internet

Internet censorship is the legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. Censorship is most often applied to specific internet domains but exceptionally may extend to all Internet resources located outside the jurisdiction of the censoring state. Internet censorship may also put restrictions on what information can be made internet accessible. Organizations providing internet access – such as schools and libraries – may choose to preclude access to material that they consider undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate or even illegal, and regard this as ethical behaviour rather than censorship. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship of material they publish, for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, political views, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences.

Internet censorship in Morocco was listed as selective in the social, conflict/security, and Internet tools areas and as no evidence in the political area by the OpenNet Initiative (ONI) in August 2009. Freedom House listed Morocco's "Internet Freedom Status" as "Partly Free" in its 2018 Freedom on the Net report.

The Internet is accessible to the majority of the population in Egypt, whether via smartphones, internet cafes, or home connections. Broadband Internet access via VDSL is widely available. Under the rule of Hosni Mubarak, Internet censorship and surveillance were severe, culminating in a total shutdown of the Internet in Egypt during the 2011 Revolution. Although Internet access was restored following Mubarak's order, government censorship and surveillance have increased since the 2013 coup d'état, leading the NGO Freedom House to downgrade Egypt's Internet freedom from "partly free" in 2011 to "not free" in 2015, which it has retained in subsequent reports including the most recent in 2021. The el-Sisi regime has ramped up online censorship in Egypt. The regime heavily censors online news websites, which has prompted the closure of many independent news outlets in Egypt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet outage</span> Loss of internet functionality over a small or large area

An Internet outage or Internet blackout or Internet shutdown is the complete or partial failure of the internet services. It can occur due to censorship, cyberattacks, disasters, police or security services actions or errors.

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance by country provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries around the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Access Now</span> Non-profit organization

Access Now is a non-profit organization founded in 2009 focused on digital civil rights.

Global Internet Usage is the number of people who use the Internet worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Kaye (academic)</span> Law professor

David Kaye is an American politician who served as the United Nations special rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression between August 2014 and July 2020. He was succeeded by Irene Khan. Kaye is clinical professor of law at the University of California, Irvine on public international law, international humanitarian law human rights and international criminal justice. He is co-director of the UCI Fair Elections and Free Speech Center working at the intersection of technology, freedom of speech and democratic deliberation. He is also the independent board chair of the Global Network Initiative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open access in Denmark</span> Overview of the culture and regulation of open access in Denmark

Open access to scholarly communication in Denmark has grown rapidly since the 1990s. As in other countries in general, open access publishing is less expensive than traditional, paper-based, pre-Internet publishing.

Open access to scholarly communication in Hungary has developed in recent years through digital repositories and academic publishers, among other means. In 2008 several academic libraries founded the Hungarian Open Access Repositories (HUNOR) consortium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open access in India</span> Overview of the culture and regulation of open access in India

In India, Open Access movement started in May 2004, when two workshops were organized by the M S Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai. In 2006, the National Knowledge Commission in its recommendations proposed that "access to knowledge is the most fundamental way of increasing the opportunities and reach of individuals and groups". In 2009, the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) began requiring that its grantees provide open access to funded research. In 2011, the Open Access India forum formulated a draft policy on Open Access for India. Shodhganga, a digital repository for theses, was established in 2011 with the aim of promoting and preserving academic research. The University Grants Commission (UGC) made it mandatory for scholars to deposit their theses in Shodhganga, as per the Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M. Phil./Ph.D. Degrees Regulations, 2016.Currently, the Directory of Open Access Journals lists 326 open access journals published in India, of which 233 have no fees.

NetBlocks is a watchdog organization that monitors cybersecurity and the governance of the Internet. The service was launched in 2017 to monitor Internet freedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Asia</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Asia provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Asia

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Oceania</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Oceania provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Oceania.

The Democracy Indices by V-Dem are democracy indices published by V-Dem Institute that describe qualities of different democracies. This dataset is published on an annual basis and is publicly available and free. In particular, the V-Dem dataset is popular among political scientists and describes the characteristics of political regimes worldwide. In total, datasets released by the V-Dem Institute include information on hundreds of indicator variables describing all aspects of government, especially on the quality of democracy, inclusivity, and other economic indicators. An R package automatically bundles new data.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Freedom on the Net 2009, Freedom House, accessed 16 April 2012
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Freedom on the Net 2020" (PDF). Freedom House.
  3. 1 2 Freedom on the Net 2011, Freedom House, accessed 15 April 2012
  4. 1 2 Freedom on the Net 2012, Freedom House, accessed 24 September 2012
  5. 1 2 Freedom on the Net 2013, Freedom House, 3 October 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2013.
  6. 1 2 "Freedom on the Net 2014" (PDF). Freedom House. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
  7. 1 2 "Freedom on the Net 2015" (PDF). Freedom House. October 2015. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
  8. 1 2 "Freedom on the Net 2016" (PDF). Freedom House. October 2016. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
  9. 1 2 "Freedom on the Net 2017" (PDF). Freedom House. October 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
  10. 1 2 "Freedom on the Net 2018" (PDF). Freedom House. November 2018. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
  11. "Freedom on the Net 2019" (PDF). Freedom House. November 2019. Retrieved 22 November 2019.
  12. "Freedom on the Net 2019" (PDF). Freedom House.
  13. "Freedom on the Net 2020" (PDF). Freedom House.
  14. 1 2 Taye, Berhan (2021). "Shattered Dreams and Lost Opportunities" (PDF). Access Now .
  15. 1 2 Mechkova, V., Daniel P., Brigitte S.,&Steven W. (2020). Digital Society Project Dataset v2.Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project http://digitalsocietyproject.org/
  16. 1 2 Fletcher, Terry; Hayes-Birchler, Andria (2020-07-30). "Comparing Measures of Internet Censorship: Analyzing the Tradeoffs between Expert Analysis and Remote Measurement". doi:10.5281/zenodo.3967398. S2CID   244992072.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. 1 2 "West Censoring East: The Use of Western Technologies by Middle East Censors, 2010–2011", Helmi Noman and Jillian C. York, OpenNet Initiative, March 2011
  18. Fletcher, Terry; Hayes-Birchler, Andria (2020-07-30). "Comparing Measures of Internet Censorship: Analyzing the Tradeoffs between Expert Analysis and Remote Measurement". doi:10.5281/zenodo.3967398. S2CID   244992072.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. Fletcher, Terry; Hayes-Birchler, Andria (2020-07-30). "Comparing Measures of Internet Censorship: Analyzing the Tradeoffs between Expert Analysis and Remote Measurement". doi:10.5281/zenodo.3967398. S2CID   244992072.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  20. "Guide to the MCC Indicators for Fiscal Year 2020". Millennium Challenge Corporation. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  21. "Guide to the MCC Indicators for Fiscal Year 2021". Millennium Challenge Corporation. Retrieved 2021-06-07.