In additive combinatorics, a discipline within mathematics, Freiman's theorem is a central result which indicates the approximate structure of sets whose sumset is small. It roughly states that if is small, then can be contained in a small generalized arithmetic progression.
If is a finite subset of with , then is contained in a generalized arithmetic progression of dimension at most and size at most , where and are constants depending only on .
For a finite set of integers, it is always true that
with equality precisely when is an arithmetic progression.
More generally, suppose is a subset of a finite proper generalized arithmetic progression of dimension such that for some real . Then , so that
This result is due to Gregory Freiman (1964, 1966). [1] [2] [3] Much interest in it, and applications, stemmed from a new proof by Imre Z. Ruzsa (1992,1994). [4] [5] Mei-Chu Chang proved new polynomial estimates for the size of arithmetic progressions arising in the theorem in 2002. [6] The current best bounds were provided by Tom Sanders. [7]
The proof presented here follows the proof in Yufei Zhao's lecture notes. [8]
The Ruzsa covering lemma states the following:
This lemma provides a bound on how many copies of one needs to cover , hence the name. The proof is essentially a greedy algorithm:
Proof: Let be a maximal subset of such that the sets for are all disjoint. Then , and also , so . Furthermore, for any , there is some such that intersects , as otherwise adding to contradicts the maximality of . Thus , so .
Let be a positive integer, and and be abelian groups. Let and . A map is a Freiman -homomorphism if
whenever for any .
If in addition is a bijection and is a Freiman -homomorphism, then is a Freiman -isomorphism.
If is a Freiman -homomorphism, then is a Freiman -homomorphism for any positive integer such that .
Then the Ruzsa modeling lemma states the following:
The last statement means there exists some Freiman -homomorphism between the two subsets.
Proof sketch: Choose a prime sufficiently large such that the modulo- reduction map is a Freiman -isomorphism from to its image in . Let be the lifting map that takes each member of to its unique representative in . For nonzero , let be the multiplication by map, which is a Freiman -isomorphism. Let be the image . Choose a suitable subset of with cardinality at least such that the restriction of to is a Freiman -isomorphism onto its image, and let be the preimage of under . Then the restriction of to is a Freiman -isomorphism onto its image . Lastly, there exists some choice of nonzero such that the restriction of the modulo- reduction to is a Freiman -isomorphism onto its image. The result follows after composing this map with the earlier Freiman -isomorphism.
Though Freiman's theorem applies to sets of integers, the Ruzsa modeling lemma allows one to model sets of integers as subsets of finite cyclic groups. So it is useful to first work in the setting of a finite field, and then generalize results to the integers. The following lemma was proved by Bogolyubov:
Generalizing this lemma to arbitrary cyclic groups requires an analogous notion to “subspace”: that of the Bohr set. Let be a subset of where is a prime. The Bohr set of dimension and width is
where is the distance from to the nearest integer. The following lemma generalizes Bogolyubov's lemma:
Here the dimension of a Bohr set is analogous to the codimension of a set in . The proof of the lemma involves Fourier-analytic methods. The following proposition relates Bohr sets back to generalized arithmetic progressions, eventually leading to the proof of Freiman's theorem.
The proof of this proposition uses Minkowski's theorem, a fundamental result in geometry of numbers.
By the Plünnecke–Ruzsa inequality, . By Bertrand's postulate, there exists a prime such that . By the Ruzsa modeling lemma, there exists a subset of of cardinality at least such that is Freiman 8-isomorphic to a subset .
By the generalization of Bogolyubov's lemma, contains a proper generalized arithmetic progression of dimension at most and size at least . Because and are Freiman 8-isomorphic, and are Freiman 2-isomorphic. Then the image under the 2-isomorphism of the proper generalized arithmetic progression in is a proper generalized arithmetic progression in called .
But , since . Thus
so by the Ruzsa covering lemma for some of cardinality at most . Then is contained in a generalized arithmetic progression of dimension and size at most , completing the proof.
A result due to Ben Green and Imre Ruzsa generalized Freiman's theorem to arbitrary abelian groups. They used an analogous notion to generalized arithmetic progressions, which they called coset progressions. A coset progression of an abelian group is a set for a proper generalized arithmetic progression and a subgroup of . The dimension of this coset progression is defined to be the dimension of , and its size is defined to be the cardinality of the whole set. Green and Ruzsa showed the following:
Green and Ruzsa provided upper bounds of and for some absolute constant . [9]
Terence Tao (2010) also generalized Freiman's theorem to solvable groups of bounded derived length. [10]
Extending Freiman’s theorem to an arbitrary nonabelian group is still open. Results for , when a set has very small doubling, are referred to as Kneser theorems. [11]
The polynomial Freiman–Ruzsa conjecture, [12] is a generalization published in a paper [13] by Imre Ruzsa but credited by him to Katalin Marton. It states that if a subset of a group (a power of a cyclic group) has doubling constant such that then it is covered by a bounded number of cosets of some subgroup with. In 2012 Tom Sanders gave an almost polynomial bound of the conjecture for abelian groups. [14] [15] In 2023 a solution over a field of characteristic 2 has been posted as a preprint by Tim Gowers, Ben Green, Freddie Manners and Terry Tao. [16] [17] [18] This proof was completely formalized in the Lean 4 formal proof language, a collaborative project that marked an important milestone in terms of mathematicians successfully formalizing contemporary mathematics. [19]
The Hahn–Banach theorem is a central tool in functional analysis. It allows the extension of bounded linear functionals defined on a vector subspace of some vector space to the whole space, and it also shows that there are "enough" continuous linear functionals defined on every normed vector space to make the study of the dual space "interesting". Another version of the Hahn–Banach theorem is known as the Hahn–Banach separation theorem or the hyperplane separation theorem, and has numerous uses in convex geometry.
In mathematics, a real interval is the set of all real numbers lying between two fixed endpoints with no "gaps". Each endpoint is either a real number or positive or negative infinity, indicating the interval extends without a bound. A real interval can contain neither endpoint, either endpoint, or both endpoints, excluding any endpoint which is infinite.
In the mathematical discipline of set theory, forcing is a technique for proving consistency and independence results. Intuitively, forcing can be thought of as a technique to expand the set theoretical universe to a larger universe by introducing a new "generic" object .
In mathematics, a linear form is a linear map from a vector space to its field of scalars.
In vector calculus, Green's theorem relates a line integral around a simple closed curve C to a double integral over the plane region D bounded by C. It is the two-dimensional special case of Stokes' theorem. In one dimension, it is equivalent to the fundamental theorem of calculus. In three dimensions, it is equivalent to the divergence theorem.
In mathematics, the uniform boundedness principle or Banach–Steinhaus theorem is one of the fundamental results in functional analysis. Together with the Hahn–Banach theorem and the open mapping theorem, it is considered one of the cornerstones of the field. In its basic form, it asserts that for a family of continuous linear operators whose domain is a Banach space, pointwise boundedness is equivalent to uniform boundedness in operator norm.
In functional analysis and related branches of mathematics, the Banach–Alaoglu theorem states that the closed unit ball of the dual space of a normed vector space is compact in the weak* topology. A common proof identifies the unit ball with the weak-* topology as a closed subset of a product of compact sets with the product topology. As a consequence of Tychonoff's theorem, this product, and hence the unit ball within, is compact.
In topology, the Lebesgue covering lemma is a useful tool in the study of compact metric spaces.
In mathematics, a generalized arithmetic progression is a generalization of an arithmetic progression equipped with multiple common differences – whereas an arithmetic progression is generated by a single common difference, a generalized arithmetic progression can be generated by multiple common differences. For example, the sequence is not an arithmetic progression, but is instead generated by starting with 17 and adding either 3 or 5, thus allowing multiple common differences to generate it. A semilinear set generalizes this idea to multiple dimensions – it is a set of vectors of integers, rather than a set of integers.
In mathematics, a locally integrable function is a function which is integrable on every compact subset of its domain of definition. The importance of such functions lies in the fact that their function space is similar to Lp spaces, but its members are not required to satisfy any growth restriction on their behavior at the boundary of their domain : in other words, locally integrable functions can grow arbitrarily fast at the domain boundary, but are still manageable in a way similar to ordinary integrable functions.
In additive number theory and combinatorics, a restricted sumset has the form
In functional analysis, the dual norm is a measure of size for a continuous linear function defined on a normed vector space.
Additive combinatorics is an area of combinatorics in mathematics. One major area of study in additive combinatorics are inverse problems: given the size of the sumset A + B is small, what can we say about the structures of A and B? In the case of the integers, the classical Freiman's theorem provides a partial answer to this question in terms of multi-dimensional arithmetic progressions.
In arithmetic combinatorics, the corners theorem states that for every , for large enough , any set of at least points in the grid contains a corner, i.e., a triple of points of the form with . It was first proved by Miklós Ajtai and Endre Szemerédi in 1974 using Szemerédi's theorem. In 2003, József Solymosi gave a short proof using the triangle removal lemma.
In mathematics, an approximate group is a subset of a group which behaves like a subgroup "up to a constant error", in a precise quantitative sense. For example, it is required that the set of products of elements in the subset be not much bigger than the subset itself. The notion was introduced in the 2010s but can be traced to older sources in additive combinatorics.
In graph theory, the hypergraph removal lemma states that when a hypergraph contains few copies of a given sub-hypergraph, then all of the copies can be eliminated by removing a small number of hyperedges. It is a generalization of the graph removal lemma. The special case in which the graph is a tetrahedron is known as the tetrahedron removal lemma. It was first proved by Nagle, Rödl, Schacht and Skokan and, independently, by Gowers.
Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions is a result in additive combinatorics concerning the existence of arithmetic progressions in subsets of the natural numbers. It was first proven by Klaus Roth in 1953. Roth's theorem is a special case of Szemerédi's theorem for the case .
In additive combinatorics, the Plünnecke–Ruzsa inequality is an inequality that bounds the size of various sumsets of a set , given that there is another set so that is not much larger than . A slightly weaker version of this inequality was originally proven and published by Helmut Plünnecke (1970). Imre Ruzsa (1989) later published a simpler proof of the current, more general, version of the inequality. The inequality forms a crucial step in the proof of Freiman's theorem.
In mathematics, calculus on Euclidean space is a generalization of calculus of functions in one or several variables to calculus of functions on Euclidean space as well as a finite-dimensional real vector space. This calculus is also known as advanced calculus, especially in the United States. It is similar to multivariable calculus but is somewhat more sophisticated in that it uses linear algebra more extensively and covers some concepts from differential geometry such as differential forms and Stokes' formula in terms of differential forms. This extensive use of linear algebra also allows a natural generalization of multivariable calculus to calculus on Banach spaces or topological vector spaces.
In mathematics, the hypergraph regularity method is a powerful tool in extremal graph theory that refers to the combined application of the hypergraph regularity lemma and the associated counting lemma. It is a generalization of the graph regularity method, which refers to the use of Szemerédi's regularity and counting lemmas.
This article incorporates material from Freiman's theorem on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.