French tariff of 1881

Last updated

The French tariff of 1881 was a tariff passed by the National Assembly of the French Third Republic that became law on 7 May 1881. [1] [2]

Contents

The Minister of Agriculture and Commerce, Marie Camille Alfred, vicomte de Meaux  [ Wikidata ], relied on the ministry's secretary, Jules Ozenne, and the general director of customs, Léon Amé, to help formulate the government's tariff policy. [3] They wished to retain and extend the free trade policies of the Second French Empire by lowering the protectionist duties in France's general tariff to the level of the conventional tariff in France's commercial treaties. [4] This new general tariff would then be used to negotiate trade treaties that would lower the conventional tariff. [5]

Meaux announced the government's intention to devise a new tariff in a circular of 7 April 1875. He also appealed for the advice on tariff levels from France's chambers of commerce. [6] 54 chambers responded, with a majority favouring replacing the ad valorem duties with fixed duties and with all of them supporting making the existing conventional tariff the new general tariff. [7] In March 1876 Meaux ordered the Conseil supérieur du commerce to draft a bill that would determine tariff levels. [8] In February 1877 the bill was submitted to the Chamber of Deputies: it abolished all protective duties and in the majority of duties it made the old minimum duties the maximum that could be levied. [9] However, the Seize Mai crisis led to the bill being withdrawn. [10]

In March 1878 the Chamber appointed a commission (under the chairmanship of Jules Ferry) to report on a tariff bill. This deliberated until March 1879. [11] Ferry called the commission "the most complete, the most practical, the best controlled, in a word, the most serious [inquiry] that has ever taken place". [12] Another request for input from the chambers of commerce again led to 54 responses between April and August 1878. [13] These revealed protectionism's growing popularity since 1875, with half favouring duties higher than those desired by the government. [14] In December 1879 the commission submitted its moderately protectionist tariff bill to the Chamber. [15]

Augustin Pouyer-Quertier Pouyer-Quertier, Augustin.jpg
Augustin Pouyer-Quertier

The debate was divided between free traders who argued for a low general tariff and a new conventional tariff, against the protectionists who favoured a prohibitive tariff if and when the commercial treaties expired. [16] In June 1878 the Free Trade Association was founded. [17] On 1 May 1879 the protectionists held a congress (chaired by Augustin Pouyer-Quertier) in the Grand Hotel in Paris, with over 100 delegates representing the chambers of commerce, senators, deputies and officers of the Association de l'industrie française. [18] Both sides campaigned to win over public opinion in the propaganda war fought across the country. [19] Pouyer-Quertier wished to convert the French farmer to protection in the hope that they would support tariffs for industry in return for tariffs for agriculture. [20]

In the Chamber the debate on the bill started on 30 January 1880, with lobbyists from both sides congregating in Paris to influence the vote. [21] An agreement between the industrial protectionists and the farmers' bloc to support protection broke down when the industrialists, mistrusting their agricultural allies, failed to vote for agricultural protection. [22] In the voting on the clauses of the bill in the Chamber, the free traders achieved their main goal in defeating the higher tariffs for industrial goods favoured by the commission. [23]

In the Senate the protectionists again dominated the commission appointed to examine the bill, with the result that their bill resembled the protectionist one drafted by the Chamber's commission. The main difference, however, reflected a renewed attempt at industrial-agricultural co-operation: this time agriculture received higher rates of protection than before. [24] The Senate began debating the bill on 15 February 1881, with voting commencing on 19 February. Again, the industrial-agricultural alliance broke down. This time, however, it was the agriculturists who broke ranks: despite the industrialists voting for agricultural protection the agriculturists voted against the duty on textiles. [25]

In the end, industry failed to receive the protection it campaigned for: the general tariff for manufacturers was raised by 24 per cent. and fixed at a specific level rather than ad valorem. [26] Agriculture received less protection than industry but the agriculturists managed to raise livestock duties and they also ensured that agricultural duties could not be lowered in any future commercial treaty. [27] Overall, the law was a victory for free traders. [28] [29]

Rates

The duty on wheat was 0.60 francs per 100kg; for flour 1.20 francs; butter 13 francs; cheese 8 francs; eggs 10 francs; beef and pork 3 francs; bullocks 15 francs; cows 8 francs; pigs 3 francs and wine 8 francs. [30] Oats and barley were admitted duty free. [31] Raw materials were either admitted duty free or subject to a small duty. [32]

Notes

  1. ↑ Tracy, p. 66.
  2. ↑ Bairoch, p. 64.
  3. ↑ Smith, p. 44.
  4. ↑ Smith, p. 44.
  5. ↑ Smith, p. 44.
  6. ↑ Smith, pp. 44-45.
  7. ↑ Smith, p. 45.
  8. ↑ Smith, p. 45.
  9. ↑ Smith, p. 47.
  10. ↑ Smith, p. 47.
  11. ↑ Smith, p. 152, p. 154.
  12. ↑ Smith, p. 154.
  13. ↑ Smith, p. 153.
  14. ↑ Smith, p. 153.
  15. ↑ Smith, p. 159.
  16. ↑ Smith, p. 160.
  17. ↑ Smith, p. 161.
  18. ↑ Smith, p. 164.
  19. ↑ Smith, p. 165, p. 169.
  20. ↑ Smith, pp. 166-169.
  21. ↑ Smith, pp. 170-171.
  22. ↑ Smith, p. 174.
  23. ↑ Smith, p. 176.
  24. ↑ Smith, p. 179.
  25. ↑ Smith, pp. 179-180.
  26. ↑ Smith, p. 181.
  27. ↑ Smith, p. 181.
  28. ↑ Smith, p. 181.
  29. ↑ Ashley, p. 316.
  30. ↑ Tracy, p. 66.
  31. ↑ Tracy, p. 66.
  32. ↑ Ashley, p. 316.

Related Research Articles

A tariff is a tax on imports or exports between sovereign states. It is a form of regulation of foreign trade and a policy that taxes foreign products to encourage or safeguard domestic industry. Traditionally, states have used them as a source of income. Now, they are among the most widely used instruments of protectionism, along with import and export quotas.

The Tariff Act of 1789 was the first major piece of legislation passed in the United States after the ratification of the United States Constitution and it had two purposes. It was to protect manufacturing industries developing in the nation and was to raise revenue for the federal government. It was sponsored by Congressman James Madison, passed by the 1st United States Congress, and signed into law by President George Washington. The act levied a 50¢ per ton duty on goods imported by foreign ships; American-owned vessels were charged 6¢ per ton.

The Morrill Tariff of 1861 was an increased import tariff in the United States, adopted on March 2, 1861, during the administration of President James Buchanan, a Democrat. It was the twelfth of seventeen planks in the platform of the incoming Republican Party, which had not yet been inaugurated, and it appealed to industrialists and factory workers as a way to foster rapid industrial growth.

Free trade Absence of government restriction on international trade

Free trade is a trade policy that does not restrict imports or exports. It can also be understood as the free market idea applied to international trade. In government, free trade is predominantly advocated by political parties that hold liberal economic positions while economically left-wing and nationalist political parties generally support protectionism, the opposite of free trade.

Protectionism Economic policy of restraining trade between states through government regulations

Protectionism is the economic policy of restricting imports from other countries through methods such as tariffs on imported goods, import quotas, and a variety of other government regulations. Proponents argue that protectionist policies shield the producers, businesses, and workers of the import-competing sector in the country from foreign competitors. However, they also reduce trade and adversely affect consumers in general, and harm the producers and workers in export sectors, both in the country implementing protectionist policies and in the countries protected against.

Sweden during the late 19th century

The period following the accession of Oscar II to the throne of Sweden in 1872 was marked by political conflict. The Lantmanna Party, representing peasant proprietors, dominated the Lower House of parliament, and demanded tax reductions and reforms of the system of military service. The Upper House opposed these positions. A compromise was reached in 1884 with reduction in land taxes and increased periods of military service, processes that continued in later years.

The Tariff of 1842, or Black Tariff as it became known, was a protectionist tariff schedule adopted in the United States. It reversed the effects of the Compromise Tariff of 1833, which contained a provision that successively lowered the tariff rates from their level under the Tariff of 1832 over a period of ten years until the majority of dutiable goods were to be taxed at 20%.

The Tariff of 1816, also known as the Dallas Tariff, is notable as the first tariff passed by Congress with an explicit function of protecting U.S. manufactured items from overseas competition. Prior to the War of 1812, tariffs had primarily served to raise revenues to operate the national government. Another unique aspect of the tariff was the strong support it received from Southern states.

Cobden–Chevalier Treaty

The Cobden–Chevalier Treaty was an Anglo-French free trade agreement signed between Great Britain and France on 23 January 1860. After Britain began free trade policies in 1846, there remained tariffs with France. The 1860 treaty ended tariffs on the main items of trade – wine, brandy and silk goods from France, and coal, iron and industrial goods from Britain. The economic effects were small, but the new policy was widely copied across Europe. It was the first of eight "most favored nation" treaties the British negotiated in the 1860s. By the 1880s, however, the rise of protectionism in Germany, the United States and elsewhere made the treaty less relevant.It was the first modern trade agreement.

Jules Méline French politician

Félix Jules Méline was a French statesman, prime minister from 1896 to 1898.

The Méline tariff was a French protectionist measure introduced in 1892. It is noted as being the most important piece of economic legislation of the Third Republic and marked a return to earlier protectionist policies effectively ending the period of free trade associated with the 1860 Cobden–Chevalier Treaty. The tariff has in part been seen to be the result of efforts by industrialists to help combat a perceived external economic threat to the domestic market.

General elections were held in Sweden in August and September 1887. Although they resulted in a victory for the pro-free trade bloc, 22 of its members were later expelled from parliament, giving the protectionist members a majority.

The German tariff of 1879 was a protectionist law passed by the Reichstag that imposed tariffs on industrial and agricultural imports into Imperial Germany.

The German tariff of 1887 was a protectionist law passed by the Reichstag that raised tariffs on agricultural imports into Imperial Germany. It became law on 21 December 1887.

German tariff of 1902

The German tariff of 1902 was a protectionist law passed by the Reichstag that raised tariffs on agricultural imports into Imperial Germany. It became law on 25 December 1902.

German tariff of 1925

The German tariff of 1925 was a moderately protectionist law passed by the Reichstag that reintroduced tariffs on agricultural imports into Weimar Germany. It came into force on 1 September 1925.

The French tariff of 1885 was a protectionist law passed by the National Assembly of the French Third Republic that imposed tariffs. It became law on 28 March 1885.

The French tariff of 1887 was a protectionist law passed by the National Assembly of the French Third Republic that imposed tariffs. It became law on 29 March 1885.

Australian governments, both those of the colonies after the introduction of responsible government in 1850 and those in the federation after 1901, have been democracies in which the power to fix and change tariff rates has resided in the legislatures. A majority vote of members in the Lower House has fixed tariff rates when, from time to time, a tariff bill is put before them.

The United States Senate Select Committee on the Tariff Regulation was a Select Committee for the U.S. Senate from February 25, 1823 until March 3, 1923. It is now a defunct congressional committee, having been consolidated into the Committee of Finance in 1923.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.