Gail S. Goodman | |
---|---|
Born | |
Occupation | Academic |
Years active | 1977-present |
Known for | Child eyewitness testimony |
Academic background | |
Education | PhD in psychology |
Alma mater | University of California, Los Angeles |
Thesis | (1977) |
Academic work | |
Discipline | Psychologist |
Sub-discipline | Legal |
Gail S. Goodman is an American psychologist,known as one of the first in her field to study children's roles in the legal system,specifically children's eyewitness testimony pertaining to the Sixth Amendment. Her awards for her contributions to research,writing,and teaching include the American Psychological Association Award for Distinguished Contributions to Psychology in the Public Interest in 2017. Her involvement includes being cited in United States Supreme Court cases,which is rare for psychologists.
Gail S. Goodman was born and raised in Los Angeles,California. She completed her studies at the University of California,Los Angeles (UCLA). She majored in psychology,with minors in sociology and anthropology,and graduated in 1971. After receiving her master's degree in 1972,she continued her education towards getting her PhD. She majored in developmental psychology,minoring in perception and physiological psychology. Goodman received her PhD in 1977. [1] Her dissertation focused on the development of schema memory and was published in the reputable Cognitive Psychology journal. Goodman then began to develop her interest in children and the law as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Denver;she began to enroll in classes concerning children's constitutional rights and the involvement of children in legal cases. Later Goodman conducted research at the Universite´Rene´Descartes in Paris for a year. When she returned from Paris she began to examine child eyewitness testimonies and the effects of these testimonies on jury members.
Early in her research career,Goodman experienced rejection by the psychological and law society who insisted that children testify too rarely for her research to be of interest. However,she began to gain recognition by the law-psychology community,beginning with her article in Psychology Today titled Would you believe a Child Witness? This article addressed the issues of child eyewitnesses and their accuracy. The article eventually even gained recognition by the American Bar Association. [2]
Goodman's research was soon being recognized and commended by experts in the law-psychology community and journals became prepared to publish her articles concerning children eyewitnesses. Goodman's later articles clarified common concerns that juries found with child witnesses. It was not considered uncommon for jury members to doubt the accuracy of child witnesses because the jury often assumed children are susceptible to suggestibility,and it is difficult for them to distinguish reality from imagination. These articles showed that children are more capable than formerly believed to recall details of eyewitness events and their suggestibility rapidly lowers by the age of four. [3] Children are also often as accurate as adults in their recall,although children recall less information than do adults,on average. [4]
Prior to Goodman's work in the area of child eyewitnesses,there was little to no modern scientific study in the area. Her findings sparked interest in many other researchers who have joined in the interest of children's involvement in legal processes. Specific topics of Goodman's research include the suggestibility of children regarding false memories,the effect of childhood witnesses on jury members,and children's recall of traumatic events.
Goodman has contributed to and written many scholarly texts including articles,chapters,monographs,and books. She has appeared on local and national radio and television talk shows to discuss her research regarding children's testimonies and child abuse. Newspaper and magazine articles dealing with these topics have cited Goodman. Some of her research has been funded by prominent sources such as United States Department of Health and Human Services,National Institute of Justice,and the National Science Foundation.
Goodman has been honored with many awards for her contribution to research and writing including:American Psychological Association's 2005 Award for Distinguished Contributions to Research in Public Policy,American Psychological Association's 2005 APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research,among many others.
She has also received teaching awards including the Teaching and Mentoring Award from the American Psychology-Law Society. Recently Goodman has been recognized for her dedication to the field with prestigious awards including the Award for Lifetime Contribution to Developmental Psychology in the Service of Science and Society,2008,and Association for Psychological Science's 2012 James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award for Lifetime Contributions to Applied Research.
Goodman has conferred with many governments about their policies on child maltreatment,and legal and health practitioners have taken workshops put on by Goodman. She has been cited in State and Federal Supreme Court case decisions,and has helped with amicus briefs to the United States Supreme Court for the American Psychological Association and American Medical Association. Some of these decisions involved the Sixth Amendment of the constitution pertaining to the Confrontation Clause.
The particular amicus briefs in which Goodman contributed to were for the cases of Craig v. Maryland and Wright v. Idaho. In the case of Craig v. Maryland the court proposed three points. First,people accused of child sexual abuse suffer damage to their reputation requires protection of their constitutional rights from preliminary investigation throughout trial. One of these rights is to be able to have a face-of-face confrontation with the witnesses. Secondly,courts must interpret the Confrontation Clause to guarantee protection against a witness' testimony if it is false. They do this because of the high emotionality involved in child sexual abuse cases and the fact that witnesses who are children can be easily influenced in their testimonies. The Confrontational Clause is in regards to the Sixth Amendment which guarantees that you can confront your accusers face to face when you are charged with a crime. Lastly,a face-to-face confrontation at trial is a right and this right must not be terminated. The ruling of the court reversed the conviction of the defendant of sexual offenses,assault,and battery to children who were enrolled in her preschool,but determined that on a case-by-case basis child sexual assault victims could testify via CCTV if the judge determined the children could not reasonably communicate otherwise. [5]
In regards to Wright v. Idaho,the court also ruled on the Confrontation Clause in four sections. First,statements that incriminated the witness under hearsay exceptions are not allowed under the Confrontation Clause unless the statement has sufficient proof of reliability. Secondly,the residual hearsay exception for Idaho is not a steadfast exception for the use of the Confrontation Clause. Next,it was the State Supreme Courts fault for placing such a great amount of influence on the lack of protection in the interview. Finally,the court found two factors pertaining to the child's testimony. Specifically is there was any motive to make up her story or if her testimony included statements in which the child would be able to make up,taking her young age into account. The defendant Wright in this case was charged with two counts of sexual conduct with two minors,which happened to be sisters. [6]
Currently Goodman is a member of the faculty at University of California- Davis,and continues to study child memory and the law. She conducts studies in her Developmental Research Center Lab and also teaches courses. She has recently begun research in the area of the effects of child abuse and neglect on long-term memory.
She is a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters. [7]
In law,a witness is someone who has knowledge about a matter,whether they have sensed it or are testifying on another witnesses' behalf. In law a witness is someone who,either voluntarily or under compulsion,provides testimonial evidence,either oral or written,of what they know or claim to know.
Kenneth Bancroft Clark and Mamie Phipps Clark were American psychologists who as a married team conducted research among children and were active in the Civil Rights Movement. They founded the Northside Center for Child Development in Harlem and the organization Harlem Youth Opportunities Unlimited (HARYOU). Kenneth Clark was also an educator and professor at City College of New York,and first Black president of the American Psychological Association.
Weapon focus is the concentration on a weapon by a witness of a crime and the subsequent inability to accurately remember other details of the crime. Weapon focus is a factor that heavily affects the reliability of eyewitness testimony. This effect involves a witness to a crime diverting his or her attention to the weapon the perpetrator is holding,thus causing memory impairments and leaving less attention for other details in the scene,such as the attacker’s face,clothing or vehicle.
Together,legal psychology and forensic psychology form the field more generally recognized as "psychology and law". Following earlier efforts by psychologists to address legal issues,psychology and law became a field of study in the 1960s as part of an effort to enhance justice,though that originating concern has lessened over time. The multidisciplinary American Psychological Association's Division 41,the American Psychology-Law Society,is active with the goal of promoting the contributions of psychology to the understanding of law and legal systems through research,as well as providing education to psychologists in legal issues and providing education to legal personnel on psychological issues. Further,its mandate is to inform the psychological and legal communities and the public at large of current research,educational,and service in the area of psychology and law. There are similar societies in Britain and Europe.
Maryland v. Craig,497 U.S. 836 (1990),was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Sixth Amendment. The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause,which provides criminal defendants with the right to confront witnesses against them,did not bar the use of one-way closed-circuit television to present testimony by an alleged child sex abuse victim.
Stephen J. Ceci is an American psychologist at Cornell University. He studies the accuracy of children's courtroom testimony,and he is an expert in the development of intelligence and memory. He has been the recipient of numerous awards,including the prestigious Lifetime Contribution Awards from the American Psychological Association (APA) and the Association for Psychological Science (APS) as well as many divisional and smaller society awards.
Wee Care Nursery School,located in Maplewood,New Jersey,was the subject of a day care child abuse case that was tried during the 1980s. Although Margaret Kelly Michaels was prosecuted and convicted,the decision was reversed after she spent five years in prison. An appellate court ruled that several features of the original trial had produced an unjust ruling and the conviction was reversed. The case was studied by several psychologists who were concerned about the interrogation methods used and the quality of the children's testimony in the case. This resulted in research concerning the topic of children's memory and suggestibility,resulting in new recommendations for performing interviews with child victims and witnesses.
Richard Jason Ofshe is an American sociologist and professor emeritus of sociology at the University of California,Berkeley. He is known for his expert testimony relating to coercion in small groups,confessions,and interrogations.
Kathy Pezdek is Professor and Associate Dean of the School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences (SBOS),Claremont Graduate University in Claremont,California. Dr. Pezdek is a cognitive psychologist specializing in the study of eyewitness memory. She frequently serves as an expert witness in the area of eyewitness identification and has testified on this topic in Federal,State and Superior Court cases. Her extensive research has focused on a range of topics related to Law and Psychology that apply to both adults and children. These topics include face memory,false memory,suggestibility of memory,lineup techniques,and detecting deception. Kathy Pezdek is a Fellow of the American Psychological Society,has served as Editor of Applied Cognitive Psychology and is currently on the Editorial Boards of the Journal of Applied Psychology and Legal and Criminological Psychology.
In eyewitness identification,in criminal law,evidence is received from a witness "who has actually seen an event and can so testify in court".
Eyewitness testimony is the account a bystander or victim gives in the courtroom,describing what that person observed that occurred during the specific incident under investigation. Ideally this recollection of events is detailed;however,this is not always the case. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness' point of view. Memory recall has been considered a credible source in the past,but has recently come under attack as forensics can now support psychologists in their claim that memories and individual perceptions can be unreliable,manipulated,and biased. As a result of this,many countries,and states within the United States,are now attempting to make changes in how eyewitness testimony is presented in court. Eyewitness testimony is a specialized focus within cognitive psychology.
Forensic developmental psychology is a field of psychology that focuses on "children's actions and reactions in a forensic context" and "children's reports that they were victims or witnesses of a crime". Bruck and Poole (2002) first coined the term "forensic developmental psychology". Although forensic developmental psychology specifically focuses on a child's reliability,credibility,and competency in the courtroom setting,it also includes topics such as autobiographical memory,memory distortion,eyewitness identification,narrative construction,personality,and attachment.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts,557 U.S. 305 (2009),is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the person who performed the test. While the court ruled that the then-common practice of submitting these reports without testimony was unconstitutional,it also held that so called "notice-and-demand" statutes are constitutional. A state would not violate the Constitution through a "notice-and-demand" statute by both putting the defendant on notice that the prosecution would submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the scientist and also giving the defendant sufficient time to raise an objection.
Perry v. New Hampshire,565 U.S. 228 (2012),is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of eyewitness identifications.
Eyewitness memory is a person's episodic memory for a crime or other dramatic event that he or she has witnessed. Eyewitness testimony is often relied upon in the judicial system. It can also refer to an individual's memory for a face,where they are required to remember the face of their perpetrator,for example. However,the accuracy of eyewitness memories is sometimes questioned because there are many factors that can act during encoding and retrieval of the witnessed event which may adversely affect the creation and maintenance of the memory for the event. Experts have found evidence to suggest that eyewitness memory is fallible.
Gary L. Wells is an American psychologist and an internationally recognized pioneer and scholar in eyewitness memory research. Wells is a professor at Iowa State University with a research interest in the integration of both cognitive psychology and social psychology and its interface with law. He has extensive research on lineup procedures and the reliability and accuracy of eyewitness identification,and has been widely acknowledged in both the field of psychology and the criminal justice system. Wells has received many awards and honorary degrees and been widely recognized for his work and contributions to psychology and the implications his research has made to the legal system.
An eyewitness testimony is a statement given under oath by a person present at an event who can describe what happened. During circumstances in which a child is a witness to the event,the child can be used to deliver a testimony on the stand. The credibility of a child,however,is often questioned due to their underdeveloped memory capacity and overall brain physiology. Researchers found that eyewitness memory requires high-order memory capacity even for well-developed adult brain. Because a child's brain is not yet fully developed,each child witness must be assessed by the proper authorities to determine their reliability as a witness and whether or not they are mature enough to accurately recall the event,provide important details and withstand leading questions.
Simona Ghetti is Professor of Psychology at the University of California,Davis,where she is affiliated with the University of California Davis Center for Mind and Brain. She is known for her research on the development of episodic memory,reconstructive memory,and metamemory in youth,with a specific focus on individuals who have had traumatic experiences.
Karen Jill Saywitz was an American psychologist,author,and educator. She worked as a developmental and clinical psychologist and professor at the UCLA School of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry and Development. For more than 20 years Saywitz taught child development and was director of several mental health programs for families. She also developed "non-leading" techniques for interviewing child witnesses and victims,based on cognitive and developmental psychology principles. She died of cancer in 2018.
Jodi Anne Quas is an applied developmental psychologist who is known for her work on how maltreatment and abuse affect memory development and children's ability to give eyewitness testimony after experiencing trauma. She holds the position of Professor of Psychological Science and Nursing Science at the University of California,Irvine School of Social Ecology.