Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag

Last updated

Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag
Court CJEU
Decided16 June 2015
Citation(s)(2015) C-62/14
Keywords
Monetary policy, Outright Monetary Transactions

Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag (2015) C-62/14 is an EU law case relevant for banking law which approved outright monetary transactions that were needed to save the Eurozone from financial turmoil.

Contents

Facts

On January 14 2014, the German Federal Constitutional Court (German: Bundesverfassungsgericht; GFCC) made its first preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice. The reference pointedly challenged the Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT) program, an initiative by the European Central Bank (ECB) to bolster economic stability by purchasing Eurozone government bonds on secondary markets. [1]  

Although the OMT had not been implemented to date, its technical features were announced via press release on September 6 2012. [2] The ECB said it would buy bonds on the secondary markets issued by states if (1) the state became subject to the European Financial Stability Facility assistance programme and the European Stability Mechanism (2) transactions focused on the shorter part of the yield curve (3) no quantitative limits were set in advance (4) the ECB got the same treatment as private creditors (5) the ECB undertook that liquidity created would be fully sterilised.

Following a challenge raised by conservative German politician Peter Gauweiler, the GFCC objected to the OMT on two grounds. [1] Firstly, it indicated that the OMT likely violated Articles 199 and 127 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as well as Articles 17 to 24 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks, by exceeding the ECB’s monetary policy mandate and interfering with economic policy. Secondly, the GFCC inquired whether the OMT violated TFEU Article 123, which prohibited monetary financing for member states.

Because German Basic Law (German: Grundgesetz) enshrines the unamendable principle of democracy, Germany cannot constitutionally comply with any EU program that is not democratically legitimized by strict adherence to the limits of its treaties. [2] Consequently, the GFCC would be compelled to unilaterally declare the OMT ultra vires if its objections were not addressed.

AG Cruz Villalon gave an opinion in favour of the EU policy. [3]

Judgment

The Grand Chamber of the CJEU held that the European Central Bank could adopt a programme to buy government bonds on the secondary markets under TFEU articles 119, 123, 127 and articles 17 to 24 of Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank. The outright monetary transaction programme was monetary policy, and measures taken were proportionate to the objectives without contravening TFEU art 123.

102 It follows that, as the Advocate General has observed in point 227 of his Opinion, when the ECB purchases government bonds on secondary markets, sufficient safeguards must be built into its intervention to ensure that the latter does not fall foul of the prohibition of monetary financing in Article 123(1) TFEU.

103 As regards a programme such as that announced in the press release, it must in the first place be stated that, in the framework of such a programme, the ESCB is entitled to purchase government bonds — not directly, from public authorities or bodies of the Member States — but only indirectly, on secondary markets. Intervention by the ESCB of the kind provided for by a programme such as that at issue in the main proceedings thus cannot be treated as equivalent to a measure granting financial assistance to a Member State.

104 That said, the point should be made, in the second place, that the ESCB’s intervention could, in practice, have an effect equivalent to that of a direct purchase of government bonds from public authorities and bodies of the Member States if the potential purchasers of government bonds on the primary market knew for certain that the ESCB was going to purchase those bonds within a certain period and under conditions allowing those market operators to act, de facto, as intermediaries for the ESCB for the direct purchase of those bonds from the public authorities and bodies of the Member State concerned.

105 However, the explanations provided by the ECB in these proceedings have made clear that the implementation of a programme such as that announced in the press release must be subject to conditions intended to ensure that the ESCB’s intervention on secondary markets does not have an effect equivalent to that of a direct purchase of government bonds on the primary market.

Aftermath

Following the ECJ’s opinion, contemporary commentators worried that the German Constitutional Court would challenge its primacy. [2] Nevertheless, the GFCC accepted the ECJ’s verdict, acknowledging that the Court of Justice conducted the requisite proportionality analysis and “set binding limits for any implementation of the OMT programme.” [4] Although the ECJ had not explicitly specified any legally binding limiting conditions, the GFCC extrapolated several criteria that the OMT would be required to observe in order to retain legitimacy:

The GFCC’s deference ceased in 2020 however with the Weiss and others case. This case saw a similar Basic Law challenge mounted against the ECB’s Public Sector Asset Purchase Program, which coordinated purchases of member states’ debt securities on secondary markets. [5] The GFCC found the ECJ’s response to its preliminary reference inadequate, arguing that it failed to consider “the importance and scope of the principle of proportionality,” which had justified restraint in Gauweiler. [6] The GFCC further asserted that the ECJ did not consider the “actual effects” of the PSPP on economic policy, nor did it adequately enforce the aforementioned standards.

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 Outright Monetary Transactions case (14 January 2014) BVerfG, 2 BvR 2728/13
  2. 1 2 3 Tridimas, Takis; Xanthoulis, Napoleon (2016). "A Legal Analysis of the Gauweiler Case: Between Monetary Policy and Constitutional Conflict". Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 23 (1): 20–21, 37. doi:10.1177/1023263X1602300102. ISSN   1023-263X.
  3. ↑ Opinion
  4. ↑ "Constitutional complaints and Organstreit proceedings against the OMT programme of the European Central Bank unsuccessful". Bundesverfassungsgericht. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  5. ↑ Decision (EU) 2015/774 of the European Central Bank of 4 March 2015 on a secondary markets public sector asset purchase programme (ECB/2015/10), 4 March 2015, retrieved 15 May 2024
  6. ↑ "ECB decisions on the Public Sector Purchase Programme exceed EU competences". Bundesverfassungsgericht. Retrieved 15 May 2024.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Central Bank</span> Supranational central bank in Europe

The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central component of the Eurosystem and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) as well as one of seven institutions of the European Union. It is one of the world's most important central banks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Court of Justice</span> Supreme court in the European Union, part of the Court of Justice of the European Union

The European Court of Justice (ECJ), formally just the Court of Justice, is the supreme court of the European Union in matters of European Union law. As a part of the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is tasked with interpreting EU law and ensuring its uniform application across all EU member states under Article 263 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deutsche Bundesbank</span> Central bank of Germany

The Deutsche Bundesbank is the German member of the Eurosystem and has been the monetary authority for Germany from 1957 to 1998, issuing the Deutsche Mark (DM). It succeeded the Bank deutscher Länder, which had introduced the DM on 20 June 1948.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European System of Central Banks</span> EU executive body

The European System of Central Banks (ESCB) is an institution that comprises the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks (NCBs) of all 27 member states of the European Union (EU). Its objective is to ensure price stability throughout the EU, and improve monetary and financial cooperation between eurozone and non-eurozone member states of the EU.

In macroeconomics, an open market operation (OMO) is an activity by a central bank to exchange liquidity in its currency with a bank or a group of banks. The central bank can either transact government bonds and other financial assets in the open market or enter into a repo or secured lending transaction with a commercial bank. The latter option, often preferred by central banks, involves them making fixed period deposits at commercial banks with the security of eligible assets as collateral.

Debt monetization or monetary financing is the practice of a government borrowing money from the central bank to finance public spending instead of selling bonds to private investors or raising taxes. The central banks who buy government debt, are essentially creating new money in the process to do so. This practice is often informally and pejoratively called printing money or money creation. It is prohibited in many countries, because it is considered dangerous due to the risk of creating runaway inflation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eurosystem</span> Monetary authority of the eurozone

The Eurosystem is the monetary authority of the eurozone, the collective of European Union member states that have adopted the euro as their sole official currency. The European Central Bank (ECB) has, under Article 16 of its Statute, the exclusive right to authorise the issuance of euro banknotes. Member states can issue euro coins, but the amount must be authorised by the ECB beforehand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantitative easing</span> Monetary policy tool

Quantitative easing (QE) is a monetary policy action where a central bank purchases predetermined amounts of government bonds or other financial assets in order to stimulate economic activity. Quantitative easing is a novel form of monetary policy that came into wide application after the financial crisis of 2007‍–‍2008. It is used to mitigate an economic recession when inflation is very low or negative, making standard monetary policy ineffective. Quantitative tightening (QT) does the opposite, where for monetary policy reasons, a central bank sells off some portion of its holdings of government bonds or other financial assets.

United Kingdom banking law refers to banking law in the United Kingdom, to control the activities of banks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European debt crisis</span> Multi-year debt crisis in multiple EU countries since late 2009

The European debt crisis, often also referred to as the eurozone crisis or the European sovereign debt crisis, was a multi-year debt crisis that took place in the European Union (EU) from 2009 until the mid to late 2010s. Several eurozone member states were unable to repay or refinance their government debt or to bail out over-indebted banks under their national supervision without the assistance of third parties like other eurozone countries, the European Central Bank (ECB), or the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Stability Mechanism</span> Intergovernmental financial organization

The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) is an intergovernmental organization located in Luxembourg City, which operates under public international law for all eurozone member states having ratified a special ESM intergovernmental treaty. It was established on 27 September 2012 as a permanent firewall for the eurozone, to safeguard and provide instant access to financial assistance programmes for member states of the eurozone in financial difficulty, with a maximum lending capacity of €500 billion. It has replaced two earlier temporary EU funding programmes: the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benoît Cœuré</span> French economist

Benoît Georges Cœuré is a French economist who has been serving as President of the Autorité de la concurence since 2022. He previously served as a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank from 2012 to 2019.

Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT) is a program of the European Central Bank under which the bank makes purchases in secondary, sovereign bond markets, under certain conditions, of bonds issued by Eurozone member-states. The program was presented by its supporters as a principal manifestation of Mario Draghi's commitment to do "whatever it takes" to preserve the euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Policy reactions to the eurozone crisis</span> Political response to an economic event

The eurozone crisis is an ongoing financial crisis that has made it difficult or impossible for some countries in the euro area to repay or re-finance their government debt without the assistance of third parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sabine Lautenschläger</span> German jurist

Sabine Lautenschläger is a German jurist who served as a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank from 2014 to 2019. She previously served as vice-president of the Deutsche Bundesbank from 2011 to 2013.

The Troika is a term used to refer to the single decision group created by three entities, the European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It was formed due to the European debt crisis as an ad hoc authority with a mandate to manage the bailouts of Cyprus, Greece, Ireland and Portugal, in the aftermath of their prospective insolvency caused by the world financial crisis of 2007–2008.

Re Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft BVerfGE 73, 339, is a German constitutional law and EU law case, popularly known as Solange II, concerning the conflict of law between the German national legal system and European Union law.

Outright Monetary Transactions case (2014) BVerfGE 134, 366 is an EU law case, concerning preliminary references to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

In 2009–2010, due to substantial public and private sector debt, and "the intimate sovereign-bank linkages" the eurozone crisis impacted periphery countries. This resulted in significant financial sector instability in Europe; banks' solvency risks grew, which had direct implications for their funding liquidity. The European central bank (ECB), as the monetary union's central bank, responded to the sovereign debt crisis with a series of conventional and unconventional measures, including a decrease in the key policy interest rate, and three-year long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) liquidity injections in December 2011 and February 2012, and the announcement of the outright monetary transactions (OMT) program in the summer of 2012. The ECB acted as a de facto lender-of-last-resort (LOLR) to the euro area banking system, providing banks with cash flow in exchange for collateral, as well as a buyer of last resort (BOLR), purchasing eurozone sovereign bonds. However, the ECB's policies have been criticised for their economic repercussions as well as its political agenda. 

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.