Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis

Last updated

"Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis" is an article by Joan Wallach Scott first published in the American Historical Review (AHR) in 1986. It is one of the most cited papers in the history of the AHR and was reprinted as part of Scott's 1989 book Gender and the Politics of History. [1] In 2008, the AHR focused its December issue on the paper, featuring six articles on the paper, including one by Scott herself. [1] At that time, "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis" was the most-visited AHR article on JSTOR, having been accessed more than 38,000 times since 1997 – more than 16,000 more views than the next most popular of that journal's articles. [2]

Contents

Argument

The paper begins by discussing three existing theoretical approaches to gender. [3] Scott then provides her own definition of gender in two parts: gender is based on the perceived differences between the sexes, but is also a way of signifying power differentials. [4] This second part of the definition is, according to William Sewell, "important and contentious", making a claim for the importance of gender in all areas of history. [3] The paper argues that the field of gender history should focus on social and political construction of gender. [5] It is, according to Dyan Elliott, a manifesto for the use of gender as a way of looking at the history of "male institutions". [6] The paper was influenced by the French philosophers Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault, [2] and Scott was influenced by the linguistic turn in history. [3]

Reception

Many of the initial reactions to Scott's paper were highly negative. She has said that when she first presented it at a seminar in 1985, the audience "were, to a man, appalled". [7] An early critic, Joan Hoff, accused Scott's paper of "nihilism, presentism, ahistoricism, obfuscation, elitism, obeisance to patriarchy, ethnocentrism, irrelevance, and possibly racism". [2] Other critics were more positive. Linda Kerber called the paper "dazzling", [8] while William Sewell called it an "instant classic". [5]

Legacy

Scott's 1986 paper had a significant longer-term impact. It was reprinted in 1988 as part of Gender and the Politics of History, a collection of Scott's essays on gender history, which was reissued in 1999 in a revised edition. Scott herself has published two papers responding to it: "Unanswered Questions" in 2008 and "Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis?" in 2010. It has been translated into several other languages, and Lola Sanchez called the Spanish translation of the paper "one of the most important texts of the past twenty-five years" for feminist scholars in Spain. [9]

In 2008, Joanne Meyerowitz wrote that it had "no discernible date of expiration". [10] By that time, it was required reading for "dozens of syllabi". [10] It was described as "canonical" by the American Historical Review [11] and was the journal's most-accessed article on JSTOR. [10] Meyerowitz credits the paper with a "significant part in the broader shift from social to cultural history". [12]

Related Research Articles

Clarence Crane Brinton was an American historian of France, as well as a historian of ideas. His most famous work, The Anatomy of Revolution (1938) likened the dynamics of revolutionary movements to the progress of fever.

<i>Signs</i> (journal) Feminist academic journal

Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society is a peer-reviewed feminist academic journal. It was established in 1975 by Jean W. Sacks, Head of the Journals Division, with Catharine R. Stimpson as its first editor in Chief, and is published quarterly by the University of Chicago Press. Signs publishes essays examining the lives of women, men, and non-binary people around the globe from both historical and contemporary perspectives, as well as theoretical and critical articles addressing processes of gendering, sexualization, and racialization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A. O. Scott</span> American journalist and film critic

Anthony Oliver Scott is an American journalist and cultural critic, known for his film and literary criticism. After starting his career at The New York Review of Books, Variety, and Slate, he began writing film reviews for The New York Times in 2000, and became the paper's chief film critic in 2004, a title he shared with Manohla Dargis. In 2023, he moved to The New York Times Book Review.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joan Wallach Scott</span> American historian (born 1941)

Joan Wallach Scott is an American historian of France with contributions in gender history. She is a professor emerita in the School of Social Science in the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Scott is known for her work in feminist history and gender theory, engaging post-structural theory on these topics. Geographically, her work focuses primarily on France, and thematically she deals with how power works, the relation between language and experience, and the role and practice of historians. Her work grapples with theory's application to historical and current events, focusing on how terms are defined and how positions and identities are articulated.

Gender history is a sub-field of history and gender studies, which looks at the past from the perspective of gender. It is in many ways, an outgrowth of women's history. The discipline considers in what ways historical events and periodization impact women differently from men. For instance, in an influential article in 1977, "Did Women have a Renaissance?", Joan Kelly questioned whether the notion of a Renaissance was relevant to women. Gender historians are also interested in how gender difference has been perceived and configured at different times and places, usually with the assumption that such differences are socially constructed. These social constructions of gender throughout time are also represented as changes in the expected norms of behavior for those labeled male or female. Those who study gender history note these changes in norms and those performing them over time and interpret what those changes say about the larger social/cultural/political climate.

Barbara Weinstein is a professor of Latin American and Caribbean history at New York University. Her research interests include race, gender, labor, and political economy, especially in relation to the making of modern Brazil.

Joanne Meyerowitz is an American historian and author. She was a professor at Indiana University and the University of Cincinnati before becoming editor of the Journal of American History from 1999 to 2004. Following her tenure there, she accepted a position at Yale University, where she was subsequently appointed the Arthur Unobskey Professor of History. Her work has appeared in the American Historical Review, Gender & History, the Journal of Women's History, and the Bulletin of the History of Medicine.

<i>Lost People</i> 2007 book by David Graeber

Lost People: Magic and the Legacy of Slavery in Madagascar is a 2007 book-length ethnographic study of Betafo, Madagascar written by anthropologist David Graeber and published by the Indiana University Press.

Judith Weisenfeld is an American scholar of religion. She is Agate Brown and George L. Collord Professor of Religion at Princeton University, where she is also the Chair of the Department of Religion. Her research primarily focuses on African-American religion in the first half of the 20th century. In 2019, Weisenfeld was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Elizabeth Castelli is an author and Professor of Religion at Barnard College. She specializes in biblical studies, late ancient Christianity, feminist studies in religion along with theory and method in the study of religion, with a particular focus on the after-effects of biblical and early Christian texts, including the citation of the Bible and ancient Christian sources in debates concerning cultural and political expression.

Fedwa Malti-Douglas is a Lebanese-American professor and writer. She is a professor emeritus at Indiana University Bloomington. Malti-Douglas has written several books, including The Star Report Disrobed (2000). She received a National Humanities Medal in 2015.

Elizabeth Dore (1946-2022) was a professor of Latin American Studies, specialising in class, race, gender and ethnicity, with a focus on modern history. She was professor emerita of Modern Languages and Linguistics at the University of Southampton, and had a PhD from Columbia University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nehemia Levtzion</span> Israeli historian (1935–2003)

Nehemia Levtzion was an Israeli scholar of African history, Near East, Islamic, and African studies, and the President of the Open University of Israel from 1987 to 1992 and the Executive Director of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute from 1994 to 1997.

<i>Beer and Revolution</i> 2007 book by Tom Goyens

Beer and Revolution: The German Anarchist Movement in New York City, 1880–1914 is a 2007 history book by Tom Goyens following the lives of German immigrant radicals in New York City.

Fatma Müge Göçek is a Turkish sociologist and professor at the University of Michigan. She wrote the book Denial of Violence in 2015 concerning the prosectution of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey, for which she received the Mary Douglas award for best book from the American Sociological Association. In 2017, she won a Distinguished Faculty Achievement Award from the university.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dror Ze'evi</span> Israeli historian

Dror Ze'evi is an Israeli historian who studies political, social and cultural history of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey and the Levant.

Elizabeth Weed is an American feminist scholar, editor and university administrator. She is the cofounder and, from 2000 to 2010, director of the Pembroke Center for Teaching and Research on Women, as well as the feminist studies journal differences, cofounded in 1989 with Naomi Schor.

<i>Vorpahavak</i> Armenian genocide phrase

Following the Armenian genocide, vorpahavak was the organized effort to rescue "hidden" Armenian women and children who had survived the genocide by being abducted and adopted into Muslim families and forcibly converted to Islam.

The Traffic in Women: Notes on the "Political Economy" of Sex is an article regarding theories of the oppression of women originally published in 1975 by feminist anthropologist Gayle Rubin. In the article, Rubin argued against the Marxist conceptions of women's oppression—specifically the concept of "patriarchy"—in favor of her own concept of the "sex/gender" system. It was by arguing that women's oppression could not be explained by capitalism alone as well as being an early article to stress the distinction between biological sex and gender that Rubin's work helped to develop women's and gender studies as independent fields. The framework of the article was also important in that it opened up the possibility of researching the change in meaning of this categories over historical time. Rubin used a combination of kinship theories from Lévi-Strauss, psycho-analytic theory from Freud, and critiques of structuralism by Lacan to make her case that it was at moments where women were exchanged that bodies were engendered and became women. Rubin's article has been republished numerous times since its debut in 1975, and it has remained a key piece of feminist anthropological theory and a foundational work in gender studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tamara Loos</span> American historian

Tamara Loos is an American historian and gender studies scholar at Cornell University.

References

  1. 1 2 Schneider 2008
  2. 1 2 3 Meyerowitz 2008 , p. 1347
  3. 1 2 3 Sewell 1990 , p. 75
  4. ↑ Scott 1986 , p. 1067
  5. 1 2 Sewell 1990 , p. 71
  6. ↑ Elliott 2008 , p. 1392
  7. ↑ Scott 2008 , p. 1422
  8. ↑ Kerber 1991 , p. 91
  9. ↑ Sanchez 2014 , p. 571
  10. 1 2 3 Meyerowitz 2008 , p. 1346
  11. ↑ American Historical Review 2008 , p. 1344
  12. ↑ Meyerowitz 2008 , p. 1353

Bibliography

  • American Historical Review (2008). "Introduction to Revisiting 'Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis' ". The American Historical Review. 113 (5): 1344–1345. doi: 10.1086/ahr.113.5.1344 .
  • Elliott, Dyan (2008). "The Three Ages of Joan Scott". The American Historical Review. 113 (5): 1390–1403. doi: 10.1086/ahr.113.5.1390 .
  • Kerber, Linda K. (1991). "Review, Joan Wallach Scott Gender and the Politics of History". International Labor and Working-Class History. 39.
  • Meyerowitz, Joanne (2008). "A History of "Gender"". The American Historical Review. 113 (5): 1346–1356. doi: 10.1086/ahr.113.5.1346 .
  • Schneider, Robert A. (December 2008). "What's in the December AHR?". Perspectives on History. American Historical Review.
  • Sanchez, Lola (2014). "Translations that Matter: About a Foundational Text of Feminist Studies in Spain". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 39 (3): 570–576. doi:10.1086/674181. S2CID   146577756.
  • Scott, Joan Wallach (1986). "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis". The American Historical Review. 91 (5): 1053–1075. doi:10.2307/1864376. JSTOR   1864376.
  • Scott, Joan Wallach (2008). "Unanswered Questions". The American Historical Review. 113 (5): 1422–1430. doi: 10.1086/ahr.113.5.1422 .
  • Sewell, William H. (1990). "Review, Joan Wallach Scott Gender and the Politics of History". History and Theory. 29 (1). doi:10.2307/2505204. JSTOR   2505204.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.