Gennaro Auletta

Last updated

Gennaro Auletta (born August 19, 1957 in Naples, Italy) is an Italian philosopher of science actively involved in scientific research. He is an internationally acknowledged expert in quantum mechanics and in the foundation and interpretation of this discipline. His main interests in quantum information led him to focus his further research on the way in which biological and cognitive systems deal with information. He is also active in the field of the dialogue between science, philosophy and theology, and has been the Vice-Director of the international conference on Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories, held at the Pontifical Gregorian University on March 2009.

Contents

Academics

Auletta graduated from the Sapienza University of Rome where he took his PhD and completed his post-doctoral research work. He is an Aggregate Professor at the Pontifical Gregorian University where, from 2003 to 2012, held the position of Scientific Director of the Specialization in Science and Philosophy. He is also Associated Professor at the University of Cassino (Italy). From 2003 to 2010, Auletta has been the Scientific Coordinator of the STOQ Project (“Science, Theology and the Ontological Quest”, a project under the patronage of the Pontifical Council for Culture involving seven Roman Pontifical Universities and supported by the John Templeton Foundation).

Since 2009, Auletta is a Fellow of the Linnean Society of London and of the International Society for Science and Religion.

Research interests and projects

One of the main results of Auletta’s original research on the foundations and interpretation of quantum mechanics is the publication (together with Giorgio Parisi and Mauro Fortunato) of a handbook of Quantum Mechanics, [1] (Cambridge University Press, 2009). Auletta has stressed that there are three basic forms of dealing with information: processing, sharing, selecting. This pathway of research eventually led him to consider quantum information as a fruitful approach for studying the way in which biological and cognitive systems deal with information at all scales. He has now published a book on Cognitive Biology, [2] (Oxford University Press, 2011), in which an attempt is made to show the consistence of such an approach with the recent impressive achievements in life sciences, within the perspective of a thorough reflection on the current paradigm dominating biological disciplines. In particular, Auletta is interested in the relevance of notions like information control, functional equivalence class, formal constraints and top-down causation as to the organisms’ capability of dealing with a challenging environment at the ontogenetic and epigenetic levels, eventually leading to the emergence of new biological functionalities at the phylogenetic level. Top-down causation mechanisms via information control may be considered as the way in which initial and random perturbations disturbing the homeostasis of an organism are subsequently framed in the organism’s network of formal constraints thus giving raise to a process of fine-tuning that ends up in an eventual stable form able to realize a new adaptive fit with certain environmental conditions and challenges. Such process of top-down fine-tuning bridging between randomicity and fitness may be at the basis of the emergence of new functionalities at the phylogenetic scale. Top-down causation via information control may also be enquired in developmental and epigenetic processes (as well as in regeneration processes) when the organism is forced to deal with unpredicted, uncontrollable and in principle noxious environmental stimuli. Finally, information control may be assumed to play a fundamental role also in the ontogenetic action of the organism on the environment (e.g. from chemotaxis up to niche construction as well as to planned actions). Accordingly, his efforts are aimed at both developing a theoretical framework and designing possible experiments and research projects based on the latter standpoints. Recently, he has published a book on the mechanization of inferences, Mechanical Logic in Three-Dimensional Space, (Pan Stanford Pub., Singapore, 2013). [3] Here a reduction of logic to combinatorics is provided. In particular, a logical 3D space is built as a substrate of the logical algebra. Arithmetic operations on propositions allow a new logical calculus.

Research projects leadership

  • (Ongoing) Experiment on Planarians Regeneration in Space (this project has been recently selected by the European Space Agency for its implementation on the International Space Station and sees the collaboration of Emili Salò's group at the Genetic Department of the University of Barcelona).
  • (2007-2011) The Reality of Top-down Causation (funded by the CTNS of Berkeley and with the participation, among others, of George Ellis).

Publications

Selected books

  1. G. Auletta, "Boolean Structures: Combinatorics, Codification, Representation", World Scientific, Singapore, 2021; ISBN   978-1-80061-009-5
  2. G. Auletta, "The Quantum Mechanics Conundrum: Interpretation and Foundations", Springer, Switzerland,2019; ISBN   978-3-030-16648-9
  3. G. Auletta, S.-Y. Wang "Quantum Mechanics for Thinkers",Pan Stanford Pub., Singapore, 2014; ISBN   9789814411714
  4. G. Auletta, "Mechanical Logic in Three-Dimensional Space", Pan Stanford Pub., Singapore, 2013; ISBN   9789814411509.
  5. G. Auletta (Ed. with I. Colagè and M. Jeannerod), "Brains Top-Down: Is Top-down Causation Challenging Neuroscience?", Singapore, World Scientific, 2013; ISBN   9789814412452.
  6. G. Auletta (in collaboration with I. Colagè, P. D’Ambrosio, and L. Torcal), "Integrated Cognitive Strategies in a Changing World", Rome, G&B Press, 2011; ISBN   9788878392076.
  7. G. Auletta, Cognitive Biology: Dealing with Information From Bacteria to Minds, Oxford University Press 2011; ISBN   9780199608485.
  8. G. Auletta, M. Leclerc, R. A. Martinez (eds.), Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories. A Critical Appraisal 150 years After «The Origin of Species», G&B press 2011; ISBN   9788878391802.
  9. G. Auletta, M. Fortunato, G. Parisi, Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press 2009; ISBN   9780521869638.
  10. G. Auletta, Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific 2001; ISBN   9810240392.

Selected papers

  1. G. Auletta, N. de Sousa, M. Caporicci, J. Vandersteen, J.I. Rojo--Laguna, E. Saló, T. Adell, T., J.J.W.A. van Loon, “Molecular Impact of Launch Related Dynamic Vibrations and Static Hypergravity in Planarians” ["npj Microgravity"] 6 (2020), Art. 25; doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-00115-7.
  2. G. Auletta, N. de Sousa, G. Rodriguez-Esteban, I. Colagè, P. D’Ambrosio, J.J.W.A. van Loon, E. Saló, T. Adell, “Transcriptomic Analysis of Planarians under Simulated Microgravity or 8 g Demonstrates That Alteration of Gravity Induces Genomic and Cellular Alterations That Could Facilitate Tumoral Transformation” "International Journal of Molecular Science" 20 (2019), 720; doi:10.3390/ijms20030720.
  3. G. Auletta, L. Rondoni, A. Vulpiani, “On the Relevance of the Maximum Entropy Principle in Non–Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics”, ["European Physical Journal: Special Topics"] 2017, 1– 17; doi:10.1140/epjst/e2017-70064-x.
  4. G. Auletta, “Networks and Causation Top-Down”, ["Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia"] 72 (2016), 171-80; doi:10.17990/RPF/2016_72_1_0171.
  5. G. Auletta, K. Friston, B. Sengupta, “Cognitive Dynamics: From Attractors to Active Inference”, "Proceedings of the IEEE" 102 (2014), 427-45; doi:10.1109/JPROC.2014.2306251.
  6. G. Auletta, «Information and Metabolism in Bacterial Chemotaxis», "Entropy" 15 (2013), 311-26; doi:10.3390/e15010311.
  7. G. Auletta, «A Paradigm Shift in Biology?», Information 1 (2010), 28-59.
  8. G. Auletta and W. Stoeger, «Highlights of the Pontifical Gregorian University’s International Conference on Biological Evolution», Theology and Science 8 (2010): 7-15.
  9. G. Auletta, G. Ellis, L. Jaeger, «Top-Down Causation by Information Control: From a Philosophical Problem to a Scientific Research Program», Journal of the Royal Society: Interface 5 (2008): 1159-72.
  10. G. Auletta, «Information, Semiotics, and Symbolic Systems», Semiotica 166 (2007): 359-76.
  11. G. Auletta, «Quantum Information as a General Paradigm», Foundations of Physics 35 (2005): 787-815.
  12. G. Auletta and G. Tarozzi, «Wavelike Correlations versus Path Detection: Another Form of Complementarity», Foundations of Physics Letters 17 (2004): 889-95.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reductionism</span> Philosophical view explaining systems in terms of smaller parts

Reductionism is any of several related philosophical ideas regarding the associations between phenomena which can be described in terms of other simpler or more fundamental phenomena. It is also described as an intellectual and philosophical position that interprets a complex system as the sum of its parts.

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to explain how the mathematical theory of quantum mechanics might correspond to experienced reality. Quantum mechanics has held up to rigorous and extremely precise tests in an extraordinarily broad range of experiments. However, there exist a number of contending schools of thought over their interpretation. These views on interpretation differ on such fundamental questions as whether quantum mechanics is deterministic or stochastic, local or non-local, which elements of quantum mechanics can be considered real, and what the nature of measurement is, among other matters.

Quantum optics is a branch of atomic, molecular, and optical physics dealing with how individual quanta of light, known as photons, interact with atoms and molecules. It includes the study of the particle-like properties of photons. Photons have been used to test many of the counter-intuitive predictions of quantum mechanics, such as entanglement and teleportation, and are a useful resource for quantum information processing.

In the mathematical study of logic and the physical analysis of quantum foundations, quantum logic is a set of rules for manip­ulation of propositions inspired by the structure of quantum theory. The formal system takes as its starting point an obs­ervation of Garrett Birkhoff and John von Neumann, that the structure of experimental tests in classical mechanics forms a Boolean algebra, but the structure of experimental tests in quantum mechanics forms a much more complicated structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emergentism</span> Philosophical belief in emergence

Emergentism is the belief in emergence, particularly as it involves consciousness and the philosophy of mind. A property of a system is said to be emergent if it is a new outcome of some other properties of the system and their interaction, while it is itself different from them. Within the philosophy of science, emergentism is analyzed both as it contrasts with and parallels reductionism. This philosophical theory suggests that higher-level properties and phenomena arise from the interactions and organization of lower-level entities yet are not reducible to these simpler components. It emphasizes the idea that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. Historically, emergentism has significantly influenced various scientific and philosophical ideas, highlighting the complexity and interconnectedness of natural systems.

The Lakatos Award is given annually for an outstanding contribution to the philosophy of science, widely interpreted. The contribution must be in the form of a monograph, co-authored or single-authored, and published in English during the previous six years. The award is in memory of the influential Hungarian philosopher of science and mathematics Imre Lakatos, whose tenure as Professor of Logic at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) was cut short by his early and unexpected death. While administered by an international management committee organised from the LSE, it is independent of the LSE Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method, with many of the committee's members being academics from other institutions. The value of the award, which has been endowed by the Latsis Foundation, is £10,000, and to take it up a successful candidate must visit the LSE and deliver a public lecture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michał Heller</span> Polish philosopher, cosmologist, Roman Catholic presbyter, awarded Templeton Prize

Michał Kazimierz Heller is a Polish philosopher, theoretical physicist, cosmologist, theologian, and Roman Catholic priest. He is a professor of philosophy at the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Kraków, Poland, and an adjunct member of the Vatican Observatory staff.

Niall Shanks was an English philosopher and critic of intelligent design.

Retrocausality, or backwards causation, is a concept of cause and effect in which an effect precedes its cause in time and so a later event affects an earlier one. In quantum physics, the distinction between cause and effect is not made at the most fundamental level and so time-symmetric systems can be viewed as causal or retrocausal. Philosophical considerations of time travel often address the same issues as retrocausality, as do treatments of the subject in fiction, but the two phenomena are distinct.

Daniel Kolak is a Croatian-American philosopher who works primarily in philosophy of mind, personal identity, cognitive science, philosophy of science, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of logic, philosophy of religion, and aesthetics. He is professor of philosophy at the William Paterson University of New Jersey and an Affiliate of the Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science (RuCCS). Kolak is the founder of the philosophical therapy known as cognitive dynamics.

The branches of science, also referred to as sciences, scientific fields or scientific disciplines, are commonly divided into three major groups:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeremy Butterfield</span> British philosopher (born 1954)

Jeremy Nicholas Butterfield FBA is a philosopher at the University of Cambridge, noted particularly for his work on philosophical aspects of quantum theory, relativity theory and classical mechanics.

An index list of articles about the philosophy of science.

Natural computing, also called natural computation, is a terminology introduced to encompass three classes of methods: 1) those that take inspiration from nature for the development of novel problem-solving techniques; 2) those that are based on the use of computers to synthesize natural phenomena; and 3) those that employ natural materials to compute. The main fields of research that compose these three branches are artificial neural networks, evolutionary algorithms, swarm intelligence, artificial immune systems, fractal geometry, artificial life, DNA computing, and quantum computing, among others.

Quantum cognition uses the mathematical formalism of quantum probability theory to model psychology phenomena when classical probability theory fails. The field focuses on modeling phenomena in cognitive science that have resisted traditional techniques or where traditional models seem to have reached a barrier, and modeling preferences in decision theory that seem paradoxical from a traditional rational point of view. Since the use of a quantum-theoretic framework is for modeling purposes, the identification of quantum structures in cognitive phenomena does not presuppose the existence of microscopic quantum processes in the human brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial life</span> Field of study

Artificial life is a field of study wherein researchers examine systems related to natural life, its processes, and its evolution, through the use of simulations with computer models, robotics, and biochemistry. The discipline was named by Christopher Langton, an American theoretical biologist, in 1986. In 1987, Langton organized the first conference on the field, in Los Alamos, New Mexico. There are three main kinds of alife, named for their approaches: soft, from software; hard, from hardware; and wet, from biochemistry. Artificial life researchers study traditional biology by trying to recreate aspects of biological phenomena.

Cognitive biology is an emerging science that regards natural cognition as a biological function. It is based on the theoretical assumption that every organism—whether a single cell or multicellular—is continually engaged in systematic acts of cognition coupled with intentional behaviors, i.e., a sensory-motor coupling. That is to say, if an organism can sense stimuli in its environment and respond accordingly, it is cognitive. Any explanation of how natural cognition may manifest in an organism is constrained by the biological conditions in which its genes survive from one generation to the next. And since by Darwinian theory the species of every organism is evolving from a common root, three further elements of cognitive biology are required: (i) the study of cognition in one species of organism is useful, through contrast and comparison, to the study of another species' cognitive abilities; (ii) it is useful to proceed from organisms with simpler to those with more complex cognitive systems, and (iii) the greater the number and variety of species studied in this regard, the more we understand the nature of cognition.

Jan Faye is a Danish philosopher of science and metaphysics. He is currently associate professor in philosophy at the University of Copenhagen. Faye has contributed to a number of areas in philosophy including explanation, interpretation, philosophy of the humanities and the natural sciences, evolutionary naturalism, philosophy of Niels Bohr, and topics concerning time, causation, and backward causation (Retrocausality).

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.