| Georgia v. Brailsford | |
|---|---|
| Decided August 11, 1792 | |
| Full case name | The State of Georgia v. Brailsford, et al. |
| Citations | 2 U.S. 402 ( more ) |
| Case history | |
| Subsequent | Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 415 (1793) Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 1 (1794) |
| Holding | |
| A state may sue in the Supreme Court. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Seriatim | Iredell |
| Seriatim | Blair |
| Seriatim | Wilson |
| Seriatim | Jay |
| Dissent | Johnson |
| Dissent | Cushing |
Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 402 (1792), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "[a] State may sue in the Supreme Court to enjoin payment of a judgment in behalf of a British creditor taken on a debt, which was confiscated by the State, until it can be ascertained to whom the money belongs". [1] [2] [3] [4]
The case was the first United States Supreme Court case where a state appeared as a party. It includes an opinion from Thomas Johnson, who joined the court on November 7, 1791, and resigned after fourteen months.