Government phonology

Last updated

Government Phonology (GP) is a theoretical framework of linguistics, and more specifically of phonology. The framework aims to provide a non-arbitrary account for phonological phenomena by replacing the rule component of SPE-type phonology with well-formedness constraints on representations. Thus, it is a non-derivational representation-based framework, and as such, the current representative of Autosegmental Phonology. GP subscribes to the claim that Universal Grammar is composed of a restricted set of universal principles and parameters. As in Noam Chomsky’s principles and parameters approach to syntax, the differences in phonological systems across languages are captured through different combinations of parameter settings.

Contents

Element Theory

The sub-theory of GP modelling the internal structure of segments is called Element Theory (ET). [1] Like chemical elements, the melodic primes of ET are phonetically interpretable alone as well as in combinations - hence their name. They are assumed, depending on the version of ET, [2] to correspond to either characteristic acoustic signatures in the signal, [3] or articulatory gestures (or hot features, as previously referred to). [4] Unlike the (binary) distinctive features of Structuralist Phonology and SPE, each element is a monovalent (unary, single-valued) and potentially interpretable phonological expression.

ET has a number of versions and has since KLV 1985 [5] been reformed in various ways with the aim of reducing the element inventory, to avoid overgeneration (being able to generate more structures than attested cross-linguistically). In its most widespread version, there are 6 elements believed to be existent across all languages: (A), (I), (U), (ʔ), (L) and (H), representing openness/coronality, frontness/palatality, roundness/labiality, stopness, voicing/nasality and frication/aspiration, respectively. Their actual interpretation depends on what phonological constituent dominates them, and whether they occupy a head or operator position within a phonological expression. For instance, when simplex, (I) is interpreted as /i/ in a syllable peak (nucleus), but as /j/ at a syllable edge (typically, in a syllable onset). (A) makes /a/ in a nucleus but /r/ in a consonantal position. [6] In complex phonological expressions, the phonetic properties mix in proportion to the head/operator status: the (A, I) expression is both open (non-high) and front, but it is more probably interpreted as [e] when the head is (I), and as [ɛ] or [æ] when the head is (A).

Syllable structure without syllables

In its classical form (sometimes referred to as GP 1.0), developed in KLV 1990, [7] prosodic structure is modelled as a sequence of Onset-Rhyme (O-R) pairs, where the syllable rhyme obligatorily contains a nucleus (N). According to their parameter settings (see above), languages may allow any of these syllabic constituents to branch (into two, maximally). Similarly to Government and Binding syntax, constituents are governing domains in which the head (or governor) governs, that is, establishes an asymmetrical, dependency relation with the governee (or complement) - it is this feature of GP that it takes its name from. A unique property of GP as a theoretical model is the denial of the constituenthood (that is, the theoretical status) of two of the components of classical syllabic theory: the coda on the one hand, and the syllable itself on the other. The coda is shown to be unable to branch universally, which is in GP explained by assuming no coda node in the representation (and only positing what is dubbed "post-nuclear rhymal complement"); [8] the syllable (hypothetically, a higher-order constituent dominating each O-R pair) does not qualify as an intraconstituent governing domain since its head (the R) follows its complement (the O) rather than preceding it, as observed in all other cases of branching constituents. [9] [10]

As in mainstream Autosegmental Phonology, GP claims that the O may be empty in certain languages, either word-initially (producing surface vowel-initial words) or word-internally (producing sequences of heterosyllabic vowels, that is, hiatuses), or both. GP also claims that certain languages license empty nuclei, which are subject to the phonological Empty Category Principle (ECP), similarly to the empty categories of syntax. Crucially, all surface word-final consonants are Onsets followed by an empty Nucleus (called domain-final empty nucleus, or FEN), which is licensed by parameter: languages in which the parameter is switched on allow for (surface) consonant-final words (like English), whereas languages in which the parameter is off have all their (content) words ending in a vowel as well as various repair strategies modifying foreign words and loanwords so that they satisfy the constraint (e.g., Italian, Japanese). [11] Another special case is word-initial /sC/ clusters (as in English sport, stop, school), which are analysed in Kaye (1992) [12] as surface manifestations of underlying sequences of an empty N plus rhyme-final /s/ plus O, where the initial empty N is parametrically licensed ("magically", as Kaye puts it) - this effect has been known as "Magic Licensing".

GP today

Today, whilst Optimality Theory has become the dominant framework in generative, formal phonological theory, GP continues to develop. In 1996, Lowenstamm proposed that syllable structure should be further reduced to strictly alternating onsets (symbolised by "C") and nuclei ("V") - all surface clusters sandwich empty categories, which conform to the ECP (see above). [13] This version of GP has become known as Strict CV Phonology or CVCV Phonology, and is currently the most widely accepted model of prosodic structure within GP circles. (See Tobias Scheer's [14] and Péter Szigetvári's [15] [16] work.)

The other major current trend in GP is represented by Pöchtrager [17] [18] and his colleagues, [19] who propose GP 2.0, another version of GP that strives to further reduce the number of elements by capturing manner of articulation (old (ʔ) and (h)/(H)) as well as element (A) with structure. Unlike CVCV Phonology's flat prosodic structure, configurations within GP 2.0 remain hierarchical and involve multiple layers, with the nodes entering into governing and m-commanding relations, very much as in X-bar theory syntax.

Further work in GP and GP-friendly frameworks includes ET-based research in laryngeal phonology, [20] [21] [22] as well as analyses in Loose CV Phonology [23] [24] and Precedence-Free Phonology. [25]

GP-ists and related researchers regularly meet at the Government Phonology Round Table (GPRT), a semi-informal meeting originally (starting in 1997) organised by teams of scholars at universities in Budapest, Hungary and Vienna, Austria. Later, a few events were organised in Slovenia. Recently, Budapest and Vienna have taken turns again as venues. [26]


  1. ↑ Backley, Ph. (2011). An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   9780748637430.
  2. ↑ Backley, Ph. (2012). "Variation in element theory". Linguistic Variation. 12 (1): 57–102. doi:10.1075/lv.12.1.03bac.
  3. ↑ Harris, J.; Lindsey, G. (1995). "The elements of phonological representation". Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations: 34–79.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ↑ Kaye, J.; Lowenstamm, J.; Vergnaud, J.-R. (1985). "The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government". Phonology Yearbook. 2: 305–328. doi:10.1017/S0952675700000476. S2CID   62562635.
  5. ↑ Kaye, J.; Lowenstamm, J.; Vergnaud, J.-R. (1985). "The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government". Phonology Yearbook. 2: 305–328. doi:10.1017/S0952675700000476. S2CID   62562635.
  6. ↑ Broadbent, J. (1991). "Linking and Intrusive r in English". UCL Working Papers in Linguistics. 3: 281–301.
  7. ↑ Kaye, J.; Lowenstamm, J.; Vergnaud, J.-R. (1990). "Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology". Phonology. 7: 193–231. doi:10.1017/S0952675700001184. S2CID   62696953.
  8. ↑ Harris, J. (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
  9. ↑ Kaye, J.; Lowenstamm, J.; Vergnaud, J.-R. (1990). "Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology". Phonology. 7: 193–231. doi:10.1017/S0952675700001184. S2CID   62696953.
  10. ↑ Harris, J. (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. ↑ Harris, J.; Gussmann, E. (1998). "Final Codas - Why the West Was Wrong". Structure and Interpretation - Studies in Phonology: 139–162.
  12. ↑ Kaye, J. (1992). "Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences". SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics. 2: 293–313.
  13. ↑ Lowenstamm, J. (1996). "CV as the only syllable type". Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods: 419–441.
  14. ↑ Scheer, T. (2004). A lateral theory of phonology. Vol 1: What is CVCV, and why should it be?. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  15. ↑ Szigetvári, P. (1999). VC Phonology: a theory of consonant lenition and phonotactics (PDF). Budapest: PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  16. ↑ Szigetvári, P. (2000). "Dismantling syllable structure". Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 47 (1/3): 155–181. doi:10.1023/A:1015647506233. S2CID   169457382.
  17. ↑ Pöchtrager, M. A. (2006). The structure of length. PhD Thesis. Vienna: Universität Wien.
  18. ↑ Pöchtrager, M. A. "It's all about size". 70 snippets to mark Ádám Nádasdy’s 70th birthday. Department of English Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  19. ↑ Pöchtrager, M. A.; Živanović, S. (2010). "GP 2 and Putonghua too" (PDF). Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 57 (4): 357–380. doi:10.1556/ALing.57.2010.4.1.
  20. ↑ Cyran, E. (2014). Between phonology and phonetics: Polish voicing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN   978-1-61451-513-5.
  21. ↑ Cyran, E. (2017). "'Voice' languages with no [voice]? Some consequences of Laryngeal Relativism". Acta Linguistica Academica. 64 (4): 477–511. doi: 10.1556/2062.2017.64.4.1 .
  22. ↑ Balogné Bérces, K.; Huszthy, B. (2018). "Laryngeal Relativism predicts Italian". Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting. 4 (1): 153–177. doi: 10.2478/yplm-2018-0007 .
  23. ↑ Polgárdi, Krisztina (2009). "Trochaic proper government, loose CV, and vowel ~ zero alternation in Hungarian". Approaches to Hungarian. Vol. 11. pp. 143–166. doi:10.1075/atoh.11.07pol. ISBN   978-90-272-0481-3.
  24. ↑ Polgárdi, K. (2014). "Syncope, syllabic consonant formation, and the distribution of stressed vowels in English". Journal of Linguistics. 51 (2): 383–423. doi: 10.1017/S0022226714000486 .
  25. ↑ Nasukawa, K. (2016). "A precedence-free approach to (de-)palatalisation in Japanese". Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 1 (1). doi: 10.5334/gjgl.26 .
  26. ↑ "Bölcsészet- és Társadalomtudományi Kar | gprt | Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem – Kiemelt felsőoktatási intézmény". btk.ppke.hu.

Further reading

Cyran, Eugeniusz (2003) Complexity Scales and Licensing in Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Charette, Monik (1990) Licence to Govern. Phonology Vol. 7, No. 2, 233–253.

Charette, Monik (1991) Conditions on Phonological Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harris, John (1990) Phonological Government. Phonology Vol. 7, No. 2, 255–300.

Harris, John (1994) English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kaye, Jonathan and Jean Lowenstamm (1984) De la syllabicité. In Forme Sonore du Langage, François Dell, Daniel Hirst and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (eds.), 123–159. Paris: Hermann.

Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1985) The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government, Phonology Yearbook 2, 305–328.

Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1990) Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology. Phonology 7, 193–231.

Lindsey, Geoff and Andrew Nevins (2017) (eds.) Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14

Lowenstamm, Jean (1996) CV as the only syllable type. In Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks (eds.), 419–441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.

Lowenstamm, Jean (1999) The beginning of the word. In Phonologica 1996: Syllables!?, John R. Rennison and Klaus Kühnhammer (eds.), 153–166. The Hague: Thesus.

Pöchtrager, Markus A. (2018) Sawing off the branch you are sitting on. Acta Linguistica Academica Vol. 65, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2018.65.1.3

Scheer, Tobias (2004) A lateral theory of phonology. Vol 1: What is CVCV, and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Scheer, Tobias and Péter Szigetvári (2005) Unified representations for stress and the syllable. Phonology Vol. 22, No. 1, 37–75.

Ségéral, Philippe and Tobias Scheer (2001) La Coda-Miroir. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 96, 107–152. English version: The Coda Mirror (ms.).

Special issue of Acta Linguistica Hungarica on GP: Volume 57, Issue 4, December 2010. https://akademiai.com/toc/064/57/4

Szigetvári, Péter (2011) Syllable. In Continuum Companion to Phonology, Bert Botma, Nancy C. Kula and Kuniya Nasukawa (eds.), 64–94. London & New York: Continuum.

Related Research Articles

Phonology is the branch of linguistics that studies how languages or dialects systematically organize their sounds or, for sign languages, their constituent parts of signs. The term can also refer specifically to the sound or sign system of a particular language variety. At one time, the study of phonology related only to the study of the systems of phonemes in spoken languages, but may now relate to any linguistic analysis either:

A diphthong, also known as a gliding vowel, is a combination of two adjacent vowel sounds within the same syllable. Technically, a diphthong is a vowel with two different targets: that is, the tongue moves during the pronunciation of the vowel. In most varieties of English, the phrase "no highway cowboy" has five distinct diphthongs, one in every syllable.

A syllable is a unit of organization for a sequence of speech sounds typically made up of a syllable nucleus with optional initial and final margins. Syllables are often considered the phonological "building blocks" of words. They can influence the rhythm of a language, its prosody, its poetic metre and its stress patterns. Speech can usually be divided up into a whole number of syllables: for example, the word ignite is made of two syllables: ig and nite.

A mora is a basic timing unit in the phonology of some spoken languages, equal to or shorter than a syllable. For example, a short syllable such as ba consists of one mora (monomoraic), while a long syllable such as baa consists of two (bimoraic); extra-long syllables with three moras (trimoraic) are relatively rare. Such metrics are also referred to as syllable weight.

Phonotactics is a branch of phonology that deals with restrictions in a language on the permissible combinations of phonemes. Phonotactics defines permissible syllable structure, consonant clusters and vowel sequences by means of phonotactic constraints.

Gǀui or Gǀwi is a Khoe dialect of Botswana with 2,500 speakers. It is part of the Gǁana dialect cluster, and is closely related to Naro. It has a number of loan words from ǂʼAmkoe. Gǀui, ǂʼAmkoe, and Taa form the core of the Kalahari Basin sprachbund, and share a number of characteristic features, including extremely large consonant inventories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sandawe language</span> Khoisan language of central Tanzania

Sandawe is a language spoken by about 60,000 Sandawe people in the Dodoma Region of Tanzania. Sandawe's use of click consonants, a rare feature shared with only two other languages of East Africa – Hadza and Dahalo, had been the basis of its classification as a member of the defunct Khoisan family of Southern Africa since Albert Drexel in the 1920s. Recent investigations however suggest that Sandawe may be related to the Khoe family regardless of the validity of Khoisan as a whole. A discussion of Sandawe's linguistic classification can be found in Sands (1998).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish phonology</span> Sound system of Spanish

This article is about the phonology and phonetics of the Spanish language. Unless otherwise noted, statements refer to Castilian Spanish, the standard dialect used in Spain on radio and television. For historical development of the sound system see History of Spanish. For details of geographical variation see Spanish dialects and varieties.

Like many other languages, English has wide variation in pronunciation, both historically and from dialect to dialect. In general, however, the regional dialects of English share a largely similar phonological system. Among other things, most dialects have vowel reduction in unstressed syllables and a complex set of phonological features that distinguish fortis and lenis consonants.

The phonology of Italian describes the sound system—the phonology and phonetics—of Standard Italian and its geographical variants.

The Sonority Sequencing Principle (SSP) or Sonority Sequencing Constraint is a phonotactic principle that aims to outline the structure of a syllable in terms of sonority.

The phonological system of the Hawaiian language is based on documentation from those who developed the Hawaiian alphabet during the 1820s as well as scholarly research conducted by lexicographers and linguists from 1949 to present.

Catherine Phebe Browman was an American linguist and speech scientist. She received her Ph.D. in linguistics from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1978. Browman was a research scientist at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey (1967–1972). While at Bell Laboratories, she was known for her work on speech synthesis using demisyllables. She later worked as researcher at Haskins Laboratories in New Haven, Connecticut (1982–1998). She was best known for developing, with Louis Goldstein, of the theory of articulatory phonology, a gesture-based approach to phonological and phonetic structure. The theoretical approach is incorporated in a computational model that generates speech from a gesturally-specified lexicon. Browman was made an honorary member of the Association for Laboratory Phonology.

Kara is an Austronesian language spoken by about 5,000 people in 1998 in the Kavieng District of New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea.

Nepali is the national language of Nepal. Besides being spoken as a mother tongue by more than 48% of the population of Nepal, it is also spoken in Bhutan and India. The language is recognized in the Nepali constitution as an official language of Nepal.

The phonology of the Zuni language as spoken in the southwestern United States is described here. Phonology is a branch of linguistics that studies how languages or dialects systematically organize their sounds.

This article summarizes the phonology of Standard Chinese.

Pisaflores Tepehua is a Tepehua language of Veracruz, Mexico. It is spoken in the towns of Ixhuatlán de Madero and Pisaflores.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ditema tsa Dinoko</span> Writing system for some Southern Bantu languages

Ditema tsa Dinoko, also known by its IsiZulu name, Isibheqe Sohlamvu, and various other related names in different languages, is a constructed writing system for the siNtu or Southern Bantu languages, developed in the 2010s from antecedent ideographic traditions of the Southern African region. Its visual appearance is inspired by these, including the traditional litema arts style. It was developed between 2014 and 2016 by a group of South African linguists and software programmers with the goal of creating a denser writing system to avoid the slowness in reading caused by the word length and visual homogeneity of Southern Bantu languages written in the Roman alphabet.

Monik Charette is a French-Canadian linguist and phonologist who taught at SOAS the University of London, in the United Kingdom. She specializes in phonology, morphophonology, stress systems, vowel harmony, syllabic structure and word-structure, focusing on Altaic languages, Turkish, and French.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.