Grandmother cell

Last updated

The grandmother cell, sometimes called the "Jennifer Aniston neuron", is a hypothetical neuron that represents a complex but specific concept or object. [1] It activates when a person "sees, hears, or otherwise sensibly discriminates" [2] a specific entity, such as their grandmother. It contrasts with the concept of ensemble coding (or "coarse" coding), where the unique set of features characterizing the grandmother is detected as a particular activation pattern across an ensemble of neurons, rather than being detected by a specific "grandmother cell". [1]

Contents

The term was coined around 1969 by cognitive scientist Jerry Lettvin. [1] Rather than serving as a serious hypothesis, the "grandmother cell" concept was initially largely used in jokes and came to be used as a "straw man or foil" for a discussion of ensemble theories in introductory textbooks. [1] However, a similar concept, that of the gnostic neuron, was introduced several years earlier by Jerzy Konorski as a serious proposal. [3] [1]

History

In 1953, Horace Barlow described cells in a frog retina as "bug detectors", but the term did not gain wide usage. [4] [1] Several years later, Jerome (Jerry) Lettvin and others also studied these and other cells, eventually resulting in their widely known 1959 paper "What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain." [1]

Around 1969, Lettvin introduced the term "grandmother cell" in a course he was teaching at MIT, telling a fictitious anecdote about a neurosurgeon who had discovered a group of "mother cells" in the brain that "responded uniquely only to a mother... whether animate or stuffed, seen from before or behind, upside down or on a diagonal or offered by caricature, photograph or abstraction". [1] In Lettvin's story, the neurosurgeon went on to remove (ablate) all these "several thousand separate neurons" from the brain of Portnoy, the title character of Philip Roth's 1969 novel Portnoy's Complaint, thus curing him from his obsession with his mother, and went on to study "grandmother cells" instead. [1]

By 2005, Ed Connor observed that the term had "become a shorthand for invoking all of the overwhelming practical arguments against a one-to-one object coding scheme. No one wants to be accused of believing in grandmother cells." [5] However, in that year UCLA neurosurgeons Itzhak Fried, mentee Rodrigo Quian Quiroga and others published findings on what they would come to call the "Jennifer Aniston neuron". [5] [6] After operating on patients who experience epileptic seizures, the researchers showed photos of celebrities like Jennifer Aniston. The patients, who were fully conscious, often had a particular neuron fire, suggesting that the brain has Aniston-specific neurons. [6] [7]

Support

Face selective cells

Visual neurons in the inferior temporal cortex of the monkey fire selectively to hands and faces. [8] [9] [10] [11] These cells are selective in that they do not fire for other visual objects important for monkeys such as fruit and genitalia. Research finds that some of these cells can be trained to show high specificity for arbitrary visual objects, and these would seem to fit the requirements of gnostic/grandmother cells. [12] [13] In addition, evidence exists for cells in the human hippocampus that have highly selective responses to different categories of stimuli [14] [15] including highly selective responses to individual human faces. [16]

However most of the reported face-selective cells are not grandmother/gnostic cells since they do not represent a specific percept, that is, they are not cells narrowly selective in their activations for one face and only one face irrespective of transformations of size, orientation, and color. Even the most selective face cells usually also discharge, if more weakly, to a variety of individual faces. Furthermore, face-selective cells often vary in their responsiveness to different aspects of faces. This suggests that cell responsiveness arises from the need of a monkey to differentiate among different individual faces rather than among other categories of stimuli such as bananas with their discrimination properties linked to the fact that different individual faces are much more similar to each other in their overall organization and fine detail than other kinds of stimuli. [1] Moreover, it has been suggested that these cells might in fact be responding as specialized feature detector neurons that only function in the holistic context of a face construct. [17] [18]

One idea has been that such cells form ensembles for the coarse or distributed coding of faces rather than detectors for specific faces. Thus, a specific grandmother may be represented by a specialized ensemble of grandmother or near grandmother cells. [1]

Individual specific recognition cells

In 2005, a UCLA and Caltech study found evidence of different cells that fire in response to particular people, such as Bill Clinton or Jennifer Aniston. A neuron for Halle Berry, for example, might respond "to the concept, the abstract entity, of Halle Berry", and would fire not only for images of Halle Berry, but also to the actual name "Halle Berry". [19] However, there is no suggestion in that study that only the cell being monitored responded to that concept, nor was it suggested that no other actress would cause that cell to respond (although several other presented images of actresses did not cause it to respond). [19] The researchers believe that they have found evidence for sparseness, rather than for grandmother cells. [20]

Further evidence for the theory that a small neural network provides facial recognition was found from analysis of cell recording studies of macaque monkeys. By formatting faces as points in a high-dimensional linear space, the scientists discovered that each face cell’s firing rate is proportional to the projection of an incoming face stimulus onto a single axis in this space, allowing a face cell ensemble of about 200 cells to encode the location of any face in the space. [21]

Sparseness vs distributed representations

The grandmother cell hypothesis is an extreme version of the idea of sparseness, [22] [5] and is not without critics. The opposite of the grandmother cell theory is the distributed representation theory, that states that a specific stimulus is coded by its unique pattern of activity over a large group of neurons widely distributed in the brain.

The arguments against the sparseness include:

  1. According to some theories, one would need thousands of cells for each face, as any given face must be recognised from many different angles – profile, 3/4 view, full frontal, from above, etc.
  2. Rather than becoming more and more specific as visual processing proceeds from retina through the different visual centres of the brain, the image is partially dissected into basic features such as vertical lines, colour, speed, etc., distributed in various modules separated by relatively large distances. How all these disparate features are re-integrated to form a seamless whole is known as the binding problem.

Pontifical cells

William James in 1890 proposed a related idea of a pontifical cell. [23] The pontifical cell is defined as a putative, and implausible cell which had all our experiences. This is different from a concept specific cell in that it is the site of experience of sense data. James's 1890 pontifical cell was instead a cell "to which the rest of the brain provided a representation" of a grandmother. The experience of grandmother occurred in this cell.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual cortex</span> Region of the brain that processes visual information

The visual cortex of the brain is the area of the cerebral cortex that processes visual information. It is located in the occipital lobe. Sensory input originating from the eyes travels through the lateral geniculate nucleus in the thalamus and then reaches the visual cortex. The area of the visual cortex that receives the sensory input from the lateral geniculate nucleus is the primary visual cortex, also known as visual area 1 (V1), Brodmann area 17, or the striate cortex. The extrastriate areas consist of visual areas 2, 3, 4, and 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual system</span> Body parts responsible for vision

The visual system is the physiological basis of visual perception. The system detects, transduces and interprets information concerning light within the visible range to construct an image and build a mental model of the surrounding environment. The visual system is associated with the eye and functionally divided into the optical system and the neural system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Auditory cortex</span> Part of the temporal lobe of the brain

The auditory cortex is the part of the temporal lobe that processes auditory information in humans and many other vertebrates. It is a part of the auditory system, performing basic and higher functions in hearing, such as possible relations to language switching. It is located bilaterally, roughly at the upper sides of the temporal lobes – in humans, curving down and onto the medial surface, on the superior temporal plane, within the lateral sulcus and comprising parts of the transverse temporal gyri, and the superior temporal gyrus, including the planum polare and planum temporale.

Visual processing is a term that refers to the brain's ability to use and interpret visual information from the world. The process of converting light energy into a meaningful image is a complex process that is facilitated by numerous brain structures and higher level cognitive processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motor cortex</span> Region of the cerebral cortex

The motor cortex is the region of the cerebral cortex involved in the planning, control, and execution of voluntary movements. The motor cortex is an area of the frontal lobe located in the posterior precentral gyrus immediately anterior to the central sulcus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neural circuit</span> Network or circuit of neurons

A neural circuit is a population of neurons interconnected by synapses to carry out a specific function when activated. Multiple neural circuits interconnect with one another to form large scale brain networks.

A neuronal ensemble is a population of nervous system cells involved in a particular neural computation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inferior temporal gyrus</span> One of three gyri of the temporal lobe of the brain

The inferior temporal gyrus is one of three gyri of the temporal lobe and is located below the middle temporal gyrus, connected behind with the inferior occipital gyrus; it also extends around the infero-lateral border on to the inferior surface of the temporal lobe, where it is limited by the inferior sulcus. This region is one of the higher levels of the ventral stream of visual processing, associated with the representation of objects, places, faces, and colors. It may also be involved in face perception, and in the recognition of numbers and words.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Premotor cortex</span> Part of the human brain

The premotor cortex is an area of the motor cortex lying within the frontal lobe of the brain just anterior to the primary motor cortex. It occupies part of Brodmann's area 6. It has been studied mainly in primates, including monkeys and humans.

Neural coding is a neuroscience field concerned with characterising the hypothetical relationship between the stimulus and the neuronal responses, and the relationship among the electrical activities of the neurons in the ensemble. Based on the theory that sensory and other information is represented in the brain by networks of neurons, it is believed that neurons can encode both digital and analog information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fusiform face area</span> Part of the human visual system that is specialized for facial recognition

The fusiform face area is a part of the human visual system that is specialized for facial recognition. It is located in the inferior temporal cortex (IT), in the fusiform gyrus.

In cognitive neuroscience, visual modularity is an organizational concept concerning how vision works. The way in which the primate visual system operates is currently under intense scientific scrutiny. One dominant thesis is that different properties of the visual world require different computational solutions which are implemented in anatomically/functionally distinct regions that operate independently – that is, in a modular fashion.

The primary gustatory cortex (GC) is a brain structure responsible for the perception of taste. It consists of two substructures: the anterior insula on the insular lobe and the frontal operculum on the inferior frontal gyrus of the frontal lobe. Because of its composition the primary gustatory cortex is sometimes referred to in literature as the AI/FO(Anterior Insula/Frontal Operculum). By using extracellular unit recording techniques, scientists have elucidated that neurons in the AI/FO respond to sweetness, saltiness, bitterness, and sourness, and they code the intensity of the taste stimulus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Primary motor cortex</span> Part of the brains frontal cortex

The primary motor cortex is a brain region that in humans is located in the dorsal portion of the frontal lobe. It is the primary region of the motor system and works in association with other motor areas including premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, posterior parietal cortex, and several subcortical brain regions, to plan and execute voluntary movements. Primary motor cortex is defined anatomically as the region of cortex that contains large neurons known as Betz cells, which, along with other cortical neurons, send long axons down the spinal cord to synapse onto the interneuron circuitry of the spinal cord and also directly onto the alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord which connect to the muscles.

Globs are millimeter-sized color modules found beyond the visual area V2 in the brain's color processing ventral pathway. They are scattered throughout the posterior inferior temporal cortex in an area called the V4 complex. They are clustered by color preference, and organized as color columns. They are the first part of the brain in which color is processed in terms of the full range of hues found in color space.

The neural encoding of sound is the representation of auditory sensation and perception in the nervous system. The complexities of contemporary neuroscience are continually redefined. Thus what is known of the auditory system has been continually changing. The encoding of sounds includes the transduction of sound waves into electrical impulses along auditory nerve fibers, and further processing in the brain.

Feature detection is a process by which the nervous system sorts or filters complex natural stimuli in order to extract behaviorally relevant cues that have a high probability of being associated with important objects or organisms in their environment, as opposed to irrelevant background or noise.

Neural decoding is a neuroscience field concerned with the hypothetical reconstruction of sensory and other stimuli from information that has already been encoded and represented in the brain by networks of neurons. Reconstruction refers to the ability of the researcher to predict what sensory stimuli the subject is receiving based purely on neuron action potentials. Therefore, the main goal of neural decoding is to characterize how the electrical activity of neurons elicit activity and responses in the brain.

In psychology, associative memory is defined as the ability to learn and remember the relationship between unrelated items. This would include, for example, remembering the name of someone or the aroma of a particular perfume. This type of memory deals specifically with the relationship between these different objects or concepts. A normal associative memory task involves testing participants on their recall of pairs of unrelated items, such as face-name pairs. Associative memory is a declarative memory structure and episodically based.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doris Tsao</span> American neuroscientist

Doris Ying Tsao is an American neuroscientist and professor of neurobiology and molecular cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. She was formerly on the faculty at the California Institute of Technology for 12 years. She is recognized for pioneering the use of fMRI with single-unit electrophysiological recordings and for discovering the macaque face patch system for face perception. She is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and the director of the T&C Chen Center for Systems Neuroscience. She won a MacArthur "Genius" fellowship in 2018. Tsao was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2020. In 2024 she was awarded a Kavli Prize in neuroscience along with Nancy Kanwisher and Winrich Freiwald for the discovery and study of specific areas in the brain that perform facial recognition. After joining UC Berkeley in 2021, her current research explores visual perception in primates in order to understand how the brain creates our sense of reality.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gross, CG (2002). ""Genealogy of the "Grandmother Cell" (PDF). Neuroscientist. 8 (5): 512–518. doi:10.1177/107385802237175. PMID   12374433. S2CID   8436406. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-02-08.
  2. ↑ Clark, Austen (2000). A Theory of Sentience. Oxford University Press. p. 43. ISBN   978-0-19-823851-5.
  3. ↑ Konorski J. 1967. Integrative activity of the brain; an interdisciplinary approach.(1967)
  4. ↑ Barlow, Horace (January 1953). "Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina". J Physiol. 119: 69–88. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004829. PMC   1393035 . PMID   13035718.
  5. 1 2 3 Connor, Charles (23 June 2005). "Friends and grandmothers". Nature. 435 (7045): 1036–1037. doi: 10.1038/4351036a . PMID   15973389.
  6. 1 2 Krulwich, Robert (March 30, 2012). "Neuroscientists Battle Furiously over Jennifer Aniston". NPR.
  7. ↑ Quian Quiroga, Rodrigo (February 1, 2013). "Searching for the Jennifer Aniston Neuron". Scientific American. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  8. ↑ Gross CG. 1998a. Brain, vision, memory: tales in the history of neuroscience.
  9. ↑ Perrett, DI; Rolls, ET; Caan, W (1982). "Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex". Exp Brain Res. 47 (3): 329–42. doi:10.1007/bf00239352. PMID   7128705. S2CID   572908.
  10. ↑ Rolls ET. 1984. Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Hum Neurobiol 3:209–22.
  11. ↑ Yamane, S; Kaji, S; Kawano, K (1988). "What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey?". Exp Brain Res. 73 (1): 209–14. doi:10.1007/bf00279674. PMID   3208858. S2CID   9851398.
  12. ↑ Logothetis, NK; Sheinberg, DL (1996). "Visual object recognition". Annu Rev Neurosci. 19: 577–621. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.003045. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-0013-EBB0-3 . PMID   8833455. S2CID   14848254.
  13. ↑ Tanaka K. 1996. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:109–39.
  14. ↑ Gross, CG (2000). "Coding for visual categories in the human brain". Nat Neurosci. 3 (9): 855–6. doi:10.1038/78745. PMID   10966610. S2CID   33297852.
  15. ↑ Kreiman, G; Koch, C; Fried, I (2000). "Category specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe". Nat Neurosci. 3 (9): 946–53. doi:10.1038/78868. PMID   10966627. S2CID   14961891.
  16. ↑ Kreiman G, Fried I, Koch C. 2001. Single neuron responses in humans during binocular rivalry and flash suppression. Abstr Soc Neurosci 27
  17. ↑ Jagadeesh, B (2009). "Recognizing grandmother". Nat Neurosci. 12 (9): 1083–5. doi:10.1038/nn0909-1083. PMID   19710647. S2CID   35004301.
  18. ↑ Freiwald, WA; Tsao, DY; Livingstone, MS (2009). "A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe". Nat Neurosci. 12 (9): 1187–96. doi:10.1038/nn.2363. PMC   2819705 . PMID   19668199.
  19. 1 2 Quian Quiroga, R.; et al. (2005). "Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain". Nature. 435 (7045): 1102–1107. Bibcode:2005Natur.435.1102Q. doi:10.1038/nature03687. PMID   15973409. S2CID   1234637.
  20. ↑ Quian Quiroga, R.; et al. (2008). "Sparse but not 'Grandmother-cell' coding in the medial temporal lobe". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12 (3): 87–91. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.003. PMID   18262826. S2CID   9383450.
  21. ↑ Chang, Tsao (2017). "The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain". Cell. 169 (6): 1013–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.011 . PMC   8088389 . PMID   28575666.
  22. ↑ Rugg, Michael (1997). Cognitive Neuroscience . MIT Press. pp.  49–58. ISBN   978-0-262-68094-3.
  23. ↑ James W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.