Gujarat Control of Organised Crime Act

Last updated

Recent Development

Status: Pending

The Gujarat Control of Organised Crime Act (GUJCOCA) is a controversial anti-terrorism law passed by the state legislature of Gujarat, India, in April 2003. On 5 November 2019, President Ram Nath Kovind gave his assent. [1]

Contents

Introduction And Presidential Assent

The bill was drawn on the lines of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (for Maharashtra) and Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act (for Karnataka). [2] It was then sent to the office of the President of India for assent. [3] Originally, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam didn't give assent because of a few controversial points:

  1. Clause 16 relates to the confession made before a police officer being admissible in court [4]
  2. Substitute the word "may" for "shall" after the words Special Court occurring in clause 20(2) and bring the provision in line with Section 43(d)(2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act(Amendment), Clause 20(2) deals with the extension of the detention period [4]
  3. Amend Clause 20(4) to bring it in conformity with Section 43(d)(5) of the UAP (Amendment) Act. Clause 20(4) deals with the powers of the court to grant bail. [4]

In July 2009, [5] the bill was re-introduced in the state legislature without the changes suggested by the President, but it failed to pass. In 2019, The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) bill passed by the Gujarat State Assembly received President Ram Nath Kovind's assent. The bill, which was formulated in 2003 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was Chief Minister of the State, had been sent for presidential clearance three times. Each time it was rejected over a few controversial provisions.

The bill was successful in its fourth attempt when President Kovind gave his assent on 7 November 2019, almost 16 years after it was first introduced. It was considered controversial for two key reasons: intercepted telephone conversations would be considered legitimate evidence and a confession made before a police officer would also be considered documented evidence. President Ram Nath Kovind passed both. [6] The law provides for the constitution of a special court along with the appointment of special public prosecutors to handle organised crime cases. Furthermore, assets acquired through organised crime could be auctioned and the transfer of assets could be cancelled.

The new law states that any act intended to disrupt or endanger law and order, public order, or the unity, integrity and security of the State, is illegal. Spreading terror in the minds of people also falls into the category of terrorism. The new law is formulated to deal with terrorism and organised crime such as contract killing, ponzi schemes, the narcotics trade, extortion rackets, cybercrime, land-grabbing and human trafficking.

According to state Ministry, the new law has a provision that allows up to life imprisonment for cases involving the crimes listed above. Additionally, if a death occurs in these crimes, capital punishment could apply.

Human Rights Issue

The bill got an outright rejection from President A.P.J Abdul Kalam. In 2008, a second attempt was made at getting the presidential nod, but President Pratibha Patil sent it back over the confession provisions. In 2015, it went before President Pranab Mukherji but was sent back as he sought clarification on some clauses. While other States have similar laws, the provisions in the Gujarat law are widely acknowledged to be harsh, dangerous and part of a larger agenda.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996</span> United States law

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. 104–132 (text)(PDF), 110 Stat. 1214, enacted April 24, 1996, was introduced to the United States Congress in April 1995 as a Senate Bill. The bill was passed with broad bipartisan support by Congress in response to the bombings of the World Trade Center and Oklahoma City. It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002</span>

The Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) was an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 2002, with the objective of strengthening anti-terrorism operations. The Act was enacted due to several terrorist attacks that were being carried out in India and especially in response to the attack on the Parliament. The Act replaced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) of 2001 and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) (1985–1995), and was supported by the governing National Democratic Alliance. The Act was repealed in 2004 by the United Progressive Alliance coalition.

Three anti-terrorism bills were enacted in the Australian Parliament in 2004 by the Howard Coalition government with the support of the Labor Opposition. These were the Anti-terrorism Bill 2004, the Anti-terrorism Bill 2004 and the Anti-terrorism Bill 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, intended to deal with the Law Lords' ruling of 16 December 2004 that the detention without trial of eight foreigners at HM Prison Belmarsh under Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was unlawful, being incompatible with European human rights laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Terrorism Act 2005</span> Counter-terrorism Act of the Parliament of Australia in 2005

The Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 (Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which is intended to hamper the activities of any potential terrorists in the country. The counter-terrorism law was passed on 6 December 2005.

<i>Anti-Terrorism Act</i> (Canada)

The Canadian Anti-terrorism Act was passed by the Parliament of Canada in response to the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States. It received Royal Assent on December 18, 2001, as Bill C-36. The "omnibus bill" extended the powers of government and institutions within the Canadian security establishment to respond to the threat of terrorism.

Anti-terrorism legislation are laws with the purpose of fighting terrorism. They usually, if not always, follow specific bombings or assassinations. Anti-terrorism legislation usually includes specific amendments allowing the state to bypass its own legislation when fighting terrorism-related crimes, under alleged grounds of necessity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act</span> Indian law to prevent unlawful activities

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is an Indian law aimed at prevention of unlawful activities associations in India. Its main objective was to make powers available for dealing with activities directed against the integrity and sovereignty of India. The most recent amendment of the law, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2019 has made it possible for the Union Government to designate individuals as terrorists without following any formal judicial process. UAPA is also known as the Anti-terror law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Investigation Agency</span> Federal investigative agency in India

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is the primary counter-terrorist task force of India. The agency is empowered to deal with the investigation of terror related crimes across states without special permission from the states under written proclamation from the Ministry of Home Affairs. The Agency came into existence with the enactment of the National Investigation Agency Act 2008 by the Parliament of India on 31 December 2008, which was passed after the deadly 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai. Such an attack revealed the failure of intelligence and ability to track such activities by existing agencies in India, hence the government of India realized the need of a specific body to deal with terror related activities in India, thereby establishing the NIA. Headquartered in New Delhi, the NIA has branches in Hyderabad, Guwahati, Kochi, Lucknow, Mumbai, Kolkata, Raipur, Jammu, Chandigarh, Ranchi, Chennai and Imphal. It maintains the NIA Most Wanted list.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act</span> Law enacted by Government of Maharashtra to combat Organised crime and Terrorism

The Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 is a law enacted by the state of Maharashtra in India in 1999 to combat organised crime and terrorism. Known as 'MCOCA', the Act provides the State Government with special powers to tackle these issues, including powers of surveillance, relaxed evidentiary standards and procedural safeguards, and prescribing additional criminal penalties, including the death penalty. The law was introduced by a coalition government of the Bharatiya Janata Party and Shiv Sena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ram Nath Kovind</span> President of India from 2017 to 2022

Ram Nath Kovind is an Indian politician who served as the 14th President of India from 2017 to 2022. He is a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party. He is the second person after K. R. Narayanan, from the Dalit community to occupy the post. Prior to his presidency, he served as the 26th Governor of Bihar from 2015 to 2017 and as a Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha from 1994 to 2006. Before entering politics, he was a lawyer for 16 years and practiced in the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India until 1993.

2017 in India highlights the national/Daily level events during the year.

<i>Combating Terrorism Act</i>

The Combating Terrorism Act is an Act of the Parliament of Canada that renewed some provisions to the Criminal Code that had expired under a sunset clause for a new five-year term, and to introduce new crimes for leaving Canada to join or train with a terror group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019</span>

The Muslim Women Act, 2019 is an Act of the Parliament of India criminalising triple talaq. In August 2017, the Supreme Court of India declared triple talaq, which enables Muslim men to instantly divorce their wives, to be unconstitutional. The minority opinion suggested the Parliament to consider appropriate legislation governing triple talaq in the Muslim community.

The Repealing and Amending Act, 2017 is an Act of the Parliament of India that repealed 104 Acts, and also partially repealed three sections of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2007, and made minor amendments to three other Acts to correct typographical errors. The Act was the fourth such repealing act tabled by the Narendra Modi administration aimed at repealing obsolete laws.

The Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2017 is an Act of the Parliament of India that repealed 131 Acts, and also repealed nine Ordinances promulgated by the Governor-General of India before independence. It also made minor amendments to The Plantations Labour Act, 1951, The Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Act was the fifth such repealing act tabled by the Narendra Modi administration aimed at repealing obsolete laws.

The One Hundred and Third Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as the Constitution Act, 2019, introduces 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of society for admission to Central Government-run educational institutions and private educational institutions, and for employment in Central Government jobs. The Amendment does not make such reservations mandatory in State Government-run educational institutions or State Government jobs. However, some states have chosen to implement the 10% reservation for economically weaker sections.

The Repealing and Amending Act, 2019 is an Act of the Parliament of India that repealed 58 Acts. It also made minor amendments to the Income Tax Act, 1961 and The Indian Institutes of Management Act, 2017. The Act was the sixth such repealing act aimed at repealing obsolete laws tabled by the Narendra Modi administration, and the first tabled during its second term. The government had repealed 1,428 Acts during its first term between 2014 and 2019.

The Code on Wages, 2019, also known as the Wage Code, is an Act of the Parliament of India that consolidates the provisions of four labour laws concerning wage and bonus payments and makes universal the provisions for minimum wages and timely payment of wages for all workers in India. The Code repeals and replaces the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, and the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span>

The One Hundred and Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India, extends the deadline for the cessation for the reservation of seats for members from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies by a period of 10 years.

References

  1. "Controversial Gujarat anti-terror law gets President assent on 4th attempt". Indiatoday. 5 November 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  2. "BJP deserters back Modi stance on GUJCOC Bill". Archived from the original on 16 September 2008. Retrieved 28 July 2009.
  3. "Jaipur blasts revive debate over GUJCOC Bill". Archived from the original on 20 June 2008. Retrieved 28 July 2009.
  4. 1 2 3 "Centre returns GUJCOC Bill, asks state to amend 3 clauses". 20 June 2009.
  5. "Gujarat passes anti-terror bill, rejects President's suggestions". The Times of India . 28 July 2009. Archived from the original on 24 October 2012.
  6. Katakam, Anupama (8 November 2019). "President's assent to Gujarat anti-terrorism Bill of 2003". Frontline. Retrieved 8 November 2019.