| Hamm v. Smith | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Full case name | Hamm v. Smith |
| Docket no. | 24-872 |
| Questions presented | |
| Whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins claim | |
Hamm v. Smith is a pending United States Supreme Court case regarding the impact of IQ scores on capital punishment.
Smith filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the death sentence, claiming to have an intellectual disability. Smith scored 75, 74, 72, 78, and 74 on five full-scale IQ tests. [1] Smith's claim was granted by the Southern District of Alabama which vacated the death sentence. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district's ruling. [2]
The case first reached the Supreme Court in the 2024 term. In a per curiam opinion, the court summarily reversed and remanded the case without granting certiorari. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch wrote a dissent to the denial of certiorari.
During the 2025 term, the case was appealed again and the court granted certiorari while limiting the question to what the cumulative affects of IQ tests should be when evaluating an Atkins claim.
 | This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Roberts Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |