Higher Education and Research Act 2017

Last updated

Higher Education and Research Act 2017
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Variant 1, 2022).svg
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long title An Act to make provision about higher education and research; and to make provision about alternative payments to students in higher or further education.
Citation 2017 c. 29
Introduced by Jo Johnson, Universities Minister (Commons)
James Younger, 5th Viscount Younger of Leckie (Lords)
Territorial extent England and Wales (whole Act), Scotland and Northern Ireland (ss. 25, 79–80, 83, parts 3–4)
Dates
Royal assent 27 April 2017
Commencement Varies by section
Other legislation
Amends Science and Technology Act 1965
Education Reform Act 1988
Further and Higher Education Act 1992
Teaching and Higher Education Act 1998
Higher Education Act 2004
Status: Current legislation
History of passage through Parliament
Records of Parliamentary debate relating to the statute from Hansard
Text of statute as originally enacted
Revised text of statute as amended

The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 (c. 29) was enacted into law in the United Kingdom by the Houses of Parliament on 27 April 2017. [1] It is intended to create a new regulatory framework for higher education, increase competition and student choice, ensure students receive value for money, and strengthen the research sector. [2]

Contents

The Act is a replacement for the Further and Higher Education Act 1992 and is intended to accommodate subsequent changes in the higher education sector. [3] Viscount Younger, the sponsor of the Bill in the House of Lords, called it "the most important legislation for the sector in 25 years", [1] a claim supported by Universities UK, who said that it is "the first major regulatory reform" to higher education in that period. [3]

The Act is split into four parts: Part 1 establishes the Office for Students and gives it responsibilities for regulating the Higher Education sector; Part 2 amends prior legislation on student financial support and student complaints procedures; Part 3 establishes a body called United Kingdom Research and Innovation and gives it responsibilities for regulating and funding research; and Part 4 addresses miscellaneous issues such as transitional arrangements and data sharing. [4]

Core provisions

Office for Students

The Office for Students (OfS) is established in the Act broadly as a replacement for the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The Act details requirements for appointments of the board of directors – that they reflect a diverse range of members with experience of various aspects of higher education – and outlines the main responsibilities of the OfS, leaving specific details to be developed in secondary legislation. It emphasises that the OfS should be a market regulator and protector of student interests, [3] and specifies the post of Director for Fair Access and Participation (section 2). The Act abolishes of the official position of Director of Fair Access (section 82), meaning that the OfS will also replace the functions of the Office for Fair Access.

The Act also creates procedures for the OfS to grant degree-awarding powers to education providers, and also for granting the right of providers to use university in their titles, [4] which will ease entry to the Higher Education market. [5] The regulatory powers granted to the OfS go as far as allowing it to apply for a warrant to enter universities' premises, and to revoke degree awarding powers and university status, even where these were issued by Royal charter under the previous system. [4]

The OfS is also given a funding role, with the ability to make "grants, loans or other payments to the governing body of an eligible higher education provider", and that it may attach any terms and conditions to the payments "as the OfS considers appropriate". [4]

United Kingdom Research and Innovation

United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI), established in Part 3 of the Act, brings together the country's seven research councils, [6] replacing each of them with committees (while still using the term "councils" to refer to them) within UKRI. [4] It is intended to strengthen interdisciplinary research, advocate for the whole research sector, and pool resources such as management and datasets. It gives the government the ability to set the direction of future research by maintaining a level of control over budgets of the individual councils, while still allowing a level of autonomy on how money is allocated to research projects. [6]

Alternative payments and the student complaints scheme

The Act amends previous legislation, replacing instances of the word "loan" with "loan, or alternative payment". [4] While not explicitly mentioned in the Act, this is to support the issuance of sharia-compliant payments by the Student Loans Company. [1]

The Office of the Independent Adjudicator's role in handling student complaints is expanded [7] under Part 2 of the Act to cover any higher education provider on the OfS's register. [4]

Introduction of the Bill

The Government published a white paper titled Success as a Knowledge Economy on 16 May 2016. [8] The paper proposed a new regulatory system, headed by an Office for Students, and gave more detail on the future of the recently-introduced Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), and how it would be linked with tuition fees. It also proposed merging the existing seven research councils into a single body, UK Research and Innovation. It proposed procedures for new providers entering the market, with substantially fewer hurdles. It also proposed a national register of students' unions, which would give students who encountered issues greater mechanisms for redress. [9]

On 18 May 2016, the week after the publication of the white paper, the State Opening of Parliament Queen's speech announced new legislation "to support the establishment of new universities and to promote choice and competition across the higher education sector". [10] The next day, the Higher Education and Research Bill had its first reading in the United Kingdom House of Commons. [11]

Passage through Parliament

The Bill was introduced to the Commons for its first reading by Jo Johnson, the Minister for Universities and Science. Even before the Bill's second reading, substantial opposition was forecast, with one Vice-Chancellor predicting that it would not get through the House of Commons without significant amendment, [12] and Gordon Marsden, the Shadow Secretary for higher education, voiced concerns that the Brexit Referendum result meant that the Bill should be shelved. [13]

At the committee stage, amendments were proposed by the Opposition including the renaming of the Office for Students, [14] requiring that de-registration of higher education providers be supported by secondary legislation [15] and changing the metrics by which teaching is measured. [16] All opposition amendments were rejected at the Commons committee stage [16] and the Bill passed through the House of Commons after the third reading on 21 November.

The Bill was sponsored in the House of Lords by Viscount Younger, and they made their own amendments to the Bill. They voted that there should be additional constraints for entry to the higher education market to prevent profit-motivated providers gaining access too easily, to the detriment of students and the sector. They also voted that the TEF should not be used to create a consolidated ranking of universities, and that its metrics should be subject to additional oversight. [17]

The snap general election meant that Parliament had to be dissolved, and so the Labour Party reached an agreement with the Government to vote for a version of the Bill with substantially reduced amendments as part of the wash-up period. The linking of the TEF to tuition fees was to be delayed, but not prevented altogether, and the OfS would be required to consult the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education before awarding the use of the university title. [18]

The amended Bill was voted on in both houses on 27 April 2017, then received royal assent as the Higher Education and Research Act later that day. [1] [18]

Reception

As the Bill passed through parliament, it was widely criticised within the sector. [19] The National Union of Students (NUS) were opposed to what they called the "marketisation of HE", stating that "a climate of competition will never be in students’ best interests", and were also concerned about the link between measured teaching quality and rises in tuition fees. [20] The amount of regulatory muscle given to the OfS, in having the authority to de-register universities, was criticised, as was the ease with which for-profit education providers could enter the market. [19]

Baroness Wolf, previously an adviser to the government, expressed concern that "sweeping general legislation might make it easier to set up a really small, innovative, educationally wonderful institution, but it’s much more likely to mean we end up with the American-style catastrophe". [21] Nick Hillman of the Higher Education Policy Institute think tank has long been in favour of legislation to support new universities, but said that even he thought the speed with which they could be approved under the new legislation was "a risk too far". [19]

Others have pointed to the lack of subject diversity that the likely influx private providers will offer. Cambridge professor Gill Evans stated that "they tend to go for what can be taught cheaply to a mass market", and that the majority of current private providers are only offering courses up to level 5, rather than full degrees. [22]

The government has hit back at critics, with Jo Johnson saying existing universities are merely afraid of competition, and are "acting like bouncers deciding who should and should not be let into the club". [23] The government position is that the increased competition, and the link between teaching quality and tuition fees, will force existing universities to improve. [24]

Outside of the government, the legislation has had its supporters. Notably, Universities UK and GuildHE, both influential bodies representing university leadership, expressed their support in a joint letter to their respective members. They welcomed the change, stating that "current regulatory framework has not kept up" with changes within the HE sector. [25] Even the NUS, otherwise fierce critics of the changes, expressed support for the provision of sharia-compliant loans supported by the legislation. [20]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Universities in the United Kingdom</span>

Universities in the United Kingdom have generally been instituted by royal charter, papal bull, Act of Parliament, or an instrument of government under the Further and Higher Education Act 1992 or the Higher Education and Research Act 2017. Degree awarding powers and the 'university' title are protected by law, although the precise arrangements for gaining these vary between the constituent countries of the United Kingdom.

Education in England is overseen by the United Kingdom's Department for Education. Local government authorities are responsible for implementing policy for public education and state-funded schools at a local level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russell Group</span> British association of universities

The Russell Group is a self-selected association of twenty-four public research universities in the United Kingdom. The group is headquartered in Cambridge and was established in 1994 to represent its members' interests, principally to government and Parliament. It was incorporated in 2007. Its members are often perceived as being the UK's best universities, but this has been disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tuition fees in the United Kingdom</span> Cost of higher education in the United Kingdom.

Tuition fees were first introduced across the entire United Kingdom in September 1998 under the Labour government of Tony Blair to fund tuition for undergraduate and postgraduate certificate students at universities; students were required to pay up to £1,000 a year for tuition. However, only those who reach a certain salary threshold (£21,000) pay this fee through general taxation. In practice, higher education (HE) remains free at the point of entry in England for a high minority of students.

The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) was a non-departmental public body in the United Kingdom, which was responsible for the distribution of funding for higher education to universities and further education colleges in England since 1992. It ceased to exist as of 1 April 2018, when its duties were divided between the newly created Office for Students and Research England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education</span> British non-profit organization

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, usually referred to simply as the Quality Assurance Agency or QAA, is the UK higher education sector's independent expert quality body, with a remit to maintain and enhance the quality of teaching and learning in tertiary education in the UK and beyond. It conducts quality assessment reviews, develops reference points and guidance for providers, and conducts or commissions research on relevant issues.

A public university or public college is a university or college that is owned by the state or receives significant public funds through a national or subnational government, as opposed to a private university. Whether a national university is considered public varies from one country to another, largely depending on the specific education landscape.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Higher Education Support Act 2003</span>

The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth) (HESA) is an Act of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia which governs funding for universities in Australia. The Act determines categories of providers eligible for public funding, establishes the basis for providing public funding, codifies the existing aims of universities, and introduces measures to strengthen Australia’s knowledge base.

The Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW) is the Welsh Government Sponsored Body responsible for funding the higher education sector.

The Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS) is a register formed under the Education Services for Overseas Students (ESOS) Act 2000. It maintains a list of institutions, and courses, which have been granted permission by states and territories, to educate overseas students. It is a Federal framework under the authority of state and territory jurisdiction, and providers must register through these agents to legally educate and train international students. CRICOS, in conjunction with other federal and state/territory bodies and legislation, provides strict guidelines for institutions, accepts and/or declines registrations, monitors registered institutions’ compliance and ensures financial capability and stability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University Alliance</span> Association of British universities formed in 2006

University Alliance (UA) is an association of British universities which was formed in 2006 as the Alliance of Non-Aligned Universities, adopting its current name in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tertiary education in Australia</span>

Tertiary education in Australia is formal education beyond high school in Australia, consisting of both government and private institutions and divided into two sectors; Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training (VET) provided by government-owned TAFEs & private Registered Training Organisations (RTO). Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF), the Australian national education policy, classifies tertiary qualification into 10 levels: level 1 to 4 undergraduate certificates; level 5 & 6 undergraduate diploma and advanced diploma; level 6 associate degree; level 7 bachelor degree, level 8 honors bachelor's degree & graduate certificates and graduate diplomas; level 9 for master's degree; level 10 PhD and post doctoral studies. Most universities are government owned and mostly self-regulated. For other institutes there are two national regulators for tertiary education for registration, recognition and quality assurance of both the "provider institutes" as well as the "individual courses" provided by the providers. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) regulates institutes which provide education from level 5 or above. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) regulates institutes which provide education from level 1 to level 6.

The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) is Australia's independent national quality assurance and regulatory agency for higher education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tertiary education in New Zealand</span>

Tertiary education in New Zealand is provided by universities, institutes of technology and polytechnics, private training establishments, industry training organisations, and wānanga. It ranges from informal non-assessed community courses in schools through to undergraduate degrees and research-based postgraduate degrees. All post-compulsory education is regulated within the New Zealand Qualifications Framework, a unified system of national qualifications for schools, vocational education and training, and 'higher' education. The New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) is responsible for quality assuring all courses and tertiary education organisations other than universities. Under the Education Act 1989, The Committee on University Academic Programmes (CUAP) and the Academic Quality Agency (AQA) have delegated authority for quality assurance of university education. The Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) is responsible for administering the funding of tertiary education, primarily through negotiated investment plans with each funded organisation.

<i>Broadcasting Services Act 1992</i> Act of the Parliament of Australia

The Broadcasting Services Act 1992(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which broadly covers issues relating to content regulation and media ownership in Australia. The law stipulates what is political advertising and the specific conditions which must be met before they are authorised for publication.

Tuition fees in the United Kingdom were reintroduced for full-time resident Students in 1998, as a means of funding tuition to undergraduate and postgraduate certificate students at universities. Since their introduction, the fees have been reformed multiple times by several bills, with the cap on fees notably rising to £9,000 a year for the 2012-13 academic year.

Julia Mary Black is the strategic director of innovation and a professor of law at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). She was the interim director of the LSE, a post she held from September 2016 until September 2017, at which time Minouche Shafik took over the directorship. She is the president of the British Academy, the UK's national academy for the humanities and social sciences, and became the academy's second female president in July 2021 for a four-year term.

The Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF) is a government assessment of the quality of undergraduate teaching in universities and other higher education providers in England, which may be used from 2020 to determine whether state-funded providers are permitted to raise tuition fees. Higher education providers from elsewhere in the United Kingdom are allowed to opt-in, but the rating has no impact on their funding. The TEF rates universities as Gold, Silver or Bronze, in order of quality of teaching. The first results were published in June 2017. This was considered a "trial year" and is to be followed by a "lessons learned exercise" that will feed into the 2018 TEF and longer-term plans for subject-level ratings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office for Students</span>

The Office for Students (OfS) is a non-departmental public body of the Department for Education, acting as the regulator and competition authority for the higher education sector in England.

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is a non-departmental public body of the Government of the United Kingdom that directs research and innovation funding, funded through the science budget of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Morris, David (27 April 2017). "Be it enacted: The Higher Education and Research Act". Wonkhe. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
  2. ↑ "Higher Education and Research Bill - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 "Implementation of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017" (PDF). Universities UK . 9 June 2017. Retrieved 31 July 2017.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Higher Education and Research Act", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 2017 c. 29
  5. ↑ "Higher education bill seeks powerful Office for Students". Times Higher Education (THE). 19 May 2016. Retrieved 1 August 2017.
  6. 1 2 "UKRI if you want to: how to read the new research landscape | Wonkhe | Analysis". Wonkhe. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  7. ↑ Clements, Judy (8 May 2017). "2017 Annual Open Meeting of the OIA" (PDF). Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  8. ↑ "HE White Paper: the higher education sector responds". Times Higher Education (THE). 13 May 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  9. ↑ "Higher education White Paper: key points at a glance". Times Higher Education (THE). 16 May 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  10. ↑ "Queen's Speech 2016". Gov.uk . 18 May 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  11. ↑ "Higher Education and Research Act 2017 — UK Parliament". services.parliament.uk. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  12. ↑ "HE bill 'will face substantial opposition in Parliament'". Times Higher Education (THE). 23 June 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  13. ↑ Marsden, Gordon (15 July 2016). "Higher Education Bill could cause massive disruption". PoliticsHome.com. Retrieved 4 August 2017.
  14. ↑ "The Office for Students: 8 Sep 2016: Public Bill Committees - TheyWorkForYou". TheyWorkForYou. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  15. ↑ "De-registration by the OfS: 15 Sep 2016: Public Bill Committees - TheyWorkForYou". TheyWorkForYou. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  16. 1 2 "Challenging Government plans for our universities". Paul Blomfield. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  17. ↑ "Lords defeat UK government again on TEF and private providers". Times Higher Education (THE). 8 March 2017. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  18. 1 2 "UPDATED: Agreement reached on HE Bill as it heads to final stages of debate | Wonkhe | Policy Watch". Wonkhe. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
  19. 1 2 3 Lock, Helen (15 February 2017). "Who's afraid of private universities?". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  20. 1 2 "NUS responds to the government's Higher Education and Research Bill". National Union of Students . Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  21. ↑ "EducationInvestor - Article: Alison Wolf: Private university plans 'risk catastrophe'". www.educationinvestor.co.uk. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  22. ↑ "The Government is championing new university providers - but where's the evidence to prove they're fit for purpose?". The Telegraph. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  23. ↑ "Jo Johnson accuses Britain's leading universities of acting like a 'cartel' and behaving like burly bouncers". The Telegraph. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  24. ↑ Johnson, Jo. "We must break open the higher education closed shop". Conservative Home. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  25. ↑ "Letter to UUK and GuildHE Members on the Higher Education and Research Bill" (PDF). 25 April 2017. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.