Historia de via Hierosolymitana

Last updated

The Historia de via Hierosolymitana is a Latin epic verse history of the First Crusade. Originally composed before 1120 as a work in five books by Gilo of Toucy, it was expanded by the addition of four more by an anonymous poet known as "Fulco" or simply the "Charleville Poet". Although neither poet was an eyewitness, there are unique details in Gilo's work that suggest he had access to eyewitnesses. [1]

Contents

Date and authorship

Gilo, a native of Toucy, wrote while he was a cleric in Paris before he joined the abbey of Cluny or became cardinal-bishop of Tusculum. His portion of the Historia must have been completed before 1120 at the latest. It was probably written in the first decade of the century. The anonymous, however, implies that King Baldwin I of Jerusalem was dead at the time of his writing, which places his additions after 1118. [2]

Since Jacques Sirmond in the seventeenth century, the author of the first three books of the Historia has been known by the name Fulco (Fulk). There is no evidence that this was the poet's actual name, although it has been suggested that he was the Magister Fulco who was a schoolmaster and dean at Reims Cathedral from 1165 to 1175. Internal evidence suggests that the poet hailed from the County of Champagne in France or from the vicinity of Bouillon in the Duchy of Lower Lorraine. [3]

Manuscripts

The work of Gilo survives in at least seven manuscripts, but that of the anonymous in only one. [4] Paul Riant assigned these manuscripts sigla (letters) [5] and they fall into two recensions: [6] ADG and BCF with E being a copy of D. [7] G, which is manuscript 97 in the municipal library of Charleville-Mézières, contains the only copy of the anonymous additions. [6]

The entire Charleville manuscript is the work of a single hand. Bound between wooden boards, its originally binding survives. It is a parchment palimpsest and almost certainly a private work done for an individual and not a library. Besides the Historia, it contains works by Avitus of Vienne and the Ecloga of Theodulus. These were popular texts in the schools and the owner of the manuscript may have been a teacher. [8]

Structure and style

The work in its fullest form is divided into nine books. The first three and the sixth are the work of the anonymous, while the fourth and fifth contain material from both poets. The final three are from the pen of Gilo. The work is structured as follows: [1]

  1. Council of Clermont (1095)
  2. Peasants' Crusade (1096)
  3. Princes' Crusade at Constantinople (1097)
  4. Siege of Nicaea (1097)
  5. First siege of Antioch (1097–1098)
  6. Establishment of the county of Edessa (1098)
  7. Second siege of Antioch (1098)
  8. Capture of Bara, Maʿarrat an-Nuʿman and Tartus (1098–1099)
  9. Capture of Jerusalem (1099)

The Historia is composed in dactylic hexameters with the occasional Leonine rhyme. Although both poets have a classicizing tendency, Gilo is the more learned. His Latin and his hexameters are of high quality for the twelfth century. [6] He is more restrained than his anonymous counterpart, employs more Leonine rhyme and makes extensive use of zeugma and the ablative absolute. He often uses periodic sentences and subordinate clauses where the anonymous prefers a linear style and parataxis. Both poets include many speeches, with Gilo preferring to use oratio recta (direct quotation) and the anonymous oratio obliqua . [9]

The hero of Gilo's poem is Bohemond of Taranto, while that of the anonymous is Godfrey of Bouillon. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1097</span> Calendar year

Year 1097 (MXCVII) was a common year starting on Thursday of the Julian calendar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Crusade</span> 1096–1099 Christian conquest of the Holy Land

The First Crusade (1096–1099) was the first of a series of religious wars, or Crusades, initiated, supported and at times directed by the Latin Church in the middle ages. The objective was the recovery of the Holy Land from Islamic rule. While Jerusalem had been under Muslim rule for hundreds of years, by the 11th century the Seljuk takeover of the region threatened local Christian populations, pilgrimages from the West, and the Byzantine Empire itself. The earliest initiative for the First Crusade began in 1095 when Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos requested military support from the Council of Piacenza in the empire's conflict with the Seljuk-led Turks. This was followed later in the year by the Council of Clermont, during which Pope Urban II supported the Byzantine request for military assistance and also urged faithful Christians to undertake an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Godfrey of Bouillon</span> Duke of Low Lorraine and crusader (1060–1100)

Godfrey of Bouillon was a pre-eminent leader of the First Crusade, and the first ruler of the Kingdom of Jerusalem from 1099 to 1100, although he avoided the title of king, preferring that of prince (princeps) and Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, or Advocate of the Holy Sepulchre. He was the second son of Eustace II, Count of Boulogne, and Lord of Bouillon, from his mother's inheritance, in 1076. In 1087 Emperor Henry IV confirmed him as Duke of Lower Lorraine, a reward for his support during the Great Saxon Revolt. Along with his brothers Eustace III and Baldwin of Boulogne, Godfrey joined the First Crusade in 1096. He took part in actions at Nicaea, Dorylaeum, and Antioch, before playing a key role during the capture of Jerusalem in 1099. When Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse declined the offer to become ruler of the new kingdom, Godfrey accepted the role and secured his kingdom by defeating the Fatimids at Ascalon a month later, bringing the First Crusade to an end. He died in July 1100 and was succeeded by his brother Baldwin as King of Jerusalem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse</span> French noble (c. 1041–1105)

Raymond of Saint-Gilles, also called Raymond IV of Toulouse or Raymond I of Tripoli, was the count of Toulouse, duke of Narbonne, and margrave of Provence from 1094, and one of the leaders of the First Crusade from 1096 to 1099. He spent the last five years of his life establishing the County of Tripoli in the Near East.

Abu Nasr Shams al-Muluk Duqaq was the Seljuq ruler of Damascus from 1095 to 1104.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Antioch</span> 1097–98 invasion of Seljuk-held Antioch during the First Crusade

The siege of Antioch took place during the First Crusade in 1097 and 1098, on the crusaders' way to Jerusalem through Syria. Two sieges took place in succession. The first siege, by the crusaders against the city held by the Seljuk Empire, lasted from 20 October 1097 to 3 June 1098. The second siege, of the crusader-held city by a Seljuk relieving army, lasted three weeks in June 1098, leading to the Battle of Antioch in which the crusaders defeated the relieving army led by Kerbogha. The crusaders then established the Principality of Antioch, ruled by Bohemond of Taranto.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tancred, Prince of Galilee</span> Italo-Norman leader of the First Crusade (1075-1112)

Tancred was an Italo-Norman leader of the First Crusade who later became Prince of Galilee and regent of the Principality of Antioch. Tancred came from the house of Hauteville and was the great-grandson of Norman lord Tancred of Hauteville.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Nicaea</span> Part of the First Crusade (1097)

The siege of Nicaea was the first major battle of the First Crusade, taking place from 14 May to 19 June 1097. The city was under the control of the Seljuk Turks who opted to surrender to the Byzantines in fear of the crusaders breaking into the city. The siege was followed by the Battle of Dorylaeum and the Siege of Antioch, all taking place in modern Turkey.

John the Oxite or John Oxeites was the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch from c. 1089 until 1100, when he was exiled by Prince Bohemond I of Antioch. He fled to the Byzantine Empire and continued to govern those parts of the patriarchate that were under Byzantine rule. He was a prominent writer of religious texts, and reformer of religious and charitable foundations.

Peter Tudebode was a Poitevin priest who was part of the First Crusade as part of the army of Raymond of Saint-Gilles. He wrote an account of the crusade, Historia de Hierosolymitano itinere, including an eye-witness account of the siege of Antioch of 1097–1098. The work is included in Patrologia Latina, Volume 155, pp. 758–823. The work appears in Recueil des historiens des croisades (RHC), with a translation and Præfatio by French historian Jean Besly (1572–1644).

Gilo of Toucy, also called Gilo of Paris or Gilo of Tusculum, was a French poet and cleric. A priest before he became a monk at Cluny, he was appointed cardinal-bishop of Tusculum sometime between 1121 and 1123. He served as a papal legate on four occasions: to Poland and Hungary around 1124, to Carinthia in 1126, to the Crusader states in 1128 or 1129 and to Aquitaine from 1131 until 1137. He took the side of the Antipope Anacletus II in the papal schism of 1130 and was deposed as cardinal-bishop by the Second Lateran Council in 1139.

William the Carpenter, viscount of Melun, was a French nobleman who participated in the Reconquista in Spain and on the First Crusade. He was notorious for defecting from the army both in Spain and on the crusade, but he was also known for his strength in battle, whence he earned his nickname "the Carpenter." He returned to the Holy Land after the crusade, and nothing further is known of his life or death.

Warner of Grez Count of Grez, was a French nobleman from Grez-Doiceau, currently in Walloon Brabant in Belgium. He was one of the participants in the army of Godfrey of Bouillon of the First Crusade, and died in Jerusalem a year after the crusade ended. His brother Henry is also listed as a Count of Grez and accompanied Warner on the First Crusade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">March from Antioch to Jerusalem during the First Crusade</span>

The First Crusade march down the Mediterranean coast, from recently taken Antioch to Jerusalem, started on 13 January 1099. During the march the Crusaders encountered little resistance, as local rulers preferred to make peace with them and furnish them with supplies rather than fight, with a notable exception of the aborted siege of Arqa. On 7 June, the Crusaders reached Jerusalem, which had been recaptured from the Seljuks by the Fatimids only the year before.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Belek Ghazi</span> 12th century Seljuk Turkish warlord

Belek Ghazi was a Turkish bey in the early 12th century.

Lambert, Count of Montaigu and Clermont, son of Conon, Count of Montaigu. Lambert was also Seigneur de Rochefort, Advocate of Dinant, and Advocate of Saint-Symphorien-des-Bois.

Raymond Pilet (1075–1120), the only child of Bernard I Pilet of Narbonne and his wife, whose name is unknown. Seigneur of Alès. Bernard was the son of Raymond II, Viscount of Narbone from 1066 to 1067. The name “pilet” refers to a fur that the nobility wore over their cuirass and coats-of-arms. Raymond distinguished himself as a combatant during the First Crusade.

The army of Godfrey of Bouillon, the duke of Lower Lorraine, in response to the call by Pope Urban II to both liberate Jerusalem from Muslim forces and protect the Byzantine Empire from similar attacks. Godfrey and his army, one of several Frankish forces deployed during the First Crusade, was among the first to arrive in Constantinople. The army was unique in that it included among its warriors the first three kings of Jerusalem, although Godfrey preferred the title Defender of the Holy Sepulchre, Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, as he believed that the true King of Jerusalem was Christ. This article focuses on the members of the army rather that its exploits which are described in detail in Godfrey’s biography as well as numerous sources listed below.

The title of Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, or Advocate of the Holy Sepulchre, has been ascribed to Godfrey of Bouillon in his role as the first Latin ruler of Jerusalem. In the aftermath of the First Crusade, there was disagreement among the clergy and secular leaders as the leadership of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. There was opposition to the naming of a king over the Holy City and the wearing of a crown in the city where Christ suffered with a crown of thorns. The original sources differ on the actual title assumed by Godfrey. However, it is generally accepted by most modern historians that, once Godfrey was selected to be leader, he declined to be crowned king instead taking the titles of prince (princeps) and advocate or defender of the Holy Sepulchre.

References

Editions

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.