Insurrection Act of 1807

Last updated

Insurrection Act of 1807
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleAn Act authorizing the employment of the land and naval forces of the United States, in cases of insurrections
Enacted bythe 9th United States Congress
EffectiveMarch 3, 1807
Citations
Public law 9-39
Statutes at Large 2  Stat.   443
Legislative history
Major amendments
1871, 2006, 2007

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law [1] that empowers the president of the United States to deploy the U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.

Contents

The act provides a "statutory exception" to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States. [2] [3]

Before invoking the powers under the act, 10 U.S.C.   § 254 requires the President to publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse. As part of the Posse Comitatus Act, these provisions have since been amended.

There are exceptions rooted in the president's own constitutional authority. Defense Department guidelines describe "homeland defense" as a "constitutional exception" to Posse Comitatus restrictions, meaning that measures necessary to protect national security from external threats are not subject to the same limitations.

Purpose and content

The Act empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard:

The 1807 Act replaced the earlier Calling Forth Act of 1792, which had allowed for federalization of state militias, with similar language that allowed either for federalization of state militias or use of the regular armed forces in the case of rebellion against a state government. [4] : 60  The Act did not provide a criminal penalty for insurrection, which was instead introduced by the Confiscation Act of 1862.

The 1807 Act has been modified twice. In 1861, a new section was added allowing the federal government to use the National Guard and armed forces against the will of the state government in the case of "rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States," in anticipation of continued unrest after the Civil War. [5] : 228  In 1871, the Third Enforcement Act revised this section (§ 253) to protect Black Americans from attacks by the Ku Klux Klan. The language added at that time allows the federal government to use the act to enforce the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [4] : 63–64  This section of the act was invoked during the Reconstruction era, and again during desegregation fights during the Civil Rights Era. [6]

The chief clause of the Insurrection Act, in its original 1807 wording (since updated to modern legal English), reads: [7]

An Act authorizing the employment of the land and naval forces of the United States, in cases of insurrections
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in all cases of insurrection, or obstruction to the laws, either of the United States, or of any individual state or territory, where it is lawful for the President of the United States to call forth the militia for the purpose of suppressing such insurrection, or of causing the laws to be duly executed, it shall be lawful for him to employ, for the same purposes, such part of the land or naval force of the United States, as shall be judged necessary, having first observed all the pre-requisites of the law in that respect. [8] [9]

In 2016, Public Law 114-328 was amended to include Guam and the US Virgin Islands under Ch. 13 jurisdiction. §252: "Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority" currently reads:

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion. [10] [7]

Application

The Insurrection Act has been invoked many times throughout American history. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it was invoked during labor conflicts. Later in the 20th century, it was used to enforce federally mandated desegregation, [11] with Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy invoking the Act in opposition to the affected states' political leaders to enforce court-ordered desegregation. More recently, governors have requested and received support following looting in the aftermath of Hurricane Hugo in 1989 and during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. [12]

In 2006, the George W. Bush administration considered intervening in the state of Louisiana's response to Hurricane Katrina despite the refusal from Louisiana's governor, but this was inconsistent with past precedent, politically difficult, and potentially unconstitutional. [4] : 73–75  A provision of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, added by an unidentified sponsor, amended the Insurrection act to permit military intervention without state consent, in case of an emergency that hindered the enforcement of laws. [2] Bush signed this amendment into law, but some months after it was enacted, all fifty state governors issued a joint statement against it, and the changes were repealed in January 2008. [2]

On June 1, 2020, President Donald Trump warned that he would invoke the Act in response to the George Floyd protests [13] [14] [15] following the murder of George Floyd. [16] In his official statement, Trump urged "every governor to deploy the National Guard in sufficient numbers" to re-establish civil law and order "until the violence has been quelled". [17] Federal officials talked Trump out of invoking the Insurrection Act. [18] The National Guard were called during the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol, but the Insurrection Act was not invoked. [19] [20]

Calls for reform

In 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced the CIVIL Act (Curtailing Insurrection and Violations of Individuals' Liberties Act) to restrict presidential authorities outlined in the Insurrection Act. [21] The legislation sought to require the President to consult with Congress before invoking the Act, restricting the President's activation of troops under the Act to fourteen days without explicit congressional authorization, requiring the President, Secretary of Defense, and Attorney General to issue a joint certification to Congress affirming a state's reluctance or inability to enforce the laws, thus justifying the use of the military, and prohibiting active duty troops from performing law enforcement actions unless authorized by law. [22]

In 2022, the Brennan Center for Justice submitted a proposal to the January 6 house committee, which investigated the January 6 United States Capitol attack, to reform the Insurrection Act with the intent of clarifying vague language and updating its contents to reflect issues of the present. Some of the language the BCJ identified as needing clarification include the section outlining the circumstances in which the President can invoke the Act that reads "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" are legally accepted criteria for the law's invocation. BCJ argues that this criterion is broad and can possibly be interpreted to allow the President to invoke the Act to address any conspiracy, large or small, to include protests or petty criminal acts with active duty military forces. The BCJ also argued for Congress to rewrite the line "The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means," as the inclusion of by any other means can leave open the possibility of a force not formally under the control of the Department of Defense being authorized by the President to act under the auspices of the Insurrection Act. [23]

    See also

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">National Guard (United States)</span> State military force and federal military reserve of the U.S. Army and U.S. Air force

    The National Guard is a state-based military force that becomes part of the U.S. military's reserve components of the U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force when activated for federal missions. It is a military reserve force composed of National Guard military members or units of each state and the territories of Guam, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, for a total of 54 separate organizations. It is officially created under Congress's Article 1 Section 8 ability to "raise and support armies". All members of the National Guard are also members of the organized militia of the United States as defined by 10 U.S.C. § 246. National Guard units are under the dual control of state governments and the federal government.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Posse Comitatus Act</span> United States law limiting use of the federal military in domestic policy

    The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes that limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. Congress passed the Act as an amendment to an army appropriation bill following the end of Reconstruction and updated it in 1956, 1981 and 2021.

    Aid to the Civil Power (ACP) or Military Aid to the Civil Power (MACP) is the use of the armed forces in support of the civil authorities of a state. Different countries have varying policies regarding the relationship between their military and civil authorities.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">War Powers Resolution</span> 1973 U.S. federal law (50 U.S.C. 1541-48)

    The War Powers Resolution is a federal law intended to check the U.S. president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of the U.S. Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States congressional joint resolution. It provides that the president can send the U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization", or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces".

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Northern Command</span> Unified combatant command of the United States Armed Forces

    The United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) is one of eleven unified combatant commands of the United States Department of Defense. The command is tasked with providing military support for non-military authorities in the U.S., and protecting the territory and national interests of the United States within the continental United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, The Bahamas, and the air, land and sea approaches to these areas. It is the U.S. military command which, if applicable, would be the primary defender against an invasion of the U.S.

    The powers of the president of the United States include those explicitly granted by Article II of the United States Constitution as well as those granted by Acts of Congress, implied powers, and also a great deal of soft power that is attached to the presidency.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil control of the military</span> Doctrine concerning civil authority over military decisions

    Civil control of the military is a doctrine in military and political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the state's civil authority, rather than completely with professional military leadership itself. As such, a "fundamental requirement of any nation is to ensure that the activities of its armed forces are subordinated to the political purposes of constitutional government; hence, the armed forces must be under civil control". The concept of civil control falls within the overarching concept of civil-military relations representing the "societal imperative that the military remain subordinate to civil authority and that it reflect, to an appropriate degree, societal values and norms".

    Two Militia Acts, enacted by the 2nd United States Congress in 1792, provided for the organization of militia and empowered the president of the United States to take command of the state militia in times of imminent invasion or insurrection.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">South Carolina National Guard</span> Organized militia of the U.S. state of South Carolina

    The South Carolina National Guard (SCNG) consists of the South Carolina Army National Guard and the South Carolina Air National Guard.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Adjutant General of Oklahoma</span>

    The Adjutant General of Oklahoma is the highest-ranking military official in the state of Oklahoma, subordinate only to the Governor of Oklahoma. The highest officer of the Oklahoma National Guard, the Adjutant General is the principal advisor to the Governor on military affairs and the head of the Oklahoma Military Department as the Secretary of the Military.

    <i>Posse comitatus</i> Aspect of common law

    The posse comitatus, frequently shortened to posse, is in common law a group of people mobilized to suppress lawlessness, defend the people, or otherwise protect the place, property, and public welfare. It may be called by the conservator of peace – typically a reeve, sheriff, chief, or another special/regional designee like an officer of the peace potentially accompanied by or with the direction of a justice or ajudged parajudicial process given the imminence of actual damage. The posse comitatus as an English jurisprudentially defined doctrine dates back to 9th-century England and the campaigns of Alfred the Great, and before in ancient custom and law of locally martialed forces, simultaneous thereafter with the officiation of sheriff nomination to keep the regnant peace. There must be a lawful reason for a posse, which can never be used for lawlessness.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Authority for Use of Military Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the United States</span>

    "Authority for Use of Military Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the United States" is a 37 page classified United States Department of Justice memorandum dated October 23, 2001. This memo states that the President has both constitutional and statutory authority to use the military as a means to combat terrorist activity within the United States. This memo is a direct result of the terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001. Its existence is known because it was referred to in another Department of Justice memo. According to the latter memo, the former memo argued that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution had no application to domestic military operations. The memo has been released to the public.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Enforcement Act of 1870</span> United States federal law

    The Enforcement Act of 1870, also known as the Civil Rights Act of 1870 or First Ku Klux Klan Act, or Force Act, is a United States federal law that empowers the President to enforce the first section of the Fifteenth Amendment throughout the United States. The act was the first of three Enforcement Acts passed by the United States Congress in 1870 and 1871, during the Reconstruction Era, to combat attacks on the voting rights of African Americans from state officials or violent groups like the Ku Klux Klan.

    Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA) is the process by which United States military assets and personnel can be used to assist in missions normally carried out by civil authorities. These missions have included: responses to natural and man-made disasters, law enforcement support, special events, and other domestic activities. A recent example of the use of DSCA is the military response to Hurricane Katrina. DSCA is the overarching guidance of how the United States military can be requested by a federal agency and the procedures that govern the actions of the military during employment.

    The reserve components of the United States Armed Forces are military organizations whose members generally perform a minimum of 39 days of military duty per year and who augment the active duty military when necessary. The reserve components are also referred to collectively as the National Guard and Reserve.

    Martial law in the United States refers to times in United States history in which in a region, state, city, or the whole United States was placed under the control of a military body. On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power, within certain constraints, to impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia. In each state, the governor has the power to impose martial law within the borders of the state. In the United States, martial law has been used in a limited number of circumstances, such as New Orleans during the Battle of New Orleans; after major disasters, such as the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, or during riots, such as the Omaha race riot of 1919 or the 1920 Lexington riots; local leaders declared martial law to protect themselves from mob violence, such as Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War, or Utah during the Utah War; or in response to chaos associated with protests and rioting, such as the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike, in Hawaii after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and during the Civil Rights Movement in response to the Cambridge riot of 1963.

    The separation of military and police roles is the principle by which the military and law enforcement perform clearly differentiated duties and do not interfere with each other's areas of discipline. Whereas the military's purpose is to fight wars, law enforcement is meant to enforce domestic law. Neither is trained specifically to do the other's job. Military and law enforcement differ, sometimes fundamentally, in areas such as source of authority, training in use of force, training in investigation and prosecution, and training in enforcing laws and ensuring civil liberties.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021</span> United States federal law

    The William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2021. Analogous NDAAs have been passed annually for 59 years. The act is named in honor of Representative Mac Thornberry, who served as either the chair or the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. Thornberry retired from Congress at the end of the congressional session.

    Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807.

    References

    1. ↑ (10 U.S.C.   §§ 251 – 255; prior to 2016, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335; amended 2006, 2007)
    2. 1 2 3 Hoffmeister, Thaddeus (2010). "An Insurrection Act for the Twenty-First Century". Stetson Law Review. 39: 898. Once finalized, the Enforcement Act was quietly tucked into a large defense authorization bill: the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. Very few people, including many members of Congress who voted on the larger defense bill, actually knew they were also voting to modify the Insurrection Act. The secrecy surrounding the Enforcement Act was so pervasive that the actual sponsor of the new legislation remains unknown to this day.
    3. ↑ Magsamen, Kelly (June 12, 2020). "4 Ways Congress Can Amend the Insurrection Act". Center for American Progress . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
    4. 1 2 3 Banks, William C. (2009). "Providing Supplemental Security – The Insurrection Act and the Military Role in Responding to Domestic Crises" (PDF). Journal of National Security Law & Policy. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 8, 2017. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
    5. ↑ Coakley, Robert (1988). The role of federal military forces in domestic disorders: 1789–1878 (PDF). Washington: United States Army Center of Military History . Retrieved January 28, 2024.
    6. ↑ "The Posse Comitatus Act and Related Matters: The Use of the Military to Execute Civilian Law" (PDF). Congressional Research Service . November 6, 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
    7. 1 2 Moore, Cortney (June 1, 2020). "What is the Insurrection Act?". FOX Business. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
    8. ↑ Ninth Congress. Sees. H. Ch. 37, 39, 40, 41. 1807.
    9. ↑ Montaro, Domenico (June 1, 2020). "What Is The Insurrection Act That Trump Is Threatening To Invoke?". NPR.org. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
    10. ↑ "[USC02] 10 USC Ch. 13: Insurrection". uscode.house.gov. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
    11. ↑ Hauser, Christine (June 2, 2020). "What Is the Insurrection Act of 1807, the Law Behind Trump's Threat to States?". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 3, 2020. Retrieved June 3, 2020.
    12. ↑ Elsea, Jennifer K. (August 14, 2006). "The Use of Federal Troops for Disaster Assistance: Legal Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service . Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2020. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
    13. ↑ Gregorian, Dareh; Kube, Courtney; Lee, Carol E. (June 2, 2020). "Trump says he will deploy military if state officials can't contain protest violence". NBC News . Archived from the original on June 3, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
    14. ↑ Anderson, Scott R.; Paradis, Michel (June 3, 2020). "Can Trump Use the Insurrection Act to Deploy Troops to American Streets?". Lawfare. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
    15. ↑ Smith, B. D. (April 15, 2021). "Invoking the Insurrection Act: The Right Thing To Do?" (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center.
    16. ↑ Carney, Jordain (June 1, 2020). "Cotton: Trump should use Insurrection Act to deploy active-duty military to cities". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 3, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
    17. ↑ "Statement by the President". whitehouse.gov . June 1, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2020– via National Archives.
    18. ↑ Schmidt, Michael S.; Haberman, Maggie (June 25, 2021). "Trump Aides Prepared Insurrection Act Order During Debate Over Protests". The New York Times . Archived from the original on May 10, 2023.
    19. ↑ Jessica Lee (January 11, 2021). "Did Trump Invoke Insurrection Act?". Snopes . Retrieved January 28, 2024.
    20. ↑ Baudoin-Laarman, Louis (January 12, 2021). "Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act". AFP. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
    21. ↑ "H.R. 7135 (IH) - Curtailing Insurrection act Violations of Individuals' Liberties Act". GovInfo. June 8, 2020. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
    22. ↑ "Blumenthal Introduces Legislation to Limit Unchecked Presidential Authority under the Insurrection Act". U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (Press release). June 4, 2020. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
    23. ↑ Goitein, Elizabeth; Nunn, Joseph (September 20, 2022). "How to Fix the Insurrection Act". Brennan Center for Justice . Retrieved October 4, 2022.
    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.