Integrability of demand

Last updated November 21, 2024

In microeconomic theory, the problem of the integrability of demand functions deals with recovering a utility function (that is, consumer preferences) from a given walrasian demand function.^[1] The "integrability" in the name comes from the fact that demand functions can be shown to satisfy a system of partial differential equations in prices, and solving (integrating) this system is a crucial step in recovering the underlying utility function generating demand.

Mathematical formulation

Given consumption space $X$ and a known walrasian demand function $x:\mathbb {R} _{++}^{L}\times \mathbb {R} _{+}\rightarrow X$ , solving the problem of integrability of demand consists in finding a utility function $u:X\rightarrow \mathbb {R}$ such that

x(p,w)=\operatorname {argmax} _{x\in X}\{u(x):p\cdot x\leq w\}

That is, it is essentially "reversing" the consumer's utility maximization problem.

Sufficient conditions for solution

There are essentially two steps in solving the integrability problem for a demand function. First, one recovers an expenditure function $e(p,u)$ for the consumer. Then, with the properties of expenditure functions, one can construct an at-least-as-good set

V_{u}=\{x\in \mathbb {R} _{+}^{L}:u(x)\geq u\}

which is equivalent to finding a utility function $u(x)$ .

If the demand function $x(p,w)$ is homogenous of degree zero, satisfies Walras' Law, and has a negative semi-definite substitution matrix $S(p,w)$ , then it is possible to follow those steps to find a utility function $u(x)$ that generates demand $x(p,w)$ .^[4]

Proof: if the first two conditions (homogeneity of degree zero and Walras' Law) are met, then duality between the expenditure minimization problem and the utility maximization problem tells us that

x(p,w)=h(p,v(p,w))

where $v(p,w)=u(x(p,w))$ is the consumers' indirect utility function and $h(p,u)$ is the consumers' hicksian demand function. Fix a utility level $u_{0}=v(p,w)$ ^{[nb 1]}. From Shephard's lemma, and with the identity above we have

{\frac {\partial e(p)}{\partial p}}=x(p,e(p))

(1)

where we omit the fixed utility level $u_{0}$ for conciseness. ( 1 ) is a system of PDEs in the prices vector $p$ , and Frobenius' theorem can be used to show that if the matrix

D_{p}x(p,w)+D_{w}x(p,w)x(p,w)

is symmetric, then it has a solution. Notice that the matrix above is simply the substitution matrix $S(p,w)$ , which we assumed to be symmetric firsthand. So ( 1 ) has a solution, and it is (at least theoretically) possible to find an expenditure function $e(p)$ such that $p\cdot x(p,e(p))=e(p)$ .

For the second step, by definition,

e(p)=e(p,u_{0})=\min\{p\cdot x:x\in V_{u_{0}}\}

where $V_{u_{0}}=\{x\in \mathbb {R} _{+}^{L}:u(x)\geq u_{0}\}$ . By the properties of $e(p,u)$ , it is not too hard to show ^[4] that $V_{u_{0}}=\{x\in \mathbb {R} _{+}^{L}:p\cdot x\geq e(p,u_{0})\}$ . Doing some algebraic manipulation with the inequality $p\cdot x\geq e(p,u_{0})$ , one can reconstruct $V_{u_{0}}$ in its original form with $u(x)\geq u_{0}$ . If that is done, one has found a utility function $u:X\rightarrow \mathbb {R}$ that generates consumer demand $x(p,w)$ .

Notes

↑ This arbirtrary choice is valid because utility levels are meaningless since preferences are preserved under monotone transformations of utility functions

Related Research Articles

In computational complexity theory, bounded-error quantum polynomial time (BQP) is the class of decision problems solvable by a quantum computer in polynomial time, with an error probability of at most 1/3 for all instances. It is the quantum analogue to the complexity class BPP.

In mathematics, the $L p$ spaces are function spaces defined using a natural generalization of the $p$ -norm for finite-dimensional vector spaces. They are sometimes called Lebesgue spaces, named after Henri Lebesgue, although according to the Bourbaki group they were first introduced by Frigyes Riesz.

In mathematical analysis, a function of bounded variation, also known as $BV$ function, is a real-valued function whose total variation is bounded (finite): the graph of a function having this property is well behaved in a precise sense. For a continuous function of a single variable, being of bounded variation means that the distance along the direction of the $y$ -axis, neglecting the contribution of motion along $x$ -axis, traveled by a point moving along the graph has a finite value. For a continuous function of several variables, the meaning of the definition is the same, except for the fact that the continuous path to be considered cannot be the whole graph of the given function, but can be every intersection of the graph itself with a hyperplane parallel to a fixed $x$ -axis and to the $y$ -axis.

In mathematics, a norm is a function from a real or complex vector space to the non-negative real numbers that behaves in certain ways like the distance from the origin: it commutes with scaling, obeys a form of the triangle inequality, and is zero only at the origin. In particular, the Euclidean distance in a Euclidean space is defined by a norm on the associated Euclidean vector space, called the Euclidean norm, the 2-norm, or, sometimes, the magnitude or length of the vector. This norm can be defined as the square root of the inner product of a vector with itself.

Utility maximization was first developed by utilitarian philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. In microeconomics, the utility maximization problem is the problem consumers face: "How should I spend my money in order to maximize my utility?" It is a type of optimal decision problem. It consists of choosing how much of each available good or service to consume, taking into account a constraint on total spending (income), the prices of the goods and their preferences.

In microeconomics, a consumer's Marshallian demand function is the quantity they demand of a particular good as a function of its price, their income, and the prices of other goods, a more technical exposition of the standard demand function. It is a solution to the utility maximization problem of how the consumer can maximize their utility for given income and prices. A synonymous term is uncompensated demand function, because when the price rises the consumer is not compensated with higher nominal income for the fall in their real income, unlike in the Hicksian demand function. Thus the change in quantity demanded is a combination of a substitution effect and a wealth effect. Although Marshallian demand is in the context of partial equilibrium theory, it is sometimes called Walrasian demand as used in general equilibrium theory.

In microeconomics, the expenditure function gives the minimum amount of money an individual needs to spend to achieve some level of utility, given a utility function and the prices of the available goods.

In microeconomics, the expenditure minimization problem is the dual of the utility maximization problem: "how much money do I need to reach a certain level of happiness?". This question comes in two parts. Given a consumer's utility function, prices, and a utility target,

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arrow–Debreu model</span> Economic Model

In mathematical economics, the Arrow–Debreu model is a theoretical general equilibrium model. It posits that under certain economic assumptions, there must be a set of prices such that aggregate supplies will equal aggregate demands for every commodity in the economy.

In mathematical analysis, and applications in geometry, applied mathematics, engineering, and natural sciences, a function of a real variable is a function whose domain is the real numbers $, or a subset of that contains an interval of positive length. Most real functions that are considered and studied are differentiable in some interval. The most widely considered such functions are the real functions, which are the real-valued functions of a real variable, that is, the functions of a real variable whose codomain is the set of real numbers.$

In microeconomics, a consumer's Hicksian demand function or compensated demand function for a good is their quantity demanded as part of the solution to minimizing their expenditure on all goods while delivering a fixed level of utility. Essentially, a Hicksian demand function shows how an economic agent would react to the change in the price of a good, if the agent's income was compensated to guarantee the agent the same utility previous to the change in the price of the good—the agent will remain on the same indifference curve before and after the change in the price of the good. The function is named after John Hicks.

Constant elasticity of substitution (CES) is a common specification of many production functions and utility functions in neoclassical economics. CES holds that the ability to substitute one input factor with another to maintain the same level of production stays constant over different production levels. For utility functions, CES means the consumer has constant preferences of how they would like to substitute different goods while keeping the same level of utility, for all levels of utility. What this means is that both producers and consumers have similar input structures and preferences no matter the level of output or utility.

In convex analysis and the calculus of variations, both branches of mathematics, a pseudoconvex function is a function that behaves like a convex function with respect to finding its local minima, but need not actually be convex. Informally, a differentiable function is pseudoconvex if it is increasing in any direction where it has a positive directional derivative. The property must hold in all of the function domain, and not only for nearby points.

In mathematics and economics, the envelope theorem is a major result about the differentiability properties of the value function of a parameterized optimization problem. As we change parameters of the objective, the envelope theorem shows that, in a certain sense, changes in the optimizer of the objective do not contribute to the change in the objective function. The envelope theorem is an important tool for comparative statics of optimization models.

Competitive equilibrium is a concept of economic equilibrium, introduced by Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu in 1951, appropriate for the analysis of commodity markets with flexible prices and many traders, and serving as the benchmark of efficiency in economic analysis. It relies crucially on the assumption of a competitive environment where each trader decides upon a quantity that is so small compared to the total quantity traded in the market that their individual transactions have no influence on the prices. Competitive markets are an ideal standard by which other market structures are evaluated.

In the calculus of variations, the notion of polyconvexity is a generalization of the notion of convexity for functions defined on spaces of matrices. The notion of polyconvexity was introduced by John M. Ball as a sufficient conditions for proving the existence of energy minimizers in nonlinear elasticity theory. It is satisfied by a large class of hyperelastic stored energy densities, such as Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden materials. The notion of polyconvexity is related to the notions of convexity, quasiconvexity and rank-one convexity through the following diagram:

The Price of Anarchy (PoA) is a concept in economics and game theory that measures how the efficiency of a system degrades due to selfish behavior of its agents. It is a general notion that can be extended to diverse systems and notions of efficiency. For example, consider the system of transportation of a city and many agents trying to go from some initial location to a destination. Here, efficiency means the average time for an agent to reach the destination. In the 'centralized' solution, a central authority can tell each agent which path to take in order to minimize the average travel time. In the 'decentralized' version, each agent chooses its own path. The Price of Anarchy measures the ratio between average travel time in the two cases.

In mathematics, low-rank approximation refers to the process of approximating a given matrix by a matrix of lower rank. More precisely, it is a minimization problem, in which the cost function measures the fit between a given matrix and an approximating matrix, subject to a constraint that the approximating matrix has reduced rank. The problem is used for mathematical modeling and data compression. The rank constraint is related to a constraint on the complexity of a model that fits the data. In applications, often there are other constraints on the approximating matrix apart from the rank constraint, e.g., non-negativity and Hankel structure.

Monotone comparative statics is a sub-field of comparative statics that focuses on the conditions under which endogenous variables undergo monotone changes when there is a change in the exogenous parameters. Traditionally, comparative results in economics are obtained using the Implicit Function Theorem, an approach that requires the concavity and differentiability of the objective function as well as the interiority and uniqueness of the optimal solution. The methods of monotone comparative statics typically dispense with these assumptions. It focuses on the main property underpinning monotone comparative statics, which is a form of complementarity between the endogenous variable and exogenous parameter. Roughly speaking, a maximization problem displays complementarity if a higher value of the exogenous parameter increases the marginal return of the endogenous variable. This guarantees that the set of solutions to the optimization problem is increasing with respect to the exogenous parameter.

K-convex functions, first introduced by Scarf, are a special weakening of the concept of convex function which is crucial in the proof of the optimality of the $policy in inventory control theory. The policy is characterized by two numbers s and S,, such that when the inventory level falls below level s, an order is issued for a quantity that brings the inventory up to level S, and nothing is ordered otherwise. Gallego and Sethi have generalized the concept of K -convexity to higher dimensional Euclidean spaces.$

References

↑ https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/14705907.pdf
↑ Samuelson, Paul (1950). "The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory". Economia. 17 (68): 355–385. doi:10.2307/2549499.
↑ Hurwicz, Leonid; Uzawa, Hirofumi (1971). "Chapter 6: On the integrability of demand functions". In Chipman, John S.; Richter, Marcel K.; Sonnenschein, Hugo F. (eds.). Preferences, utility, and demand: A Minnesota symposium. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. pp. 114–148.
1 2 Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Micheal D.; Green, Jerry R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 75–80. ISBN 978-0195073409.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[5] This arbirtrary choice is valid because utility levels are meaningless since preferences are preserved under monotone transformations of utility functions

[1] ttps://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/14705907.pdf

[2] Samuelson, Paul (1950). "The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory". Economia. 17 (68): 355–385. doi:10.2307/2549499.

[3] Hurwicz, Leonid; Uzawa, Hirofumi (1971). "Chapter 6: On the integrability of demand functions". In Chipman, John S.; Richter, Marcel K.; Sonnenschein, Hugo F. (eds.). Preferences, utility, and demand: A Minnesota symposium. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. pp. 114–148.

[mwg-4] 1 2 Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Micheal D.; Green, Jerry R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 75–80. ISBN 978-0195073409.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[nb 1]