Isbell's zigzag theorem

Last updated

Isbell's zigzag theorem, a theorem of abstract algebra characterizing the notion of a dominion, was introduced by American mathematician John R. Isbell in 1966. [1] Dominion is a concept in semigroup theory, within the study of the properties of epimorphisms. For example, let U is a subsemigroup of S containing U, the inclusion map is an epimorphism if and only if , furthermore, a map is an epimorphism if and only if . [2] The categories of rings and semigroups are examples of categories with non-surjective epimorphism, and the Zig-zag theorem gives necessary and sufficient conditions for determining whether or not a given morphism is epi. [3] Proofs of this theorem are topological in nature, beginning with Isbell (1966) for semigroups, and continuing by Philip (1974), completing Isbell's original proof. [3] [4] [5] The pure algebraic proofs were given by Howie (1976) and Storrer (1976). [3] [4] [note 1]

Contents

Statement

Zig-zag

The dashed line is the spine of the zig-zag. Zigzag theorem 2.svg
The dashed line is the spine of the zig-zag.

Zig-zag: [7] [2] [8] [9] [10] [note 2] If U is a submonoid of a monoid (or a subsemigroup of a semigroup) S, then a system of equalities;

in which and , is called a zig-zag of length m in S over U with value d. By the spine of the zig-zag we mean the ordered (2m + 1)-tuple .

Dominion

Dominion: [5] [6] Let U be a submonoid of a monoid (or a subsemigroup of a semigroup) S. The dominion is the set of all elements such that, for all homomorphisms coinciding on U, .

We call a subsemigroup U of a semigroup U closed if , and dense if . [2] [12]

Isbell's zigzag theorem

Isbell's zigzag theorem: [13]

If U is a submonoid of a monoid S then if and only if either or there exists a zig-zag in S over U with value d that is, there is a sequence of factorizations of d of the form

This statement also holds for semigroups. [7] [14] [9] [4] [10]

For monoids, this theorem can be written more concisely: [15] [2] [16]

Let S be a monoid, let U be a submonoid of S, and let . Then if and only if in the tensor product .

Application

A proof sketch for example of non-surjective epimorphism in the category of rings by using zig-zag

We show that: Let to be ring homomorphisms, and , . When for all , then for all .

as required.

See also

References

Citations

Bibliography

Further reading

Footnote

  1. These pure algebraic proofs were based on the tensor product characterization of the dominant elements for monoid by Stenström (1971). [6] [4]
  2. See Hoffman [5] or Mitchell [11] for commutative diagram.
  3. Some results were corrected in Isbell (1969).