Janet Halley | |
---|---|
Born | February 1952 72) | (age
Academic background | |
Education | Princeton University (BA) University of California, Los Angeles (PhD) Yale University (JD) |
Influences | Eve Sedgwick, Friedrich Nietzsche, Michel Foucault, Sigmund Freud |
Academic work | |
Discipline | Family law,gender,sexuality |
Institutions | Harvard University Stanford University Hamilton College |
Notable works | Split Decisions:How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism |
Notable ideas | Governance feminism |
Janet Elizabeth Halley (born February 1952) is an American legal scholar who is the Eli Goldston Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Her work is influenced by critical legal studies,legal realism and postmodernism.
A self-described feminist, [1] Halley is known for her critique of American feminism,dominance feminism,and left legalism,as well as her work on family law and the regulation of sexuality. She has also been a prominent voice in the public debate regarding sexual conduct codes on campuses in the United States in recent years,arguing against the broadening of the definition sexual assault and the adoption of the affirmative consent standard. She was the first expert on gender and sexuality in the legal system to receive a position at Harvard University. [2]
Halley received a Bachelor's degree summa cum laude in English literature from Princeton University in 1974. In 1980 she earned a PhD in English literature from the University of California at Los Angeles,focusing on seventeenth century English poetry. Before pursuing legal education,she taught English for five years at Hamilton College as an assistant professor. Halley received her J.D. from Yale University in 1988,and then clerked for Judge Gilbert S. Merritt Jr. at the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. She worked two years as a litigator for the Boston office of the law firm Skadden,Arps,Slate,Meagher &Flom,before joining the Stanford Law School. She taught at Stanford from 1991 until 2000,and then joined the Harvard law school. In 2006 she was appointed to the Royall chair in the institution. [3]
Halley has written on a wide variety of issues,but is widely known for her criticism of left legalism,radical dominance feminist thought and cultural feminism. She argues that left legal identitarian projects,such as feminist ones,have "bestowed sacred cow status" on certain reforms and deployed "identity-based claims in the form of rights,supposedly trumping all competing normative claims". [4] Such legal projects,according to her,include,among others,affirmative action,sexual harassment and racial justice legal reforms.
Much of her critical writing is directed towards legal projects of dominance feminism and cultural feminism,branches of feminism which she says hold on to a self-perception of political powerlessness,despite gaining many achievements and influence in governance since the 1980s,especially in the legal realm. [5] [6] According to her,this self-perception prevents American feminism from examining social issues through other theories of sexual life and politics,such as queer theory and the knowledge-power theory of Michel Foucault,as well as making it difficult for feminists to acknowledge other just causes and harm to men. [7] By focusing on legal projects and sanctions on issues such as rape,pornography and commercial sex,Halley claims radical feminism has adopted a sentimental and moralizing view of legal action,and created alliances with conservative and paternalistic male elites. [5] [8] She argues that seeking State-centered and legal solutions is a narrow point of view and many times an obstacle to finding pragmatic solutions to wide social problems such as sexual inequality,and that this approach often fosters weakness in the group it is trying to protect,enforcing traditional social norms of female fragility. [8] In her book Split Decisions:How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism she calls to reexamine politics of sexuality by putting aside the feminist perspective,and to appreciate and learn from the splits and contradictions among different theories of sexuality.
In the past Halley stated that she identifies increasingly with and as a gay man [9] and published an article on queer theory under the name Ian Halley. [10] In Split Decisions she described herself as:
A sex-positive postmodernist,only rarely and intermittently feminist,a skeptic about identity politics,with a strong attraction to "queer" revelations of the strangeness and unknowability of social and sexual life,and a deep distrust of slave-moralistic pretensions to identity-political "powerlessness". [11]
The term "governance feminism" was first coined in Halley's book Split Decisions and later developed it in several articles,defining it as the new muscular feminist organizational style of the "quite noticeable installation of feminists and feminist ideas in actual legal-institutional power". [12] [13] Examples of such power according to her are the numerous sexual harassment programs in educational institutions and corporations in the United States and the development of feminist expertise that is used by special offices on gender equality and Non-governmental organizations. The name of the term was derived from the similarities Halley and colleagues identified between the powerful network-like non governmental organization establishments that feminists adopted,and the law produced by the school of new governance. [13] (The latter is a movement in governance aimed at problem-solving through public participation in deliberations,which is intended to legitimize governing and make it more efficient [14] ).
Halley claims that governance feminism,led mainly by radical and cultural feminists,fails to acknowledge its will to power and the power it has acquired,and still views itself as the underdog through a theory of male domination and female subordination. [5] She also points out a paradox in the fact that feminists work against male violence by envisioning solutions that are muscular and top-down in their power formation:
In Foucault's terms,they have not learned - they do not want to learn - how to cut off the head of the king. They seek to wield the sovereign's scepter and especially his sword. Criminal law is their preferred vehicle for reform and enforcement;and their idea of what to do with criminal law is not to manage populations,not to warn and deter,but to endimpunity and abolish. [13]
The term is to be further developed in the forthcoming book Governance Feminism:an Introduction,to be published by Minnesota University press,co-authored by Halley,Hila Shamir,Prabha Kotiswaran and Rachel Rebouche. [15]
One of the key feminist legal projects that are subject of Halley's writing is the criminalization of rape in international law. Governance feminism,according to her,had many achievements in this area,mainly in the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia,international criminal tribunal for Rwanda and Rome statute of the international criminal court,where a wide range of feminist legal rules were accepted. This has created what Halley names "the war rape antinomy":a dilemma among two separate feminist projects,one aimed at moving sex crimes higher up the hierarchy of the international courts' criminality,and the other at isolating sexual assault on women for separate prosecution. "To put it bluntly",Halley writes,"making rape visible contextualised sexual assaults in war —while framing sexual violence as an independent predicate crime reclassified rape as war. The former placed the rape of women in visible proximity to the death of men;the latter exceptionalised the rape of women,detached it from other aspects of the armed conflict in which it occurred,and focused prosecution,conviction and punishment on rape alone". [16]
Through a close literary reading of the memoir A Woman in Berlin, Halley raises several legal questions regarding the criminalization of rape. The memoir describes the efforts of a German woman to survive the occupation of Berlin by the Red Army in 1945,and the widespread rapes committed by Soviet soldiers. Halley suggests that a special condemnation of rape,which emphasises sexual crimes in war over others,may weaponise rape and make it a tool of war or a casus belli. She also draws attention to the possibility that the idea that rape in war is a fate worse than death,which is advocated by some feminist circles,has downsides. These include a tendency to classify some armed conflicts in which war rapes occurred as "wars against women," despite the clear suffering they have inflicted on men too. She urges for suspicion towards such comparisons in legal advocacy. [16]
Halley has voiced criticism on the shift of policies at several higher education institutions enforcing the anti-sex discrimination law,Title IX,and was one of the leaders of the opposition to a new sexual conduct code at Harvard in 2014. She claims that at some campuses the requirements for conviction of sexual assault were loosened,and that this was influenced by dominance feminist ideas coming from the department of education office for civil rights and student movements. [8] These changes,according to Halley,include allowing complaints on the basis of subjective unwantedness of the sexual conduct,and the disregard of the objective reasonableness requirement of the supreme court,which ruled that the conduct must be sufficiently severe or pervasive and to have a detrimental impact on the complainant in the eyes of the reasonable person. [8] She also argues that the new requirements of affirmative consent in policies and procedures in some institutions,including Harvard,will foster a repressive and sex-negative moral order,and wrote that:
They will enable people who enthusiastically participated in sex to deny it later and punish their partners. They will function as protective legislation that encourages weakness among those they protect. They will install traditional social norms of male responsibility and female helplessness. [8]
Halley was one of 28 Harvard law school faculty members to sign a statement objecting to changes to the sexual harassment policy and procedures of the university in 2014. The statement claimed that the new policy and procedures "lack the most basic elements of fairness and due process" and "expanded the scope of forbidden conduct",so that it includes rules that are bluntly one-sided in favor of complainants. [8] In a memo sent to her colleagues in Harvard,following the reform,Halley acknowledged a need to change the former "slipshod,dismissive and actively malign handling of sexual harassment claims",but warned that the new code threatens stigmatized minorities,lacks support for accused students and harms equal procedural treatment. [17] In the following year after Halley and colleagues raised their concerns,the Harvard law school announced it will implement its own policy and procedures on prevention of sexual harassment,which unlike the general policy of the university,provides a lawyer to accused students and includes a separate adjudicatory panel to determine guilt,whose members are not associated with Harvard. [18]
Halley has visited several universities to share her ideas and views on changes to sexual conduct codes on campuses. [1]
Several feminist legal scholars have criticized Halley's work,and particularly her call to "take a break from feminism". In her book Reshaping the Work-Family Debate,Joan Williams writes that this call is "not a play date that women subjected to domestic violence,rape,impoverishment upon divorce,sex discrimination at work,and other subjects at the center of feminism would care to attend". [19] Williams argues that Halley's work is focused more on an assimilation-desire to resemble men,than on women's issues. She also hints that there is a connection between what she terms as Halley's "celebration of masculinity" and her position at Harvard,writing that "it is intriguing that Harvard has chosen a gender theorist who makes a name for herself by telling women not to make demands on men". [19]
Michele Dauber from the Stanford law school objects to Halley's claim that legal procedure is a potentially harmful tool which is used too frequently by feminists to regulate sexuality. In an interview with The New York Times Magazine she said that "The actual lived experience of real women is that they often are the victims of sexual violence. It's absurd to say that it undermines women's agency to give them a tool to stop that bad thing from happening. People are suffering from harm,you provide them with a remedy,and somehow that's infantilizing? No,it's empowering." [1]
Robin West criticized Halley's work on left legalism and named it part of a neo-critical legal movement. West argues that unlike the traditional critical legal studies,which suggested utopian possibilities of less alienated forms of existence,neo-critics such as Halley write against attempts to advance such possibilities,targeting the "expanded civil rights world,with its focus on the injuries sustained by various minorities,cultures,sexually harassed working women,disabled adults,and badly educated and learning-disabled children". [20] She claims that Halley and her colleagues refuse to acknowledge human suffering and its causes as a subject for left-legal theoretical scholarship,and that this brings the new critical movement closer to libertarian goals that it might want to admit. [21]
Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political,economic,personal,and social equality of the sexes. Feminism holds the position that societies prioritize the male point of view and that women are treated unjustly in these societies. Efforts to change this include fighting against gender stereotypes and improving educational,professional,and interpersonal opportunities and outcomes for women.
Radical feminism is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical re-ordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts,while recognizing that women's experiences are also affected by other social divisions such as in race,class,and sexual orientation. The ideology and movement emerged in the 1960s.
Sex-positive feminism,also known as pro-sex feminism,sex-radical feminism,or sexually liberal feminism,is a feminist movement centering on the idea that sexual freedom is an essential component of women's freedom. They oppose legal or social efforts to control sexual activities between consenting adults,whether they are initiated by the government,other feminists,opponents of feminism,or any other institution. They embrace sexual minority groups,endorsing the value of coalition-building with marginalized groups. Sex-positive feminism is connected with the sex-positive movement. Sex-positive feminism brings together anti-censorship activists,LGBT activists,feminist scholars,producers of pornography and erotica,among others. Sex-positive feminists believe that prostitution can be a positive experience if workers are treated with respect,and agree that sex work should not be criminalized.
Catharine Alice MacKinnon is an American feminist legal scholar,activist,and author. She is the Elizabeth A. Long Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School,where she has been tenured since 1990,and the James Barr Ames Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. From 2008 to 2012,she was the special gender adviser to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.
Feminist legal theory,also known as feminist jurisprudence,is based on the belief that the law has been fundamental in women's historical subordination. Feminist jurisprudence the philosophy of law is based on the political,economic,and social inequality of the sexes and feminist legal theory is the encompassment of law and theory connected.The project of feminist legal theory is twofold. First,feminist jurisprudence seeks to explain ways in which the law played a role in women's former subordinate status. Feminist legal theory was directly created to recognize and combat the legal system built primarily by the and for male intentions,often forgetting important components and experiences women and marginalized communities face. The law perpetuates a male valued system at the expense of female values. Through making sure all people have access to participate in legal systems as professionals to combating cases in constitutional and discriminatory law,feminist legal theory is utilized for it all.
Feminist sociology is an interdisciplinary exploration of gender and power throughout society. Here,it uses conflict theory and theoretical perspectives to observe gender in its relation to power,both at the level of face-to-face interaction and reflexivity within social structures at large. Focuses include sexual orientation,race,economic status,and nationality.
Sexual ethics is a branch of philosophy that considers the ethics or morality or otherwise in sexual behavior. Sexual ethics seeks to understand,evaluate and critique interpersonal relationships and sexual activities from a social,cultural,and philosophical perspective. Some people consider aspects of human sexuality,such as gender identification and sexual orientation,as well as consent,sexual relations and procreation,as giving rise to issues of sexual ethics.
Sheila Jeffreys is a former professor of political science at the University of Melbourne,born in England. A lesbian feminist scholar,she analyses the history and politics of human sexuality.
Feminist sexology is an offshoot of traditional studies of sexology that focuses on the intersectionality of sex and gender in relation to the sexual lives of women. Sexology has a basis in psychoanalysis,specifically Freudian theory,which played a big role in early sexology. This reactionary field of feminist sexology seeks to be inclusive of experiences of sexuality and break down the problematic ideas that have been expressed by sexology in the past. Feminist sexology shares many principles with the overarching field of sexology;in particular,it does not try to prescribe a certain path or "normality" for women's sexuality,but only observe and note the different and varied ways in which women express their sexuality. It is a young field,but one that is growing rapidly.
Josephine Chuen-juei Ho is the chair of the English department of National Central University,Taiwan,and coordinator of its Center For the Study of Sexualities.
Sylvia Rosila Tamale is a Ugandan academic,and human rights activist in Uganda. She was the first woman dean in the law faculty at Makerere University,Uganda.
Feminism is aimed at defining,establishing,and defending a state of equal political,economic,cultural,and social rights for women. It has had a massive influence on American politics. Feminism in the United States is often divided chronologically into first-wave,second-wave,third-wave,and fourth-wave feminism.
Feminist views on pornography range from total condemnation of the medium as an inherent form of violence against women to an embracing of some forms as a medium of feminist expression. This debate reflects larger concerns surrounding feminist views on sexuality,and is closely related to those on prostitution,BDSM,and other issues. Pornography has been one of the most divisive issues in feminism,particularly in Anglophone (English-speaking) countries. This division was exemplified in the feminist sex wars of the 1980s,which pitted anti-pornography activists against pro-pornography ones.
Feminist views on BDSM vary widely from acceptance to rejection. BDSM refers to bondage and discipline,dominance and submission,and Sado-Masochism. In order to evaluate its perception,two polarizing frameworks are compared. Some feminists,such as Gayle Rubin and Patrick Califia,perceive BDSM as a valid form of expression of female sexuality,while other feminists,such as Andrea Dworkin and Susan Griffin,have stated that they regard BDSM as a form of woman-hating violence. Some lesbian feminists practice BDSM and regard it as part of their sexual identity.
Feminist views on sexuality widely vary. Many feminists,particularly radical feminists,are highly critical of what they see as sexual objectification and sexual exploitation in the media and society. Radical feminists are often opposed to the sex industry,including opposition to prostitution and pornography. Other feminists define themselves as sex-positive feminists and believe that a wide variety of expressions of female sexuality can be empowering to women when they are freely chosen. Some feminists support efforts to reform the sex industry to become less sexist,such as the feminist pornography movement.
Australia has a long-standing association with the protection and creation of women's rights. Australia was the second country in the world to give women the right to vote and the first to give women the right to be elected to a national parliament. The Australian state of South Australia,then a British colony,was the first parliament in the world to grant women full suffrage rights. Australia has since had multiple notable women serving in public office as well as other fields. Women in Australia with the notable exception of Indigenous women,were granted the right to vote and to be elected at federal elections in 1902.
Ratna Kapur is a law professor and former director of the Center for Feminist Legal Research in New Delhi,India [1995–2012].
Feminist interventions in the philosophy of law concern the examination and reformulation of traditional legal systems in order to better reflect the political,social,and economic concerns of women---which also includes various other minority and ethnic groups. Though it draws heavily from feminist legal theory,feminist interventions in the philosophy of law differs from the more common feminist jurisprudence as it also seeks to explain the justification that a government has in interfering with the lives of its citizenry. Accordingly,then,feminist interventions in legal philosophy specifically addresses the relationship and rationale between a judicial system's exercise of power and its effects on female citizens. While particular views vary greatly,most feminist interventions in the philosophy of law operate under a belief that many contemporary legal systems are predicated on patriarchal notions of masculinity that result in a system of deeply-rooted bias and inequality.
Carceral feminism is a critical term for types of feminism that advocate for enhancing and increasing prison sentences that deal with feminist and gender issues. The term criticises the belief that harsher and longer prison sentences will help work towards solving these issues. The phrase "carceral feminism" was coined by Elizabeth Bernstein,a feminist sociologist,in her 2007 article,"The Sexual Politics of the 'New Abolitionism'". Examining the contemporary anti-trafficking movement in the United States,Bernstein introduced the term to describe a type of feminist activism which casts all forms of sexual labor as sex trafficking. She sees this as a retrograde step,suggesting it erodes the rights of women in the sex industry,and takes the focus off other important feminist issues,and expands the neoliberal agenda.
Feminist perspectives on sex markets vary widely,depending on the type of feminism being applied. The sex market is defined as the system of supply and demand which is generated by the existence of sex work as a commodity. The sex market can further be segregated into the direct sex market,which mainly applies to prostitution,and the indirect sex market,which applies to sexual businesses which provide services such as lap dancing. The final component of the sex market lies in the production and selling of pornography. With the distinctions between feminist perspectives,there are many documented instances from feminist authors of both explicit and implied feminist standpoints that provide coverage on the sex market in regards to both "autonomous" and "non-autonomous" sex trades. The quotations are added since some feminist ideologies believe the commodification of women's bodies is never autonomous and therefore subversive or misleading by terminology.
{{cite book}}
: |first2=
has generic name (help)