Katherine Cuff

Last updated
Katherine Cuff
NationalityCanadian
Academic career
Institutions McMaster University
Field Optimal Taxation
Fiscal Federalism
Tax Competition
Alma mater Queen's University
York University
Information at IDEAS / RePEc

Katherine Cuff is a Canadian economist who currently serves as Professor of Economics at McMaster University. [1] She holds the Canada Research Chair in Public Economic Theory and has been recognized as a McMaster University Scholar. [2] Cuff also serves as Managing Editor of the Canadian Journal of Economics and editor of the FinanzArchiv (Public Finance Analysis).

Contents

Biography

Cuff obtained a Bachelors of Arts in Economics with Honours at Queen's University in 1994, then went on to complete a Masters of Arts in Economics at York University in 1995. [1] In 2000, she completed a Ph.D in Economics from Queen's University with her doctoral thesis, Three Essays on Optimal Redistributive Policies. [3] Cuff then joined McMaster University's Department of Economics as an Assistant Professor until 2006, when she became an Associate Professor within the department. [4] In 2016, she was conferred as a tenured Professor of Economics at McMaster University, where she remains at present. Cuff is faculty member of the McMaster Decision Science Laboratory (McDSL), an experimental economics research centre, where she focuses on the topic of funding and financing issues in Canadian healthcare. [5]

Selected publications

"Optimal unemployment insurance and redistribution" (2018)

Cuff and Robin Boadway undertake an analysis of unemployment insurance and redistributive taxes and transfers in a framework that acknowledges the employment choices of individuals with varying levels of skilled talent. A literature review finds that existing literature on the topic of optimal unemployment insurance is primarily concerned with the moral hazard issues associated with insurance policies, where individuals with insurance may feel a false sense of protection from it and then engage in risky behaviour that they would not otherwise condone. [6] [7] Using a model that utilizes an adaptation of an extensive-margin approach, while taking into account involuntary unemployment due to search frictions whereby individuals may decide themselves how intensely to search for work, the paper tests a number of propositions on optimal wage taxes and income transfers. The paper finds that an optimal policy would address large-scale effects of changes in wages using a "piecewise linear wage tax", or an income bracket-based approach to taxation that is able to address a variety of different levels of skilled work and productivity. Meanwhile, specific employment taxes and unemployment insurance remain available for redistribution without being overly concerned by potential repercussions of the insurance-moral hazard issue. [8]

"Should I stay or should I go? Exit options within mixed systems of public and private health care finance" (2016)

A comparative study of mixed public-private finance in healthcare systems that compares the conditions by which users are able to fully exit from the public system and purchase private insurance, and investigates the reasoning behind such exit decisions. The authors used a controlled laboratory experiment that allowed for either 'universal-exit', where any household regardless of income may exit, or 'conditional-exit', where only individuals who satisfy certain conditions may exit—for purposes of the experiment, the set condition was high-income. The study confirmed predictions that when presented with the opportunity to exit, high-income individuals generally will generally take it. However, contrary to initial predictions, the results showed that high-income earners are less likely to exit under a universal-exit scenario than a conditional-exit despite identical incentives in both scenarios. The paper offers three potential explanations for why high-income individuals were less likely to exit in a universal-exit scenario: altruism, priming bias, and time-constraint. The first explanation is that high-income individuals may stay and support the public system because they are concerned that, upon seeing all the high-income individuals exiting, low-income individuals will follow suit, leading to the collapse of the public system. Second, a priming bias where high-income individuals might recognize the incentive to exit the system, but feel an obligation to help maintain the public system. This may occur when they feel that "the environment into which they are placed is an environment primed with public provision." Finally, it might be that it simply takes time for individuals to realize their incentive to exit the public system. Were the slow collapse and unraveling of the public system to take place at a faster rate, these individuals would then also exit sooner. The paper concludes that individuals in the "upper three quintiles" would above-all prefer a purely private healthcare system over any type of public system exit, while the rest of the population should strongly prefer a purely publicly financed system without any type of exit option. In an environment where majority-voting is the primary mechanism by which the system is chosen, the latter would win out over any other possible combination. [9]

"Capital tax competition and returns to scale" (2005)

This paper by Cuff and John Burbridge examines capital tax competition in different regions through a comparison of Nash equilibria using variations of the standard capital tax model. The conclusion finds that inefficiencies in both capital and head taxes can be attributed to regions' incentives to manipulate the terms of trade, rather than any difference in increasing returns. [10]

"Equalization and the Decentralization of Revenue–Raising in a Federation" (2003)

Cuff and Maurice Marchand study a combination of federalism and economics to determine what specific fiscal policies and intergovernmental transfers are required for federal economies that possess regional governments responsible for public services. According to their study, when labour is homogeneous, a wide variety of regional taxation policies can be utilized for purposes of redistribution so long as there is an optimal equalization scheme in place without concern for the cost of migration . On the other hand, if labour is heterogeneous, the costliness of inter-regional migration does have an effect on optimal policies. When migration is costless, "the set of instruments that can be used to decentralize the unitary state optimuum" is less broad, while when migration is costly, the central government must specifically introduce some incentive to encourage regional governmental redistribution of resources. [11]

Professional affiliations

Honours

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tax law</span> Area of law

Tax law or revenue law is an area of legal study in which public or sanctioned authorities, such as federal, state and municipal governments use a body of rules and procedures (laws) to assess and collect taxes in a legal context. The rates and merits of the various taxes, imposed by the authorities, are attained via the political process inherent in these bodies of power, and not directly attributable to the actual domain of tax law itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare</span> Means-oriented social benefit

Welfare, or commonly social welfare, is a type of government support intended to ensure that members of a society can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter. Social security may either be synonymous with welfare, or refer specifically to social insurance programs which provide support only to those who have previously contributed, as opposed to social assistance programs which provide support on the basis of need alone. The International Labour Organization defines social security as covering support for those in old age, support for the maintenance of children, medical treatment, parental and sick leave, unemployment and disability benefits, and support for sufferers of occupational injury.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public finance</span> Study of the role of government within the economy

Public finance is the study of the role of the government in the economy. It is the branch of economics that assesses the government revenue and government expenditure of the public authorities and the adjustment of one or the other to achieve desirable effects and avoid undesirable ones. The purview of public finance is considered to be threefold, consisting of governmental effects on:

  1. The efficient allocation of available resources;
  2. The distribution of income among citizens; and
  3. The stability of the economy.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive tax</span> Form of tax

A progressive tax is a tax in which the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. The term progressive refers to the way the tax rate progresses from low to high, with the result that a taxpayer's average tax rate is less than the person's marginal tax rate. The term can be applied to individual taxes or to a tax system as a whole. Progressive taxes are imposed in an attempt to reduce the tax incidence of people with a lower ability to pay, as such taxes shift the incidence increasingly to those with a higher ability-to-pay. The opposite of a progressive tax is a regressive tax, such as a sales tax, where the poor pay a larger proportion of their income compared to the rich.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transfer payment</span> Governmental wealth redistribution

In macroeconomics and finance, a transfer payment is a redistribution of income and wealth by means of the government making a payment, without goods or services being received in return. These payments are considered to be non-exhaustive because they do not directly absorb resources or create output. Examples of transfer payments include welfare, financial aid, social security, and government subsidies for certain businesses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Mirrlees</span> British Nobel Laureate in Economic Sciences

Sir James Alexander Mirrlees was a British economist and winner of the 1996 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. He was knighted in the 1997 Birthday Honours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social insurance</span> Government-sponsored social program

Social insurance is a form of social welfare that provides insurance against economic risks. The insurance may be provided publicly or through the subsidizing of private insurance. In contrast to other forms of social assistance, individuals' claims are partly dependent on their contributions, which can be considered insurance premiums to create a common fund out of which the individuals are then paid benefits in the future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Boskin</span> American businessman

Michael Jay Boskin is the T. M. Friedman Professor of Economics and senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. He also is chief executive officer and president of Boskin & Co., an economic consulting company.

Optimal tax theory or the theory of optimal taxation is the study of designing and implementing a tax that maximises a social welfare function subject to economic constraints. The social welfare function used is typically a function of individuals' utilities, most commonly some form of utilitarian function, so the tax system is chosen to maximise the aggregate of individual utilities. Tax revenue is required to fund the provision of public goods and other government services, as well as for redistribution from rich to poor individuals. However, most taxes distort individual behavior, because the activity that is taxed becomes relatively less desirable; for instance, taxes on labour income reduce the incentive to work. The optimization problem involves minimizing the distortions caused by taxation, while achieving desired levels of redistribution and revenue. Some taxes are thought to be less distorting, such as lump-sum taxes and Pigouvian taxes, where the market consumption of a good is inefficient, and a tax brings consumption closer to the efficient level.

Robin William Boadway, is a Canadian economist. He held the David Smith Chair at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. Earlier he was Sir Edward Peacock Professor of Economic Theory at Queen's University. He has taught at Queen's University since 1973. He was Head of the Department of Economics at Queen's from 1981–86, and was previously Associate Director of the John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy.

Lars Osberg has been a member of the Economics Department at Dalhousie University since 1977. He also worked for a brief period at the University of Western Ontario. He is well known internationally for his contributions in the field of economics. His major research interests are the measurement and determinants of inequality, social exclusion and poverty, measurement of economic well-being, leisure co-ordination and economic well-being, time use and economic development, economic insecurity.

Public economics(or economics of the public sector) is the study of government policy through the lens of economic efficiency and equity. Public economics builds on the theory of welfare economics and is ultimately used as a tool to improve social welfare. Welfare can be defined in terms of well-being, prosperity, and overall state of being.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Negative income tax</span> Proposed tax reform

In economics, a negative income tax (NIT) is a system which reverses the direction in which tax is paid for incomes below a certain level; in other words, earners above that level pay money to the state while earners below it receive money, as shown by the blue arrows in the diagram. NIT was proposed by Juliet Rhys-Williams while working on the Beveridge Report in the early 1940s and popularized by Milton Friedman in the 1960s as a system in which the state makes payments to the poor when their income falls below a threshold, while taxing them on income above that threshold. Together with Friedman, supporters of NIT also included James Tobin, Joseph A. Pechman, and Peter M. Mieszkowski, and even then-President Richard Nixon, who suggested implementation of modified NIT in his Family Assistance Plan. After the increase in popularity of NIT, an experiment sponsored by the US government was conducted between 1968 and 1982 on effects of NIT on labour supply, income, and substitution effects.

Redistribution of income and wealth is the transfer of income and wealth from some individuals to others through a social mechanism such as taxation, welfare, public services, land reform, monetary policies, confiscation, divorce or tort law. The term typically refers to redistribution on an economy-wide basis rather than between selected individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narayana Kocherlakota</span> American economist

Narayana Rao Kocherlakota is an American economist and the Lionel W. McKenzie Professor of Economics at the University of Rochester. Previously, he served as the 12th president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis until December 31, 2015. Appointed in 2009, he joined the Federal Open Markets Committee in 2011. In 2012, he was named one of the top 100 Global Thinkers by Foreign Policy magazine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare's effect on poverty</span>

The effects of social welfare on poverty have been the subject of various studies.

Optimal capital income taxation is a subarea of optimal tax theory which studies the design of taxes on capital income such that a given economic criterion like utility is optimized.

Stéfanie Stantcheva is a Bulgarian-born French economist who is the Nathaniel Ropes Professor of Political Economy at Harvard University. She is a member of the French Council of Economic Analysis. Her research focuses on public finance—in particular questions of optimal taxation. In 2018, she was selected by The Economist as one of the 8 best young economists of the decade. In 2020, she was awarded the Elaine Bennett Research Prize. In 2021, she received the Prix Maurice Allais.

Ilyana Kuziemko is a professor of economics at Princeton University, where she has taught since 2014. She previously served as the David W. Zalaznick Associate Professor of Business at Columbia Business School from July 2013 to June 2014 and as associate professor from July 2012 to June 2013. From 2007 to 2012, she was an assistant professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University and Woodrow Wilson School. She also served as a Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy at the U.S. Department of the Treasury from 2009 to 2010 under The Office of Microeconomic Analysis. During her tenure, she worked primarily on the development and early implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joanne Roberts</span>

Joanne Roberts is the third President and Professor of Social Sciences (Economics) at Yale-NUS College, the first liberal arts college in Singapore. She is also a Professor at the National University of Singapore, Department of Economics.

References

  1. 1 2 "Cuff Katherine, Professor | Canada Research Chair in Public Economic Theory | Managing Editor, Canadian Journal of Economics | McMaster University Scholar". McMaster Faculty of Social Sciences. Retrieved 2019-03-29.
  2. 1 2 Government of Canada, Industry Canada (2012-11-29). "Canada Research Chairs". www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca. Retrieved 2019-03-29.
  3. 1 2 "Queen's Economics Department". 130.15.145.46. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
  4. 1 2 3 Cuff, Katherine. "Katherine Cuff, Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). Retrieved 2019-03-29.
  5. ↑ "About". McMaster Faculty of Social Sciences. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
  6. ↑ Diamond, P. (1980). "Income taxation with fixed hours of work". Journal of Public Economics. 13 (1): 101–110. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(80)90024-9. ISSN   0047-2727. S2CID   154389870.
  7. ↑ Saez, E. (2002-08-01). "Optimal Income Transfer Programs: Intensive versus Extensive Labor Supply Responses". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 117 (3): 1039–1073. doi:10.1162/003355302760193959. ISSN   0033-5533. S2CID   12992368.
  8. ↑ Boadway, Robin; Cuff, Katherine (2018). "Optimal unemployment insurance and redistribution" (PDF). Journal of Public Economic Theory. 20 (3): 303–324. doi:10.1111/jpet.12287.
  9. ↑ Buckley, Neil; Cuff, Katherine; Hurley, Jeremiah; Mestelman, Stuart; Thomas, Stephanie; Cameron, David (2016). "Should I stay or should I go? Exit options within mixed systems of public and private health care finance". Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 131: 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.013. hdl: 20.500.11937/50766 . S2CID   156274600.
  10. ↑ Burbidge, John; Cuff, Katherine (July 2005). "Capital tax competition and returns to scale" (PDF). Regional Science and Urban Economics. 35 (4): 353–373. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.05.003.
  11. ↑ Boadway, Robin; Cuff, Katherine; Marchand, Maurice (April 2003). "Equalization and the Decentralization of Revenue-Raising in a Federation" (PDF). Journal of Public Economic Theory. 5 (2): 201–228. doi:10.1111/1467-9779.00130. ISSN   1097-3923.
  12. ↑ "Members". Behavioural Experiments in Health Network. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
  13. ↑ "International Institute of Public Finance Official Bodies". www.iipf.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.