Kelly v Sulivan

Last updated
Kelly v Sulivan
Supreme court of Canada in summer.jpg
Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing: 8–9 June 1876
Judgment: 10 June 1876
Full case nameIn the matter of the application of Francis Kelly, Commissioner of Public Lands, for the purchase of the estate of Charlotte Antonia Sulivan, and the Prince Edward Island Land Purchase Act, 1875.
Prior historyAPPEAL FROM a decision of the Supreme Court of Judicature of Prince Edward Island, quashing an award made on 4 September 1875 by the Commissioners of Public Lands
RulingThe Supreme Court of Judicature of Prince Edward Island is the court of last resort for that Province. That court did not have the power to quash an award by the Commissioners of Public Lands — under the Land Purchase Act, 1875 it only had the power to remit the award back for reconsideration if application had been made within thirty days of the date of the award.
Court membership
Chief Justice Richards CJ
Puisne Justices Ritchie, Strong, Jean-Thomas Taschereau and Fournier JJ
Reasons given
Henry J took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Kelly v. Sulivan, 1876 CanLII 9 , 1 SCR 3 was the first case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court answered the simple question of whether a case ruling from the Supreme Court of Judicature of Prince Edward Island could be appealed to a provincial appellate court. On the evidence available the Court found that there was insufficient records to prove that an appellate court for the province was ever created.

Contents

The Court before Kelly

The Supreme Court had only just come into existence. On April 8, 1875 the bill creating the court was passed and the court was inaugurated on November 18. The Court's very first sitting was on January 17, but there were no cases to be heard so they adjourned until spring.

That April the Supreme Court was given a reference question from the Senate of Canada (In Re "The Brothers of the Christian Schools in Canada"). The Senate wanted to know if a bill entitled "An Act to incorporate the Brothers of the Christian Schools in Canada" was constitutional and within the authority of the federal government. Only Ritchie, Strong, and Fournier JJ. were in attendance, each only giving a single-sentence judgement.

It was not until June that the Court had its first hearings with the case of Kelly v. Sullivan.

Background

In 1873, Prince Edward Island agreed to join Confederation, and one of the terms of union was that the federal government of Canada agreed to contribute $800,000 towards the purchase of absentee landholdings on the Island. To that end, the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island passed the Land Purchase Act, 1875, [1] which provided a procedure for the compulsory acquisition of all such estates that were larger than 500 acres (200 ha), other than untenanted estates less than 1,000 acres (400 ha). Awards in disputes relating to land values were made by the Commissioners of Public Lands, whose decisions could be appealed to the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island under s. 45 of the Act within 30 days of the award. The same section provided that the Court could remit the award back to the Commissioners; otherwise, such awards were declared to be "binding, final and conclusive on all parties."

In 1875, the Commissioner of Public Lands applied to acquire the lands of Charlotte Antonia Sulivan, and the resulting award determined that she was entitled to be paid $81,500. Sulivan, through her agent George Wastie DeBlois, [2] appealed on the basis that the awards did not describe the lands in sufficient detail, that proper legal procedures had not been followed, and that the British North America Act did not permit such legislation as the Land Purchase Act. The provincial Supreme Court agreed in January 1876.

The Province, through Francis Kelly, its Commissioner for Public Lands, [3] lodged an appeal to the newly created Supreme Court of Canada, on the basis that:

  1. The SCC had jurisdiction to hear the appeal
  2. The award was final under s. 45 of the Act
  3. There was no uncertainty to the award, and the Court had no jurisdiction to declare it bad

In response, Sulivan's side contended:

  1. No appeal lay to the SCC, as PEI legislation recognized the existence of a Court of Error and Appeal composed of the Lieutenant-Governor in Council
  2. The provincial Court did possess jurisdiction to act as it did, under s. 32 of the Act
  3. The Commissioners had no jurisdiction in this cause, and therefore their award was bad and should be set aside
  4. The award is not final and it is uncertain, and it also exceeded its jurisdiction as it dealt with all of Sulivan's lands, and not just those in excess of 500 acres

Ruling

The Court was unanimous in its ruling, although each justice issued a separate opinion. In the most comprehensive ruling, Richards CJ declared: [4]

  1. The provincial Court was the court of last resort for the purposes of appeal to the SCC, as no other court of error or appeal was shown to have been in operation before Confederation [5]
  2. The Act contemplated the acquisition of total estates, and not just lands in excess of 500 acres [6]
  3. The provincial Court's powers were expressly circumscribed by s. 45 of the Act [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

Court of Cassation (France)

The Court of Cassation is one of the four courts of last resort in France. It has jurisdiction over all civil and criminal matters triable in the judicial system, and is the supreme court of appeal in these cases. It has jurisdiction to review the law, and to certify questions of law, to determine miscarriages of justice. The Court is located in the Palace of Justice in Paris.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

The court system of Canada forms the judicial branch of government, formally known as "The Queen on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

In Canadian law, a reference question or reference case is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an advisory opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation.

Before 1982, modifying the Constitution of Canada primarily meant amending the British North America Act, 1867. Unlike most other constitutions, however, the Act had no amending formula; instead, changes were enacted through Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom called the British North America Acts.

<i>Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider</i>

Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider is a famous Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the Council struck down the federal Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, precursor to the Canada Labour Code. The Court identified matters in relation to labour to be within the exclusive competence of the province in the property and civil rights power under section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867. This decision is considered one of the high-water marks of the Council's interpretation of the Constitution in favour of the provinces.

<i>Kirkbi AG v Ritvik Holdings Inc</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Kirkbi AG v. Ritvik Holdings Inc., popularly known as the Lego Case, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court upheld the constitutionality of section 7(b) of the Trade-marks Act which prohibits the use of confusing marks, as well, on a second issue it was held that the doctrine of functionality applied to unregistered trade-marks.

The Supreme Court of Canada was founded in 1875 and has served as the final court of appeal in Canada since 1949. Its history may be divided into three general eras. From its inception in 1875 until 1949, the Court served as an intermediate appellate court subject to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain. Following 1949, the Court gained importance and legitimacy as the court of last resort in Canada, establishing a greater role for the Canadian judiciary. In 1982, the introduction of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms significantly changed the role of the Court in Canadian society, by providing the Court with greater powers of oversight over Parliament and through formal recognition of civil rights including aboriginal rights and equality rights.

The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (SKCA) is a Canadian appellate court.

Supreme court Highest court in a jurisdiction

A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts in many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.

Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island Provincial high court in Canada

The Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island is the superior court of the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island.

The Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island is the provincial court in the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island, established according to the Provincial Court Act.

George Wastie DeBlois was a businessman and political figure in Prince Edward Island. He represented 5th Queens in the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island from 1877 to 1882 as a Conservative member.

The Government of Guam (GovGuam) is a presidential representative democratic system, whereby the President is the head of state and the Governor is head of government, and of a multi-party system. Guam is an organized, unincorporated territory of the United States with policy relations between Guam and the US under the jurisdiction of the Office of Insular Affairs.

Land Question (Prince Edward Island) Question of land ownership on Prince Edward Island

The "Land Question", as it pertains to the history of Prince Edward Island, Canada, related to the question of the system of ownership of land on the island. Proprietors, the owners of the land parcels on Prince Edward Island, favoured a system of renting to tenants, whilst the tenants preferred a system of freehold. In 1767 the British government divided all land in Prince Edward Island into lots to be owned by 'proprietors' who would collect rent from the settlers, or 'tenants'. Problems soon arose with this scheme, and low numbers of tenants resulted in proprietors collecting little rent, which in turn led to many proprietors defaulting on their quitrents. An attempt at compulsorily acquiring the land by the Prince Edward Island government from rent defaulters in 1781 resulted in Colonial Office intervention in 1783. In 1786, Governor Walter Patterson, who set in motion the compulsory acquisition, was removed from office.

Land Purchase Act (1875)

The Land Purchase Act, 1875 was a statute passed by the General Assembly of Prince Edward Island in 1875. Much of the land in the province was owned by absentee landlords, and the objective of the statute was to force the landlords to sell their estates to the provincial government, which would in turn sell the land at lower prices to local farmers.

<i>Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Daniels v Canada , 2016 SCC 12 is a case of the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that Métis and non-status Indians are "Indians" for the purpose of s 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The Court of Appeal of Prince Edward Island is the appellate court for the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island, and thus the senior provincial court below the Supreme Court of Canada. As the number of appeals heard by the Supreme Court of Canada is extremely limited, the Court of Appeal is in practice the court of final appeal for most residents of Prince Edward Island.

<i>NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v BC Government and Service Employees Union</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v BC Government and Service Employees' Union is a leading Supreme Court of Canada constitutional law case dealing with jurisdiction over labour relations in the context of federalism and Aboriginal rights.

<i>Reference re Pan‑Canadian Securities Regulation</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Reference re Pan‑Canadian Securities Regulation, 2018 SCC 48 is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, dealing with the Canadian doctrine of cooperative federalism and how it intersects with the power of the Parliament of Canada over trade and commerce, as well as discussing the nature of parliamentary sovereignty in Canada.

References

  1. ↑ Island, Prince Edward (1875). Land Purchase Act, 1875 (38 Vic., c. 32) . Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  2. ↑ Elinor Bernice Vass (1982). "DeBlois, George Wastie". In Halpenny, Francess G (ed.). Dictionary of Canadian Biography . XI (1881–1890) (online ed.). University of Toronto Press.
  3. ↑ D.B. Boylan (1972). "Kelly, Francis". In Hayne, David (ed.). Dictionary of Canadian Biography . X (1871–1880) (online ed.). University of Toronto Press.
  4. ↑ Kelly v Sulivan, p. 52
  5. ↑ Kelly v Sulivan, pp. 31–32
  6. ↑ Kelly v Sulivan, p. 38
  7. ↑ Kelly v Sulivan, p. 44

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.