Knowledge-based decision making

Last updated
Knowledge-based decision making model Screen Shot 2015-10-31 at 12.19.12.jpg
Knowledge-based decision making model

Knowledge-Based Decision-Making (KBDM) in management is a decision-making process [2] that uses predetermined criteria to measure and ensure the optimal outcome for a specific topic.

Contents

KBDM is used to make decisions by establishing a thought process and reasoning behind a decision. [3] It gathers vital background essentials [4] to collectively increase understanding about a topic or agreed criteria. [5]

Key elements

History of knowledge management is quite short because there was a long-time lack of consensus on what would be a good definition of knowledge management. Before starting to use knowledge management as a theoretical frame there was only know-how about thinking with knowledge. The most important key factor of knowledge management is recognizing tacit and explicit knowledge. [6]

Open communication between leadership and membership [7] consists of being able to demonstrate face-to-face dialogue, exchange information and experiences, and sharing facts with one another. Each party takes turns listening and respects what others have to say. There should be regular dialogue and communication between individuals regarding the specified topic.

Dialogue before deliberation [7] – "I must consider all the facts and examine the possible consequences". [8] Dialogue before deliberation recommends communicating prior to demonstrating actions. It is similar to KBDM in that background information about the selected topic must be gathered and made available to all the decision makers prior to meeting or discussing the information. The storage location of materials and sources is shared so that all decision makers involved have equal access to the same information. During the duration of the discussion period, background information and facts are evaluated and discussed among the decision makers. [9] This is done so that decision makers can use this time as an opportunity to ask questions about the specified topic and receive timely and appropriate responses. The overall purpose of these meetings is to discuss the background information, as well as ensuring each decision makers' questions have been answered, via face-to-face contact. [2]

All decision makers have common access to information – All information involved in the KBDM process must be distributed equally to all decision makers and the sources should be stored in a mutual location to ensure the same grounds for each decision maker. [10] It is important that all of the information provided to the decision makers have the same content.

Decisions makers exist in a culture of trust – Organizational culture comes from individual beliefs, procedures, norms, values, and meanings shared by other members in the organization. Organizational culture has an impact on an individual's behavior in various situations. [11] "Culture" is based on the characteristics and behavior among a particular group of individuals. [12] Corresponding to this, knowledge-based decision making tries to focus on functioning within an environment containing a variety of components, including respecting one another's decisions and listening to each other. These factors influence a culture since they can contribute to how an individual feels within the environment. This influence can be positive or negative, reducing the amount of fear and pressure put on individuals if they make a mistake. If individuals feel as though they need advice, the culture can assist individuals, since it would be normal to help each other, by reassuring as well as encouraging. In contrast, not having a culture of trust can increase the level of risk when making decisions, as individuals may take advantage of situations and be non-supportive or unwilling to give advice to others. [4]

Advantages

Open communication contributes to increased relevant overall knowledge and understanding about the topic, doing this can limit both confusion and misunderstanding. [4]

Dialogue before deliberation gives a clear direction of the conversation and provides an opportunity for decision makers to prepare by viewing background information founded, which can generate a better understanding of the topic involved. [10] Decision makers are prepared for discussions as they have the chance to formulate questions and identify specific aspects of the findings and information they want to discuss or develop. The decision makers gain a clearer and rounded understanding of the topic beforehand from the background information provided.

All decision makers have common access to information. Having information published in one location contributes to ease of access and ensures availability, allowing decision makers to view information efficiently and effectively before a meeting. [2] Publishing information beforehand allows members to have sufficient time to become informed about the content provided, generate further questions, and express opinions [4] about the matter to reach the most suitable outcome.

Decision makers exist in a culture of trust. It allows them to help, advise, and support each other, as well as fostering a common goal towards achieving the same objectives. [13] The content of information needed to make an informed decision supersedes authority, and group members are more likely to support a decision made because of their contribution. [7]

Disadvantages

Holding open communication can still lead to confusion if some decision makers do not communicate effectively. Miscommunication can still occur between individuals from different perceptions.

Dialogue before deliberation may be impeded by individuals who may not have read the background information or understand the direction of the conversation. Background information provided may be hard to understand and impact preparation time.

All decision makers have common access to information that may not always be possible for all decision makers. Storing all information in one location is a huge risk if the location is compromised. Background information may be outdated. [7]

New decision makers may not fully understand the culture of trust. It is important to understand the benefits of the Internet as a tool that knit together the intellectual asset of an organization and organize and manage this content through the lenses of common interest. [14] Nowadays ability to simulate rich, interactive, face-to-face knowledge is the key factory to use knowledge management as a part of decision making in B2B business.

Bias influenced according to the veil of ignorance of decision making, for one to make a sound choice they have to separate themselves from what they know so as not to be biased.

Process

The process is composed of six main components:

Knowledge-based decision making (KBDM) KDBM Process.jpg
Knowledge-based decision making (KBDM)
  1. A topic is specified.
  2. Relevant background information [16] and key facts are identified and gathered in relation to the specified topic. This information is stored in a mutual location and made accessible to all decision makers. At this stage, decision makers may add any missing information.
  3. The background information is analyzed using set criteria, or a set of questions by the decision makers. During this stage, questions and queries [17] are created.
  4. A discussion occurs between all decision makers; questions and queries are discussed during this stage. Concerns and opinions are also stated during this stage.
  5. From the discussions and information gathered a summary is made. The purpose of the summary is to clearly outline key factors that are most relevant to the specified topic.
  6. The results and findings from the analysis are discussed among decision makers as a group to ensure that the best possible outcome can be made strategically. [17]

Purpose

The KBDM process allows the main focus and emphasis to be on the actual decision and reasoning. Authority is not a major factor. [4]

In KBDM, there are structures in place that allow methodical approaches to occur and indicate a starting point when making vital decisions. In this case, KBDM is used as an indicator and standard guideline which can be applied to decision-making situations. [13]

At the beginning of the process, the relevant information is gathered so that the overall decision can be based on background information and factual knowledge. [7] By researching background information can focus on particular areas in the topic. The structure enables the thought process of a decision to be specified and states the reasons behind a decision, [4] so if an issue occurs with the overall outcome the thought process can be evaluated thoroughly.

In regards to business, the KBDM process can give companies or organizations a competitive advantage, create common grounds, and gain an understanding of others in the same sector due to the structured format. The structure supports and is suited to assist long-term planning and strategic decision-making. [10] At the beginning of the process key background information is assembled to increase the amount of knowledge and understanding each individual decision maker has about the topic; vital aspects of information are included. Discovered research and information are put into a mutual location to provide equal grounds in terms of knowledge before a discussion occurs to give time for questions to be established. From the KBDM process, a decision can be made based on facts, understanding and suitable reasoning from discussions to conclude the most appropriate decision. [18]

Questions

In the third stage of the process background information is measured against a set of questions. These questions are answered and then used to contribute to the overall decision made.

Questions that are used to measure information include:

  1. What do we currently know about the needs, wants and preferences of our members that relate to this discussion?
  2. What do we know about both our resources and strategic position that is relevant to this issue?
  3. What do we know about the current environment and culture that relates to this issue?
  4. What are the (ethical) implications of our choice (pros and cons)? [19]
  5. What do we not know about this issue that we wish we knew? [18]
  6. How do the organization's legacies apply to this issue?
  7. What is your part in the process? [2]

Decision making in project management

Effective project management is best achieved using an adaptive approach focused on effective decision-making. [20] Therefore, a variety of tools based on software and structure have been developed to support decision making in groups. Decision Making processes are strongly correlated to the level of available knowledge regarding the environment, the decision is based on. [21] Successfully using knowledge management supporting tools improves overall project performance and is an essential method for organizations with project-related work styles. [22]

B2B decision making based on knowledge management

There are many studies that discuss the importance of knowledge management on organizational outcomes such as organizational performance, product quality and organizational learning. Despite these various studies, knowledge management literature and practice are lacking research on how decision-making styles influence the processes of knowledge management on organizational performance. [11]

Decision-making is a solid part of the problem solving process. The description of a problem solving process begins with the complicated description of a problem that is required to be solved by the so-called initial situation diagnosis. For such purpose, there are specific tools and methods. Then there is a decision on how to solve the particular problem. The final stage of the process is the optimization of the proposed solution. It is recommended that companies take into account matters related to the company management (i.e. employees, processes, equipment) if their decision making is based on knowledge. It is also important to identify and update the critical knowledge of the company and continuous conduct the critical knowledge area analyses. It is not to be forgotten to monitor and develop data resources and their content either. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning theory (education)</span> Theory that describes how students receive, process, and retain knowledge during learning

Learning theory describes how students receive, process, and retain knowledge during learning. Cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences, as well as prior experience, all play a part in how understanding, or a worldview, is acquired or changed and knowledge and skills retained.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socratic method</span> Type of cooperative argumentative dialogue

The Socratic method is a form of argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering questions.

In common usage, evaluation is a systematic determination and assessment of a subject's merit, worth and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. It can assist an organization, program, design, project or any other intervention or initiative to assess any aim, realizable concept/proposal, or any alternative, to help in decision-making; or to generate the degree of achievement or value in regard to the aim and objectives and results of any such action that has been completed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knowledge management</span> Process of creating, sharing, using and managing the knowledge and information of an organization

Knowledge management (KM) is the collection of methods relating to creating, sharing, using and managing the knowledge and information of an organization. It refers to a multidisciplinary approach to achieve organizational objectives by making the best use of knowledge.

Development communication refers to the use of communication to facilitate social development. Development communication engages stakeholders and policy makers, establishes conducive environments, assesses risks and opportunities and promotes information exchange to create positive social change via sustainable development. Development communication techniques include information dissemination and education, behavior change, social marketing, social mobilization, media advocacy, communication for social change, and community participation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recruitment</span> Process of attracting, selecting and appointing candidates to a job or other organization

Recruitment is the overall process of identifying, sourcing, screening, shortlisting, and interviewing candidates for jobs within an organization. Recruitment also is the process involved in choosing people for unpaid roles. Managers, human resource generalists, and recruitment specialists may be tasked with carrying out recruitment, but in some cases, public-sector employment, commercial recruitment agencies, or specialist search consultancies such as Executive search in the case of more senior roles, are used to undertake parts of the process. Internet-based recruitment is now widespread, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

Competitive intelligence (CI) is the process and forward-looking practices used in producing knowledge about the competitive environment to improve organizational performance. Competitive intelligence involves systematically collecting and analysing information from multiple sources and a coordinated competitive intelligence program. It is the action of defining, gathering, analyzing, and distributing intelligence about products, customers, competitors, and any aspect of the environment needed to support executives and managers in strategic decision making for an organization.

Formal consensus refers to a specific organizational structure which formalizes both the relationships between members of an organization and the processes through which they interact to create an environment in which consensus decision-making can occur in a specific, consistent, and efficient manner. While many diverse consensus decision-making techniques exist, formal consensus emphasizes the concept that the particular process by which a decision is made is equally significant to gaining consensus as the content of any proposal or discussion.

Organizational intelligence (OI) is the capability of an organization to comprehend and create knowledge relevant to its purpose; in words, it is the intellectual capacity of the entire organization. With relevant organizational intelligence comes great potential value for companies and organizations to figure out where their strengths and weaknesses lie in responding to change and complexity.

Public engagement or public participation is a concept that has recently been used to describe "the practice of involving members of the public in the agenda-setting, decision-making, and policy-forming activities of organizations/institutions responsible for policy development." It is focused on the participatory actions of the public to aid in policy making based in their values.

Knowledge sharing is an activity through which knowledge is exchanged among people, friends, peers, families, communities, or within or between organizations. It bridges the individual and organizational knowledge, improving the absorptive and innovation capacity and thus leading to sustained competitive advantage of companies as well as individuals. Knowledge sharing is part of the knowledge management process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Issue-based information system</span> Argumentation scheme

The issue-based information system (IBIS) is an argumentation-based approach to clarifying wicked problems—complex, ill-defined problems that involve multiple stakeholders. Diagrammatic visualization using IBIS notation is often called issue mapping.

Interactive planning is a concept developed by Russell L. Ackoff, an American theorist, early proponent of the field of operations research and recognized as the pioneer in systems thinking. Interactive planning forwards the idea that in order to arrive at a desirable future, one has to create a desirable present and create ways and means to resemble it. One of its unique features is that development should be ideal-oriented. Interactive planning is unlike other types of planning such as reactive planning, inactive planning, and preactive planning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compendium (software)</span> Social science computer program

Compendium is a computer program and social science tool that facilitates the mapping and management of ideas and arguments. The software provides a visual environment that allows people to structure and record collaboration as they discuss and work through wicked problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Working group</span> Group of experts working together

A working group is a group of experts working together to achieve specified goals. Such groups are domain-specific and focus on discussion or activity around a specific subject area. The term can sometimes refer to an interdisciplinary collaboration of researchers, often from more than one organization, working on new activities that would be difficult to sustain under traditional funding mechanisms. Working groups are variously also called task groups, workgroups, technical advisory groups, working parties, or task forces.

Collaborative decision-making (CDM) software is a software application or module that helps to coordinate and disseminate data and reach consensus among work groups.

Text and conversation is a theory in the field of organizational communication illustrating how communication makes up an organization. In the theory's simplest explanation, an organization is created and defined by communication. Communication "is" the organization and the organization exists because communication takes place. The theory is built on the notion, an organization is not seen as a physical unit holding communication. Text and conversation theory puts communication processes at the heart of organizational communication and postulates, an organization doesn't contain communication as a "causal influence", but is formed by the communication within. This theory is not intended for direct application, but rather to explain how communication exists. The theory provides a framework for better understanding organizational communication.

Intuition in the context of decision-making is defined as a "non-sequential information-processing mode." It is distinct from insight and can be contrasted with the deliberative style of decision-making. Intuition can influence judgment through either emotion or cognition, and there has been some suggestion that it may be a means of bridging the two. Individuals use intuition and more deliberative decision-making styles interchangeably, but there has been some evidence that people tend to gravitate to one or the other style more naturally. People in a good mood gravitate toward intuitive styles, while people in a bad mood tend to become more deliberative. The specific ways in which intuition actually influences decisions remain poorly understood.

Intercultural dialogue (ICD) builds upon the concept of dialogue, which refers to at least two people holding a conversation. And it builds upon the term intercultural, which is typically used to refer to people communicating across differences in nationality, race and ethnicity, or religion. Dialogue has several meanings: it sometimes refers to dialogue in a script, which simply means people talking, but more often it refers to "a quality of communication characterized by the participants' willingness and ability simultaneously to be radically open to the other(s) and to articulate their own views. ... Dialogue's primary goal is understanding rather than agreement."

References

  1. ↑ Anon, Anon (n.d.). "The Steps of Knowledge Based Decision Making" (PDF). The Steps of Knowledge Based Decision Making. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Knowledge Based Decision Making Overview" (PDF). Al-Anon District 12 Panel 52. January 2012.
  3. ↑ Yim, Nam-Hong (2004). "Knowledge based decision making - Strategic concerns: system dynamics approach" (PDF). Knowledge Based Decision Making on Higher Level Strategic Concerns: System Dynamics Approach. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Anon, Anon (n.d.). "The Knowledge Based Decision Making Process To Reach an Informed Group Conscience" (PDF). Oegonal-anon.org. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  5. ↑ Dalkir (2020). Knowledge management in theory and practice. MIT Press. pp. 25–.
  6. ↑ Dalkir (2011). Knowledge management in theory and practice. MIT Press. pp. 25–.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Anon, Anon (n.d.). "Knowledge Based Decision Making KBDM" (PDF). KBDM. Retrieved 26 October 2015.
  8. ↑ Family Group Head Inc, Al-Anon (1997). Paths to Recovery: Al-Anon's Steps, Traditions and Concepts. pp. 149–151.
  9. ↑ NEA, National Education Association (2015). "NEA Knowledge Based Decision Making" (PDF). 2015 NEA Leadership Summit. Retrieved 26 October 2015.
  10. 1 2 3 Anon, Al (n.d.). "Knowledge Based Decision Making - Key Elements" (PDF). KBDM Model. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  11. 1 2 Abubakar, Abubakar Mohammed; Elrehail, Hamzah; Alatailat, Maher Ahmad; Elçi, Alev (2017-10-21). "Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance". Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 4 (2): 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003 . ISSN   2444-569X.
  12. ↑ "What is Culture? | Definition of Culture". LiveScience.com. Retrieved 2015-11-04.
  13. 1 2 Anon, Anon (n.d.). "Knowledge based decision making, benefits" (PDF). KBDM Benefits. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  14. ↑ Dalkir (2011). Use of Knowledge Management in theory and practice. MIT Press. pp. 25–.
  15. ↑ Bolukbas; Guneri (2018). "Knowledge-based decision making for the technology competency analysis of manufacturing enterprises". Applied Soft Computing. 67: 781–799. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.11.023. S2CID   21699506 . Retrieved 15 November 2020.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ↑ Inc, Tech-Clarity (2012). "Knowledge- Enabled Decision Making" (PDF). Tech Clarity Insight. Retrieved 17 October 2015.{{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  17. 1 2 Anon, Anon (n.d.). "The Steps of Knowledge Based Decision Making" (PDF). Making an Informed Decision. Retrieved 1 November 2015.
  18. 1 2 Al- Anon, SCWS (n.d.). "KBDM" (PDF). KBDM. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
  19. ↑ Anon, Anon (n.d.). "Knowledge based decision making - questions" (PDF). Pa-al-anon.
  20. ↑ O’Sullivan, David (2015-06-24). "Decision making in project management". Production Planning & Control. 26 (16): 1386–1387. doi:10.1080/09537287.2015.1055092. ISSN   0953-7287. S2CID   109003565.
  21. ↑ Holsapple, C. W. (1995), Knowledge Management in Decision Making and Decision Support, Technical report
  22. ↑ Hobday, M. (2000), The project-based organization: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?, Technical report
  23. ↑ Litvaj; Stancekova (2015). "Use of Knowledge Management in Decision-Making". Procedia Economics and Finance 23: 467–472. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00547-X .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.