| Lacertibaenia | |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Reptilia |
| Superorder: | Lepidosauria |
| Order: | Squamata |
| Clade: | Lacertoidea |
| Clade: | Lacertibaenia Vidal & Hedges, 2005 |
| Subgroups | |
Lacertibaenia is a clade of squamate reptiles that unites the worm lizards (Amphisbaenia) with the true lizards (Lacertidae). The clade was named by Vidal & Hedges (2005), who recovered the group from analyses of nine nuclear protein-coding genes within their broader clade Laterata (Lacertoidea). [1] Subsequent molecular datasets with broader gene and taxon sampling have repeatedly recovered amphisbaenians as sister to lacertids, corroborating the monophyly of Lacertibaenia. [2] [3] A 2024 satellite-DNA study further supported Lacertibaenia as a coherent lineage. [4]
An important fossil relevant to Lacertibaenia is the Messel fossil Cryptolacerta hassiaca, which Müller et al. (2011) interpreted as shedding light on amphisbaenian origins and supporting a close relationship with lacertids. [5] Additional paleontological work has proposed Late Cretaceous stem-amphisbaenians ( Slavoia ) and explored trait evolution associated with fossoriality in worm lizards. [6] [7]
Vidal & Hedges (2005) erected Lacertibaenia within the larger clade Laterata, which they subdivided as Teiformata (Gymnophthalmidae + Teiidae) and Lacertibaenia (Amphisbaenia + Lacertidae). [1] Their classification was refined in a later synthesis focusing on squamate molecular evolution and divergence times, [8] and has been widely adopted in subsequent molecular phylogenies of Squamata. [2] [3]
Within Laterata/Lacertoidea, Teiformata is usually recovered as the sister group to Lacertibaenia. [1] [2] Some large-scale morphology-focused matrices have instead placed amphisbaenians in alternative positions, highlighting persistent conflict between data types and character sampling strategies. [9]