Land Apportionment Act of 1930

Last updated
Location of Zimbabwe(in dark red) within the African continent in 1914(British Colonies in Light red); at the time it was known as Southern Rhodesia. Southern Rhodesia 1914.png
Location of Zimbabwe(in dark red) within the African continent in 1914(British Colonies in Light red); at the time it was known as Southern Rhodesia.

The 1930 Land Apportionment Act made it illegal for Africans to purchase land outside of established Native Purchase Areas in the region of Southern Rhodesia, what is now known as Zimbabwe. [1] Before the 1930 act, land was not openly accessible to natives, but there were also no legal barriers to ownership. [1] The Act was passed under British colonial rule in an attempt to prevent a loss of government authority over those native to the region. [1]

Contents

The Act led to the eventual overpopulation of Native Reservations, and limited African access to quality land that resulted in large economic and social inequality. [2] The consequences of The Land Apportionment Act of 1930 can be seen in the legislation passed to address the issues it created, such as the Native Land Husbandry act of the 1950s, that also enforced land segregation and limited native opportunities in Southern Rhodesia. [2] Post independence, land reform continues to maintain its salience in Zimbabwe, as the current administration works to redefine land ownership in the twenty-first century. [3]

Land rights before 1930

Flag of Southern Rhodesia under the British South Africa Company, along with the insignia. Flag of BSAC.svg
Flag of Southern Rhodesia under the British South Africa Company, along with the insignia.

Various southern Bantu peoples inhabited Matabele and Mashonalands (what is now known as Zimbabwe) for thousands of years according to fossilized evidence and discovery of present tribes' artifacts stretching over the last 9 centuries. Alongside archived DNA proof of African Peoples around Great Zimbabwean ruins as early as 1500s and various tribal oral history accounts paint a picture of the native settlements and land past. Land ownership of most agrarian peoples consisted of common tribal communal lands for sustenance and trade with pastoralists. Peoples thrived in this land structure while mining gold, copper and Ivory for barter trade with even the far away ancient Chinese dynasties during Kingdom of Zimbabwe (Great Zimbabwe ruins) era. [4] The exploration and subsequent settlement of European Christian missionaries in the late 19th century greatly increased the population of foreigners, with the areas temperate climate found suitable by most of these new immigrants. While concessions and treaties with tribal chiefs made up the vast majority of legal agreements in these native tribal lands through most of the 18th and 19th centuries, it wasn't until the partition and Scramble for Africa after the 1884 Berlin Conference that territorial control switched from local (native) to colonial (foreign) rule. Colonialism also shifted the power base from the local natives to colonial foreign powers with military support from the colonizing nations to secure their colonies. Common (British European) law replaced native (African) law. The capitalist British society, still in pre-industrial stages, sought agrarian means to self-sustain its colonies alongside other exploitative means. In 1889 Britain granted royal charters to two firms that merged to form the British South Africa Company as a vehicle for Imperial wealth extraction. This ushered in the commoditization of these native ancestral lands as instruments of economic gain through farming or mining for future european settlers in Zimbabwe. [5]

Southern Rhodesia was under the chartered control of the British South Africa Company starting in the 1890s and became a self governed British colony in 1923. [6] [7] In the time leading up to the Land Apportionment Act of 1930, there were no legal barriers to land ownership by black Africans. [1] [7] Section 83 and 81 of the Southern Rhodesia Order in Council had established the right for natives to land ownership within the region, and also established the responsibility of the colonial state to provide land to the natives of the region. [1] [8]

However, that did not mean that land was easily accessible to native Africans in the region. In 1919, the Southern Rhodesia Privy Council took steps to limit land purchase to solely black South African migrants, seen as more capable of individual land tenure. [1] The council had reasoned that exposure to white settlers in South Africa made these migrants more capable of adhering to the idea of individual land tenure, as opposed to communal ownership. [1] The Privy Council sold these lands at higher prices, excluding local Africans from purchase, and also demanded recommendations for land tenure by missionaries before allowing purchase. [1]

These recommendations were difficult to come by as missionaries tended to provide negative recommendations in an attempt to maintain religious control of their congregation. [1] At the same time, the British South African Company in charge of administering the region refused to sell land to black Africans, in a total rejection of the Southern Rhodesia Order of 1898. [1] In response, Africans began to buy land directly from white settlers or through third parties. [1] Those who bought land through this method had to purchase at higher prices and pay fees to land agents, and tended to be wealthier than the general African population. [1] This segment of the population were often those employed in higher wage positions such as catechism teachers connected to missionaries; the purchase of land allowed these individuals to accumulate more wealth and resources than others in the community. [1]

Land Apportionment Act of 1930: implementation

With agriculture growing increasingly important to Southern Rhodesia 's economy, white settlers began to see the practice of subsistence and small scale farming as an inappropriate use of farmland. [9] As the initial focus on mineral extraction proved to result in little profit, land became the most valuable commodity for the new settlers. [10] Black landowners were portrayed as incapable for what white settlers deemed profitable use, and these settlers began to push for not only segregation but access to more land for further agricultural development. [9] Not all white settlers pushed for land segregation on racial terms; and at the times there were others who proposed legal segregation as a method for preventing future losses in African land holding by setting aside land exclusively for African use. [9] Documents at the time also speak of a portion of the African population that accepted the 1930 Act, on the grounds that it would give them increased access to landownership and that segregation would prove beneficial to not only the white settlers. [9]

In 1894, the first of many Land Commissions were established to deal with issues relation to African and white settler land ownership. [7] The outcome, the establishment of two areas carved out of the state for native use, lead to a series of rebellions in 1896 that revealed the necessity of ensuring appropriate land access for natives. [7] This resulted in the establishment of Native Reserves, defined without the necessary geographic understanding of the region and therefore created through conflicting guidelines. [7] In 1925, the Morris Carter Commission concluded that the proper solution to issues of land allocation was the absolute segregation of land ownership between the white and black populations. [7] This resulted in the Land Apportionment Act of 1930, passed by Southern Rhodesian Legislature that year and accepted by the Imperial British government in 1931. [1]

Implementation

The Land Apportionment Act of 1930 segregated land ownership by segmenting certain areas within the country to be for either white or African land ownership. [1] [2] The act initially set aside 19.9 million hectares for European white settlers, with 3 million hectares claimed for the native population; this 3 million was later expanded into 8.8 million hectares, and was soon the only land outside of reservations available to sixty percent of the population. [9] The remaining lands were set aside for future use. [2] At the time the act was passed, the European population was assumed to be around 50,000 and the native population was estimated at 1,081,000 people. [11] The European population was granted approximately 50 percent of the land, with the African population being provided 29.8 percent of the land. [11]

Lands allocated to white settlers tended to consist of richer soils and higher rainfall, ultimately seen as lands with higher production potential. [10] Natives who had settled onto what were now white-only territories were forced to relinquish their land rights and expected to subside on overcrowded reservations. [2] Africans were only allowed to purchase land in Native Purchase Areas, regions situated at the border of native reservations. [1] The lands available for purchase were far from the technical services and resources needed for proper farming, with some lacking access to water or suffering from overuse and soil erosion. [2] These lands were considered to be poorer in quality and less valuable, and only a few individuals were able to acquire land through these methods. [1] The majority of Africans were forced to access land through what was known as customary tenure in Native Reserves. [1]

The Act itself was amended in 1936 and 1941, and continued to be repeatedly amended in the years that followed. [11]

Legacy and consequences

Robert Mugabe, previous president of Zimbabwe, under which there were attempts to reform land ownership in the 2000s. Robert Mugabe - 2009.jpg
Robert Mugabe, previous president of Zimbabwe, under which there were attempts to reform land ownership in the 2000s.

Immediate consequences

The Land Apportionment Act limited quality land access, resulting in the overcrowding of Africans on native reserves, limited resources, and poverty. [2] This destroyed the native reserve economy, limiting the social or economic advancement of Africans while allowing white settlers to profit. [2] The Act ultimately led to a decline in agricultural production for native peoples, which added to the growing inequality. [10] This in turn caused food shortages within the reserves, with individuals unable to engage in profitable farming. [11] To make matters worse, large portions of the land allotted to white settlers were unused, and left to fallow. [2] Within twenty years, the Land Apportionment Act had created a crisis in terms of population size and ecological damage on the native reserves. [2]

Off the Native Reserves, the Land Apportionment Act limited the ability for black Africans to live in urban centers, being that the only land available to them was connected to Native Purchase Areas. [1] Towns and urban centers became dominated by white settlers, and black Zimbabweans who became the majority population were forced to live in townships miles from cities where they were able to rent. [12] This led to the development of townships for Africans that worked and provided services for white urban centers, or towns. [9] Land access was therefore tied to attempts by the colonial, and white settler majority, to limit African mobility and residence. [9]

Pushes for reform

Issues of land ownership continue to affect political and social life. As the 1930 Land Apportionment Act became entrenched into the history of white settlement within Southern Rhodesia, attempts to address the issues it created continued to push for land segregation and the limitation of African migration. [2] In 1951, the white majority passed the Native Land Husbandry Act in order to create a landless peasant population that would aid in the industrialization of the state. [2] The act also established strict guidelines on grazing, land allocation, and ownership rights within the reserves, in hopes of increasing agriculture production. [2] The result was a continued limitation on African land ownership, and increasing hostility toward the settler administration. [2]

The Rhodesian Referendum of 1969, in which white settlers attempted to create a white minority country, moved to update the 1930 act through additions like the Property Owners (Residential Protection) Act, which gave the right to remove individuals of a race different to that of the majority in the surrounding areas. [13] Therefore, a black landowner surrounded by white landowners could be legally asked to remove themselves and relinquish their land rights in order to protect the surrounding landowners. [13] Following legislation such as the Land Tenure Act of 1969 were later altered during the civil war in 1977, opening the way for black land ownership outside of the limits of The Land Apportionment Act of 1930. [14] As the push for independence from the white majority grew, the issue of land became a focal point for the development of nationalism and rebellion. [10] Nearing the end of the Rhodesian Bush War, land reform was addressed in the Lancaster House Agreement of 1979 through the creation of a fund that compensated white farmers who lost their lands in future government led land reforms. [15]

Post independence, land ownership and land reform have continued to dominate. [14] After independence, there was an increasing push for equitable distribution of the land in an attempt to correct colonial injustices. [3] White farmers still owned a disproportionate amount of viable land, and profited from a dominant position in agricultural production. [3] Previous President Mugabe made steps to transfer land ownership to black civilians after independence, with varied results. [14] The issue intensified, with the 2000s witnessing an attempt by the Zimbabwe government, along with peasant farmers, youth, and veterans, to seize land from white settlers. [14] [10] This resulted in the seizure of 10 million hectares, or 90 percent of all farms, without compensation to title holding landowners. [3] Issues with land reform now center on equalizing the distribution of land and generating solutions to decades of unequal land accumulation of white settlers and elites in power. [3]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhodesia</span> Unrecognised state in Southern Africa (1965–1979)

Rhodesia, officially from 1970 the Republic of Rhodesia, was an unrecognised state in Southern Africa from 1965 to 1979. During this fourteen-year period, Rhodesia served as the de facto successor state to the British colony of Southern Rhodesia, and in 1980 it became modern day Zimbabwe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Rhodesia</span> 1911–1964 British protectorate in Southern Africa

Northern Rhodesia was a British protectorate in Southern Africa, now the independent country of Zambia. It was formed in 1911 by amalgamating the two earlier protectorates of Barotziland-North-Western Rhodesia and North-Eastern Rhodesia. It was initially administered, as were the two earlier protectorates, by the British South Africa Company (BSAC), a chartered company, on behalf of the British Government. From 1924, it was administered by the British Government as a protectorate, under similar conditions to other British-administered protectorates, and the special provisions required when it was administered by BSAC were terminated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern Rhodesia</span> British colony in Africa (1923–65)

Southern Rhodesia was a landlocked, self-governing British Crown colony in Southern Africa, established in 1923 and consisting of British South Africa Company (BSAC) territories lying south of the Zambezi River. The region was informally known as South Zambesia until annexation by Britain, at the behest of Cecil Rhodes's British South Africa Company. The bounding territories were Bechuanaland (Botswana), Northern Rhodesia (Zambia), Portuguese Mozambique (Mozambique) and the Transvaal Republic.

Land reform in Zimbabwe officially began in 1980 with the signing of the Lancaster House Agreement, as a program to redistribute farmland from white Zimbabweans to black Zimbabweans as an effort by the ZANU-PF government to give more control over the country's extensive farmlands to the black African majority. Before the implementation of these policies, the distribution of land in what was then known as Rhodesia saw a population of 4,400 white Rhodesians owning 51% of the country's land while 4.3 million black Rhodesians owned 42%, with the remainder being non-agricultural land. The discrepancy of this distribution, as well as the overall dominance of the white population in the newly-independent but largely unrecognized Rhodesian state was challenged by the black nationalist organizations ZANU and ZAPU in the Rhodesian Bush War. At the establishment of the modern Zimbabwean state in 1980 after the bush war, the Lancaster House Agreement held a clause that prohibited forced transfer of land, this resulted in changes in land distribution from the willing sale or transfer by owners being minor until 2000, when the government of Robert Mugabe began a more aggressive policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhodesian Front</span> Ruling party of Rhodesia (1965–1979)

The Rhodesian Front (RF) was a conservative political party in Southern Rhodesia, subsequently known as Rhodesia. Formed in March 1962 by white Rhodesians opposed to decolonisation and majority rule, it won that December's general election and subsequently spearheaded the country's Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) from the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland in 1965, remaining the ruling party and upholding white minority rule through the majority of the Bush War until 1979. Initially led by Winston Field, the party was led by the majority of its existence by co-founder Ian Smith. Following the end of the Bush War and the country's reconstitution as Zimbabwe, it dissolved in 1981 and was succeeded by the Republican Front.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British South Africa Company</span> 1889–1965 British mining and colonial enterprises company

The British South Africa Company was chartered in 1889 following the amalgamation of Cecil Rhodes' Central Search Association and the London-based Exploring Company Ltd, which had originally competed to capitalize on the expected mineral wealth of Mashonaland but united because of common economic interests and to secure British government backing. The company received a Royal Charter modelled on that of the British East India Company. Its first directors included The 2nd Duke of Abercorn, Rhodes himself, and the South African financier Alfred Beit. Rhodes hoped BSAC would promote colonisation and economic exploitation across much of south-central Africa, as part of the "Scramble for Africa". However, his main focus was south of the Zambezi, in Mashonaland and the coastal areas to its east, from which he believed the Portuguese could be removed by payment or force, and in the Transvaal, which he hoped would return to British control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhodesian Bush War</span> 1964–1979 conflict in Southern Africa

The Rhodesian Bush War also known as the Second Chimurenga as well as the Zimbabwean War of Independence, was a civil conflict from July 1964 to December 1979 in the unrecognised country of Rhodesia.

White Zimbabweans, also known as Rhodesians, are Zimbabwean people of European descent. In linguistic, cultural, and historical terms, these Zimbabweans of European ethnic origin are mostly English-speaking descendants of British settlers. A small minority are either Afrikaans-speaking descendants of Afrikaners from South Africa or those descended from Greek, Portuguese, Italian, and Jewish immigrants.

Goffals or Coloured Zimbabweans are persons of mixed race, predominately those claiming both European and African descent, in Malawi, Zambia, and, particularly Zimbabwe. They are generally known as Coloureds, though the term Goffal is used by some in the Coloured community to refer to themselves, though this does not refer to the mixed-race community in nearby South Africa. The community includes many diverse constituents of Shona, Northern Ndebele, Bemba, Fengu, British, Afrikaner, Cape Coloured, Cape Malay and less commonly Portuguese, Greek, Goan, and Indian descent. Similar mixed-race communities exist throughout Southern Africa, notably the Cape Coloureds of South Africa.

The Southern Rhodesia African National Congress (SRANC) was a political party active between 1957–1959 in Southern Rhodesia. Committed to the promotion of indigenous African welfare, it was the first fully fledged black nationalist organisation in the country. While short-lived — it was outlawed by the predominantly white minority government in 1959 — it marked the beginning of political action towards black majority rule in Southern Rhodesia, and was the original incarnation of the National Democratic Party (NDP); the Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU); the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU); and the Zimbabwe African National Union — Patriotic Front (ZANU–PF), which has governed Zimbabwe continuously since 1980. Many political figures who later became prominent, including Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo, were members of the SRANC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military history of Zimbabwe</span>

The military history of Zimbabwe chronicles a vast time period and complex events from the dawn of history until the present time. It covers invasions of native peoples of Africa, encroachment by Europeans, and civil conflict.

The colonial history of Southern Rhodesia is considered to be a time period from the British government's establishment of the government of Southern Rhodesia on 1 October 1923, to Prime Minister Ian Smith's unilateral declaration of independence in 1965. The territory of 'Southern Rhodesia' was originally referred to as 'South Zambezia' but the name 'Rhodesia' came into use in 1895. The designation 'Southern' was adopted in 1901 and dropped from normal usage in 1964 on the break-up of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, and Rhodesia became the name of the country until the creation of Zimbabwe Rhodesia in 1979. Legally, from the British perspective, the name Southern Rhodesia continued to be used until 18 April 1980, when the name Republic of Zimbabwe was formally proclaimed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Languages of Zimbabwe</span>

Many languages are spoken, or historically have been spoken, in Zimbabwe. Since the adoption of its 2013 Constitution, Zimbabwe has 16 official languages, namely Chewa, Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Koisan, Nambya, Ndau, Ndebele, Shangani, Shona, sign language, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Venda, Xhosa. The country's main languages are Shona, spoken by over 70% of the population, and Ndebele, spoken by roughly 20%. English is the country's lingua franca, used in government and business and as the main medium of instruction in schools. English is the first language of most white Zimbabweans, and is the second language of a majority of black Zimbabweans. Historically, a minority of white Zimbabweans spoke Afrikaans, Greek, Italian, Polish, and Portuguese, among other languages, while Gujarati and Hindi could be found amongst the country's Indian population. Deaf Zimbabweans commonly use one of several varieties of Zimbabwean Sign Language, with some using American Sign Language. Zimbabwean language data is based on estimates, as Zimbabwe has never conducted a census that enumerated people by language.

The Indian presence in what is now Zimbabwe dates back to 1890 or earlier. Some scholars have suggested the similarities of the gold mining techniques carried out in southern Zimbabwe during ancient periods with the Indian ones, a brass cup of Hindu workmanship dated to 14th or 15th century AD has been found in Zimbabwean workings. During colonial period Indian plantation workers in South Africa crossed the border into Southern Rhodesia. A voluntary wave of Indian migrants also came at this time from the east, made up mostly of Gujarati men crossing the Indian Ocean to look for new opportunities. These men landed in Beira in Mozambique. Finding that immigration restrictions made it difficult for them to go to South Africa, they made their way across Mozambique, ending up what was then Southern Rhodesia. Further immigration was restricted in 1924 when the colony became a self-governing colony of the United Kingdom. The next year, entry of Indian migrants was restricted to wives and minor children of existing residents, with exceptions made on occasion for teachers and priests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">INTAF</span> Cabinet ministry of the Rhodesian government

The Ministry of Internal Affairs, commonly referred to as INTAF, was a cabinet ministry of the Rhodesian government. One of Rhodesia's most important governmental departments, it was responsible for the welfare and development of the black African rural population. It played a significant role maintaining control of rural African villages during the Rhodesian Bush War.

Racism in Zimbabwe was introduced during the colonial era in the 19th century, when emigrating white settlers began racially discriminating against the indigenous Africans living in the region. The colony of Southern Rhodesia and state of Rhodesia were both dominated by a white minority, which imposed racist policies in all spheres of public life. In the 1960s–70s, African national liberation groups waged an armed struggle against the white Rhodesian government, culminating in a peace accord that brought the ZANU–PF to power but which left much of the white settler population's economic authority intact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern Rhodesia in World War I</span> The territorys contributions during the Great War

When the United Kingdom declared war on Germany at the start of World War I in August 1914, settler society in Southern Rhodesia, then administered by the British South Africa Company, received the news with great patriotic enthusiasm. The Company administrator, Sir William Milton, wired the UK government, "All Rhodesia ... ready to do its duty". Although it supported Britain, the company was concerned about the possible financial implications for its chartered territory should it make direct commitments to the war effort, particularly at first, so most of the colony's contribution to the war was made by Southern Rhodesians individually—not only those who volunteered to fight abroad, but also those who remained at home and raised funds to donate food, equipment and other supplies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bledisloe Commission</span> 1937–9 Royal Commission examining the potential Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland

The Bledisloe Commission, also known as the Rhodesia-Nyasaland Royal Commission, was a Royal Commission, appointed in 1937 and undertaking its enquiries between 1937 and 1939. to examine the possible closer union of the three British territories in Central Africa, Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland. These territories were to some degree economically inter-dependent, and it was suggested that an association would promote their rapid development. Its chairman was Lord Bledisloe.

Sir William Morris Carter, CBE (1873–1960) was a British lawyer and colonial administrator. He served as registrar and judge in Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika between 1902 and 1924. He tried without success to alienate lands held by Africans in Uganda so they could be organized as European plantations using native laborers. He chaired the 1925 Southern Rhodesia land commission and the 1932–1933 Kenya Land Commission, both of which alienated Africans from their land and allocated large areas for exclusively European settlement. He served on the Royal Commission on Palestine (1936–1937).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom–Zimbabwe relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between the UK and Zimbabwe have been complex since the latter's independence in 1980. The territory of modern Zimbabwe had been colonised by the British South Africa Company in 1890, with the Pioneer Column raising the Union Jack over Fort Salisbury and formally establishing company, and by extension, British, rule over the territory. In 1920 Rhodesia, as the land had been called by the company in honour of their founder, Cecil Rhodes, was brought under jurisdiction of the Crown as the colony of Southern Rhodesia. Southern Rhodesia over the decades following its establishment would slowly be populated by large numbers of Europeans emigrants who came to form a considerable diaspora, largely consisting of Britons but also smaller groups of Italians, Greeks and Afrikaners. A settler culture that had already existed since the time of company would come to cement fully and the white population began to identify as Rhodesians, often in conjunction with British/Afrikaner/Southern European identities of their ancestors. Southern Rhodesia would go on to participate heavily in both the First and Second wars, providing soldiers and military equipment to the British war effort.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Mujere, Joseph; Mseba, Admire (2019). "The Politics of African Freehold Land Ownership in Earlycolonial Zimbabwe, 1890–1930". African Economic History. 47 (1): 32–53. doi:10.1353/aeh.2019.0002. ISSN   2163-9108. S2CID   204427986.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Machingaidze, Victor E.M. (1991). "Agrarian Change from above: The Southern Rhodesia Native Land Husbandry Act and African Response". The International Journal of African Historical Studies. 24 (3): 557–588. doi:10.2307/219092. ISSN   0361-7882. JSTOR   219092.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Laurie, Charles (2016-04-01), "Overview of the Land Seizure Era", The Land Reform Deception, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–20, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398294.003.0001, ISBN   978-0-19-939829-4
  4. ↑ Chirikure, Shadreck (2020). "New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe". Journal of Archaeological Research. 28 (2): 139–186. doi: 10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w . S2CID   195236827.
  5. ↑ "Who owns land in Africa?". Spore. 1993.
  6. ↑ "Zimbabwe - The British South Africa Company". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Floyd, Barry N. (October 1962). "Land Apportionment in Southern Rhodesia". Geographical Review. 52 (4): 566–582. doi:10.2307/212615. ISSN   0016-7428. JSTOR   212615.
  8. ↑ JENNINGS, A. C. (July 1935). "Land Apportionment in Southern Rhodesia". African Affairs. XXXIV (CXXXVI): 296–312. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a100934. ISSN   1468-2621.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Nelson, Harold D. Nelson, Harold D. Area handbook for Southern Rhodesia. (1983). Zimbabwe, a country study. The Studies. OCLC   597164804.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Mafa, Onias, author (19 October 2015). Gender, politics and land use in Zimbabwe, 1980-2012. Codesria. ISBN   978-2-86978-590-8. OCLC   968246589.{{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. 1 2 3 4 Moyana, Henry V. (1975-01-01). "Land and race in Rhodesia". African Review. 5 (1): 17–41. ISSN   0002-0117.
  12. ↑ "Zimbabwe | History, Map, Flag, Population, Capital, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
  13. 1 2 Kirkman, W. P. (William Patrick) (1969). The Rhodesian referendum: the significance of June 20, 1969. OCLC   772578183.
  14. 1 2 3 4 "Zimbabwe - Climate". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
  15. ↑ Gregory, M. (1980). Rhodesia : from Lusaka to Lancaster House. OCLC   769971614.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.