Law of reentry

Last updated

The law of reentry, sometimes called the principle of the open stage, is a traditional rule in English Renaissance theatre where a character who exits the stage at the end of a scene cannot immediately reenter at the beginning of the next if it is set in a different location. Before the character may reenter, a conversation, speech, or other dramatic action must first take place to clarify that some amount of time has passed and prevent confusion.

Contents

The law of reentry has been used to explain the numerous scenes in Shakespeare's plays that begin or end with a monologue and the inclusion of speeches and scenes that were "otherwise unnecessary". Other scholars point to examples of a character immediately reentering with others or through another door as adequately illustrating that time has passed or the location has changed between scenes. The law is also described as a convention in public theatre houses, which did not have intermissions between acts, and not in private ones, which had intermissions.

Principle

The law of reentry, or the principle of the open stage, [1] [2] was described by Robert Prölß  [ de ] in Von den ältesten Drucken der Dramen Shakespeares (1905) as: to avoid confusion in the audience, characters who leave the stage at the end of a scene cannot immediately reenter at the beginning of the next if the location has changed. Before the character may reenter, a speech, some dialogue, or "stage business" must first occur to suggest the passage of time. [2] [3] [4] The character who exited may also immediately reenter with several others. Reynolds further suggested that reentering through a different door was sufficient to signal a change in location, [4] and W. J. Lawrence also asserted that the law was not violated if the action was continuous. Lawrence further defined the law as asserting that the last speaker in a scene cannot be the first speaker in the next. [5] The rule sought to prevent audiences from becoming confused and believing that a character was merely returning and that the scene was continuous without a change in location. [2]

The intervening dramatic action or speech need not be lengthy, and business as simple as "alarm" or "a retreat sounded" or "alarums and excursions" may suffice. [6] [7] Smith observed that a Shakespearean character would typically reenter after about ten lines and further noted that this time off-stage may be shorter if the distance needed to travel between scenes was small, such as when moving between rooms within the same building. [8]

Act changes and intermissions

Graves noted that there are many cases in which a character exits at the end of an act and immediately reenters at the beginning of the next act where the location has changed. He surmises that, in light of the law of reentry, this is evidence that there was an intermission (or an "act time") practiced between acts, even if such time went unremarked upon in stage directions. [3] Rasmussen described the "innovation" of intermissions as allowing for characters to leave at the end of an act and immediately reenter without violating the law. [2] Reynolds similarly noted that a character exiting at the end of an act and immediately reentering at the beginning of the next is not violating the rule. [6]

Scholars describe the law as prevalent in Shakespeare's works before the King's Men acquired the Blackfriars Theatre in 1608 and moved from the conventions of public theatre to those of private theatre. The public theatre did not use intermissions between acts where a private theatre, like Blackfriars, did. [8]

In scholarship

The law of reentry was noted to be so strictly observed that violations are noteworthy. [8] [9] Lawrence felt that "so strictly was the Law of Re-entry obeyed that, where we find it contravened, we have reason to suspect that clumsy revision has taken place and an intervening scene been removed." [5]

First Folio, Shakespeare - 0345.jpg
Red circle.svg
Page from the First Folio, showing Richard II . John of Gaunt exits (red circle) for no clear reason just before the end of Act 1 Scene 1, and re-enters the stage at the start of Scene 2 to speak with the Duchess of Gloucester.

Prölß suggested that short scenes were often inserted between characters exiting and entering to keep the law of reentry in Shakespeare plays. [3] Neuendorff felt that the law was a significant influence on the dramatic construction of plays; Reynolds paraphrased Neuendorff as feeling the law explained why many scenes in Elizabethan plays begin or end with a monologue and include (in Reynolds' words) "speeches or even scenes otherwise unnecessary". [6] Reynolds, however, was "not entirely convinced" that this was done as often as Prölß believed to keep the rule and indicate passage of time and felt it was more to indicate a scene change. [4] While considering revisions John Fletcher made to A Wife for a Month , Robert Kean Turner speculated that a speech of "mostly filler" lines occurring at the end of Act III Scene 2 was an attempt at resolving a violation of the law of reentry. [10] Eric Rasmussen similarly pointed to the law as the motivation behind a revision in The Second Maiden's Tragedy that added an eleven line soliloquy breaking up the exit of the Tyrant and his soldiers and their reentry by a different door, [2] though Martin White believed it was less to do with the law and more a practical consideration to buy time to execute a complicated scene change. [1]

The law of reentry was also cited to explain why a character suddenly exits a number of lines before the end of a scene before reentering in the next one. John of Gaunt's in the first scene of the Folio version of Richard II is a commonly noted example: unnoticed by other characters, he makes a silent and unexplained exit—variously described as unmotivated, abrupt, and awkward—to apparently avoid violating the law. [2] [8] [11] In the quarto version of the play, John of Gaunt leaves at the end of the scene and immediately reenters. [2]

Wentersdorf speculated that a violation in The Taming of the Shrew suggests that an episode involving Christopher Sly was dislocated when the First Folio manuscript was printed, such as one that existed in the quarto version. [12] J. Dover Wilson similarly believed that an apparent violation in The Tempest between Act IV Scene 1 into Act V Scene 1 made it "practically certain" that a scene between the two was deleted, [9] [13] though E. K. Chambers questioned this and Eric Rasmussen later noted that this instance is not necessarily a violation as an intermission would have intervened. [2]

George Walton Williams cited the law as disproving the theory that Macbeth is the Third Murderer, as these characters being the same would violate the law twice across Act III Scenes 2, 3, and 4; he noted that the First Murderer exits with the Third at the end of scene 3 and does not reenter in scene 4 until after eight lines. [14]

Apparent violations

Violations of the law are called immediate reentrances. [15] Immediate reentrances noted by scholars include:

Haines dismissed a supposed instance in A Midsummer Night's Dream between Act III Scene 2 and Act IV Scene 1 because the characters do not exit the stage, rather they remain on stage asleep and awaken in the next scene. He further enumerated thirty-six immediate reentrances in Shakespeare. [7] Haines and Smith both dismissed twenty-four of these apparent violations because they involved battle scenes where the reentry is stated or presumed to be preceded by alarums and excursions, which is sufficient. [8]

Related Research Articles

<i>Hamlet</i> Tragedy by William Shakespeare

The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, often shortened to Hamlet, is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare sometime between 1599 and 1601. It is Shakespeare's longest play. Set in Denmark, the play depicts Prince Hamlet and his attempts to exact revenge against his uncle, Claudius, who has murdered Hamlet's father in order to seize his throne and marry Hamlet's mother. Hamlet is considered among the "most powerful and influential tragedies in the English language", with a story capable of "seemingly endless retelling and adaptation by others". It is widely considered one of the greatest plays of all time. Three different early versions of the play are extant: the First Quarto ; the Second Quarto ; and the First Folio. Each version includes lines and passages missing from the others.

<i>Macbeth</i> Play by William Shakespeare

The Tragedy of Macbeth, often shortened to Macbeth, is a tragedy by William Shakespeare. It is thought to have been first performed in 1606. It dramatises the damaging physical and psychological effects of political ambition on those who seek power. Of all the plays that Shakespeare wrote during the reign of James I, Macbeth most clearly reflects his relationship with King James, patron of Shakespeare's acting company. It was first published in the Folio of 1623, possibly from a prompt book, and is Shakespeare's shortest tragedy.

<i>Romeo and Juliet</i> Tragedy by William Shakespeare

The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, often shortened to Romeo and Juliet, is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare early in his career about the romance between two Italian youths from feuding families. It was among Shakespeare's most popular plays during his lifetime and, along with Hamlet, is one of his most frequently performed. Today, the title characters are regarded as archetypal young lovers.

<i>Henry V</i> (play) Play by Shakespeare

The Life of Henry the Fifth, often shortened to Henry V, is a history play by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written near 1599. It tells the story of King Henry V of England, focusing on events immediately before and after the Battle of Agincourt (1415) during the Hundred Years' War. In the First Quarto text, it was titled The Cronicle History of Henry the fift, and The Life of Henry the Fifth in the First Folio text.

<i>The Taming of the Shrew</i> Play by Shakespeare

The Taming of the Shrew is a comedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written between 1590 and 1592. The play begins with a framing device, often referred to as the induction, in which a mischievous nobleman tricks a drunken tinker named Christopher Sly into believing he is actually a nobleman himself. The nobleman then has the play performed for Sly's diversion.

<i>Antony and Cleopatra</i> Play by William Shakespeare

Antony and Cleopatra is a tragedy by William Shakespeare. The play was first performed around 1607, by the King's Men at either the Blackfriars Theatre or the Globe Theatre. Its first appearance in print was in the First Folio published in 1623, under the title The Tragedie of Anthonie, and Cleopatra.

<i>The Winters Tale</i> Play by Shakespeare

The Winter's Tale is a play by William Shakespeare originally published in the First Folio of 1623. Although it was grouped among the comedies, many modern editors have relabelled the play as one of Shakespeare's late romances. Some critics consider it to be one of Shakespeare's "problem plays" because the first three acts are filled with intense psychological drama, while the last two acts are comic and supply a happy ending.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Globe Theatre</span> 16th/17th-century theatre in London

The Globe Theatre was a theatre in London associated with William Shakespeare. It was built in 1599 at Southwark, close to the south bank of the Thames, by Shakespeare's playing company, the Lord Chamberlain's Men. It was destroyed by fire on 29 June 1613. A second Globe Theatre was built on the same site by June 1614 and stayed open until the London theatre closures of 1642. As well as plays by Shakespeare, early works by Ben Jonson, Thomas Dekker and John Fletcher were first performed here.

<i>The Comedy of Errors</i> Play by William Shakespeare

The Comedy of Errors is one of William Shakespeare's early plays. It is his shortest and one of his most farcical comedies, with a major part of the humour coming from slapstick and mistaken identity, in addition to puns and word play. It has been adapted for opera, stage, screen and musical theatre numerous times worldwide. In the centuries following its premiere, the play's title has entered the popular English lexicon as an idiom for "an event or series of events made ridiculous by the number of errors that were made throughout".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intermission</span> Recess between parts of a performance

An intermission, also known as an interval in British and Indian English, is a recess between parts of a performance or production, such as for a theatrical play, opera, concert, or film screening. It should not be confused with an entr'acte, which, in the 18th century, was a sung, danced, spoken, or musical performance that occurs between any two acts, that is unrelated to the main performance, and that thus in the world of opera and musical theater became an orchestral performance that spans an intermission and leads, without a break, into the next act.

<i>Henry VIII</i> (play) Play by Shakespeare

The Famous History of the Life of King Henry the Eighth, often shortened to Henry VIII, is a collaborative history play, written by William Shakespeare and John Fletcher, based on the life of Henry VIII. An alternative title, All Is True, is recorded in contemporary documents, with the title Henry VIII not appearing until the play's publication in the First Folio of 1623. Stylistic evidence indicates that individual scenes were written by either Shakespeare or his collaborator and successor, John Fletcher. It is also somewhat characteristic of the late romances in its structure. It is noted for having more stage directions than any of Shakespeare's other plays.

<i>The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (Abridged)</i> Parody of Shakespeares plays

The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (Abridged) (also known as The Compleat Wrks of Wllm Shkspr (Abridged)) is a play written by Adam Long, Daniel Singer, and Jess Winfield. It parodies the plays of William Shakespeare with all of them being performed in comically shortened or merged form by only three actors. Typically, the actors use their real names and play themselves rather than specific characters.

A ghost character, in the bibliographic or scholarly study of texts of dramatic literature, is a term for an inadvertent error committed by the playwright in the act of writing. It is a character who is mentioned as appearing on stage, but who does not do anything, and who seems to have no purpose. As Kristian Smidt put it, they are characters that are "introduced in stage directions or briefly mentioned in dialogue who have no speaking parts and do not otherwise manifest their presence". It is generally interpreted as an author's mistake, indicative of an unresolved revision to the text. If the character was intended to appear and say nothing, it is assumed this would be made clear in the playscript.

Portia (<i>The Merchant of Venice</i>) Character in The Merchant of Venice

Portia is a female protagonist in The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare. In creating her character, Shakespeare drew from the historical figure of Porcia — the daughter of Cato the Younger — as well as several parts of the Bible.

Critical approaches to <i>Hamlet</i>

From its premiere at the turn of the 17th century, Hamlet has remained Shakespeare's best-known, most-imitated, and most-analyzed play. The character of Hamlet played a critical role in Sigmund Freud's explanation of the Oedipus complex. Even within the narrower field of literature, the play's influence has been strong. As Foakes writes, "No other character's name in Shakespeare's plays, and few in literature, have come to embody an attitude to life ... and been converted into a noun in this way."

<i>As You Like It</i> Pastoral comedy by William Shakespeare

As You Like It is a pastoral comedy by William Shakespeare believed to have been written in 1599 and first published in the First Folio in 1623. The play's first performance is uncertain, though a performance at Wilton House in 1603 has been suggested as a possibility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ophelia</span> Character in Shakespeares drama Hamlet

Ophelia is a character in William Shakespeare's drama Hamlet (1599–1601). She is a young noblewoman of Denmark, the daughter of Polonius, sister of Laertes and potential wife of Prince Hamlet, who, due to Hamlet's actions, ends up in a state of madness that ultimately leads to her drowning.

"The quality of mercy" is a speech given by Portia in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. In the speech, Portia, disguised as a lawyer, begs Shylock to show mercy to Antonio. The speech extols the power of mercy, "an attribute to God Himself".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shylock</span> Character in Shakespeares "The Merchant of Venice"

Shylock is a fictional character in William Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice. A Venetian Jewish moneylender, Shylock is the play's principal villain. His defeat and conversion to Christianity form the climax of the story.

Beatrice (<i>Much Ado About Nothing</i>) Fictional character

Beatrice is a fictional character in William Shakespeare's play Much Ado About Nothing. In the play, she is the niece of Leonato and the cousin of Hero. Atypically for romantic heroines of the sixteenth century, she is feisty and sharp-witted; these characteristics have led some scholars to label Beatrice a protofeminist character. During the play, she is tricked into falling in love with Benedick, a soldier with whom she has a "merry war", after rumours are spread that they are in love with each other.

References

  1. 1 2 White, Martin (1998). Renaissance drama in action: an introduction to aspects of theatre practice and performance. London ; New York: Routledge. p. 34. ISBN   978-0-415-06738-6.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Rasmussen, Eric (1989). "Shakespeare's Hand in The Second Maiden's Tragedy". Shakespeare Quarterly. 40 (1): 1–26. doi:10.2307/2870751. ISSN   0037-3222. JSTOR   2870751.
  3. 1 2 3 Graves, Thornton Shirley (1915). "The "Act Time" in Elizabethan Theatres". Studies in Philology. 12 (3): 101–134. ISSN   0039-3738. JSTOR   4171674.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Reynolds, George F. (1914). "William Percy and His Plays, with a Summary of the Customs of Elizabethan Staging". Modern Philology. 12 (4): 252. doi:10.1086/386960. ISSN   0026-8232. JSTOR   433204.
  5. 1 2 3 Lawrence, William J. (1928). Shakespeare's Workshop. Houghton Mifflin Company. pp. 17–18.
  6. 1 2 3 Reynolds, G. F. (1911). "What We Know of the Elizabethan Stage". Modern Philology. 9 (1): 47–82. doi:10.1086/386858. ISSN   0026-8232. JSTOR   432699.
  7. 1 2 3 Haines, C. M. (1925). "The "Law of Re-Entry" in Shakespeare". The Review of English Studies. 1 (4): 449–451. doi:10.1093/res/os-I.4.449. ISSN   0034-6551. JSTOR   508708.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Smith, Irwin (1967-01-01). "Their Exits and Reentrances". Shakespeare Quarterly. 18 (1): 7–16. doi:10.2307/2868057. ISSN   0037-3222. JSTOR   2868057.
  9. 1 2 Chambers, E. K. (1925). "The Integrity of The Tempest". The Review of English Studies. 1 (2): 129–150. doi:10.1093/res/os-I.2.129. ISSN   0034-6551. JSTOR   508056.
  10. ↑ Turner, Robert Kean (1983). "Revisions and Repetition-Brackets in Fletcher's "A Wife for a Month"". Studies in Bibliography. 36: 178–190. ISSN   0081-7600. JSTOR   40371779.
  11. ↑ Bryson, Bill (2007). Shakespeare: The World as Stage . Eminent lives. New York: Atlas Books. p. 103. ISBN   978-0-06-074022-1.
  12. ↑ Wentersdorf, Karl P. (1978). "The Original Ending of The Taming of the Shrew: A Reconsideration". Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 18 (2): 201–215. doi:10.2307/450357. ISSN   0039-3657. JSTOR   450357.
  13. ↑ Quiller-Couch, Arthur; Dover Wilson, John, eds. (2009). The Tempest: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare (New ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 85. ISBN   9781108006057.
  14. ↑ Williams, George Walton (1972). "The Third Murderer in Macbeth". Shakespeare Quarterly. 23 (3): 261. doi:10.2307/2868513. ISSN   0037-3222. JSTOR   2868513.
  15. 1 2 Nicol, David (2019). ""Exit at one door and enter at the other": The Fatal Re-Entrance in Jacobean Drama". Shakespeare Bulletin. 37 (2): 205–229. doi:10.1353/shb.2019.0031. ISSN   1931-1427.
  16. ↑ Wentersdorf, Karl P. (1978). "The Original Ending of The Taming of the Shrew: A Reconsideration". Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 18 (2): 201–215. doi:10.2307/450357. ISSN   0039-3657. JSTOR   450357.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.