Light-A-Fire Movement

Last updated

The Light-A-Fire Movement (often referred to as the "LAFM", "L-A-F", or "L-A-F Movmement") was a small guerrilla resistance group that fought against the martial law regime of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines. [1] [2] The group engaged in symbolic acts of sabotage targeting offices and businesses associated with Marcos, aiming to inspire other Filipinos to rise up against his rule. The LAFM is notable for being the first armed anti-Marcos group aligned with the pre-martial law political center, rather than with movements on the extreme left or right. [3]

Contents

Members of this group spent the early years of martial law, from 1972 to 1978, opposing Marcos through diplomacy and negotiation. However, political suppression [4] and widely recognized election fraud [5] [6] during the 1978 Philippine parliamentary election convinced them that Marcos would never willingly permit the emergence of a genuine, viable political opposition. [1]

The group's strategy involved staging small but attention-grabbing explosions and fires in establishments owned by known "Marcos cronies." They also sent nonlethal letter bombs intended to shock Marcos' technocrats into withdrawing their support for the administration. Their goal was to show that resistance to Marcos existed, challenging his propaganda narrative that his regime was stable. [1] Though they had limited success locally, due to Marcos' control over domestic media, they managed to attract international media attention, which added to the growing global pressure on the regime to end martial law. [7]

The group was short-lived; its key members were captured in December 1979, only a year after its formation. [8] After the core members of the Light-A-Fire Movement were imprisoned, a more skilled guerrilla group called the April 6 Liberation Movement took up the LAFM's cause and tactics. This shift contributed to pressure from the United States, which ultimately led Marcos to nominally end martial law in January 1981. [1]

Despite this victory, Marcos remained in power, retaining his ability to rule by decree and order warrantless arrests. He continued to do so for five more years until he was finally deposed in the civilian-led People Power Revolution. The members of the Light-A-Fire Movement were subsequently either freed from Marcos' prisons or returned from exile. They then resumed their pre-martial law roles in government and the business sector. [1]

Background

Barred from running for a third term as president in 1973, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos declared martial law on September 23, 1972, citing civil unrest following the 1969 Philippine balance of payments crisis as justification. [4] [9] Through this decree, Marcos seized emergency powers, giving him full control over the military and authority to suppress freedom of speech and of the press, as well as other civil liberties. He dissolved the Philippine Congress and shut down media establishments critical of his administration. [4] He also ordered the immediate arrest of political opponents and critics, including key opposition senators Jose W. Diokno, Benigno Aquino Jr., Jovito Salonga, and Raul Manglapus. [10] With nearly all his political opponents arrested, in hiding, or exiled, Marcos would ultimately hold onto power for 14 years beyond his first two presidential terms. [4]

This period in Philippine history is remembered for the Marcos administration's record of human rights abuses, [11] [12] particularly against political opponents, student activists, journalists, religious workers, farmers, and others who resisted the dictatorship. [13] Based on documentation from Amnesty International, Task Force Detainees of the Philippines, and similar human rights monitoring groups, [14] historians estimate that the Marcos dictatorship was marked by 3,257 known extrajudicial killings, 35,000 cases of documented torture, 759 disappearances, and 70,000 incarcerations. [14] [15] [ page needed ] [16] : 16  After Marcos was ousted, government investigators discovered that martial law had also enabled the Marcoses to conceal vast stashes of unexplained wealth, which various courts [17] later determined to be "of criminal origin." [18]

Formation

The idea of waging an armed resistance against the Marcos dictatorship was not new when the Light-A-Fire Movement was formed in 1978. By that time, an armed leftist resistance led by the New People's Army and a Muslim Separatist conflict led by the Moro National Liberation Front (and later the Moro Islamic Liberation Front) had been ongoing for years. [4] [19] However, Filipinos who identified as politically "centrist" and wished to avoid aligning with either the extreme left or right generally favored unarmed resistance strategies. For those who could leave the Philippines, this meant lobbying and diplomacy in liberal Western legislatures; those who remained in the Philippines documented the Marcos dictatorship's abuses for exposure to the international community. In both cases, their goal was to counter Marcos' propaganda, which portrayed the implementation of martial law as peaceful and lawful. [1]

In the wake of the 1978 Philippine parliamentary election, however, some anti-Marcos activists in exile in the United States realized that Marcos' propaganda machine and suppressive political tactics were so effective at concealing his abuses that it would be impossible to force him to restore democracy through diplomatic means alone. [1]

During that election, Marcos did not allow opposition parties to organize properly, and when the results were announced, they were widely believed to be fraudulent. [5] Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter even remarked that "Marcos stole the election." [6]

Nevertheless, these anti-Marcos activists drew inspiration from the noise barrage organized by the opposition on April 6, 1978—the night before the election—which provided a rare opportunity for ordinary citizens to express their protest against the repression of the Marcos regime. [1] Taking their cue from the success of the noise barrage, they believed that if centrist moderate Filipinos saw individuals with mainstream political views willing to take action against the regime, they would soon rise up against Marcos and force him to abolish martial law. [1]

Among those known to be involved in the LAFM were Business Day publisher Eduardo Olaguer, his friends Othoniel and Ester Paredes Jimenez, Asia Institute of Management professor Gaston Ortigas, and Filipino-American businessman Ben Lim—all of whom were later tried by the Marcos regime for their alleged membership in the group. [20] Some individuals said to have supported the group financially include Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation Chairman Alfonso Yuchengco, industrialists Vicente Puyat and J. Amado Araneta, and former Senator Oscar Ledesma. [1]

1978-1979 "Acts of Sabotage"

In the months between its formation in 1978 and its effective dissolution in December 1979, the Light-A-Fire Movement implemented several small-scale "acts of sabotage," the most prominent of which included a fire at the Floating Manila Bay Casino, [1] which had been operating since 1977, [21] and a bombing at the former offices of the Commission on Elections, a symbol of the electoral fraud widely believed to have plagued the April 1978 elections. [1] They also caused property damage to several luxury hotels owned by "Marcos cronies." [1] Additionally, they sent a small non-fatal letter bomb intended to scare Education Minister Onofre Corpuz. [1] None of these attacks resulted in casualties, as the group confined itself to the "legitimate use of force" while upholding Catholic precepts against killing. Although more potent and lethal attacks occurred shortly after the LAFM became inactive, these were the work of other groups. [1]

The attacks received little media coverage in the Philippines because Marcos still controlled reporting, one of his powers under martial law. [1] However, as international pressure groups lobbied Western countries to take action against Marcos, the incidents succeeded in attracting attention from both international media and diplomatic circles. They effectively disproved Marcos' claims of broad national support in the Philippines and put pressure on the regime to finally end martial law. [7]

1979 Capture by Marcos

Ultimately, the LAFM was short-lived, as its members were captured by the Marcos regime in December 1979, only a year after the group’s formation and seven years before the Philippines would finally oust Marcos in the civilian-led People Power Revolution. [8] [22]

The Marcos regime's first major success against the group occurred when one of its members, after being stopped by customs while traveling to and from the Philippines, shared some details about the group with U.S. Customs officials, believing that the U.S. would support their cause. Instead, the U.S. passed the information to the Marcos regime. Soon after, in December 1979, LAFM member Ben Lim was caught with explosives and LAFM documents at Manila International Airport, leading to the arrest of sixteen group members. [1] Mindful of potential backlash from arresting respected figures, the Marcos regime chose not to file charges against a Jesuit priest and various businessmen implicated by the documents. [1]

After the core members of the Light-A-Fire Movement were imprisoned, a different, better-trained guerrilla group called the April 6 Liberation Movement took up the LAFM's cause and tactics. This shift led the United States to pressure Marcos into nominally ending the formal state of martial law in January 1981. [1]

After the People Power Revolution

Despite the nominal lifting of martial law, Marcos remained in power, retaining his ability to rule by decree and order warrantless arrests. He continued to do so for five more years until he was finally deposed in the civilian-led People Power Revolution. The members of the Light-A-Fire Movement were subsequently either freed from Marcos' prisons or returned from exile. They then resumed their pre-martial law roles in government and the business sector. [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">People Power Revolution</span> Series of popular demonstrations in the Philippines in 1986 that overthrew Ferdinand Marcos

The People Power Revolution, also known as the EDSA Revolution or the February Revolution, were a series of popular demonstrations in the Philippines, mostly in Metro Manila, from February 22 to 25, 1986. There was a sustained campaign of civil resistance against regime violence and electoral fraud. The nonviolent revolution led to the departure of Ferdinand Marcos, the end of his 20-year dictatorship and the restoration of democracy in the Philippines.

The Coalition Against the Marcos Dictatorship was a North America-based antiimperialist organization that was at the center of the international movement opposing the dictatorship of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos from the 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lino Brocka</span> Filipino film director (1949–1991)

Catalino Ortiz Brocka was a Filipino film director. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential and significant filmmakers in the history of Philippine cinema. His filmography often addressed the country's societal issues, and despite his initial closeness with the Marcos family, his work eventually grew to have anti-authoritarian themes in opposition to the Marcos dictatorship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proclamation No. 1081</span> 1972 declaration of martial law by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos

Proclamation No. 1081 was the document which contained formal proclamation of martial law in the Philippines by President Ferdinand Marcos, as announced to the public on September 23, 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Philippines (1965–1986)</span>

The history of the Philippines, from 1965 to 1986, covers the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos. The Marcos era includes the final years of the Third Republic (1965–1972), the Philippines under martial law (1972–1981), and the majority of the Fourth Republic (1981–1986). By the end of the Marcos dictatorial era, the country was experiencing a debt crisis, extreme poverty, and severe underemployment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Martial law in the Philippines</span> Authorized military government in the Philippines

Martial law in the Philippines refers to the various historical instances in which the Philippine head of state placed all or part of the country under military control—most prominently during the administration of Ferdinand Marcos, but also during the Philippines' colonial period, during the second world war, and more recently on the island of Mindanao during the administrations of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and Rodrigo Duterte. The alternative term "martial law era" as applied to the Philippines is typically used to describe the Marcos martial law period specifically.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francisco Claver</span>

Francisco Funaay Claver, S.J. was a Filipino Jesuit, cultural anthropologist and human rights activist. As a Roman Catholic prelate, he is renowned for his writings on ecclesiology and social justice, and his efforts to institutionalize Vatican II reforms in the Philippine Catholic Church. As a human rights activist, Claver was one of the most persistent critics of the Marcos dictatorship among Philippine Catholic Church leaders. Claver was at the forefront of civil society groups that opposed the Marcos regime's World Bank-funded Chico River Dam project, which would have caused the displacement of Indigenous peoples living in the area. He was also responsible for drafting the 1986 Philippine bishops' statement, which was considered a key moment in the People Power Revolution that overthrew the Marcos dictatorship. Claver is considered one of the "intellectual minds" in the ranks of the bishops of the Catholic Church in Asia.

Student activism in the Philippines from 1965 to 1972 played a key role in the events which led to Ferdinand Marcos' declaration of Martial Law in 1972, and the Marcos regime's eventual downfall during the events of the People Power Revolution of 1986.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behn Cervantes</span> Filipino artist and activist (1938–2013)

Benjamín Roberto "Behn" Holcombe Cervantes was a Filipino artist and activist. He was highly regarded as a theater pioneer, teacher, and progressive thinker who was detained multiple times during martial law in the Philippines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Martial law under Ferdinand Marcos</span> 1972–1981 period in the Philippines

At 7:15 p.m. on September 23, 1972, President Ferdinand Marcos announced on television that he had placed the Philippines under martial law, stating he had done so in response to the "communist threat" posed by the newly founded Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), and the sectarian "rebellion" of the Muslim Independence Movement (MIM). Opposition figures of the time accused Marcos of exaggerating these threats and using them as an excuse to consolidate power and extend his tenure beyond the two presidential terms allowed by the 1935 constitution. Marcos signed Proclamation No. 1081 on September 21, 1972, marking the beginning of a fourteen-year period of one-man rule, which effectively lasted until Marcos was exiled from the country on February 25, 1986. Proclamation No. 1081 was formally lifted on January 17, 1981, although Marcos retained essentially all of his powers as dictator until he was ousted in February 1986.

Religious sector opposition against the dictatorship of President Ferdinand Marcos included leaders and workers belonging to different beliefs and denominations.

The dictatorship of 10th Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos in the 1970s and 1980s is historically remembered for its record of human rights abuses, particularly targeting political opponents, student activists, journalists, religious workers, farmers, and others who fought against his dictatorship. Based on the documentation of Amnesty International, Task Force Detainees of the Philippines, and similar human rights monitoring entities, historians believe that the Marcos dictatorship was marked by 3,257 known extrajudicial killings, 35,000 documented tortures, 737 'disappeared', and 70,000 incarcerations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workers' resistance against the Marcos dictatorship</span> Opposition in the Philippines, 1970s and 1980s

During the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos, Filipino workers in the labor industry experienced the effects of government corruption, crony capitalism, and cheap labor for foreign transnational industries, One of the objectives of Martial Law was to cheapen labor costs, in order to attract transnational corporations to export labor to the Philippines. Marcos signed many presidential decrees beneficial only to his associates, while allowing for the forced relocation of indigenous peoples, decreasing workers' wages, and murders of labor activists. Minimum wage was a fixed PHP8.00 per day. Many workers were unemployed or underemployed. It was also during the Marcos presidency when the practice of contractualization began, enabling managements to avoid giving regular, permanent status to employees after six months of work. Strikes were banned and the government controlled trade unions, leaving workers without effective protection against employers who had unfair labor practices and regulations.

Ester Dolores Erquiaga Misa Paredes Jimenez was a Filipina activist best known for her contributions to the resistance against the dictatorship of former Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos.

The August 24, 1974 military raid on the Sacred Heart Novitiate in the Novaliches district of Quezon City in the Philippines is considered an important turning point in the Philippine Catholic Church's resistance to the Marcos dictatorship. It was one of the key contributors to the emergence of the "middle force" of the opposition to Ferdinand Marcos, which were willing to work towards the dictator's ouster but were not part of the leftist opposition which had led the movement against Marcos up until that point.

Anarchism in the Philippines has its roots in the anti-colonial struggle against the Spanish Empire, becoming influential in the Philippine Revolution and the country's early trade unionist movement. After being supplanted by Marxism-Leninism as the leading revolutionary tendency during the mid-20th century, it experienced a resurgence as part of the punk subculture, following the fragmentation of the Communist Party of the Philippines.

Indigenous people’s resistance against the Marcos dictatorship varied from case to case among the various indigenous peoples of the Philippines. The most documented cases are the various resistance movements towards the Marcos administration’s appropriation of indigenous lands, particularly in the case of the Chico River Dam Project and the Manila Water Supply III project on the Kaliwa River watershed, and the birth of the various separatist groups and their coalescing into the Moro conflict in the wake of news about the Jabidah Massacre.

Journalism during the Marcos dictatorship in the Philippines—a fourteen year period between the declaration of Martial Law in September 1972 until the People Power Revolution in February 1986—was heavily restricted under the dictatorial rule of President Ferdinand Marcos in order to suppress political opposition and prevent criticism of his administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle force opposition to the Marcos dictatorship</span>

In the Philippines during the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos, groups and individuals which opposed the regime without subscribing to leftist ideology were usually labeled with the terms "middle force," "third force," the "mainstream opposition," or more rarely, as the "conservative opposition." Mostly consisting of middle class and upper class groups which had been apolitical when Marcos first declared martial law, the most prominent examples of oppositionists in this category include religious groups, business sector groups, professional groups, social democrats, academics, journalists, and artists. Politicians from the traditional opposition are also sometimes counted in this category, although the terms are traditionally associated with ground level opposition, rather than political opposition per se.

Movement for a Free Philippines was a Washington, D.C.-based organization established in 1973 by exiled Filipinos in opposition to the authoritarian regime of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Thompson, Mark R. (1995). The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines. Yale University Press. ISBN   9780300184150.
  2. ↑ "A time for heroes". The Philippines Graphic. 2017-12-10. Retrieved 2024-03-13.
  3. ↑ "Filipino Middle Class Provides Recruits for War Against Marcos". Washington Post. 2023-12-23. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-03-15.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Celoza, Albert (1997), Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: the political economy of authoritarianism, Greenwood Publishing Group
  5. 1 2 "Martial Law Museum". Martial Law Museum. Retrieved 2024-03-13.
  6. 1 2 "Marcos 'stole' election, Carter says - UPI Archives".
  7. 1 2 Alvarez, Heherson T. "Cutting US ties with the Marcos dictatorship" . Retrieved 2024-03-13.
  8. 1 2 "Waking up to martial law: A personal journey". GMA News Online. 20 September 2009.
  9. ↑ "Declaration of Martial Law". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.
  10. ↑ "Ninoy linked up with the Left to aid presidential ambition". GMA News. August 18, 2010. Archived from the original on February 7, 2015.
  11. ↑ "Alfred McCoy, Dark Legacy: Human rights under the Marcos regime". Ateneo de Manila University. September 20, 1999.
  12. ↑ N., Abinales, P. (2005). State and society in the Philippines. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN   978-0-7425-1023-4. OCLC   57452454.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ↑ "Gone too soon: 7 youth leaders killed under Martial Law". Rappler. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
  14. 1 2 "3,257: Fact checking the Marcos killings, 1975–1985 – The Manila Times Online". www.manilatimes.net. April 12, 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-04-12. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
  15. ↑ "Document". www.amnesty.org.
  16. ↑ Robles, Raissa (2016). Marcos Martial Law: Never Again. Filipinos for a Better Philippines, Inc.
  17. ↑ Francisco, Katerina (September 22, 2016). "Martial Law, the dark chapter in Philippine history". Rappler. Archived from the original on September 23, 2016. Retrieved June 29, 2018.
  18. ↑ de Ynchausti, Nik (September 24, 2016). "The tallies of Martial Law". Esquire Magazine Philippines. Archived from the original on September 28, 2016. Retrieved June 27, 2018.
  19. ↑ Yegar, Moshe (2002). Between Integration and Secession: The Muslim Communities of the Southern Philippines, Southern Thailand and Western Burma/Myanmar. Lexington Books. pp. 267–268.
  20. ↑ Peña, Fernando (2015-09-26). "Why raps filed vs anti-Marcos freedom fighters in US" . Retrieved 2024-03-14.
  21. ↑ https://www.esquiremag.ph/long-reads/features/philippine-village-hotel-history-a00289-20231206-lfrm
  22. ↑ "Ms. Vivian Velez, meet my Mother". philstar.com.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.