Local adaptation

Last updated

Local adaptation is a mechanism in evolutionary biology whereby a population of organisms evolves to be more well-suited to its local environment than other members of the same species that live elsewhere. Local adaptation requires that different populations of the same species experience different natural selection. For example, if a species lives across a wide range of temperatures, populations from warm areas may have better heat tolerance than populations of the same species that live in the cold part of its geographic range.

Contents

Definition

More formally, a population is said to be locally adapted [1] if organisms in that population have evolved different phenotypes than other populations of the same species, and local phenotypes have higher fitness in their home environment compared to individuals that originate from other locations in the species range. [2] [3] This is sometimes called 'home site advantage'. [4] A stricter definition of local adaptation requires 'reciprocal home site advantage', where for a pair of populations each out performs the other in its home site. [5] [2] This definition requires that local adaptation result in a fitness trade-off, such that adapting to one environment comes at the cost of poorer performance in a different environment. [3] Before 2004, reciprocal transplants sometimes considered populations locally adapted if the population experienced its highest fitness in its home site vs the foreign site (i.e. compared the same population at multiple sites, vs. multiple populations at the same site). This definition of local adaptation has been largely abandoned after Kawecki and Ebert argued convincingly that populations could be adapted to poor-quality sites but still experience higher fitness if moved to a more benign site (right panel of figure). [3]

Testing for local adaptation

Testing for local adaptation requires measuring the fitness of organisms from one population in both their local environment and in foreign environments. This is often done using transplant experiments. Using the stricter definition of reciprocal home site advantage, local adaptation is often tested via reciprocal transplant experiments. In reciprocal transplants, organisms from one population are transplanted into another population, and vice versa, and their fitness is measured (see figure). [3] If local transplants outperform (i.e. have higher fitness than) the foreign transplants at both sites, the local populations are said to be locally adapted. [3] If local adaptation is defined simply as a home site advantage of one population (local sources outperform foreign sources at a common site), it can be tested for using common garden experiments, where multiple source populations are grown in a common site, as long as one of the source populations is local to that site.

Transplant experiments have most often been done with plants or other organisms that do not move. [5] However, evidence for rapid local adaptation in mobile animals has been gathered through transplant experiments with Trinidadian guppies. [6]

Hypothetical results from two reciprocal transplant experiments, in which organisms from site1 and site2 are transplanted to both sites and their performance compared. In both experiments (panels), the local sources outcompete the foreign sources, indicating that populations are locally adapted. In the left panel each source also does best at its home site. In the right panel site1 is higher quality than site2, so both populations do best in site1, even though the population from site2 is locally adapted to its poor quality site. Local adaptation.png
Hypothetical results from two reciprocal transplant experiments, in which organisms from site1 and site2 are transplanted to both sites and their performance compared. In both experiments (panels), the local sources outcompete the foreign sources, indicating that populations are locally adapted. In the left panel each source also does best at its home site. In the right panel site1 is higher quality than site2, so both populations do best in site1, even though the population from site2 is locally adapted to its poor quality site.


Frequency of local adaptation

Several meta-analyses have attempted to quantify how common local adaptation is, and generally reach similar conclusions. Roughly 75% of transplant experiments (mostly with plants) find that local populations outcompete foreign populations at a common site, but less than 50% find the reciprocal home site advantage that defines classic local adaptation. [5] [7] Exotic plants are locally adapted to their invasive range as often and as strongly as native plant are locally adapted, suggesting that local adaptation can evolve relatively rapidly. [8] [9] However, biologists likely test for local adaptation where they expect to find it. Thus these numbers likely reflect local adaptation between obviously differing sites, rather than the probability than any two randomly-selected populations within a species are locally adapted.

Drivers of local adaptation

Any component of the environment can drive local adaptation, as long as it affects fitness differently at different sites (creating divergent selection among sites), and does so consistently enough for populations to evolve in response. Seminal examples of local adaptation come from plants that adapted to different elevations [10] or to tolerate heavy metals in soils. [11] Interactions among species (e.g. herbivore-plant interactions) can also drive local adaptation, though do not seem to be as important as abiotic factors, at least for plants in temperate ecosystems. [12] Many examples of local adaptation exist in host-parasite systems as well. For instance, a host may be resistant to a locally-abundant pathogen or parasite, but conspecific hosts from elsewhere where that pathogen is not abundant may have no evolved no such adaptation. [13]

Effects of Gene Flow on Local Adaption

Gene flow can completely prevent local adaptations in populations by increasing the amount of genetic material exchanged which can than lower the frequency of alleles associated with the specific local adaptation. [14] However gene flow can also introduce beneficial alleles to a population, which increases the amount of genetic variation, therefore strengthening the likelihood of local adaptations. [15] Gene flow is the transfer of genetic information from one population to another, mainly through migration of organisms or their genetic material. [16] It is possible for genetic material such as pollen or spores that can travel via wind, water or being brought by an animal, to reach an isolated population. [15]

The role gene flow plays in local adaptation is complex because gene flow can reduce the likelihood of local adaptation in a population since gene flow is genetic material from different populations mixing frequently, which makes populations genetically more similar which is the opposite of local adaptation. [17] The level of gene flow impacts its effects on local adaptation, high gene flow tends to reduce local adaptation whereas low gene flow can increase local adaptation. [17] High gene flow is when there is a lot of new genetic material entering the population often and low gene flow is when a population occasionally gets new genetic material. Populations with extensive local adaptations are the most impacted by high gene flow; in such cases where high gene flow occurs in populations with local adaptations it has negative effects such as reducing or removing the adaptation. [14]

Populations with local adaptation can be isolated from other populations however complete isolation is not necessary, gene flow can play a role in populations developing local adaptations. Gene flow allows for the introduction of new beneficial alleles into populations where it was not previously present; if these end up being extremely beneficial to the population they were introduced to, this may allow organisms to locally adapt. [14] Further, local adaptation can happen under gene flow if recombination at genes connected to or controlling the adapted trait is reduced. [14]

Field Observations

Paper Wasps: Parasite & Host Relationship

The effect of high gene flow on local adaptation in populations co-evolving with a parasite is of particular interest because parasites are known to specialize on a given host. [14] Populations of coevolving wasps were studied, a type of paper wasps ( Polistes biglumis ) and the parasite wasp ( Polistes atrimandibularis ) that preys on it, the parasite essentially takes over the nest of the host and begins to reproduce, eventually taking over the host’s nest. [14] The specific type of parasitism taking place between these two wasp species is social parasitism, meaning one species gets another species to raise its young; social parasitism is known to impact genetic diversity of the host populations. [18] A specific local adaptation of the P. biglumis is having a small number of offspring and putting more energy towards defenses against potential intruders, which would help prevent the parasitic wasp from entering the nest. [14]

Looking at different local populations with similar levels of gene flow is particularly important because the presence of local adaptations in some populations but not others could suggest factors other than gene flow and selective pressure from parasites are causing the differences. Further, regional populations with varying levels of gene flow allows us to get a better idea of how gene flow at the local population level within these regions contributes to local adaptations at the regional level. The Alps were chosen as the area for the wasp study because the elevation of the mountains separate regional and local populations; resulting in multiple local populations of both host and parasite at different elevations and regions. [14] For example, wasps on the same mountain but at different elevations do interbred so gene flow is occurring between local populations. In addition, there are also more isolated regional populations of both host wasp and parasitic wasp on completely different mountains that do not interbreed with other regional populations. [14] DNA microsatellites, a type of genetic marker, were used to study the differences between local populations, to compare to regional populations, in an attempt to see how gene flow was impacting their genetics. [14] What's very important to note is that gene flow is taking place between wasp populations to the same degree; all local populations in the same region have the same amount of gene flow. [14] Meaning that one host population does not have more exposure to different additional genetic material than another host population at a different elevation.

The wasp study found that significant local adaptation only took place in different regional populations, rather than different local populations, for instance higher and lower elevation populations on the same side of the mountain did not have significant differences. [14] But populations in different regions, on the other side of the mountain, a completely different mountain, did have significant differences. [14] Results from the DNA microsatellites showed that the out of the regional wasp populations, the most isolated regional population was the most different from other regional populations. [14] This evidence supports the idea that some level of isolation is needed in order for local adaptations to occur within populations, further supporting the idea that high levels of gene flow do not produce local adaptations.

Experimental Evidence

Fruit Flies

Experimental data suggests limited gene flow will produce the most local adaptations and high gene flow will cause populations to hybridize. There was study done on fruit flies ( Drosophila melanogaster ) to see if adaptive potential was increased in populations that were previously isolated and then experienced different levels of gene flow, or complete hybridization between two populations of previously isolated fruit flies. [17] Experiments introducing different levels of gene flow and complete hydration of D. melanogaster populations showed that limited gene flow (in comparison to high gene flow or full hybridization) was actually what produced the greatest number of beneficial alleles within the fruit fly population. [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution</span> Change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations

Evolution is the change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolution occurs when evolutionary processes such as natural selection and genetic drift act on genetic variation, resulting in certain characteristics becoming more or less common within a population over successive generations. The process of evolution has given rise to biodiversity at every level of biological organisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coevolution</span> Two or more species influencing each others evolution

In biology, coevolution occurs when two or more species reciprocally affect each other's evolution through the process of natural selection. The term sometimes is used for two traits in the same species affecting each other's evolution, as well as gene-culture coevolution.

Population genetics is a subfield of genetics that deals with genetic differences within and among populations, and is a part of evolutionary biology. Studies in this branch of biology examine such phenomena as adaptation, speciation, and population structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene flow</span> Transfer of genetic variation from one population to another

In population genetics, gene flow is the transfer of genetic material from one population to another. If the rate of gene flow is high enough, then two populations will have equivalent allele frequencies and therefore can be considered a single effective population. It has been shown that it takes only "one migrant per generation" to prevent populations from diverging due to drift. Populations can diverge due to selection even when they are exchanging alleles, if the selection pressure is strong enough. Gene flow is an important mechanism for transferring genetic diversity among populations. Migrants change the distribution of genetic diversity among populations, by modifying allele frequencies. High rates of gene flow can reduce the genetic differentiation between the two groups, increasing homogeneity. For this reason, gene flow has been thought to constrain speciation and prevent range expansion by combining the gene pools of the groups, thus preventing the development of differences in genetic variation that would have led to differentiation and adaptation. In some cases dispersal resulting in gene flow may also result in the addition of novel genetic variants under positive selection to the gene pool of a species or population

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetic diversity</span> Total number of genetic characteristics in a species

Genetic diversity is the total number of genetic characteristics in the genetic makeup of a species, it ranges widely from the number of species to differences within species and can be attributed to the span of survival for a species. It is distinguished from genetic variability, which describes the tendency of genetic characteristics to vary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Group selection</span> Proposed mechanism of evolution

Group selection is a proposed mechanism of evolution in which natural selection acts at the level of the group, instead of at the level of the individual or gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of sexual reproduction</span> How sexually reproducing multicellular organisms could have evolved from a common ancestor species

Sexual reproduction is an adaptive feature which is common to almost all multicellular organisms and various unicellular organisms. Currently, the adaptive advantage of sexual reproduction is widely regarded as a major unsolved problem in biology. As discussed below, one prominent theory is that sex evolved as an efficient mechanism for producing variation, and this had the advantage of enabling organisms to adapt to changing environments. Another prominent theory, also discussed below, is that a primary advantage of outcrossing sex is the masking of the expression of deleterious mutations. Additional theories concerning the adaptive advantage of sex are also discussed below. Sex does, however, come with a cost. In reproducing asexually, no time nor energy needs to be expended in choosing a mate and, if the environment has not changed, then there may be little reason for variation, as the organism may already be well-adapted. However, very few environments have not changed over the millions of years that reproduction has existed. Hence it is easy to imagine that being able to adapt to changing environment imparts a benefit. Sex also halves the amount of offspring a given population is able to produce. Sex, however, has evolved as the most prolific means of species branching into the tree of life. Diversification into the phylogenetic tree happens much more rapidly via sexual reproduction than it does by way of asexual reproduction.

In biology, adaptation has three related meanings. Firstly, it is the dynamic evolutionary process of natural selection that fits organisms to their environment, enhancing their evolutionary fitness. Secondly, it is a state reached by the population during that process. Thirdly, it is a phenotypic trait or adaptive trait, with a functional role in each individual organism, that is maintained and has evolved through natural selection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conservation genetics</span> Interdisciplinary study of extinction avoidance

Conservation genetics is an interdisciplinary subfield of population genetics that aims to understand the dynamics of genes in a population for the purpose of natural resource management and extinction prevention. Researchers involved in conservation genetics come from a variety of fields including population genetics, natural resources, molecular ecology, biology, evolutionary biology, and systematics. Genetic diversity is one of the three fundamental measures of biodiversity, so it is an important consideration in the wider field of conservation biology.

An evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) is a population of organisms that is considered distinct for purposes of conservation. Delineating ESUs is important when considering conservation action. This term can apply to any species, subspecies, geographic race, or population. Often the term "species" is used rather than ESU, even when an ESU is more technically considered a subspecies or variety rather than a biological species proper. In marine animals the term "stock" is often used as well.

The Red Queen's hypothesis is a hypothesis in evolutionary biology proposed in 1973, that species must constantly adapt, evolve, and proliferate in order to survive while pitted against ever-evolving opposing species. The hypothesis was intended to explain the constant (age-independent) extinction probability as observed in the paleontological record caused by co-evolution between competing species; however, it has also been suggested that the Red Queen hypothesis explains the advantage of sexual reproduction at the level of individuals, and the positive correlation between speciation and extinction rates in most higher taxa.

The evolution of biological complexity is one important outcome of the process of evolution. Evolution has produced some remarkably complex organisms – although the actual level of complexity is very hard to define or measure accurately in biology, with properties such as gene content, the number of cell types or morphology all proposed as possible metrics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetic pollution</span> Problematic gene flow ⇨ wild populations

Genetic pollution is a term for uncontrolled gene flow into wild populations. It is defined as "the dispersal of contaminated altered genes from genetically engineered organisms to natural organisms, esp. by cross-pollination", but has come to be used in some broader ways. It is related to the population genetics concept of gene flow, and genetic rescue, which is genetic material intentionally introduced to increase the fitness of a population. It is called genetic pollution when it negatively impacts the fitness of a population, such as through outbreeding depression and the introduction of unwanted phenotypes which can lead to extinction.

A genetic isolate is a population of organisms with little genetic mixing with other organisms within the same species due to geographic isolation or other factors that prevent reproduction. Genetic isolates form new species through an evolutionary process known as speciation. All modern species diversity is a product of genetic isolates and evolution.

Host–parasite coevolution is a special case of coevolution, where a host and a parasite continually adapt to each other. This can create an evolutionary arms race between them. A more benign possibility is of an evolutionary trade-off between transmission and virulence in the parasite, as if it kills its host too quickly, the parasite will not be able to reproduce either. Another theory, the Red Queen hypothesis, proposes that since both host and parasite have to keep on evolving to keep up with each other, and since sexual reproduction continually creates new combinations of genes, parasitism favours sexual reproduction in the host.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecological fitting</span> Biological process

Ecological fitting is "the process whereby organisms colonize and persist in novel environments, use novel resources or form novel associations with other species as a result of the suites of traits that they carry at the time they encounter the novel condition". It can be understood as a situation in which a species' interactions with its biotic and abiotic environment seem to indicate a history of coevolution, when in actuality the relevant traits evolved in response to a different set of biotic and abiotic conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolving digital ecological network</span>

Evolving digital ecological networks are webs of interacting, self-replicating, and evolving computer programs that experience the same major ecological interactions as biological organisms. Despite being computational, these programs evolve quickly in an open-ended way, and starting from only one or two ancestral organisms, the formation of ecological networks can be observed in real-time by tracking interactions between the constantly evolving organism phenotypes. These phenotypes may be defined by combinations of logical computations that digital organisms perform and by expressed behaviors that have evolved. The types and outcomes of interactions between phenotypes are determined by task overlap for logic-defined phenotypes and by responses to encounters in the case of behavioral phenotypes. Biologists use these evolving networks to study active and fundamental topics within evolutionary ecology.

Arsenophonus nasoniae is a species of bacterium which was previously isolated from Nasonia vitripennis, a species of parasitoid wasp. These wasps are generalists which afflict the larvae of parasitic carrion flies such as blowflies, houseflies and flesh flies. A. nasoniae belongs to the phylum Pseudomonadota and family Morganellaceae. The genus Arsenophonus, has a close relationship to the Proteus (bacterium) rather than to that of Salmonella and Escherichia. The genus is composed of gammaproteobacterial, secondary-endosymbionts which are gram-negative. Cells are non-flagellated, non-motile, non-spore forming and form long to highly filamentous rods. Cellular division is exhibited through septation. The name 'Arsenophonus nasoniae gen. nov., sp. nov.' was therefore proposed for the discovered bacterium due to its characteristics and its microbial interaction with N. vitripennis. The type strain of A. nasoniae is Strain SKI4.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecological speciation</span>

Ecological speciation is a form of speciation arising from reproductive isolation that occurs due to an ecological factor that reduces or eliminates gene flow between two populations of a species. Ecological factors can include changes in the environmental conditions in which a species experiences, such as behavioral changes involving predation, predator avoidance, pollinator attraction, and foraging; as well as changes in mate choice due to sexual selection or communication systems. Ecologically-driven reproductive isolation under divergent natural selection leads to the formation of new species. This has been documented in many cases in nature and has been a major focus of research on speciation for the past few decades.

<i>Drosophila quinaria</i> species group Species group of the subgenus Drosophila

The Drosophila quinaria species group is a speciose lineage of mushroom-feeding flies studied for their specialist ecology, their parasites, population genetics, and the evolution of immune systems. Quinaria species are part of the Drosophila subgenus.

References

  1. ↑ Williams, George (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  2. 1 2 Leimu, Roosa (December 23, 2008). "A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants". PLOS ONE. 3 (12): e4010. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.4010L. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004010 . PMC   2602971 . PMID   19104660.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Kawecki, Tadeusz J.; Ebert, Dieter (2004-12-01). "Conceptual issues in local adaptation" (PDF). Ecology Letters. 7 (12): 1225–1241. Bibcode:2004EcolL...7.1225K. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x . ISSN   1461-0248.
  4. ↑ Galloway, Laura F.; Fenster, Charles B. (2000). "Population Differentiation in an Annual Legume: Local Adaptation". Evolution. 54 (4): 1173–1181. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00552.x . ISSN   1558-5646. PMID   11005286. S2CID   13652390.
  5. 1 2 3 Hereford, Joe (2009). "A Quantitative Survey of Local Adaptation and Fitness Trade‐Offs". The American Naturalist. 173 (5): 579–588. doi:10.1086/597611. ISSN   0003-0147. PMID   19272016. S2CID   524423.
  6. ↑ Gordon, Swanne; Reznick, David; Kinnison, Michael; Bryant, Michael; Weese, Dylan; Räsänen, Katja; Millar, Nathan; Hendry, Andrew (2009). "Adaptive changes in life history and survival following a new guppy introduction". The American Naturalist. 174 (1): 34–45. doi:10.1086/599300. PMID   19438322. S2CID   8589987.
  7. ↑ Leimu, Roosa; Fischer, Markus (2008). Buckling, Angus (ed.). "A Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants". PLOS ONE. 3 (12): e4010. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.4010L. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004010 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   2602971 . PMID   19104660.
  8. ↑ Oduor, Ayub M. O.; Leimu, Roosa; Kleunen, Mark van (2016). "Invasive plant species are locally adapted just as frequently and at least as strongly as native plant species". Journal of Ecology. 104 (4): 957–968. Bibcode:2016JEcol.104..957O. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12578 . ISSN   1365-2745.
  9. ↑ Elizabeth, Leger (2009). "Genetic variation and local adaptation at a cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) invasion edge in western Nevada". Molecular Ecology. 18 (21): 4366–4379. Bibcode:2009MolEc..18.4366L. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04357.x. PMID   19769691. S2CID   13846376.
  10. ↑ Clausen, J (1949). "Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species III. Environmental Responses of Climatic Races of Achillea. Jens Clausen , David D. Keck , William M. Hiesey". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 24 (2): 144. doi:10.1086/396966. ISSN   0033-5770.
  11. ↑ Wilcox Wright, Jessica; Stanton M; Scherson R (2006). "Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsiflora". Evolutionary Ecology Research. 8: 1–21.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ↑ Hargreaves, Anna L.; Germain, Rachel M.; Bontrager, Megan; Persi, Joshua; Angert, Amy L. (2020-03-01). "Local Adaptation to Biotic Interactions: A Meta-analysis across Latitudes". The American Naturalist. 195 (3): 395–411. doi:10.1086/707323. ISSN   0003-0147. PMID   32097037. S2CID   209575982.
  13. ↑ Kaltz, O; Shykoff, JA (1998). "Local adaptation in host-parasite systems". Heredity. 81 (4): 361–370. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00435.x .
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Seppä, Perttu; Bonelli, Mariaelena; Dupont, Simon; Hakala, Sanja Maria; Bagnères, Anne-Geneviève; Lorenzi, Maria Cristina (September 2020). "Strong Gene Flow Undermines Local Adaptations in a Host Parasite System". Insects. 11 (9): 585. doi: 10.3390/insects11090585 . ISSN   2075-4450. PMC   7564341 . PMID   32882832.
  15. 1 2 Kling, Matthew M.; Ackerly, David D. (2021-04-27). "Global wind patterns shape genetic differentiation, asymmetric gene flow, and genetic diversity in trees". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (17). Bibcode:2021PNAS..11817317K. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017317118 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   8092467 . PMID   33875589.
  16. ↑ Choudhuri, Supratim (2014-01-01), Choudhuri, Supratim (ed.), "Chapter 2 - Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution**The opinions expressed in this chapter are the author's own and they do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the FDA, the DHHS, or the Federal Government.", Bioinformatics for Beginners, Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 27–53, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-410471-6.00002-5, ISBN   978-0-12-410471-6 , retrieved 2023-12-11
  17. 1 2 3 4 Swindell, William R.; Bouzat, Juan L. (2006-02-01). "Gene Flow and Adaptive Potential in Drosophila melanogaster". Conservation Genetics. 7 (1): 79–89. Bibcode:2006ConG....7...79S. doi:10.1007/s10592-005-8223-5. ISSN   1572-9737. S2CID   25145342.
  18. ↑ Hoffman, Eric A.; Kovacs, Jennifer L.; Goodisman, Michael AD (2008-08-20). "Genetic structure and breeding system in a social wasp and its social parasite". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 8 (1): 239. Bibcode:2008BMCEE...8..239H. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-239 . ISSN   1471-2148. PMC   2533669 . PMID   18715511.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.