Lucas A. Powe Jr.

Last updated
Lucas A. Powe Jr.
Born
Oakland, California
NationalityAmerican
Alma mater Yale University
University of Washington
Known forFirst Amendment and broadcasting
Scientific career
Fields Legal studies
Institutions University of Texas Law School

Lucas A. Powe Jr. is an American lawyer who serves as the Anne Green Regents Chair in Law at University of Texas at Austin. He is a Supreme Court historian of law. [1] [2]

Contents

Early years and education

Powe's father was from Los Angeles. Powe Sr. attended the University of California, Berkeley, where he ran the mile in track, and in 1941 was graduated from Boalt Hall School of Law. He married Nellie Sheafe, and moved near her family in Oakland, California.

Powe was born in 1943 in Oakland, California. After the war his parents moved to Seattle where he was raised. He majored in American history at Yale and graduated in 1965 and married Carolyn McKenny of Seattle, WA. He then went to the University of Washington School of Law where he graduated number one in his class and was Articles Editor of the Law Review. After two years teaching at the University of British Columbia he was selected as Law Clerk to Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas for the 1970 Term.

Teaching and scholarship

In 1971, he joined the University of Texas faculty. He holds the Anne Green Regents Chair and teaches in the Law School and Government Department. He has been a visiting professor at the University of California Berkeley, the University of Connecticut, and Georgetown University Law Center.

Powe's scholarship has analyzed government regulation and the role of the Supreme Court in shaping society.

In Powe's 1987 book, American Broadcasting and the First Amendment, he urged deregulation of broadcast media, in contrast to the theory in favor of television regulation put forth by Lee C. Bollinger. [3] A key difference between newspapers, on the one hand, and television stations, on the other, is that broadcasters are licensed by the Federal Communications Commission. No matter what politically sensitive stories a newspaper prints, the government cannot take away its presses. But a television station that offends the government can have its license revoked, a paradigm that can contribute to self-censorship, Powe argued.

In his 2000 book, The Warren Court and American Politics, Powe contended the flaw in the tenure of Chief Justice Earl Warren was an attempt at social engineering at the expense of fidelity to the Constitution. One scholar described Powe's criticism: "it was a result-oriented Court, less concerned with legal reasoning than with the outcome. Powe writes that 'it is difficult to speak of an overriding jurisprudence apart from the results reached.' But what were the right results? What drove the Court? For Powe, the answer is straightforward: 'From the justices' points of view, the Court's prime role was to facilitate the policies ordained by the elected branches.'" [4] The review in the American Historical Review concluded: “This book is a brilliant renewal of the public law tradition, and Powe deserves the thanks of legal scholars and political scientists – and, not least, historians of modern America.” [5]

Powe's second book on the Court, The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789-2008 was described by Princeton's Keith Whittington as "the best one volume history of the Supreme Court ever published." [6] An updated version was published as The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789-2020 and Whittington concluded “it remains the best one-volume history of the Supreme Court.” [7]

His third book on the Court, "America’s Lone Star Constitution: How Supreme Court Cases from Texas Shape America" combines Texas history with that of the Court.

When Powe was selected by the alumni (or “Exes” as the University of Texas calls its alums) as one of the ten best teachers in the university in 2019, he became the only faculty member to hold that distinction along with the honor of having one of his books (The Warren Court and American Politics) selected by a faculty committee as the best book published by a Texas faculty member that year.

In Powe’s first oral argument before any court, he prevailed unanimously at the United States Supreme Court. [8]

Powe is a member of the American Law Institute.

He was a reviewer for the History Book Club for almost thirty years.

Selected publications

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the United States</span> Supreme law of the US since 1789

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States. It superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, on March 4, 1789. Originally including seven articles, the Constitution delineates the frame of the federal government. The Constitution's first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, in which the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress ; the executive, consisting of the president and subordinate officers ; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Article IV, Article V, and Article VI embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. Article VII establishes the procedure subsequently used by the 13 states to ratify it. The Constitution of the United States is the oldest and longest-standing written and codified national constitution in force in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1992 amendment delaying congressional salary changes

The Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution states that any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress may take effect only after the next election of the House of Representatives has occurred. It is the most recently adopted amendment but was one of the first proposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earl Warren</span> Chief Justice of the United States from 1953 to 1969

Earl Warren was an American lawyer, politician, and jurist who served as the 30th governor of California from 1943 to 1953 and as the 14th Chief Justice of the United States from 1953 to 1969. The Warren Court presided over a major shift in American constitutional jurisprudence, which has been recognized by many as a "Constitutional Revolution" in the liberal direction, with Warren writing the majority opinions in landmark cases such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Reynolds v. Sims (1964), Miranda v. Arizona (1966), and Loving v. Virginia (1967). Warren also led the Warren Commission, a presidential commission that investigated the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He served as Governor of California from 1943 to 1953, and is the last chief justice to have served in an elected office before nomination to the Supreme Court. Warren is generally considered to be one of the most influential Supreme Court justices and political leaders in the history of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugo Black</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1937 to 1971

Hugo Lafayette Black was an American lawyer, politician, and jurist who served as a U.S. Senator from Alabama from 1927 to 1937 and as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1937 to 1971. A member of the Democratic Party and a devoted New Dealer, Black endorsed Franklin D. Roosevelt in both the 1932 and 1936 presidential elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Warren E. Burger</span> Chief Justice of the United States from 1969 to 1986

Warren Earl Burger was an American attorney and jurist who served as the 15th chief justice of the United States from 1969 to 1986. Born in Saint Paul, Minnesota, Burger graduated from the St. Paul College of Law in 1931. He helped secure the Minnesota delegation's support for Dwight D. Eisenhower at the 1952 Republican National Convention. After Eisenhower won the 1952 presidential election, he appointed Burger to the position of Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Division. In 1956, Eisenhower appointed Burger to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Burger served on this court until 1969 and became known as a critic of the Warren Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Originalism</span> Constitutional interpretation doctrine

Originalism is a legal theory that bases constitutional, judicial, and statutory interpretation of text on the original understanding at the time of its adoption. Proponents of the theory object to judicial activism and other interpretations related to a living constitution framework. Instead, originalists argue for democratic modifications of laws through the legislature or through constitutional amendment.

Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a landmark criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court invalidated all then existing legal constructions for the death penalty in the United States. It was a 5–4 decision, with each member of the majority writing a separate opinion. Following Furman, in order to reinstate the death penalty, states had to at least remove arbitrary and discriminatory effects in order to satisfy the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Marshall Harlan II</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1955 to 1971

John Marshall Harlan was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1955 to 1971. Harlan is usually called John Marshall Harlan II to distinguish him from his grandfather, John Marshall Harlan, who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1877 to 1911.

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Hart Ely</span> American legal scholar (1938–2003)

John Hart Ely was an American legal scholar. He was a professor of law at Yale Law School from 1968 to 1973, Harvard Law School from 1973 to 1982, Stanford Law School from 1982 to 1996, and at the University of Miami Law School from 1996 until his death. From 1982 until 1987, he was the 9th dean of Stanford Law School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Warren Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1953 to 1969

The Warren Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1953 to 1969 when Earl Warren served as the chief justice. The Warren Court is often considered the most liberal court in U.S. history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Tushnet</span> American constitutional law scholar (born 1945)

Mark Victor Tushnet is an American legal scholar. He specializes in constitutional law and theory, including comparative constitutional law, and is currently the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Tushnet is identified with the critical legal studies movement.

Freedom of the press in the United States is legally protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 395 U.S. 367 (1969), was a seminal First Amendment ruling at the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that radio broadcasters enjoyed free speech rights under the First Amendment, but those rights could be partially restricted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to maintain the public interest in equitable use of scarce broadcasting frequencies. As a result, the FCC's Fairness Doctrine was found to be constitutional.

The Professor Robert W. Hamilton Book Author Award is presented annually to the best book-length publication by a staff or faculty member of the University of Texas at Austin. It is chosen by a committee of various disciplines, who in turn were chosen by the Vice President for Research at the University of Texas at Austin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom C. Clark</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1949 to 1967

Thomas Campbell Clark was an American lawyer who served as the 59th United States Attorney General from 1945 to 1949 and as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1949 to 1967.

Richard Labunski is an American journalism professor at the University of Kentucky and newspaper columnist who is an outspoken advocate for reforming the United States Constitution in his book The Second Constitutional Convention. He has been a critic of voter apathy, low voter turnout, and excessive campaign spending. Labunski's book James Madison and the Struggle for the Bill of Rights (2006) argued that Madison was initially lukewarm to the idea of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, but later came to energetically support the ten amendments and worked hard for their inclusion. He has called for a Second Constitutional Convention of the United States, and argued that reform will not happen through the current system because Congress would be reluctant to "limit its own powers."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sanford Levinson</span> American political writer

Sanford Victor Levinson is an American legal scholar known for his writings on constitutional law. A professor at the University of Texas Law School, Levinson is notable for his criticism of the United States Constitution as well as excessive presidential power and has been widely quoted on such topics as the Second Amendment, gay marriage, nominations to the Supreme Court, and other legal issues. He has called for a Second Constitutional Convention of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacobus tenBroek</span> American lawyer

Jacobus tenBroek (1911–1968) was an American disability rights activist, historian and political scientist.

Keith E. Whittington is an American political scientist and legal scholar. He has been the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics at Princeton University since 2006. In July 2024, he joined the Yale Law School faculty. Whittington's research focuses on American constitutionalism, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law.

References

  1. ↑ "Lucas A. Powe, Jr". utexas.edu. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
  2. ↑ "Powe, L. A. Scot". worldcat.org. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
  3. ↑ Ayres, Ian (1988). "Halfway Home: On Powe's American Broadcasting and the First Amendment," 13 Law & Soc. Inquiry 413.
  4. ↑ Rosenberg, Gerald (2000). "Bringing Politics Back In (reviewing Lucas A. Powe, Jr., The Warren Court and American Politics (2000))". Northwestern Law Review. 95 (1): 309, 310.
  5. ↑ Karst, Kenneth. "106 American Historical Review 1021 (2001))".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ↑ "Reviews in American History (2011)". v39: 633.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ↑ On the back cover of the book.
  8. ↑ "Collins v. City of Harker Heights, Texas, 503 U.S. 115 (1992)".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.