Lulu (app)

Last updated
Luluvise, Inc. [1]
Industry Social networking service, mobile app
FounderAlexandra Chong
Headquarters,
WebsiteNo longer available, formerly onlulu.com

Lulu (formerly Luluvise) is a mobile app formerly available for iOS and Android that allowed female users to make positive and negative evaluations of male users on the basis of their romantic, personal, and sexual appeal. The app allowed only female users to access the evaluation system, and evaluations made through the app are attached publicly and anonymously.

Contents

In 2015 the app moved away from Facebook, and currently only allows registration via mobile phone numbers, for both male and female users.

Lulu describes itself as "a private network for girls to express and share their opinions openly and honestly" [2] about the weaknesses and strengths of the manners, appearances, spending habits, and career ambitions of their male acquaintances. The company's expansion of its user base focuses heavily on recruiting undergraduate [3] members of American all-female sororities, which commentators describe as reflected in the "app's linguistic and visual design [which] is visibly influenced by US sorority culture." [4]

The app has been highly controversial, and the functionalities offered by the app are frequently described negatively in the popular press as "sexist and objectifying", [5] "nonconsensual", [6] and "shallow and mean". [7] Although female users cannot write their own comments to avoid bullying, the company's harshest critics hold that the pre-selected terms used within the app for evaluations in the form of hashtags are instrumental in "reinforcing completely horrible stereotypes", [8] accuse the site of tolerating a sexist double standard, [9] [10] and liken the "candor" [11] for which the app aims to a form of public harassment. [12] The company's founder, Alexandra Chong, refers to the app's functionalities as "provocative" and "ground-breaking" [7] and the website holds that the multiple-choice nature of evaluations creates "a safe and positive place for girls and guys". [2]

The company has also been accused of inappropriate use of Facebook accounts' user data. Lulu does not query male Facebook users for their consent in integrating their profiles in the app, and at the time of its release the product caused notable social "recoil" [13] and received significant negative coverage in the press for its violation of Facebook's policies on the use of user data. [14] The company notes that its data collection policies are now in compliance with Facebook's Platform Policies. Also, it points out how users who have unwittingly been incorporated into Lulu's databases may contact their support center for the removal of their personal data.

Lulu was sold to Badoo in 2016.

History

Lulu was created by Alexandra Chong, a Chinese-Jamaican/Canadian from Ocho Rios and former Jamaican tennis Olympian who studied at Appalachian State University and received her LLB from the London School of Economics. [15] [16] She has stated as her inspiration a "really funny" Valentine's Day date she went on in 2009, after which she wanted to be able to discuss details with her female friends without sharing information on Facebook. [17] In December 2011, after stints at Upstream and The Corporate Executive Board Company, [16] she launched Luluvise.com, which was succeeded in January 2013 by Lulu, then as a private, invitation-only app for female users at Florida State University and the University of Florida. [15] In February 2013 the app was released nationally in the US. [15] By April 2013 the app had 200,000 men listed and rated. [18] In November 2013, the app was covered by The New York Times , [4] at which point the company claimed more than a million users. [1] New York magazine reported in November 2013 that the average rating for male users on the app's 10-point numerical scale was 7.5 points. [13]

Current features

Female users answer multiple-choice questions about a man’s sense of humor, manners, ambition, commitment level, and look and style. Results are converted to a 0-to-10 rating, which constitutes a guy’s “score”. Unlike other review-based systems, they cannot add their own comments.

Male users on Lulu can add photos and hashtags to influence female users' opinion. They can edit any detail on their profiles, see their average score, how they perform across 7 categories, and which hashtags girls they know use to describe them. They can also acquire a subscription to see a more detailed breakdown of their scores.

Lulu has an online automatic self-removal tool that allows both male and female users to delete their account at their request and "blacklist" their mobile phone numbers. Their Support Center also mentions the inclusion of agree and disagree buttons let girls weigh in on the accuracy of each review.

In 2014 Truth Bombs was launched: [19] an anonymous forum where users can anonymously share their doubts and opinions about relationships and sex.

In 2015 the Private Chat feature was added [20] to the app as a main feature, allowing women “to make the first move”: female users can invite men they are interested in to a one-on-one conversation via their profiles or Truth Bombs.

Acquisition by Badoo

In February 2016, Badoo acquired Lulu and removed the app's ability to rate men. [21]

Controversy

The stock phrases and "coy euphemisms" [5] used within the app in the form of hashtags to evaluate users' male acquaintances have been noted by The Independent to evoke "stupid cookie-cutter men who can't feel or think and can be summarised in a few sassy phrases of cute girl-talk", [5] highlighting concerns that the app violates the bounds of social propriety and could be used to debase the social standing of users of whom it contains evaluations.[ citation needed ]

Lulu states that it aims to "unleash the value of girl talk" to empower its female reviewers. [2] Columnists dispute the app's stated aim to help "girls to make smarter decisions on topics [such as] relationships", [11] arguing that the "Lisa Frank girly fun" of the app and its pre-selected review terms prevent the service from meaningfully addressing a substantive topic such as dating abuse or sexual assault. [22] The Telegraph praised the app for “...making dating safer for women”. [23]

Critical reactions such as in Forbes note the a sexist double standard regarding the app: "If Lulu existed for men to rate women," columnist Kelly Clay notes, "it's likely that Apple would probably reject it from the app store." [24] The Daily Barometer likewise suggested that the app is degrading to both men and women, concurring that: "If there was a man’s version of Lulu, women would absolutely not stand for it." [7] Slate described the app as "creepy" and noted that "[u]nwelcomed sexual commentary isn't a compliment, it's harassment." [12] Forbes notes that Lulu "has enabled female millennials to think that digital revenge is acceptable ... and provided them a sleek platform to slander men." [24]

In May 2013, a "Shut Down Lulu" petition was created on Change.org by a man named George Orlin. This petition gained over 700 supporters. [25] [26]

Lulu attracted attention after its release for how its initial collection of male Facebook users' data was at the time in violation of Facebook's Platform Policies. [14] The public nature of the app's negative evaluations has also sparked concerns that the evaluations could potentially be libelous in nature. According to the libel laws of the United Kingdom, observers note that it "could well be construed by a judge in a court of law that [an evaluation on the app] has 'lowered [the male Facebook user] in the minds of right thinking members of society'". [27] In response to such allegations, a Lulu representative responded at the time that they "have good legal counsel and guidelines in place" and "also have a takedown policy", [28] and the site notes that its present data collection does not violate Facebook's Platform Policies. [14] Lulu's terms and conditions likewise have referenced how "uploading or posting information about other individuals might encroach on the data protection rights of those individuals". [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

Hot or Not, is a rating site in the Netherlands that allowed users to rate the attractiveness of photos submitted voluntarily by others. The site offered a matchmaking engine called 'Meet Me' and an extended profile feature called "Hotlists". The domain hotornot.com is currently owned by Hot Or Not Limited, and was previously owned by Avid Life Media. 'Hot or Not' was a significant influence on the people who went on to create the social media sites Facebook and YouTube.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Online dating</span> Internet service providing potential relationship contacts

Online dating, also known as Internet dating, Virtual dating, or Mobile app dating, is a method used by people with a goal of searching for and interacting with potential romantic or sexual partners, via the internet. An online dating service is a company that promotes and provides specific mechanisms for the practice of online dating, generally in the form of dedicated websites or software applications accessible on personal computers or mobile devices connected to the internet. A wide variety of unmoderated matchmaking services, most of which are profile-based with various communication functionalities, is offered by such companies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Femicide</span> Murder of women or girls because of their gender

Femicide or feminicide is a hate crime which is broadly defined as "the intentional killing of women or girls because they are female", with definitions varying based on cultural context. In 1976, the feminist author Diana E. H. Russell first defined the term as "the killing of females by males because they are female." A spouse or partner is responsible in almost 40% of homicides involving a female victim. Additionally, femicide may be underreported. Femicide often includes domestic violence and forced or sex-selective abortions.

OkCupid is a U.S.-based, internationally operating online dating, friendship, and formerly also a social networking website and application. It features multiple-choice questions to match members. Registration is free. OKCupid is owned by Match Group, which also owns Tinder, Hinge, Plenty of Fish, and many other popular dating apps and sites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook</span> Social networking service

Facebook is an online social media and social networking service owned by American technology giant Meta Platforms. Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with fellow Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes, its name derives from the face book directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to only Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities and, since 2006, anyone over 13 years old. As of December 2022, Facebook claimed 2.96 billion monthly active users, and ranked third worldwide among the most visited websites. It was the most downloaded mobile app of the 2010s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender differences in social network service use</span> Differences between genders with regard to use of social media and social network service

Men and women use social network services (SNSs) differently and with different frequencies. In general, several researchers have found that women tend to use SNSs more than men and for different and more social purposes.

Role congruity theory proposes that a group will be positively evaluated when its characteristics are recognized as aligning with that group's typical social roles. Conversely, the stereotype fit hypothesis suggests that group members will experience discrimination in different social roles or positions to the extent that their group stereotypically does not have characteristics associated with success in the position. For instance, women may not be considered a good fit for a managerial position if being aggressive is seen as a characteristic of a successful manager. Due to stereotype fit, men may be considered more qualified for the position and are not only more likely to be hired, but are also more likely to be promoted as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instagram</span> Social media platform

Instagram is a photo and video sharing social networking service owned by American company Meta Platforms. The app allows users to upload media that can be edited with filters and organized by hashtags and geographical tagging. Posts can be shared publicly or with preapproved followers. Users can browse other users' content by tag and location, view trending content, like photos, and follow other users to add their content to a personal feed.

Blendr was an online dating application based on geosocial networking for Android, iOS and Facebook. It is designed to connect like-minded people near to each other. It was created by Joel Simkhai and patterned after his previous app Grindr which is instead aimed at gay men. Blendr claims to be "powered by" Badoo but largely appears to be the same service. As of 2022, it had 200 million users worldwide and requires users to be over the age of 18.

Slut-shaming is the practice of criticizing people, especially women and girls, who are perceived to violate expectations of behavior and appearance regarding issues related to sexuality. The term is used to reclaim the word slut and empower women and girls to have agency over their own sexuality. Gender-based violence can be a result of slut-shaming primarily affecting women. It may also be used in reference to gay men, who may face disapproval for promiscuous sexual behaviors. Slut-shaming rarely happens to heterosexual men.

Networked feminism is a phenomenon that can be described as the online mobilization and coordination of feminists in response to sexist, misogynistic, racist, and other discriminatory acts against minority groups. This phenomenon covers all possible definitions of what feminist movements may entail, as there have been multiple waves of feminist movements and there is no central authority to control what the term "feminism" claims to be. While one may hold a different opinion from another on the definition of "feminism", all those who believe in these movements and ideologies share the same goal of dismantling the current patriarchal social structure, where men hold primary power and higher social privileges above all others. Networked feminism is not spearheaded by one singular women's group. Rather, it is the manifestation of feminists' ability to leverage the internet to make traditionally unrepresented voices and viewpoints heard. Networked feminism occurs when social network sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr are used as a catalyst in the promotion of feminist equality and in response to sexism. Users of these social media websites promote the advancement of feminism using tools such as viral Facebook groups and hashtags. These tools are used to push gender equality and call attention to those promoting anything otherwise. Online feminist work is a new engine of contemporary feminism. With the possibility of connecting and communicating all around the world through the Internet, no other form of activism in history has brought together and empowered so many people to take action on a singular issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tinder (app)</span> American online dating app

Tinder is an online dating and geosocial networking application. In Tinder, users "swipe right" to like or "swipe left" to dislike other users' profiles, which include their photos, a short bio, and a list of their interests. Tinder uses a "double opt-in" system where both users must like each other before they can exchange messages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexism and video games</span> Gender-based prejudice or discrimination related to video games

Sexism in video gaming is prejudiced behavior or discrimination based on sex or gender as experienced by people who play and create video games, primarily women. This may manifest as sexual harassment or in the way genders are represented in games, such as when characters are presented according to gender-related tropes and stereotypes.

Hashtag activism refers to the use of Twitter's hashtags for Internet activism. The hashtag has become one of the many ways that social media contributes to civic engagement and social movements. The use of the hashtag on social media provides users with an opportunity to share information and opinions about social issues in a way that others (followers) can interact and engage as part of a larger conversation with the potential to create change. The hashtag itself consists of a word or phrase that is connected to a social or political issue, and fosters a place where discourse can occur. Social media, provides an important platform for historically marginalized populations. Through the use of hashtags these groups are able to communicate, mobilize, and advocate for issues less visible to the mainstream.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminism and media</span> Use of media by feminist movements

The socio-political movements and ideologies of feminism have found expression in various media. These media include newspaper, literature, radio, television, social media, film, and video games. They have been essential to the success of many feminist movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free the nipple</span> Topfreedom campaign since 2012

Free the Nipple is a topfreedom campaign created in 2012 during pre-production of a 2014 film of the same name. The campaign highlights the general convention of allowing men to appear topless in public while considering it sexual or indecent for women to do the same, and asserts that this difference is an unjust treatment of women. The campaign argues that it should be legally and culturally acceptable for women to bare their nipples in public.

Bumble is an online dating and networking application. Profiles of potential matches are displayed to users, who can "swipe left" to reject a candidate or "swipe right" to indicate interest. In heterosexual matches, only female users can make the first contact with matched male users, while in homosexual matches either person can send a message first. The app is a product of Bumble Inc.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexandra Chong</span> Jamaican entrepreneur

Alexandra Chong is a Jamaican entrepreneur. She is the founder and CEO of Jacana, a global cannabis company. Jacana cultivates, develops and distributes medical cannabis internationally and in a historic move, it was the first company to export Jamaican medical cannabis flower internationally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TikTok</span> Chinese video-focused social network

TikTok, and its Chinese counterpart Douyin, is a short-form video hosting service owned by ByteDance. It hosts user-submitted videos, which can range in duration from 3 seconds to 10 minutes.

Meta Platforms Inc., or Meta for short, has faced a number of privacy concerns. These stem partly from the company’s revenue model that involves selling information collected about its users for many things including advertisement targeting. Meta Platforms Inc. has also been a part of many data breaches that have occurred within the company. These issues and others are further described including user data concerns, vulnerabilities in the company’s platform, investigations by pressure groups and government agencies, and even issues with students. In addition, employers and other organizations/individuals have been known to use Meta Platforms Inc. for their own purposes. As a result, individuals’ identities and private information have sometimes been compromised without their permission. In response to these growing privacy concerns, some pressure groups and government agencies have increasingly asserted the users’ right to privacy and to be able to control their personal data.

References

  1. 1 2 "Lulu". Google Play. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  2. 1 2 3 "How Lulu works". Lulu.com. Luluvise Inc. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  3. "Lulu: Fake feminism for the 'hashtag generation'". Zeynep Zileli Rabanea. Al Jazeera English. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  4. 1 2 Schoeneman, Deborah (20 November 2013). "What's He Really Like? Check the Lulu App". The New York Times. Retrieved November 13, 2015.
  5. 1 2 3 Jupp, Emily (6 February 2013). "Luluvise: Nobody—male or female—comes out of this boyfriend-rating app looking good". The Independent. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  6. Hess, Amanda (7 February 2013). "Rating Men on Lulu Isn't Empowering. It's Creepy". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  7. 1 2 3 Strasbaugh, Werner (7 May 2013). "Lulu strikes OSU". The Daily Barometer. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  8. Cardiff, Ashley (7 February 2013). "Review Men Like Restaurants With New Lulu App, The Yelp Of Romance (For Girls!)". The Gloss. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  9. Griffin, Spencer (7 March 2013). "'Lulu' app shows social double standard". The Echo. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  10. Kelly, Audrey (27 February 2013). "Lulu app supports double standard for objectification". The LU Chameleon. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  11. 1 2 "About Us". Lulu.com. Luluvise Inc. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  12. 1 2 Benedikt, Allison (7 February 2013). "Rating Men on Lulu Isn't Empowering. It's Creepy". Slate. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  13. 1 2 O'Connor, Maureen (13 November 2013). "The Nice Girls of Lulu, So-Called 'Yelp for Men'". New York Magazine. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  14. 1 2 3 Scott, Tom (8 February 2012). "Luluvise's date-rating site shows where your Facebook data can end up". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  15. 1 2 3 "Lulu, The Girls-Only App for Dating Intelligence, Launches in US Colleges". PR Newswire (Press release). UBM plc. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  16. 1 2 "Alexandra Chong". The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  17. "Lifestyle: Style Observer: Cocktails With - Alexandra Chong". The Jamaica Observer . 20 November 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  18. After Rebooting, Lulu Sees Its Database Of Guys App Hit 200K Users In 8 Weeks Across U.S. Campuses. TechCrunch (2013-04-09). Retrieved on 2013-07-30.
  19. Stampler, Laura (22 October 2014). "Here Are The Strange Things Dudes Are Asking on Lulu's New Messaging Service". Time Magazine. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  20. Kosoff, Maya. "Lulu, the app that lets women secretly rate men, now lets them send men anonymous messages too". Business Insider. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  21. The infamous app for rating men doesn’t let you rate men anymore
  22. Friedman, Alex (1 May 2012). "Opinion: Lulu blurs line between networking and crazy". The Daily Reveille. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  23. Buchanan, Daisy. "How rating men on a 'sexist' app is making dating safer for women". The Telegraph. Retrieved November 17, 2015.
  24. 1 2 Clay, Kelly (24 November 2013). "Why We Should All Be Scared Of Lulu App". Forbes. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  25. "Lulu app lets women rate men they've dated". 13 Dec 2013.
  26. "Lulu app gets iOS 7 revamp, lets girls rate and date guys". 19 Sep 2013.
  27. 1 2 Phelps, Tony (11 February 2013). "Lulu—Review Guys, Violate Privacy, Have a Cosmopolitan". Consumer Privacy USA. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  28. Butcher, Mike (13 December 2013). "Luluvise goes live, but will this girl-only site attract more legal ire than eyeballs?". TechCrunch. Retrieved 20 November 2013.