Manipur State Congress

Last updated

Manipur State Congress
PresidentR. K. Bhubonsana Singh
General SecretaryYumnam Khoimacha
Founded4 October 1946
Dissolved1949;75 years ago (1949)
Preceded by Nikhil Manipuri Mahasabha
Merged into Indian National Congress
Ideology responsible government
Political position centrist

Manipur State Congress was a political party in the princely state of Manipur around the time of Indian independence. It was influential in the Constitution-making Committee. It contested the election for the legislative assembly under the constitution in 1948, and emerged as the largest party in the assembly, but failed to win a majority. A newly formed royalist party formed the government and Congress sat in the opposition. Following the merger of Manipur into India in 1949, it merged into the Assam provincial unit of the Indian National Congress.

Contents

Background

In 1934, Nikhil Manipuri Mahasabha (NMM) was established by Hijam Irabot with the-then Maharajah Churachand Singh as president. [1] By 1938 it had become a prominent political front advocating the democratization of the powers held by the Darbar [Council] and an overhaul of the corrupt colonial administration. [2] [3] [4] The organisation called for abolition of exploitative taxes, reunification of the hills with the valley, establishment of self-rule, installation of a Panchayat system, and the establishment of a unicameral legislature based on suffrage. [3] [5] [6] Around the period of World War II, 1940–1946, Irabot was imprisoned and later externed from the state. In prison, he had met communist leaders and was influenced by them. After release, he took part in kisan movements (farmers' movements). During his absence, other leaders took control of the Nikhil Manipuri Mahasabha.

When Irabot returned to Manipur in 1946, according to commentators, the new leaders of NMM did not wish to relinquish control, and decided to marginalise Irabot. [7] Their strategem was to accuse Irabot of collusion with the communists. In a letter written to Irabot in April, NMM made it clear that it sympathised with the Indian National Congress and that it was anti-communist. [8] In a submission to the British Cabinet Mission, NMM is said to have proposed a 'united kingdom' for the whole of India with the central government controlling defence, finance, trade, communications, road and transport, taxes and foreign policy. [8] In August 1946, NMM petitioned Maharaja Bodhchandra Singh for an immediate declaration of responsible government. The Maharaja appears to have been receptive to an extent. [9]

In the meantime, Irabot had set up new organisations such as the Manipur Praja Mandal, Manipur Praja Sanmelani, Manipur Praja Sangha and Manipur Krishak Sabha. Through them, he promoted mass movements and competed with NMM. [10]

Relations with Indian National Congress

Relations and strategies of Manipur parties with regard to Indian National Congress (INC) are subject to debate within Manipuri scholarship, with some scholars claiming that the Manipur State Congress was an integral part of the INC, [11] [12] others denying that it had any relation with it, [13] and some others being ambivalent. [14]

INC's policies towards the princely states are found by scholars to have been "ambiguous and negligent". [15] The Haripura annual session in 1938 passed a resolution confirming the long-standing policy of non-involvement in the affairs of the princely states, but individual members were not barred from getting involved in their personal capacity. These involvements were via the All India States Peoples' Conference (AISPC), a conglomeration of peoples' movements in the princely states. [16] It appears that both NMM and the Manipur State Congress after its formation, were members of the AISPC, and these links extended back to the days of Irabot's leadership. [17] Jawaharlal Nehru, a key INC leader, was elected AISPC president in 1939 and remained in that position till 1946. In his January 1946 presidential address to AISPC (in Udaipur), Nehru stated his vision that about fifteen to twenty large states might enter the Indian federation as autonomous units with their rulers as constitutional heads while the other states would be absorbed into the neighbouring British Indian provinces. He was opposed to the formation of unions of princely states. [18] [lower-alpha 1]

Formation

The Manipur State Congress was formed on 4 October 1946, in a meeting convened at the Aryan Theatre in Imphal, with the agenda of bringing together all the political parties on a common platform so that pressure could be mounted on the Maharaja for responsible government. [10] [19] Irabot's parties, Manipur Krishak Sabha and Manipur Praja Sangha, were given one seat each on the governing committee, but Irabot himself was barred from being their representative on account of being a "communist". The accusation of Irabot created an ugly scene, with the result that Irabot and his colleagues left the meeting. The remaining organisations resolved to come together under the umbrella of Manipur State Congress. The president of the new party was R. K. Bhubonsana Singh and the general secretary was Yumnam Khoimacha. [10] [20] [21] [lower-alpha 2]

Activities and fissures

In December 1946, the Maharaja declared the formation of a Constitution-Making Committee for the state. Manipur State Congress won all the five seats in the valley area for the Constitution-Making Committee. Irabot's parties boycotted the election, calling it undemocratic. The Constitution was formulated by July 1947, ahead of schedule. [23]

Almost a whole year passed before the election for the legislative assembly were held under the new constitution. [lower-alpha 3] On 11 August 1947, the Maharaja acceded to the Indian Union and also signed a standstill agreement to continue the existing arrangements as present under the British rule. [24] [25] The British Political Agent was replaced by a 'Dominion Agent' of the Government of India, with Debeswar Sarmah, a high-ranking member of the Assam unit of INC, taking the place. [26] The President of Manipur State Durbar was replaced by a chief minister, Maharaja's brother M. K. Priyobrata Singh being appointed to the post. He headed an Interim Council, two out of whose six members were drawn from the Manipur State Congress. [27]

The formation of the Interim Council split the Manipur State Congress, with an opposing faction formed under the leadership of Elangbam Tompok Singh. [lower-alpha 4] It came to be called the 'Tompok Congress'. A faction under Tomal Singh (the 'Tomal Congress') supported the Interim Council as formed. It appeared that the Tompok Congress was integrationist, supporting measures for the integration of Manipur with India in some form. [28] [29]

Before the election, a new party called Praja Shanti came into being, widely believed to have been floated by the Maharaja and his Durbar elites. The party was pro-royalist and anti-Congress. When the election was held in June–July 1948, Manipur State Congress won 14 seats, but Praja Shanti was close behind with 12 seats. Praja Shanti was able to form the government with the support of Irabot's parties (6 seats) and the hill representatives, who were not affiliated to any of the valley parties (18 seats). [30]

Notes

  1. ↑ These were evidently Nehru's remarks in his personal capacity, not official INC policy. As it happens, princely state unions were indeed formed after the independence of India.
  2. ↑ Bhubonsana Singh was formerly the president of Manipur Praja Sangha, which was a union of Manipur Praja Mandal and Manipur Praja Sanmelani, parties set up by Irabot himself. [22]
  3. ↑ The reason for the delay is not adequately explained.
  4. ↑ Tompok Singh was a former member of the NMM.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manipur</span> State in northeastern India

Manipur is a state in northeast India, with the city of Imphal as its capital. It is bounded by the Indian states of Nagaland to the north, Mizoram to the south and Assam to the west. It also borders two regions of Myanmar, Sagaing Region to the east and Chin State to the south. The state covers an area of 22,327 km2 (8,621 sq mi). The official and most widely spoken language is the Meitei language. Native to the Meitei people, it is also used as a lingua franca by smaller communities, who speak a variety of other Tibeto-Burman languages. Manipur has been at the crossroads of Asian economic and cultural exchange for more than 2,500 years. This exchange connects the Indian subcontinent and Central Asia to Southeast Asia, East Asia, Siberia, regions in the Arctic, Micronesia and Polynesia enabling migration of people, cultures and religions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meitei people</span> Ethnic group of South Asia

The Meitei people, also known as Meetei, Manipuri people, is an ethnic group native to Manipur. They form the largest and dominant ethnic group of Manipur in Northeast India. They speak the Meitei language, one of the 22 official languages of the Republic of India and the sole official language of Government of Manipur. The Meiteis primarily settled in the Imphal Valley region in modern-day Manipur, though a sizeable population has settled in the other Indian states of Assam, Tripura, Nagaland, Meghalaya, and Mizoram. There is also a notable presence of Meitei people in the neighbouring countries of Myanmar and Bangladesh. The Meitei ethnic group represents about 53% of Manipur's population.

Nikhil Manipuri Mahasabha, initially called Nikhil Hindu Manipuri Mahasabha, was founded in Manipur in 1934 with the Maharaja Churachand Singh as its president. The organisation was focused mainly on the ethnic interests of the Meitei people and their religious interests as Hindus.

The All India States Peoples Conference (AISPC) was a conglomeration of political movements in the princely states of the British Raj, which were variously called Praja Mandals or Lok Parishads. The first session of the organisation was held in Bombay in December 1927. The Conference looked to the Indian National Congress for support, but Congress was reluctant to provide it until 1939, when Jawaharlal Nehru became its president, serving in this position till 1946. After the Indian Independence, however, the Congress distanced itself from the movement, allying itself with the princely rulers via its national government's accession relationships.

The history of Manipur is reflected by archaeological research, mythology and written history. Historically, Manipur was an independent sovereign kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty but at different point of time it was invaded and rule over by other state and authority. The Kangleipak State developed under King Loiyumba with its first written constitution in the early 12th century. Manipur under the 18th-century king Pamheiba saw the legendary burning of sacred scripture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hijam Irabot</span> Freedom fighter, social activist and politician from Manipur

Hijam Irabot, also known as Jana Neta Hijam Irabot, was a politician and leader of Communist party of India and revolutionary social activist from Manipur. He fought against the social evils of the society. He later was jailed for supporting the second Nupi Lan, 1939. In the June/July 1948 election to the Manipur Assembly, Irabot won from the Utlou Constituency.

The Kabaw Valley also known as Kubo valley is a highland valley in Myanmar's western Sagaing Division, close to the border with India's Manipur. The valley is located between Yomadong range of mountains, which constitute the present-day India–Myanmar border, and the Chindwin River.

Khampat (ခမ်းပါတ်မြို့) is a town in the Kabaw Valley in the Sagaing Region in western Myanmar. It is at the location where the Namsaweng River flows down from the hills and enters the Kabaw Valley. It is the site of a historical principality, which often changed hands between Manipur and the Burmese kingdoms to the east.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meitei literature</span> Indian literature

Meitei literature, also known as Manipuri literature, is literature written in the Meitei language of Manipur. An ancient institution of learning, the Luwang Nonghumsang, later known as the Pandit Loishang, collected sources of indigenous Meitei knowledge and philosophy until the 18th century. Writing by Meiteis is assumed to go back to the Kingdom of Kangleipak in the early 12th century. The Meitei script is a Brahmic abugida. It is known only from the Puya manuscripts discovered in the first half of the 20th century. Manuscripts of the 18th and 19th centuries were written using the Bengali alphabet. The existence of the Meitei script in the 15th-century hinges on the authenticity of an inscription dated to the reign of Senbi Kiyamba. The first printed Manipuri book, Manipurer Itihas, appeared in 1890 from the Baptist Mission Press, Calcutta. Though the kings of Manipur had established contact with the British from the middle of the eighteenth century onward the real impact of the contact came much later. Johnstone Middle English School, based on the western system of education, was started in 1885 at Imphal, and in 1891 Manipur lost its independence to the British. British domination facilitated the introduction of new systems in the civil, political and educational spheres, which hastened the process of modernization in Manipur, exposed as it was to new ideas and influences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ningthouja dynasty</span> Ruling dynasty of Kangleipak (Manipur) Kingdom

The Ningthouja dynasty, also known as Mangang dynasty, comprises the descendants of the kings of Manipur. Ningthouja literally means progeny of King. It has 125 extended families. It was apparently founded by King Nongdā Lāiren Pākhangba in 33 CE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manipur (kingdom)</span> 1110–1949 kingdom in South Asia, now Manipur state, India

The Manipur Kingdom also known as Meckley was an ancient kingdom at the India–Burma frontier. Historically, Manipur was an independent kingdom ruled by a Meitei dynasty. But it was also invaded and ruled over by Burmese kingdom at various point of time. It became a protectorate of the British East India Company from 1824, and a princely state of British Raj in 1891. It bordered Assam Province in the west and British Burma in the east, and in the 20th century covered an area of 22,327 square kilometres and contained 467 villages. The capital of the state was Imphal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bodhchandra Singh</span> Maharaja of Manipur from 1941 to 1949

Maharaja Bodhchandra Singh or Bodhachandra Singh (1908–1955) was the last ruler of the princely state of Manipur under the British Raj as well as the Dominion of India. He ruled between 1941 and 15 October 1949. During his term, India was decolonised by the British, receiving independence on 14 August 1947. The Maharaja presided over a transition to democracy, passing the Manipur State Constitution Act 1947. He signed the Instrument of Accession, joining India shortly before the British departure. In 1949, a few months before India became a republic, he signed a merger agreement, whereby Manipur became an integral part of India governed by the Constitution of India.

The Nupi Lan were two demonstrations led by women in Manipur, British India against the colonial authorities. In 1904, the first Nupi Lan broke out in response to an order by the colonial authorities to send Manipuri men to the Kabow Valley to fetch timber for re-building the then Police Agent's bungalow. The second Nupi Lan broke out in 1939 in response to the export of rice during the Second World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insurgency in Manipur</span> Ongoing armed conflict between India and multiple separatist rebel groups

The Insurgency in Manipur is an ongoing armed conflict between India and a number of separatist rebel groups, taking place in the state of Manipur. The Insurgency in Manipur is part of the wider Insurgency in Northeast India; it displays elements of a national liberation war as well as an ethnic conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anglo-Manipur War</span> 1891 Armed Conflict Between Manipur Kingdom and British

The Anglo-Manipur War or Manipuri Rebellion of 1891 was a short armed conflict between the British Colonial Forces and the dissenting royal princes of Manipur Kingdom, which was arguably a dependency of the British Empire in India. The conflict began with a palace coup staged by the general (Senapati) of Manipur, ousting its reigning king, and installing a half-brother, the heir-apparent, in his place. The British government took objection to the action and attempted to arrest the general. The effort failed, with the Manipuri forces attacking the British residency and the resident and other British officials getting executed. The British launched a punitive expedition that lasted from 31 March to 27 April 1891. The general and other rebels were arrested and convicted. The British conquered Manipur and did not annex it under British India but governed it as a princely state till 1947.

The following is a timeline of the Kashmir conflict during the period 1846–1946.

Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 is an act which enabled the princely state of Manipur to have a de jure written constitution enacted by the last Maharajah of Manipur, Bodhchandra Singh. Under the constitution, a Legislative Assembly was elected in mid-1948 and a ministry was formed, which was responsible to the Maharaja. The constitution is deemed to have lapsed on 15 October 1949, when the Maharaja signed a merger agreement with the Indian Union. The validity of the act in present time is debated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meitei nationalism</span> Nationalism of Kangleipak

Meitei nationalism refers to nationalism among the Meitei people. In the Meitei context this includes various movements throughout history to sustain Meitei cultural identity, political boundary, ethnicity and history to regain sovereign state status of Kangleipak.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communist movements in India</span>

Communist movements in India refers to the various social and political movements led by communists in India. Communism in India has existed since the 1920s. Some of the major events are listed below.

References

  1. ↑ Parratt & Parratt, Hijam Irabot (2000) [ page needed ]
  2. ↑ Parratt & Parratt, Hijam Irabot (2000) [ page needed ]
  3. 1 2 Thoiba Singh, Wakambam (1984). Meetei Polity – A study of the socio-economic and political changes among the Meeteis from 1750 to 1950 (Thesis). Guwahati University/Shodhganga. p. 228-232 (Chapter 5). hdl: 10603/69732 .
  4. ↑ Indrakumar, Colonialism and Movement for Democracy (2015) [ page needed ]
  5. ↑ Indrakumar, Colonialism and Movement for Democracy (2015) [ page needed ]
  6. ↑ Parratt & Parratt, Hijam Irabot (2000) [ page needed ]
  7. ↑ Parratt, Wounded Land (2005), pp. 94–95: "Some in the NMM, whether through genuine concern at possible Communist infiltration or simply through envy, were clearly unhappy with Irabot's participation in the deliberations, and swiftly plotted to remove him from the political scene.".
  8. 1 2 Parratt, Wounded Land (2005), pp. 94–95.
  9. ↑ Parratt, Wounded Land (2005), pp. 95–96: "Bodhchandra had by this time accepted proposals for an assembly, and on 21 September 1946 he wrote to the Political Agent asking for the Government's approval to make a declaration which would lead to responsible government.".
  10. 1 2 3 Parratt, Wounded Land (2005), pp. 95–96.
  11. ↑ Meetei, Narrating the Nation in Manipur (2018), pp. 116-117: "The Manipur state Congress Unit formed in 1946 as an extension of the Indian National Congress (INC), which had advocated integration... ".
  12. ↑ Constantine, R. (1981), Manipur, Maid of the Mountains, Lancers, p. 86, ... the Nikhil Manipur Mahasabha which had by then become the Manipur State Congress, was part and parcel of the Indian National Congress which brought about Independence.
  13. ↑ Parratt, Wounded Land (2005), p. 101: "The Manipur State Congress did not originate in the Indian National Congress (as some have argued), and only gradually came under its umbrella, partly at least because its leaders saw this connection as a means of consolidating their power in the state.".
  14. ↑ Ramusack, Congress and the People's Movement in Princely India (1988), p. 377: "Congress was oriented primarily towards institutions and events in the British-controlled provinces of India and in some ways was as ambiguous and negligent in its policies toward political activity in the princely states as the British were toward their rulers.".
  15. ↑ McLeod, Sovereignty, Power, Control (1999), pp. 44–45.
  16. ↑ Chishti, Political Development in Manipur (2005), pp. 90–92: "It was quite apparent that the leaders of the Nikhil Manipuri Mahasabha also received regular instructions from the Sylhet and Gauhati Congresses. Irabot occasionally visited Gauhati and Sylhet to see the President of the Assam Provincial Committee with a view to receive instructions.".
  17. ↑ Ramusack, Congress and the People's Movement in Princely India (1988), p. 393.
  18. ↑ Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011).
  19. ↑ Indrakumar, Colonialism and Movement for Democracy (2015), pp. 67–68.
  20. ↑ Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 117–118.
  21. ↑ Indrakumar, Colonialism and Movement for Democracy (2015), p. 67.
  22. ↑ Indrakumar, Colonialism and Movement for Democracy (2015), pp. 68–69.
  23. ↑ Dena, Lal (1991), History of Modern Manipur, 1826-1949, Orbit Publishers-Distributors
  24. ↑ Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), p. 139.
  25. ↑ Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 139–140.
  26. ↑ Parratt, Wounded Land (2005), pp. 97–99.
  27. ↑ Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 123–124.
  28. ↑ Chishti, Political Development in Manipur (2005), pp. 120–121.
  29. ↑ Indrakumar, Colonialism and Movement for Democracy (2015), p. 69.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.