Manrique v. United States

Last updated

Manrique v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided April 19, 2017
Full case nameManrique v. United States
Docket no. 15-7250
Citations581 U.S. ___ ( more )
Holding
A defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy  · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg  · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito  · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan  · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinions
MajorityThomas
DissentGinsburg, joined by Sotomayor
Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Manrique v. United States, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order. [1] [2]

References

  1. Manrique v. United States,No. 15-7250 , 581 U.S. ___(2017).
  2. "Opinion analysis: Justices require notice of appeal from deferred restitution judgments". SCOTUSblog. April 19, 2017. Retrieved December 4, 2024.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .