Maracich v. Spears

Maracich v. Spears
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 17, 2013
Full case name	Maracich v. Spears
Docket no.	12-25
Citations	570 U.S. ___ ( more )
Holding
An attorney's solicitation of clients is not a permissible purpose covered by the "litigation exception" to the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
Majority	Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Alito
Dissent	Ginsburg, joined by Scalia, Sotomayor, Kagan
Laws applied
Driver's Privacy Protection Act

Maracich v. Spears, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an attorney's solicitation of clients is not a permissible purpose covered by the "litigation exception" to the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act. ^{[1] [2]}

References

1. Maracich v. Spears,No. 12-25 , 570 U.S. ___(2013)
2. "Opinion analysis: Turns out, turnabout is fair play". SCOTUSblog. June 17, 2013. Retrieved October 26, 2024.

External links

• Text of Maracich v. Spears,No. 12-25, 570 U.S. ___(2013) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .