Mark M. Goldblatt

Last updated
Mark Goldblatt
MarkGoldblatt.jpg
BornMark Meyer Goldblatt
(1957-06-08) June 8, 1957 (age 65)
Queens, New York
OccupationWriter, teacher
Education Queens College, CUNY
Website
markgoldblatt.com

Mark Meyer Goldblatt (born June 8, 1957) is an American journalist, novelist, theologian and educator. He attended Queens College of the City University of New York from 1974-1979, where he earned a bachelor's degree in English. After brief stints as a proofreader and copyeditor, he enrolled in the CUNY Graduate Center in 1983 and was awarded a doctorate in English literature in 1990, writing his dissertation on the theological underpinning of the Protestant Reformation in England.

Contents

Goldblatt is perhaps best known as a political commentator. He published his first opinion piece on the op-ed page of The New York Times in 1989. Since then, he has written hundreds of columns and book reviews for periodicals and online journals such as Newsday , The New York Post , The New York Daily News , Commentary Magazine , USA Today , Reason Magazine , National Review , the American Spectator , the Claremont Review of Books, the Common Review and Intellectual Conservative.

Since 1989, Goldblatt has taught at Fashion Institute of Technology of the State University of New York.

Political writing

Though often classified as a conservative or even a neocon, Goldblatt has on occasion veered from right of center positions. He has been a steadfast supporter of the war against totalitarian Islam [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and a fierce critic of hip hop culture. [6] [7] [8] In an article published on October 17, in 2005, Goldblatt wrote, "The solution to poverty, therefore, doesn’t lie in a collective movement. It lies in the will and discipline of the individual people who dedicate themselves to living moral lives, striving to improve their circumstances, and providing greater opportunities for their children. By that measure, the great betrayer of African-Americans is not their government but their groins." [9] This statement attracted criticism from hip-hop scholarship. Goldblatt is, additionally, a critic of postmodernism [10] and multiculturalism, [11] but has also argued in favor of legalizing gay marriage [12] and upholding the Roe v. Wade decision. [13] He has written sympathetically about Barack Obama. [14] [15]

Bumper Sticker Liberalism, a book of political commentary, was published by HarperCollins in 2012. In 2022 Goldblatt published I Feel, Therefore I Am: The Triumph of Woke.

Novels

Goldblatt engaging audience at New York book signing. Friday, June 7, 2013. Mark Goldblatt at Barnes & Noble.JPG
Goldblatt engaging audience at New York book signing. Friday, June 7, 2013.

Goldblatt’s first novel, Africa Speaks, was published by Permanent Press in 2002. It a satire of black urban culture told in the voice of a young black man named Africa Ali. In her blurb for Africa Speaks, far-right columnist Michelle Malkin stated, "With an uncanny knack for the hip-hop idiom, stiletto-sharp satire, unusual sensitivity, and unparalleled courage in tackling racial taboos, Mark Goldblatt has created a masterpiece. Africa Speaks sings." [16] Conservative critic John Podhoretz declared that Goldblatt was "one of America’s most uncompromising literary iconoclasts." [17]

His second novel, Sloth, a comedic take on the through-the-looking-glass world of postmodern thought, was published by Greenpoint Press in 2010. Two more novels followed in 2013: The Unrequited, a literary mystery published by Five Star/Cengage, and Twerp , a middle grade novel published by Random House. Finding the Worm, a sequel to Twerp, was published by Random House in 2015.

Theology

In a pair of essays for the British journal Philosophy Now , Goldblatt addressed the subject of rational language and the existence of God.

In "Did the World Have a Beginning?" [18] he argues that the temporal world cannot always have existed. An actual infinity is impossible, he reasons, because infinity is a potential value that cannot be reached. A line, for example, may be extended infinitely—that is, without a limit—but at no point will the actual measure of the line become infinite. Likewise, time itself, whether measured by minutes or millennia, cannot comprise an actual infinity. Therefore, the temporal world cannot have existed forever.

In a follow up article, "Talking About God", [19] Goldblatt teases out the ramifications of his conclusion about the impossibility of an actual infinity with respect to the concept of an infinite God. Since we know that the temporal world cannot have existed forever, it therefore must have come into existence "in the beginning". It cannot have come into existence without an efficient cause (since that would violate the law of causality, one of the basic laws of thought). That First Cause, Goldblatt states, following the Cosmological Argument of Thomas Aquinas, is what all men call God. But this realization leads to a paradox. On the one hand, it would seem God cannot be infinite either since an actual infinity is impossible. On the other hand, God cannot have come into existence since that would require a cause prior to the First Cause and lead to an infinite regress of causes . . . which, in turn, would comprise an actual infinity (which cannot be). Therefore, we must suppose an infinite God as the First Cause of the world—even though an actual infinity violates the laws of thought. But whatever violates the laws of thought cannot be subject to rational language; it cannot be said to exist any more than a sentient stone (i.e. a sentient non-sentient being) can be said to exist. (At the moment a stone becomes sentient, in other words, it ceases to be a stone.) Goldblatt concludes that two theological statements, which seem irreconcilable, are nevertheless necessarily true: 1) God created the world; 2) God does not exist.

Related Research Articles

The Absolute Infinite is an extension of the idea of infinity proposed by mathematician Georg Cantor.

A cosmological argument, in natural theology, is an argument which claims that the existence of God can be inferred from facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects. A cosmological argument can also sometimes be referred to as an argument from universal causation, an argument from first cause, the causal argument, or prime mover argument. Whichever term is employed, there are two basic variants of the argument, each with subtle yet important distinctions: in esse (essentiality), and in fieri (becoming).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georg Cantor</span> German mathematician (1845–1918)

Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Philipp Cantor was a mathematician. He played a pivotal role in the creation of set theory, which has become a fundamental theory in mathematics. Cantor established the importance of one-to-one correspondence between the members of two sets, defined infinite and well-ordered sets, and proved that the real numbers are more numerous than the natural numbers. Cantor's method of proof of this theorem implies the existence of an infinity of infinities. He defined the cardinal and ordinal numbers and their arithmetic. Cantor's work is of great philosophical interest, a fact he was well aware of.

In the philosophy of mathematics, the abstraction of actual infinity involves the acceptance of infinite entities as given, actual and completed objects. These might include the set of natural numbers, extended real numbers, transfinite numbers, or even an infinite sequence of rational numbers. Actual infinity is to be contrasted with potential infinity, in which a non-terminating process produces a sequence with no last element, and where each individual result is finite and is achieved in a finite number of steps. As a result, potential infinity is often formalized using the concept of a limit.

In metaphysics, extension signifies both 'stretching out' as well as later 'taking up space', and most recently, spreading one's internal mental cognition into the external world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnipotence paradox</span> Family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent

The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that arise with some understandings of the term omnipotent. The paradox arises, for example, if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome, even a logically contradictory one such as creating a square circle. Atheological arguments based on the omnipotence paradox are sometimes described as evidence for countering theism. Other possible resolutions to the paradox hinge on the definition of omnipotence applied and the nature of God regarding this application and whether omnipotence is directed toward God himself or outward toward his external surroundings.

Finitism is a philosophy of mathematics that accepts the existence only of finite mathematical objects. It is best understood in comparison to the mainstream philosophy of mathematics where infinite mathematical objects are accepted as legitimate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pascal's wager</span> Argument that posits human beings bet with their lives that God either exists or does not

Pascal's wager is a philosophical argument presented by the seventeenth-century French mathematician, philosopher, physicist and theologian Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). It posits that human beings wager with their lives that God either exists or does not.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Lane Craig</span> American philosopher and theologian (born 1949)

William Lane Craig is an American analytic philosopher, Christian apologist, author, and Wesleyan theologian who upholds the view of Molinism and neo-Apollinarianism. He is currently a Professor of Philosophy at Houston Baptist University and a Research Professor of Philosophy at Biola University's Talbot School of Theology. Craig has updated and defended the Kalam cosmological argument for the existence of God. He has also published work where he argues in favor of the historical plausibility of the resurrection of Jesus. His study of divine aseity and Platonism culminated with his book God Over All.

The existence of God is a subject of debate in theology, philosophy of religion and popular culture. A wide variety of arguments for and against the existence of God or deities can be categorized as logical, empirical, metaphysical, subjective or scientific. In philosophical terms, the question of the existence of God or deities involves the disciplines of epistemology and ontology and the theory of value.

The Kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. It is named after the Kalam from which its key ideas originated. William Lane Craig was principally responsible for giving new life to the argument, due to his The Kalām Cosmological Argument (1979), among other writings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Best of all possible worlds</span> Concept in metaphysics

The phrase "the best of all possible worlds" was coined by the German polymath and Enlightenment philosopher Gottfried Leibniz in his 1710 work Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l'homme et l'origine du mal, more commonly known simply as the Theodicy. The claim that the actual world is the best of all possible worlds is the central argument in Leibniz's theodicy, or his attempt to solve the problem of evil.

In mathematical logic, the theory of infinite sets was first developed by Georg Cantor. Although this work has become a thoroughly standard fixture of classical set theory, it has been criticized in several areas by mathematicians and philosophers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trademark argument</span> Argument for the existence of God

The trademark argument is an a priori argument for the existence of God developed by French philosopher and mathematician, René Descartes. The name derives from the fact that the idea of God existing in each person "is the trademark, hallmark or stamp of their divine creator".

Henry (of) Harclay was an English medieval philosopher and university chancellor.

In philosophy and theology, infinity is explored in articles under headings such as the Absolute, God, and Zeno's paradoxes.

Temporal finitism is the doctrine that time is finite in the past. The philosophy of Aristotle, expressed in such works as his Physics, held that although space was finite, with only void existing beyond the outermost sphere of the heavens, time was infinite. This caused problems for mediaeval Islamic, Jewish, and Christian philosophers who, primarily creationist, were unable to reconcile the Aristotelian conception of the eternal with the Genesis creation narrative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infinity</span> Mathematical concept

Infinity is that which is boundless, endless, or larger than any natural number. It is often denoted by the infinity symbol .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eternity of the world</span> Philosophical question

The eternity of the world is the question of whether the world has a beginning in time or has existed from eternity. It was a concern for both ancient philosophers and the medieval theologians and medieval philosophers of the 13th century. The problem became a focus of a dispute in the 13th century, when some of the works of Aristotle, who believed in the eternity of the world, were rediscovered in the Latin West. This view conflicted with the view of the Catholic Church that the world had a beginning in time. The Aristotelian view was prohibited in the Condemnations of 1210–1277.

<i>The Kalām Cosmological Argument</i> Book by William Lane Craig

The Kalām Cosmological Argument is a 1979 book by the philosopher William Lane Craig, in which the author offers a contemporary defense of the Kalām cosmological argument and argues for the existence of God, with an emphasis on the alleged metaphysical impossibility of an infinite regress of past events. First, Craig argues that the universe began to exist, using two philosophical and two scientific arguments. Second, Craig argues that whatever begins to exist has a cause that caused it to begin to exist. Finally, Craig argues that this cause is a personal creator who changelessly and independently willed the beginning of the universe.

References

  1. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark (2008-03-03). "Terror & Fairness". NYPOST.com. Archived from the original on 2012-10-20. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  2. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark. "The American Spectator : Winding Up Matters". Spectator.org. Archived from the original on 2009-11-20. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  3. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark (2008-01-11). "The War on Islamic Terror: Four Key Concepts « Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy". Intellectualconservative.com. Archived from the original on 2011-06-14. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  4. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark. "The American Spectator : Bush Hatred: The Sequel". Spectator.org. Archived from the original on 2010-02-12. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  5. ↑ Mark Goldblatt (2010-05-14). "The Poet Versus the Prophet - Reason Magazine". Reason.com. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  6. ↑ "Mark Goldblatt reviews The Hip-Hop Generation on National Review Online". Old.nationalreview.com. 2002-06-06. Archived from the original on 2011-08-10. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  7. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark (2004-07-23). "Mark Goldblatt on Def Poetry on National Review Online". Old.nationalreview.com. Archived from the original on 2012-07-12. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  8. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark. "The American Spectator : Keeping It Real". Spectator.org. Archived from the original on 2008-12-01. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  9. ↑ Rose, T. (2008). The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters. African American music reference. Basic Books. p. 61. ISBN   978-0-7867-2719-3 . Retrieved 2023-05-30.
  10. ↑ "Can Humanists Talk to Postmodernists? by Mark Goldblatt". Ducts.org. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  11. ↑ Goldblatt, Mark (2005-02-09). "Mark Goldblatt on Ward Churchill on National Review Online". Old.nationalreview.com. Archived from the original on 2011-08-10. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  12. ↑ "Advocate". Markgoldblatt.com. 2004-05-17. Archived from the original on 2006-02-15. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  13. ↑ "Liberty, Logic & Abortion". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on 2023-05-30. Retrieved 2023-05-30.
  14. ↑ "The Upside of Obama". National Review. 2009-01-05. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
  15. ↑ "The Cognitive Gap". National Review. 2008-03-24. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
  16. ↑ "The Permanent Press - Africa Speaks". Archived from the original on 2010-11-29. Retrieved 2010-10-12.
  17. ↑ Barnes & (2022-10-04). "I Feel, Therefore I Am: The Triumph of Woke Subjectivism: - Paperback". Barnes & Noble. Retrieved 2023-05-31.
  18. ↑ "Issue 44". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on 2010-06-17. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
  19. ↑ "Issue 50". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on 2010-06-17. Retrieved 2010-09-23.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.