Maverick Gaming v. United States of America

Last updated

Maverick Gaming v. United States of America is a lawsuit filed by Maverick Gaming that contests an agreement granting exclusive rights to sports betting for Native American tribes within the state.

Contents

Background

In 2018, following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to nullify a federal prohibition on sports betting, states gained the autonomy to establish their individual regulations. [1] Subsequently, in 2020, the Washington legislature opted to permit sports wagering exclusively on Native American territories. [1] Advocates asserted that tribal governments possessed the necessary competence for supervising responsible gaming, while concurrently circumventing extensive proliferation. [1] Tribal entities assert that Maverick Gaming's lawsuit transcends sports betting, claiming that weakening Washington's gaming compacts could endanger their sovereignty. [1] This controversy coincides with a Supreme Court review of a challenge against the Indian Child Welfare Act, with both legal disputes being represented by the same law firm. [1]

Maverick Gaming

Maverick Gaming is an American casino company based in Kirkland, Washington. [2] It owns 22 card rooms in the state. [3] [4] It is headed by Eric Persson who is a citizen of the Shoalwater Bay Tribe. [3]

Gibson Dunn

Matthew McGill, a lawyer from the law firm Gibson Dunn, who represented Citizens United in the 2010 Supreme Court case, took on the Brackeens' case pro bono. He advocated for them before the U.S. Supreme Court in November. [5] The law firm is also known for representing Chevron in the enduring lawsuit initiated by Indigenous communities in Ecuador, and Energy Transfer Partners, the entity responsible for the Dakota Access Pipeline. [5]

In January 2022, McGill filed the Maverick lawsuit. [5]

History

In January 2022, Maverick Gaming filed a lawsuit accusing state and federal officials of favoring a "discriminatory tribal gaming monopoly." [3] Maverick sought to invalidate Washington's 2020 sports gambling law, which took effect in September 2021, and to halt wagering until legislation expanded gambling rights beyond tribal entities. [3] [6] However, tribal entities contend that Maverick's lawsuit transcends sports betting, asserting that any challenge to Washington's gaming compacts could jeopardize their recognition as sovereign nations. [1] Supporters and legal specialists argue that the Maverick case, along with similar ones, risk reviving the Termination Era policies from the 1950s, during which the U.S. government attempted to permanently dissolve the political status of Indigenous tribes. [5]

In August 2022, the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe initiated a legal motion against the company in the federal court in Tacoma, aiming to invalidate Maverick Gaming's federal sports betting and gambling expansion lawsuit. [7] In the submitted document, the Shoalwater Bay Tribe's attorneys state that Persson, through his plea for relief in the current litigation, aims to dismantle the primary source of employment and discretionary revenue for his own Tribe. [7] Consequently, the Tribe is obliged to pursue limited intervention in this case and put a stop to his attempts to undermine the Tribe's endeavors to attain economic self-sufficiency and deliver sufficient governmental services to its members. [7]

US District Judge David Estudillo dismissed the lawsuit, siding with the Shoalwater Bay Tribe, whose motion to intervene argued that Washington tribes were the lawsuit's actual target. [3] [6] The court's decision thus reaffirms tribal gaming compacts and exclusivity in Washington State. [3] [8]

In September 2023, a coalition of 22 Native American tribes urged the Ninth Circuit in an amicus brief to reject an appeal from Maverick Gaming LLC. The tribes contend that Maverick Gaming is trying to bypass the tribes' sovereign immunity by suing state and federal officials. [9]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American gaming</span> Gambling operations on Indian reservations in the United States

Native American gaming comprises casinos, bingo halls, and other gambling operations on Indian reservations or other tribal lands in the United States. Because these areas have tribal sovereignty, states have limited ability to forbid gambling there, as codified by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. As of 2011, there were 460 gambling operations run by 240 tribes, with a total annual revenue of $27 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theodore Olson</span> American lawyer

Theodore Bevry Olson is an American lawyer who served as the 42nd solicitor general of the United States from 2001 until 2004. Previously, Olson served as the United States Assistant Attorney General of the Office of Legal Counsel (1981–1984) under President Ronald Reagan. He remains a practicing attorney at the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sports betting</span> Form of gambling

Sports betting is the activity of predicting sports results and placing a wager on the outcome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turning Stone Resort Casino</span> Casino and Resort in Upstate New York, USA

Turning Stone Resort Casino is a Native American resort casino owned and operated by the Oneida Indian Nation of New York (OIN) in Verona, New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Wire Act</span>

The Interstate Wire Act of 1961, often called the Federal Wire Act, is a United States federal law prohibiting the operation of certain types of betting businesses in the United States. It begins with the text:

Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sportsbook</span> Sports gambling establishment

In the United States, a sportsbook or a race and sports book is a place where a gambler can wager on various sports competitions, including golf, football, basketball, baseball, ice hockey, soccer, horse racing, greyhound racing, boxing, and mixed martial arts. The method of betting varies with the sport and the type of game. In the US, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 allowed only Nevada, Oregon, Montana, and Delaware to legally wager on sports other than horse racing, greyhound racing, and jai alai; the law was ruled unconstitutional on May 14, 2018, freeing states to legalize sports betting at their discretion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oneida Indian Nation</span> Indigenous tribe of North America

The Oneida Indian Nation (OIN) or Oneida Nation is a federally recognized tribe of Oneida people in the United States. The tribe is headquartered in Verona, New York, where the tribe originated and held territory prior to European colonialism, and continues to hold territory today. They are Iroquoian-speaking people, and one of the Five Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy, or Haudenosaunee. The Oneida are known as "America's first allies" as they were the first, and one of the few, Iroquois nations to support the American cause. Three other federally recognized Oneida tribes operate in locations where they migrated or were removed to during and after the American Revolutionary War: one in Wisconsin in the United States, and two in Ontario, Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian Gaming Regulatory Act</span> US federal law

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act is a 1988 United States federal law that establishes the jurisdictional framework that governs Indian gaming. There was no federal gaming structure before this act. The stated purposes of the act include providing a legislative basis for the operation/regulation of Indian gaming, protecting gaming as a means of generating revenue for the tribes, encouraging economic development of these tribes, and protecting the enterprises from negative influences. The law established the National Indian Gaming Commission and gave it a regulatory mandate. The law also delegated new authority to the U.S. Department of the Interior and created new federal offenses, giving the U.S. Department of Justice authority to prosecute them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gambling in the United States</span>

In the United States, gambling is subject to a variety of legal restrictions. In 2008, gambling activities generated gross revenues of $92.27 billion in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992</span> U.S. law mostly banning sports gambling

The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, also known as PASPA or the Bradley Act, was a law, judicially-overturned in 2018, that was meant to define the legal status of sports betting throughout the United States. This act effectively outlawed sports betting nationwide, excluding a few states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gambling in New Jersey</span>

Gambling in New Jersey includes casino gambling in Atlantic City, the New Jersey Lottery, horse racing, off-track betting, charity gambling, amusement games, and social gambling. New Jersey's gambling laws are among the least restrictive in the United States. In 2013, the state began to allow in-state online gambling. Five years later, the state won a lawsuit that dismantled Nevada's monopoly on legal sports betting.

Daily fantasy sports (DFS) are a subset of fantasy sport games. As with traditional fantasy sports games, players compete against others by building a team of professional athletes from a particular league or competition while remaining under a salary cap, and earn points based on the actual statistical performance of the players in real-world competitions. Daily fantasy sports are an accelerated variant of traditional fantasy sports that are conducted over short-term periods, such as a week or single day of competition, as opposed to those that are played across an entire season. Daily fantasy sports are typically structured in the form of paid competitions typically referred to as a "contest"; winners receive a share of a pre-determined pot funded by their entry fees. A portion of entry fee payments go to the provider as rake revenue.

Legal forms of gambling in the U.S. state of North Carolina include the North Carolina Education Lottery, three Indian casinos, charitable bingo and raffles, and low-stakes "beach bingo". North Carolina has long resisted expansion of gambling, owing to its conservative Bible Belt culture.

Legal forms of gambling in the U.S. state of Texas include the Texas Lottery; parimutuel wagering on horse and greyhound racing; limited charitable bingo, limited charitable raffles, and three Indian casinos. Other forms of gambling are illegal in Texas.

Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 572 U.S. 782 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case examining whether a federal court has jurisdiction over activity that violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act but takes place off Indian lands, and, if so, whether tribal sovereign immunity prevents a state from suing in federal court. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the State of Michigan's suit against Bay Mills is barred by tribal immunity.

Legal forms of gambling in the U.S. state of Massachusetts include casinos, sports betting, parimutuel wagering on horse racing, the Massachusetts Lottery, and charitable gaming. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission regulates commercial operations under state jurisdiction.

Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 16-476, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The issue was whether the U.S. federal government has the right to control state lawmaking. The State of New Jersey, represented here by Governor Philip D. Murphy, sought to have the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) overturned, allowing state-sponsored sports betting. The case, formerly titled Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association until Governor Chris Christie left office, was combined with NJ Thoroughbred Horsemen v. NCAA No. 16-477.

Legal forms of gambling in the U.S. state of Connecticut include two Indian casinos, parimutuel wagering, charitable gaming, the Connecticut Lottery, and sports betting.

Legal forms of gambling in the U.S. state of New Hampshire include the New Hampshire Lottery, sports betting, parimutuel wagering, and charitable gaming. The state's Gaming Regulatory Oversight Authority (GROA) is part of the New Hampshire Lottery Commission, which also maintains an Investigative & Compliance Division.

Eric Persson is an American businessman, and co-founder and CEO of Maverick Gaming. Persson is also known for participating in a cash game poker match that yielded one of the largest pots in American televised poker history, $1,978,000, and for owning/operating the Maverick Gaming casinos in Nevada, Colorado, and Washington.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lambert, Hannah Ray (January 23, 2023). "Sports betting battle pitting casino owner against tribes could go all the way to Supreme Court". Fox News.
  2. ↑ "A renewed push to expand sports betting percolates in Washington's Legislature - Axios Seattle".
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Washington tribes celebrate court decision to dismiss Maverick Gaming's lawsuit over sports betting exclusivity | Yogonet International". www.yogonet.com.
  4. ↑ "Federal court deals blow to potential sports gambling expansion in WA". The Seattle Times. February 21, 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Brown, Karina (January 1, 2023). "Betting, adoption lawsuits pose greatest threat to tribes in decades, experts say". oregonlive.
  6. 1 2 "Federal Judge Dismisses Maverick Gaming's Lawsuit Challenging Tribal Sports Betting". Law.com.
  7. 1 2 3 "Shoalwater Bay Tribe files legal action against Maverick Gaming". KXRO News Radio. August 5, 2022.
  8. ↑ "Court dismisses lawsuit challenging Washington tribal sports gaming". KXRO News Radio. February 22, 2023.
  9. ↑ Ali Sullivan (September 11, 2023). "Wash. Tribes Say Gambling Co.'s Suit Could Ruin Economies". Law360. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.