Maxey Flats

Last updated
Maxey Flats Low-Level Radioactive Waste facility
Superfund site
Maxey Flats Disposal Site - Aerial View 001.jpg
Aerial view of the Maxey Flats Disposal Site.
Geography
Town Hillsboro
County Fleming County
State Kentucky
Coordinates 38°15′30″N83°34′10″W / 38.25833°N 83.56944°W / 38.25833; -83.56944
USA Kentucky location map.svg
Red pog.svg
Maxey Flats Low-Level Radioactive Waste facility
Information
CERCLIS IDKYD980729107
ContaminantsHeavy metals, radioactive compounds, VOCs, pesticides, and PAHs
Responsible
parties
50 "de maximis" parties
306 "de minimis" parties
Progress
Proposed10/15/84
Listed06/10/86
List of Superfund sites

The Maxey Flats low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal site is a Superfund site in Kentucky which served as a disposal site for low-level nuclear waste from 1963 to 1977. [1] Investigations by the Environmental Protection Agency, among others, determined that plutonium stored at the site had migrated beyond the site's trenches, and the site was closed in 1977. [2]

Contents

Location

The entrance to the Maxey Flats Low-Level Radioactive Waste site in Maxey Flat, Kentucky, USA. Taken in 2003 before the sign was removed by Homeland Security. Maxey Flat Kentucky Low-Level Radiation Facility Entrance Sign.jpg
The entrance to the Maxey Flats Low-Level Radioactive Waste site in Maxey Flat, Kentucky, USA. Taken in 2003 before the sign was removed by Homeland Security.

The Maxey Flats disposal site is located on a plateau in northeastern Kentucky, approximately 9 miles (14 km) northwest of Morehead. It is part of Fleming County. [3] [4] Residents refer to the area as "Maxey Flat," while the radioactive waste disposal site is called "Maxey Flats." [5]

History

As part of a program to encourage the nuclear industry in Kentucky, the Kentucky General Assembly created the Division of Nuclear Information. In 1960 the Kentucky General Assembly passed legislation granting the governor power to enter into agreement with the federal government for the transfer of regulatory powers concerning atomic energy in Kentucky. Also in 1960, Governor Bert T. Combs charged the Cabinet of Health with the regulatory and licensing responsibilities for the handling of radioactive materials. In 1962 Kentucky became the first of the old Atomic Energy Commission "Agreement States." The Kentucky Division of Nuclear Information was then succeeded by the Division of Atomic Development which then transferred its responsibilities to the Kentucky Atomic Energy Authority which eventually became the Kentucky Science and Technology Commission. In retrospect it seems that many of these agencies were established with the hope of bringing a nuclear power plant to Kentucky. Despite being the first state to enter into agreement with the Atomic Energy Commission, Kentucky has never been the site of a nuclear reactor. However, in 1962, Nuclear Engineering Company, Inc. (NECO) bought 252 acres (1.02 km2) of land on Maxey Flats and submitted an application for a license to bury radioactive waste there. [6] The license was granted in January 1963. [7]

From 1963 to 1977 the Maxey Flats facility served as a dump site for low-level nuclear waste. [8] The EPA identified 832 parties as potentially responsible for the site's contamination. [7] The site covered 252 acres (1.02 km2) and consisted of a series of 52 unlined trenches that are an average of 360 feet (110 m) long, 70 feet (21 m) wide and 20 feet (6.1 m) deep. Approximately 4,750,000 cubic feet (135,000 m3) of low-level radioactive waste was deposited onsite. [7] [9] These trenches were capped with shale and clay when they reached their capacity. Over time, the caps' structures collapsed and the trenches filled with water. [10] This has been referred to as the "bathtub effect." [11] The water became radioactive and had to be disposed of. Under the direction of President and Chief Executive Officer James N. Neel, Nuclear Engineering Company (referred to in operational documentation as 'NECO'), now known as 'American Ecology' (Nasdaq: ECOL), installed an evaporator and disposed of the accumulated radioactive water as steam from 1973 to April 1986, nearly 9 years after the site had stopped accepting waste materials. The evaporator generally operated 24 hours a day. Approximately six million gallons of liquid were processed by the evaporator. In addition to the trenches for low-level radioactive waste, there were "Hot Wells" that were used to store special nuclear material (plutonium and enriched uranium). The Hot Wells were typically 10 to 15 feet (4.6 m) deep, constructed of concrete, coated steel pipe or tile, and capped with a slab of concrete. Approximately 950 pounds of Special Nuclear Material is buried at Maxey Flats.[ full citation needed ]

On September 27, 1982, the Kentucky New Era reported that the Maxey Flats disposal site was being closed due to "radioactive leakage". Although no immediate health hazard was reported, "the potential [was] still there". State Natural Resources Coordinator Jackie Swigart confirmed that radioactive material had escaped burial trenches and been detected beyond the borders of the 250 acre site. The geology of the Maxey Flats area may contribute to the inadvertent spread of radioactive materials beyond the site's boundaries underground.[ full citation needed ] In 1986, the EPA designated the site as a Superfund site. [1] [5]

From 1987 to 1991 a study was done to determine the best method of cleaning up the site. Extensive remediation was then undertaken, including the installation of a 45 mil scrim-reinforced geomembrane liner covering the site of the trenches to prevent the infiltration of water. The site is currently managed by the Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The site is considered non-reclaimable and will have to be monitored and maintained in perpetuity. In 2003 the site's nature as a risk to national security came under review by the Department of Homeland Security, primarily because of the transuranic isotopes stored at the site.[ full citation needed ]

In response to concerns that the radioactive isotopes at the site might be used against American interests, DHS had the sign at the entrance to the facility removed so it would be harder to find.[ full citation needed ]

Maxey Flats ground water contamination data from 1988 Maxey groundwater.jpg
Maxey Flats ground water contamination data from 1988

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioactive waste</span> Unusable radioactive materials

Radioactive waste is a type of hazardous waste that contains radioactive material. Radioactive waste is a result of many activities, including nuclear medicine, nuclear research, nuclear power generation, nuclear decommissioning, rare-earth mining, and nuclear weapons reprocessing. The storage and disposal of radioactive waste is regulated by government agencies in order to protect human health and the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear reprocessing</span> Chemical operations that separate fissile material from spent fuel to be recycled as new fuel

Nuclear reprocessing is the chemical separation of fission products and actinides from spent nuclear fuel. Originally, reprocessing was used solely to extract plutonium for producing nuclear weapons. With commercialization of nuclear power, the reprocessed plutonium was recycled back into MOX nuclear fuel for thermal reactors. The reprocessed uranium, also known as the spent fuel material, can in principle also be re-used as fuel, but that is only economical when uranium supply is low and prices are high. Nuclear reprocessing may extend beyond fuel and include the reprocessing of other nuclear reactor material, such as Zircaloy cladding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rocky Flats Plant</span> Defunct American nuclear weapons manufacturing site in Colorado

The Rocky Flats Plant was a U.S. manufacturing complex that produced nuclear weapons parts in the western United States, near Denver, Colorado. The facility's primary mission was the fabrication of plutonium pits, which were shipped to other facilities to be assembled into nuclear weapons. Operated from 1952 to 1992, the complex was under the control of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), succeeded by the Department of Energy (DOE) in 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waste Isolation Pilot Plant</span> Deep geological repository for radioactive waste

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, or WIPP, is the world's third deep geological repository licensed to store transuranic radioactive waste for 10,000 years. The storage rooms at the WIPP are 2,150 feet underground in a salt formation of the Delaware Basin. The waste is from the research and production of United States nuclear weapons only. The plant started operation in 1999, and the project is estimated to cost $19 billion in total.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Savannah River Site</span> Nuclear reservation in the US

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reservation in the United States, located in the state of South Carolina on land in Aiken, Allendale, and Barnwell counties adjacent to the Savannah River. It lies 25 miles (40 km) southeast of Augusta, Georgia. The site was built during the 1950s to refine nuclear materials for deployment in nuclear weapons. It covers 310 square miles (800 km2) and employs more than 10,000 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mayak</span> Nuclear reprocessing plant in Russia

The Mayak Production Association is one of the largest nuclear facilities in the Russian Federation, housing a reprocessing plant. The closest settlements are Ozyorsk to the northwest and Novogornyi to the south.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Valley Demonstration Project</span> Nuclear waste remediation site outside Buffalo, NY

The West Valley Demonstration Project is a nuclear waste remediation site in West Valley, New York in the U.S. state of New York. The project focuses on the cleanup and containment of radioactive waste left behind after the abandonment of a commercial nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in 1980. The project was created by an Act of Congress in 1980 and is directed to be a cooperative effort between the United States Department of Energy and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pondcrete</span> Radioactive waste mixture

Pondcrete is a mixture of cement and sludge. Its role is to immobilize hazardous waste and, in some cases, low-level and mixed-level radioactive waste, in the form of solid material. The material was used by the United States Department of Energy and its contractor, Rockwell International, in an attempt to handle the radioactive waste from contaminated ponds in the Rocky Flats Plant for burial in Nevada desert. Portland cement is mixed with sludge to solidify into “pondcrete” blocks and placed into large, plastic lined boxes. The sludge is taken from solar evaporation ponds which are used to remove moisture from waste materials, therefore reducing their weight. To do this, liquid waste is poured into artificial, shallow ponds. The waste is heated by solar radiation and any moisture is evaporated, leaving behind the waste. These ponds contained low level radioactive process waste as well as sanitary sewage sludge and wastes, which categorize them and the Pondcrete as a mixed waste.

Saltcrete is a mixture of cement with salts and brine, usually originating from liquid waste treatment plants. Its role is to immobilize hazardous waste and in some cases lower-level radioactive waste in the form of solid material. It is a form of mixed waste.

A waste pond or chemical pond is a small impounded water body used for the disposal of water pollutants, and sometimes utilized as a method of recycling or decomposing toxic substances. Such waste ponds may be used for regular disposal of pollutant materials or may be used as upset receivers for special pollution events. Often, chemical ponds themselves are addressed for cleanup action after their useful life is over or when a risk of groundwater contamination arises. Peak usage of waste ponds in the United States occurred in the period 1955 to 1985, after which the environmental risks of pond technology were sufficiently understood, such that alternative technologies for waste disposal gradually began to displace many of the waste ponds. Waste ponds often have pond liners, such as concrete or robust synthetic polymeric materials, to prevent infiltration of chemicals to soil or groundwater.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of nuclear power</span>

Nuclear power has various environmental impacts, both positive and negative, including the construction and operation of the plant, the nuclear fuel cycle, and the effects of nuclear accidents. Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide emitted during mining, enrichment, fabrication and transport of fuel is small when compared with the carbon dioxide emitted by fossil fuels of similar energy yield, however, these plants still produce other environmentally damaging wastes. Nuclear energy and renewable energy have reduced environmental costs by decreasing CO2 emissions resulting from energy consumption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High-level radioactive waste management</span> Management and disposal of highly radioactive materials

High-level radioactive waste management concerns how radioactive materials created during production of nuclear power and nuclear weapons are dealt with. Radioactive waste contains a mixture of short-lived and long-lived nuclides, as well as non-radioactive nuclides. There was reportedly some 47,000 tonnes of high-level nuclear waste stored in the United States in 2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mound Laboratories</span>

Mound Laboratory in Miamisburg, Ohio was an Atomic Energy Commission facility for nuclear weapon research during the Cold War, named after the nearby Miamisburg Indian Mound.

<i>Nuclear Power and the Environment</i>

Nuclear Power and the Environment, sometimes simply called the Flowers Report, was released in September 1976 and is the sixth report of the UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, chaired by Sir Brian Flowers. The report was dedicated to "the Queen's most excellent Majesty." "He was appointed "to advise on matters, both national and international, concerning the pollution of the environment; on the adequacy of research in this field; and the future possibilities of danger to the environment." One of the recommendations of the report was that:

"There should be no commitment to a large programme of nuclear fission power until it has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that a method exists to ensure the safe containment of longlived, highly radioactive waste for the indefinite future."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Church Rock uranium mill spill</span> Radioactive spill in New Mexico on July 16, 1979

The Church Rock uranium mill spill occurred in the U.S. state of New Mexico on July 16, 1979, when United Nuclear Corporation's tailings disposal pond at its uranium mill in Church Rock breached its dam. The accident remains the largest release of radioactive material in U.S. history, having released more radioactivity than the Three Mile Island accident four months earlier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioactive contamination from the Rocky Flats Plant</span> Radioactive contamination from the Rocky Flats Plant in Colorado

The Rocky Flats Plant, a former U.S. nuclear weapons production facility located about 15 miles (24 km) northwest of Denver, caused radioactive contamination within and outside its boundaries. The contamination primarily resulted from two major plutonium fires in 1957 and 1969 and from wind-blown plutonium that leaked from barrels of radioactive waste. Much lower concentrations of radioactive isotopes were released throughout the operational life of the plant from 1952 to 1992, from smaller accidents and from normal operational releases of plutonium particles too small to be filtered. Prevailing winds from the plant carried airborne contamination south and east, into populated areas northwest of Denver.

From 1946 through 1993, thirteen countries used ocean disposal or ocean dumping as a method to dispose of nuclear/radioactive waste with an approximation of 200,000 tons sourcing mainly from the medical, research and nuclear industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shpack Landfill</span> Hazardous waste site in Massachusetts

Shpack Landfill is a hazardous waste site in Norton, Massachusetts. After assessment by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) it was added to the National Priorities List in October 1986 for long-term remedial action. The site cleanup is directed by the federal Superfund program. The Superfund site covers 9.4 acres, mostly within Norton, with 3.4 acres in the adjoining city of Attleboro. The Norton site was operated as a landfill dump accepting domestic and industrial wastes, including low-level radioactive waste, between 1946 and 1965. The source of most of the radioactive waste, consisting of uranium and radium, was Metals and Controls Inc. which made enriched uranium fuel elements for the U.S. Navy under contract with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Metals and Controls merged with Texas Instruments in 1959. The Shpack landfill operation was shut down by a court order in 1965.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Lake Landfill</span> EPA superfund site in Missouri, US

West Lake Landfill is a closed, unlined mixed-waste landfill located in Bridgeton, Missouri. It was featured in the 2015 documentaries The First Secret City, The Safe Side of the Fence and the 2017 HBO documentary Atomic Homefront. Its contents have been shown to include radioactive waste; it is thus also an EPA Superfund cleanup site.

References

  1. 1 2 "Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal, Hillsboro, KY: Cleanup Activities". cumulis.epa.gov. Retrieved 2021-05-24.
  2. Peyton, C. (2017). "Kentucky's "atomic graveyard": Maxey Flats and environmental inequity in rural America." Register of the Kentucky Historical Society. 115 (2): 223-224.
  3. Wilson, K.; Lyons, B. (1991). Ground-water levels and tritium concentrations at the Maxey Flats Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Site near Morehead, Kentucky, June 1984 to April 1989. Louisville, Ky.: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. p. 2. doi:10.3133/wri904189.
  4. Hupp, C.; Carey, W. (July 1990). "Dendrogeomorphic approach to estimating slope retreat, Maxey Flats, Kentucky". Geology. 18 (7): 658. Bibcode:1990Geo....18..658H. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0658:DATESR>2.3.CO;2.
  5. 1 2 "Why Maxey Flats Matters". Kentucky Historical Society. 2017-03-14. Retrieved 2021-05-24.
  6. Peyton, C. (2017). "Kentucky's "atomic graveyard": Maxey Flats and environmental inequity in rural America". Register of the Kentucky Historical Society. 115 (2): 232. doi:10.1353/khs.2017.0050. S2CID   131856576.
  7. 1 2 3 "Explanation of significant differences: Maxey Flats disposal site, Fleming County, Kentucky" (PDF). p. 2. September 2014.
  8. Bruggers, James. "Maxey Flats nuke dump: What were they thinking?". The Courier-Journal. Retrieved 2021-05-25.
  9. "Maxey Flats Section: Superfund Branch". Kentucky.gov. Retrieved May 24, 2021.
  10. Wilson, K.; Lyons, B. (1991). Ground-water levels and tritium concentrations at the Maxey Flats Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Site near Morehead, Kentucky, June 1984 to April 1989 . Louisville, Ky.: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. p. 4.
  11. Payne, T. E.; Harrison, J. J.; Hughes, C. E.; Johansen, M. P.; Thiruvoth, S.; Wilsher, K. L.; Cendón, D. I.; Hankin, S. I.; Rowling, B.; Zawadzki, A. (2013-12-03). "Trench 'bathtubbing' and surface plutonium contamination at a legacy radioactive waste site". Environmental Science & Technology. 47 (23): 13284–13293. Bibcode:2013EnST...4713284P. doi:10.1021/es403278r. ISSN   0013-936X. PMC   3854837 . PMID   24256473.