McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.

Last updated

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided June 20, 2025
Full case nameMcLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
Docket no. 23-1226
Citations606 U.S. ___ ( more )
Holding
The Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings to an agency's interpretation of a statute. District courts must independently determine the law's meaning under ordinary principles of statutory interpretation while affording appropriate respect to the agency's interpretation.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch  · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett  · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
MajorityKavanaugh
DissentKagan, joined by Sotomayor, Jackson
Laws applied
Hobbs Act

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., 606 U.S. ___(2025), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings to an agency's interpretation of a statute. District courts must independently determine the law's meaning under ordinary principles of statutory interpretation while affording appropriate respect to the agency's interpretation. [1] [2]

Contents

See also

References

  1. McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.,No. 23-1226 , 606 U.S. ___(2025).
  2. "Additional opinions from Friday, June 20". SCOTUSblog. June 20, 2025. Retrieved July 5, 2025.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .