McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 20, 2025
Full case name	McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
Docket no.	23-1226
Citations	606 U.S. ___ ( more )
Holding
The Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings to an agency's interpretation of a statute. District courts must independently determine the law's meaning under ordinary principles of statutory interpretation while affording appropriate respect to the agency's interpretation.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas  · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch  · Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett  · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
Majority	Kavanaugh
Dissent	Kagan, joined by Sotomayor, Jackson
Laws applied
Hobbs Act

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., 606 U.S. ___(2025), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings to an agency's interpretation of a statute. District courts must independently determine the law's meaning under ordinary principles of statutory interpretation while affording appropriate respect to the agency's interpretation. ^{[1] [2]}

See also

• Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

References

1. McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.,No. 23-1226 , 606 U.S. ___(2025).
2. "Additional opinions from Friday, June 20". SCOTUSblog. June 20, 2025. Retrieved July 5, 2025.

External links

• Text of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.,No. 23-1226, 606 U.S. ___(2025) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .