McVeigh v. Cohen

Last updated

McVeigh v. Cohen
Seal of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.png
Court United States District Court for the District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 26, 1998
Citation(s)983 F.Supp. 215
Holding
The United States military violates freedom of speech when discharging a service member for reasons of anonymous speech on the Internet.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Stanley Sporkin

McVeigh v. Cohen was a 1998 lawsuit in U.S. federal court in which a member of the U.S. Armed Forces challenged the military's application of its "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy, which established guidelines for service by gays and lesbians in the U.S. military. The U.S. Navy sought to discharge Timothy R. McVeigh for declaring his homosexuality, which he had allegedly done via anonymous Internet posts. McVeigh's suit denied he had made such a declaration and charged the Navy with failure to adhere to its own DADT policy in the course of investigating him, while violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by collecting his private online communications.

Contents

McVeigh won a preliminary injunction against his discharge and the Navy, without acknowledging culpability, allowed him to retire with an honorable discharge. The New York Times called it "a victory for gay rights, with implications for the millions of people who use computer on-line services." [1]

Background

Timothy R. McVeigh (no relation to convicted domestic terrorist Timothy McVeigh) entered the Navy at the age of 18 around 1980 and earned four Good Conduct Medals and the Navy Commendation Medal. [2] His performance review in 1997 described him as "an outstanding role model" and the "embodiment of Navy core values". [3] By that time he had reached the rank of Senior Chief Petty Officer.

In September 1997, while based in Honolulu and serving on the nuclear submarine USS Chicago, [2] McVeigh sent email messages from his America Online (AOL) account that used the screen name "boysrch" and the signature "Tim" when communicating with Helen Hajny, a civilian working as a volunteer Ombudsman. The AOL user directory identified the marital status of the owner of that AOL account as "gay". Naval authorities suspected that the "boysrch" handle on AOL was being used by McVeigh and constituted an announcement of his homosexuality. A Navy paralegal, misrepresenting himself, obtained confirmation from AOL by telephone that the account belonged to McVeigh. The Navy initiated an administrative discharge on the basis of his "homosexual conduct, as evidenced by your statement that you are homosexual." A Navy disciplinary board held a hearing at which McVeigh acknowledged he had authored the email messages using the "boysrch" account and presented evidence of prior relationships with women. They concluded that by a preponderance of the evidence McVeigh had engaged in "homosexual conduct" that was grounds for a dishonarable discharge under the then-current DADT policy. [4]

With his discharge scheduled for January 16, 1998, McVeigh, represented by Proskauer Rose, filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking a preliminary injunction to bar his discharge. His suit named Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen as principal defendant. At stake in addition to his job and income were the pension, health and life insurance, and other benefits when stepping down from the Navy honorably, as he expected to soon retire after 20 years of service. The Navy, after first resisting, acceded to the court's request to delay the discharge until January 27. [2]

Privacy advocates supported McVeigh's suit. David L. Sobel of the Electronic Privacy Information Center said: "It is probably the most clear-cut example we have of a violation of this statute on the part of the Government. If the Navy prevails, it will basically mean there is no meaningful protection against government intrusion in cyberspace." [3] An America Online spokesman said: "We have clear policies in place that our member service representatives don't give out member information. What is disturbing to us is that the Navy may have circumvented established channels that we have for working with law enforcement in an attempt to get information about one of our members." [3] A representative of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy group for gay and lesbian military personnel, said: "Timothy McVeigh didn't work hard to get on anybody's radar screen. The only information that the Navy has is this AOL profile, and I think there's a strong argument that this is the sort of case that demands discretion from the military." [3]

Political commentator Frank Rich thought McVeigh could be: [2]

the man who finally brings home the absurdity and bigotry of Don't ask, don't tell. Mr. McVeigh is as clear-cut a victim of a witch hunt as could be imagined, and that witch hunt could expand exponentially if the military wants to add on-line fishing to its invasion of service members' privacy. Multitudes of military personnel identify themselves as gay on the Internet, rank and base often included.

Rich contrasted the different treatment the U.S. military afforded the two men named Timothy McVeigh. For years the U.S. Army ignored the racism and anti-government radicalism of former soldier Timothy J. McVeigh, who went on to perpetrate the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. The U.S. Navy by contrast "torments the second, exemplary Timothy [R.] McVeigh for the 'crime' of having a private life that should be nobody's business but his own." [2]

Before a hearing in the case, AOL acknowledged that its customer service representative should not have released information about McVeigh's account. It also said the Navy had violated federal law and reported that it had lodged protests with the Navy and Department of Defense. [5] [6] McVeigh's attorney also brought to court a statement from sociologist Charles Moskos of Northwestern University, architect of the DADT policy, who supported McVeigh and called the Navy's investigation of his sexual orientation "unwarranted". [7] In Moskos's words: "In simple terms, Senior Chief McVeigh did not 'tell' in a manner contemplated under the policy – he sent an anonymous e-mail which did not list his surname or his Navy connection." [5]

Opinion

On January 26, 1998, U.S. District Court Judge Stanley Sporkin granted McVeigh a preliminary injunction barring the Navy from discharging him. He wrote that the central issue was whether the Navy complied with its own Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) policy and, by extension, "whether there is really a place for gay officers in the military under the new policy." Sporkin sometimes referred to DADT by its longer name – "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue" – as he questioned the Navy's pursuit of information about McVeigh. He wrote: [8]

The facts ... clearly demonstrate that the Plaintiff did not openly express his homosexuality in a way that compromised this "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. Suggestions of sexual orientation in a private, anonymous email account did not give the Navy a sufficient reason to investigate to determine whether to commence discharge proceedings. In its actions, the Navy violated its own regulations.

Sporkin quoted DADT guidelines that specified that "creditable information" from a "reliable person" about sexual orientation was required to prompt an investigation. Instead, he wrote: [8]

When the Navy affirmatively took steps to confirm the identity of the email respondent, it violated the very essence of "Don't Ask, Don't Pursue" by launching a search and destroy mission.

Sporkin also called it a "search and 'outing' mission." He noted that "cyberspace ... invites fantasy and affords anonymity," an environment at odds with the regulatory requirement that the subject of an investigation show "a likelihood actually to carry out homosexual acts." He also found that the Navy's investigation had "likely violated" the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Though the government had argued that the statute penalized the party that disclosed information, in this case AOL, and not the party requesting information, he wrote: [8]

[I]t is elementary that information obtained improperly can be suppressed where an individual's rights have been violated. In these days of "big brother", where through technology and otherwise the privacy interests of individuals from all walks of life are being ignored or marginalized, it is imperative that statutes explicitly protecting these rights be strictly observed.

On the government's argument that McVeigh had acknowledged owning the AOL account, Sporkin wrote: [8]

That the Plaintiff may have made incriminating statements at the subsequent administrative hearing does not bootstrap the Navy out of its legal dilemma of not only violating its own policy, but also a federal statute in its attempt to charge the Plaintiff with homosexuality.

Sporkin concluded with his view of the significance of the DADT policy: [8]

The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue" policy was clearly aimed at accommodating gay men and women in the military. In effect, it was intended to bring our nation's armed forces in line with the rest of society, which finds discrimination of virtually every form intolerable. It is self-evident that a person's sexual orientation does not affect that individual's performance in the workplace. At this point in history, our society should not be deprived of the many accomplishments provided by people who happen to be gay. The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue" policy was a bow to society's growing recognition of this fact. For the policy to be effective, it has to be implemented in a sensitive, balanced manner. Under the policy as it stands today, gay service members must be permitted to serve their country honorably, so long as they are discrete in pursuing their personal lives.

In conclusion, the court granted McVeigh the preliminary injunction and his discharge was overturned as an "immediate and irreparable injury" to McVeigh's career and reputation. [4]

Settlement and impact

Clarence Page, writing in the Chicago Tribune , said that the case was "a defining test of the right to privacy in cyberspace and in the military. The military flunked. So did a major on-line service." [9] Arthur Leonard of New York Law School commented: "Every one of these cases that comes to the public's attention reinforces the absurdity of the [DADT] policy, and that can only help us in the long run. It's just a shame some people are turned into martyrs, but it looks as if in this case McVeigh won't be a martyr." [10]

The parties began negotiating McVeigh's retirement with full benefits. A Defense Department official said: "I think many of us would like to see this case go away." [11] But McVeigh's attorney complained that in the days after Sporkin's ruling the Navy had assigned McVeigh to "supervising people moving trash out of a room that's being renovated." In March, Judge Sporkin was asked to consider if the Navy had violated his order not to take any "adverse action" against McVeigh, who contended that the Navy had not provided him with an assignment comparable to his rank and experience. [12] As negotiations continued, Defense Secretary Cohen supported the Navy's position in the case and warned Attorney General Janet Reno that any settlement needed to make clear the Clinton administration's full support for DADT. [13]

McVeigh and the Navy agreed to a settlement in June 1998. The Navy did not admit any wrongdoing and agreed not to pursue an appeal. McVeigh was allowed to retire with the rank of Master Chief Petty Officer and full benefits. He commented: "I'm happy that this case has been resolved on my terms. I think that all sailors can take comfort from this. I hope it sends a message that the rules and regulations that are in place need to be followed by the military." [1] His attorney said: "It is the first time, as far as I'm aware, that the Navy has let stand a court decision that it has broken the law in this area. Obviously it has a precedent that can be relied on in the future." [1] The Navy also paid McVeigh's $90,000 in legal expenses. [14]

McVeigh retired from the Navy on July 14, 1998. He said he had been treated well by other service members "with an exception of a few senior officers in the submarine squadron." He concluded: "I think the Navy has been fairly pig-headed. I just got set up and this thing just getting passed up the line and no one stopped to look at it." [14]

In a separate settlement reached months earlier but not announced until McVeigh settled with the Navy, America Online apologized and agreed to pay McVeigh damages for having improperly disclosed his identity. Outside the settlement, AOL announced plans to provide all of its 5,000 customer service representatives with "scenario training" to protect their clients' privacy, and it posted a new version of its privacy policy online written to be, in the words of one commentator, "understandable to us mere mortals." [1] [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don't ask, don't tell</span> 1994–2011 policy on LGBT in the US military

"Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT) was the official United States policy on military service of non-heterosexual people. Instituted during the Clinton administration, the policy was issued under Department of Defense Directive 1304.26 on December 21, 1993, and was in effect from February 28, 1994, until September 20, 2011. The policy prohibited military personnel from discriminating against or harassing closeted homosexual or bisexual service members or applicants, while barring openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual persons from military service. This relaxation of legal restrictions on service by gays and lesbians in the armed forces was mandated by Public Law 103–160, which was signed November 30, 1993. The policy prohibited people who "demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts" from serving in the armed forces of the United States, because their presence "would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability".

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) personnel are able to serve in the armed forces of some countries around the world: the vast majority of industrialized, Western countries including some South American countries such as Argentina and Chile in addition to South Africa, and Israel. The rights concerning intersex people are more vague.

Charles Constantine Moskos, Jr. was a sociologist of the United States military and a professor at Northwestern University. Described as the nation's "most influential military sociologist" by The Wall Street Journal, Moskos was often a source for reporters from The New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, USA Today, and other periodicals. He was the author of the "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT) policy, which prohibited homosexual service members from acknowledging their sexual orientation from 1994 to 2011.

<i>Holmes v. California National Guard</i>

Andrew Holmes v. California National Guard, 124 F.3d 1126 was a federal court case heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, that upheld the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that restricted service by gays and lesbians in the California National Guard of the United States. The court decided that a member of the National Guard could not be discharged for saying publicly that he or she is homosexual or bisexual, but could be restricted to assignments that did not require recognition by the federal government.

Joseph Charles Steffan is an American lawyer and gay activist. He was expelled from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis in 1987 shortly before graduation after disclosing his homosexuality. He sued the U.S. Department of Defense, claiming that his oral avowal of homosexuality could not be construed as an indication that he ever had or intended to engage in sexual relations with another man. He lost a protracted court battle for reinstatement in 1994.

Darren Manzella was a United States Army Sergeant, Army medic and gay activist from Portland, New York, who was discharged under the Don't ask, don't tell policy. Manzella served in Iraq and Kuwait, and was stationed in Fort Hood, Texas.

<i>Unfriendly Fire</i> 2009 American political book

Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America is an American 2009 political book by Nathaniel Frank that argues that the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy banning openly gay servicemen and women from the United States armed forces weakened military and national security. According to Frank, 12,000 people — 800 of whom had previously been deemed "mission critical" by the U.S. government — were discharged from the military between 1993 and 2008, based on policies that Frank describes as "rooted in denial, and deception, and repression."

The United States Navy dog handler hazing scandal was a pattern of misconduct engaged in by members of the United States Navy at Naval Support Activity Bahrain between 2004 and 2006. Naval investigators documented nearly 100 incidents of abuse committed against several members of a Military Working Dog (MWD) unit stationed at the United States military base at Juffair. Documented incidents of abuse include racial intimidation, sexual harassment, physical abuse and anti-gay harassment. One sailor, Master-At-Arms 3rd Class Joseph Rocha, suffered post-traumatic stress disorder because of his abuse at the hands of fellow sailors, and he alleges that another sailor committed suicide because of her treatment. The Navy investigated the allegations in 2007 and documented the abuse, but took little substantive action. However, Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak, a former Vice Admiral, demanded a new examination of the report's findings which led to the disciplining of Rocha's former superior, Chief Petty Officer Michael Toussaint. The scandal came to widespread public attention as United States President Barack Obama faced increased pressure to repeal the military's gay-exclusionary policy known as "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT).

The United States military formerly excluded gay men, bisexuals, and lesbians from service. In 1993, the United States Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, a law instituting the policy commonly referred to as "Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT), which allowed gay, lesbian, and bisexual people to serve as long as they did not reveal their sexual orientation. Although there were isolated instances in which service personnel were met with limited success through lawsuits, efforts to end the ban on openly gay, lesbian, and bisexual people serving either legislatively or through the courts initially proved unsuccessful.

<i>Log Cabin Republicans v. United States</i> Federal lawsuit

Log Cabin Republicans v. United States, 658 F.3d 1162 was a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. § 654, commonly known as don't ask, don't tell (DADT), which, prior to its repeal, excluded homosexuals from openly serving in the United States military. The Log Cabin Republicans (LCR), an organization composed of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Republicans, brought the suit on behalf of LCR members who serve or served in the military and were subject to DADT.

<i>Witt v. Department of the Air Force</i>

Witt v. Department of the Air Force, 527 F.3d 806 is a federal lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. § 654, the law, since repealed, that excluded openly homosexual people from serving in the United States military, commonly known as "Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in 2008 that under Lawrence v. Texas DADT constitutes an "[attempt] to intrude upon the personal and private lives of homosexuals" and it is subject to "heightened scrutiny", meaning that the government "must advance an important governmental interest, the intrusion must significantly further that interest, and the intrusion must be necessary to further that interest."

Stephen Timothy May is an American politician who served in the Arizona House of Representatives. He was openly gay when he ran for and served in the legislature. He was nevertheless recalled to active duty in the military. He came to national attention in 1999 when the U.S. Army attempted to discharge him from the United States Army Reserve under the gay-exclusionary law known as "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010</span> 2011 US federal law allowing LGBT people to openly serve in the military

The Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 is a landmark United States federal statute enacted in December 2010 that established a process for ending the "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT) policy, thus allowing gay, lesbian, and bisexual people to serve openly in the United States Armed Forces. It ended the policy in place since 1993 that allowed them to serve only if they kept their sexual orientation secret and the military did not learn of their sexual orientation, which was controversial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">OutServe-SLDN</span> Non-profit organisation in the USA

OutServe-SLDN was a network of LGBT military personnel, formed as a result of the merger between OutServe and the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. OutServe-SLDN was one of the largest LGBT employee resource groups in the world. OutServe was founded by a 2009 graduate of the US Air Force Academy, Josh Seefried and Ty Walrod. There were over 7,000 members and 80 chapters worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zoe Dunning</span>

Maria Zoe Dunning is a U.S. Naval Academy graduate and gay rights activist. She is known for being the only openly gay person remaining on active duty in the U.S. military after coming out. She was involved in a series of lawsuits against the U.S. military and the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy during the 1990s.

Collins v. United States is a class-action lawsuit filed on November 10, 2010, against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims that ended in a settlement on January 7, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jase Daniels</span> United States Navy linguist

Jase Daniels is a United States Navy linguist who was discharged from the military twice under the policy known as "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT). Daniels served from 2001 to 2005 and again from 2006 to 2007. After coming out in Stars and Stripes, a newspaper published under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Defense, Daniels challenged the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that forbade gay and lesbian service members from serving openly. His case attracted attention in such major U.S. media outlets as Newsweek and the New York Times. Daniels returned to active duty in the United States Navy on December 12, 2011, and is believed to be one of the first servicemembers, and perhaps the first, to return to active duty following the end of restrictions on service by openly gay and lesbian servicemembers in the U.S. Armed Forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States military chaplains</span>

United States military chaplains hold positions in the armed forces of the United States and are charged with conducting religious services and providing counseling for their adherents. As of 2011, there are about 2,900 chaplains in the Army, among the active duty, reserve, and National Guard components.

Keith Meinhold is an American former Navy first class petty officer. He is a veteran of the US Navy who successfully challenged the Navy's attempt to discharge him for coming out as gay in 1992 and ended his Navy career in 1996, one of the first openly gay U.S. service members to be honorably discharged.

Tracy William Thorne-Begland is an American judge on the General District Court of Richmond, Virginia, appointed in 2012. He was the first openly gay jurist elected by the Virginia General Assembly.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Shenon, Philip (June 12, 1998). "Sailor Victorious in Gay Case of On-Line Privacy". New York Times. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Rich, Frank (January 17, 1998). "The 2 Tim McVeighs". New York Times. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Shenon, Philip (January 17, 1998). "Navy Case Combines Gay Rights and On-Line Privacy". New York Times. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  4. 1 2 McVeigh v. Cohen, 983 F.Supp. 215 (D.C.D.C, 1998).
  5. 1 2 Napoli, Lisa (January 22, 1998). "AOL Admits Error in Sailor's Case". New York Times. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  6. ↑ Kornblum, Janet (January 21, 1998). "AOL admits to privacy lapse". Cnet. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  7. ↑ Kakesako, Gregg K. (January 1998). "Navy accused violating policy". Honolulu Star Bulletin. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Sporkin, Stanley (January 26, 1998). "Memorandum Opinion, Timothy R. McVeigh v. William S. Cohen, et al." (PDF). U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  9. ↑ Page, Clarence (January 29, 1998). "Internet And Military Clash Was Inevitable". Florida Sun Sentinel. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  10. ↑ Gallagher, John (March 3, 1998). "Don't Ask, Don't Log On". The Advocate. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  11. ↑ Shenon, Philip (January 30, 1998). "Navy May Resolve Gay Case by Letting Sailor Retire". New York Times. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  12. ↑ Sporkin, Stanley. "Memorandum Opinion, March 11, 1998". Justia. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  13. ↑ Bull, Chris (May 26, 1998). "Cohen Under Fire". The Advocate. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  14. 1 2 Kakesako, Gregg K. (July 14, 1998). "McVeigh leaves Navy, Hawaii today". Honolulu Star Bulletin. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  15. ↑ "Gay Sailor Accepts Early Retirement Offer". Greensboro News Record. June 13, 1998. pp. A8.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.