United States v. Choi

Last updated

United States v. Choi
Seal of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.png
Court United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Full case name United States of America v. Daniel Choi
Docket nos. 1:10-mj-00739
ProsecutionAngela S. George
Citation818 F. Supp. 2d 79
Case history
Subsequent actions Cert. denied, 566 U.S. 1022(2012)
Court membership
Judge sitting Royce C. Lamberth
United States v Choi day 1 United States v Choi day 1.jpg
United States v Choi day 1

United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79 (D.D.C. 2011), was a federal criminal case in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. In November 2010, Choi and 12 other protesters chained themselves to the White House fence in protest of the military "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy, shouting "Let us serve." All 13 were arrested and charged federally. Choi rejected a plea bargain deal, and trial commenced on August 29, 2011, before United States Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola. [1] [2] [3]  It was halted by the prosecution after three days to pursue a writ of mandamus prohibiting the defense of selective and vindictive prosecution. [4] [5] [6] After the writ was issued, Choi was convicted of a single misdemeanor charge on March 28, 2013, and fined $100. [7]

Contents

Charges

On November 15, 2010, a group of 13 gay-rights activists, including former Army Lieutenant Daniel "Dan" Choi stood on the masonry base of the White House fence and handcuffed themselves in protest of the military "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy. [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]  The policy barred openly gay, lesbian or bisexual service members from revealing their sexual orientation. The 13 were arrested and charged with "Failure to Obey a Lawful Order", a United States Park Police regulation, Title 36 C.F.R. Section 2.32(a)(2). [14] [15]

At pre-trial hearings and conferences, prosecutors offered the group a wired plea deal. [16]  In return for pleading guilty to the charge, the group would have all charges dismissed after four months of no arrests upon probable cause. Choi refused to plead guilty, but the deal was offered to the other 12. [17]

Trial

Trial commenced for Choi on August 29, 2011. Prosecutor Angela George filed a motion in limine asking the judge to prohibit the defenses of impossibility and selective prosecution. [18]  Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola ruled against this motion until the submission of all evidence at trial. [19]  Prosecution called witnesses from the United States Park Police including the arresting officer, Lieutenant Robert LaChance, who testified to the existence of Secret Service advance knowledge of the protest. [20]  Defense team led by Robert Feldman (pictured above) filed a motion to compel evidence of Secret Service emails and issued subpoena to directors of Homeland Security and the Department of the Interior. [21]  After Choi himself testified in the defense case, Judge Facciola made a prima facie finding for selective and vindictive prosecution. [22]  Prosecution petitioned for a writ of mandamus to prohibit Judge Facciola from entertaining the defense, and the trial was stayed. [23] [24] [25]

Selective prosecution

Choi asserted pre-trial that the decision to federally prosecute the group of 13 protesters was selective enforcement of the regulations, noting a rally at the White House following the death of Osama bin Laden, where none of the revelers were arrested. [26] [27]  Choi also asserted at trial that he was arrested two previous times, on March 18, 2010, and April 20, 2010, for the same conduct but charged at municipal court. During those prosecutions, all charges against Choi were dropped, without an official statement from the Washington D.C. Office of the Attorney General. [28]  Choi claimed the federal charges were a result of White House and prosecutor vindictiveness, to punish him for successfully asserting his constitutional rights to free speech. [29]  Choi pointed out that he was the only protester in history to stand federal trial for handcuffing himself to the White House fence. [30]  He claimed the wiring of the plea deal was an attempt to punish Choi although several of the others were never previously arrested. At trial, prosecution revealed an email between US Park Police detective Sgt. Timothy Hodge communicating with Department of Interior Solicitor Randolph Myers on prosecuting the group with federal charges. [31]  After evidence of White House LGBT Liaison Brian K. Bond alerting Secret Service, Homeland Security and US Park Police to the protest, three days prior, [32] two of the 12 protesters withdrew their guilty pleas in order to stand trial with Choi. Their motions were denied by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay.

Interlocutory petition for mandamus

On October 7, 2011, a mandamus hearing was held, and on October 11 a federal district court chief judge granted a writ of mandamus against a magistrate judge of the same district court, for the first time in history. [33] In his opinion, Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth expressed the rare nature of this action but granted the writ after finding the defense should have raised the selective and vindictive prosecution claim before trial. Judge Lamberth agreed with the prosecution's claim that responding to a selective prosecution claim would be too costly for the government. [34] [35]

Choi appealed this decision to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and petitioned for a writ of mandamus prohibiting Judge Lamberth's writ of mandamus. He terminated his attorneys and proceeded pro se. [36]

Re-enlistment in the military

During the course of the trial, the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy was officially repealed and Choi, discharged under the policy in July 2010, attempted to re-enlist in the U.S. Army. [37]  However, he was told by recruiters that the federal trial prevented his re-enlistment. [38]

Civil suit

Choi filed a civil suit against the United States Park Police and Secret Service for the wrongful arrest on November 14, 2011. He also filed conspiracy charges against White House officials involved in the arrest and subsequent federal charges. [39]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don't ask, don't tell</span> 1994–2011 policy on LGBT in the US military

"Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT) was the official United States policy on military service of non-heterosexual people. Instituted during the Clinton administration, the policy was issued under Department of Defense Directive 1304.26 on December 21, 1993, and was in effect from February 28, 1994, until September 20, 2011. The policy prohibited military personnel from discriminating against or harassing closeted homosexual or bisexual service members or applicants, while barring openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual persons from military service. This relaxation of legal restrictions on service by gays and lesbians in the armed forces was mandated by Public Law 103–160, which was signed November 30, 1993. The policy prohibited people who "demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts" from serving in the armed forces of the United States, because their presence "would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability".

A writ of mandamus is a judicial remedy in the English and American common law system consisting of a court order that commands a government official or entity to perform an act it is legally required to perform as part of its official duties, or to refrain from performing an act the law forbids it from doing. Writs of mandamus are usually used in situations where a government official has failed to act as legally required or has taken a legally prohibited action. They cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against the law. For example, it cannot be used to force a lower court to take a specific action on applications that have been made, but if the court refuses to rule one way or the other, then a mandamus can be used to order the court to rule on the applications.

<i>Ex parte Merryman</i> United States legal case

Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (No. 9487), was a controversial U.S. federal court case that arose out of the American Civil War. It was a test of the authority of the President to suspend "the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus" under the Constitution's Suspension Clause, when Congress was in recess and therefore unavailable to do so itself. More generally, the case raised questions about the ability of the executive branch to decline to enforce judicial decisions when the executive believes them to be erroneous and harmful to its own legal powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri</span> Alleged al-Qaeda mastermind

Abd al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Abdu al-Nashiri is a Saudi Arabian citizen alleged to be the mastermind of the bombing of USS Cole and other maritime attacks. He is alleged to have headed al-Qaeda operations in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf states prior to his capture in November 2002 by the CIA's Special Activities Division.

William Alexander White is an American neo-Nazi. He was the former leader of the American National Socialist Workers' Party, and former administrator of Overthrow.com, a now-defunct website dedicated to racist and antisemitic content.

Puerto Rico v. Branstad, 483 U.S. 219 (1987), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that ruled unanimously that federal courts have the power to enforce extraditions based on the Extradition Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution. The decision overruled a 1861 decision in Kentucky v. Dennison, which had made federal courts powerless to order governors of other U.S. states to fulfill their obligations in the Extradition Clause.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sholom Rubashkin</span> Former executive officer of Agriprocessors

Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin is the former CEO of Agriprocessors, a now-bankrupt kosher slaughterhouse and meat packing plant in Postville, Iowa, formerly owned by his father, Aaron Rubashkin. During his time as CEO of the plant, Agriprocessors grew into one of the nation's largest kosher meat producers, but was also cited for issues involving animal cruelty, food safety, environmental safety, child labor, and hiring undocumented immigrants.

Fong Foo v. United States, 369 U.S. 141 (1962), was a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the protection from double jeopardy by the federal government. While the protection from double jeopardy did not get incorporated to apply to the state governments until 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution prevented the Federal Government from bringing a defendant to trial twice for the same charge. In this case, the court ruled that despite the error of the District Judge, the 5th Amendment protected the defendants from facing a second trial for the same charge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Gleeson (judge)</span> American judge (born 1953)

John Gleeson is an American attorney who served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He is a member of the United States Sentencing Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emmet G. Sullivan</span> American judge (born 1947)

Emmet Gael Sullivan is an American attorney and jurist serving as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward F. Harrington</span> American judge (born 1933)

Edward Francis Harrington is an American lawyer who serves as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

<i>Log Cabin Republicans v. United States</i> Federal lawsuit

Log Cabin Republicans v. United States, 658 F.3d 1162 was a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. § 654, commonly known as don't ask, don't tell (DADT), which, prior to its repeal, excluded homosexuals from openly serving in the United States military. The Log Cabin Republicans (LCR), an organization composed of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Republicans, brought the suit on behalf of LCR members who serve or served in the military and were subject to DADT.

GetEQUAL was, from 2010 to 2018, an American non-profit organization and advocacy group which advocates for LGBTQ social and political equality through confrontational but non-violent direct action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dan Choi</span> American LGBT activist (born 1981)

Dan Choi is an American former infantry officer in the United States Army who served in combat in the Iraq War during 2006–2007. He became an LGBT rights activist following his coming out on The Rachel Maddow Show in March 2009 and publicly challenged America's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, which forbade lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) service members from serving openly.

Mohamed Alanssi is a Yemeni national who has worked as an informant for the FBI in over 20 terrorism-related federal prosecutions, starting in November 2001. Alanssi set himself on fire in front of the White House on November 15, 2004. A note he wrote to his FBI handler at the time said he had to travel to Yemen to see his sick wife before he testified in a major terrorism prosecution in 2005. Alanssi was the sole informant in that case, which involved various counts of material support of terrorism against Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad and his assistant. At the trial, Alanssi was not called by the prosecution, but appeared as a hostile witness for Al-Moayad's defense.

Mohamad Anas Haitham Soueid is a Syrian-born naturalized United States citizen and a resident of Leesburg, Virginia who was indicted on espionage-related charges by federal prosecutors in October 2011. Soueid, 47 years old, is accused of passing information about Syrian American protesters in the United States to the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who are thought to have arrested and tortured numerous Syrian political refugees' family members and associates living in Syria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal law in the Taney Court</span> Aspect of U.S. judicial history (1836–1864)

The Taney Court heard thirty criminal law cases, approximately one per year. Notable cases include Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842), United States v. Rogers (1846), Ableman v. Booth (1858), Ex parte Vallandigham (1861), and United States v. Jackalow (1862).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carmen Ortiz</span> American attorney and college instructor

Carmen Milagros Ortiz is an attorney, college instructor, and former United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Killing of Freddie Gray</span> Death in custody of Baltimore Police

On April 12, 2015, Freddie Carlos Gray Jr., a 25-year-old African American, was arrested by the Baltimore Police Department for possession of a knife. While in police custody, Gray sustained fatal injuries and was taken to the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center. Gray's death on April 19, 2015, was ascribed to injuries to his cervical spinal cord.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neomi Rao</span> American federal judge (born 1973)

Neomi Jehangir Rao is an American jurist and legal scholar serving since 2019 as a U.S. circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was appointed by President Donald Trump, having served in the Trump Administration from 2017 to 2019 as Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. She was previously a professor of law at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School.

References

  1. ↑ John Riley (August 29, 2011). "Choi's Trial Ends Day One, With More to Come Tuesday". Metro Weekly - Poliglot. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  2. ↑ "Federal Trial Begins for Lt. Dan Choi, Over 'DADT' Arrest at White House". Tower Road. August 30, 2011. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  3. ↑ "Dan Choi's Trial Begins". August 30, 2011. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  4. ↑ Lou Chibbaro, Jr. (September 1, 2011). "Choi trial halted after challenge to judge's ruling". Washington Blade. Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  5. ↑ Jessica Gresko (November 1, 2011). "Dan Choi Trial Over 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' White House Protest Put On Hold". Huff Post - Politics. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  6. ↑ John Riley (August 31, 2011). "Lawyers Spar Over Defense as Choi Trial Grinds to Abrupt Halt". Metro Weekly - Poliglot. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  7. ↑ Anya, Callahan. "Why Gay Military Activist Lt. Dan Choi Won't Be Paying His $100 Court Fine". Campus Progress. After more than two years of legal battles, LGBT activist Lt. Dan Choi was convicted of a misdemeanor by a federal judge and fined $100 on Thursday, March 28. Lt. Choi was tried for one count of "Failure to Obey Lawful Order" for a protesting Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) in front of the White House back in 2010. Since the judge ruled in the case, Lt. Choi has stated publicly that he will not pay the $100 fee on moral principle and free-speech grounds.
  8. ↑ Stephen C. Webster (November 15, 2010). "Protesting 'Don't Ask', gay activists arrested after chaining themselves to White House fence". The Raw Story. Raw Story Media, Inc. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  9. ↑ SDGLN Staff (November 15, 2010). "BREAKING NEWS: 13 people chain themselves to White House fence to protest DADT inaction". SDGLN.com. Hale Media, Inc. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  10. ↑ Steven Thrasher (November 15, 2010). "Dan Choi Off To The White House at 2PM: Handcuffs Needed?". The Village Voice. Village Voice, LLC. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  11. ↑ "White House protest". YouTube. Washington Blade. November 16, 2010. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  12. ↑ Steven Portnoy and Sunlen Miller (March 18, 2010). "'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Protesters Chain Themselves to White House Fence". abc News. ABC News Internet Ventures. pp. 1–2. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  13. ↑ Kevin Douglas Grant (September 20, 2011). "After Don't Ask, Don't Tell: The ongoing battle". global post. GlobalPost. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  14. ↑ "13 arrested during DADT protest". Air Force Times. Gannett Government Media Corporation. November 15, 2010. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  15. ↑ Brad Luna (November 15, 2010). "13 Arrested at White House Fence in Protest of DADT". GetEQUAL. Get Equal. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  16. ↑ Joe Sudbay (March 17, 2011). "13 DADT protesters in court tomorrow facing more serious charges than standard". gay.americablog.com. ohn Aravosis. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  17. ↑ David Badash (May 10, 2011). "Don't Ask Don't Tell: White House Fence Protestors Have Day In Court". The New Civil Rights Movement. The New Civil Rights Movement and David Badash. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  18. ↑ "Omnibus Motion In Limine – August 29th, 2011". firedoglake. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  19. ↑ "Transcript: August 29, 2011 (Morning)". firedoglake. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  20. ↑ "Emails Reveal White House Alerted Secret Service to Dan Choi, GetEqual Protests in November 2010". firedoglake. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  21. ↑ Kerry Eleveld (October 4, 2011). "The Government Cracks Down On White House Protests - But Is It Legal?". Equality Matters. Media Matters Action Network. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  22. ↑ "Transcript: August 31, 2011 (Afternoon)". firedoglake. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  23. ↑ Jessica Gresko (September 1, 2011). "Choi Trial put on Hold in DC". Military.com - News. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  24. ↑ "Dan Choi Trial Put on Hold". Advocate. Here Media Inc. September 1, 2011. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  25. ↑ Jane Hamsher (August 31, 2011). "Transcript of Dan Choi Trial, Day 3: DoJ Files Writ of Mandamus Against Judge Facciola". firedoglake. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  26. ↑ ERIC TUCKER (August 30, 2011). "Dan Choi Testifies On White House 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Protest". Huff Post - Politics. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  27. ↑ Michael K. Lavers (August 18, 2011). "Dan Choi Blasts Obama, Prepares for Trial". Edge. Boston, MA: EDGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  28. ↑ Jay Kernis (July 22, 2011). "Lt. Dan Choi on his arrest in Moscow while protesting the ban on a gay rights parade". CNN. Cable News Network. Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  29. ↑ Yusef Najafi (July 14, 2010). "Government drops all charges against Lt. Dan Choi and former Capt. James E. Pietrangelo for DADT protests". Metro Weekly. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  30. ↑ Chris Geidner (June 14, 2011). "Choi White House Protest Arrest Trial Set for Aug. 29". Metro Weekly. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  31. ↑ Jane Hamsher. "Dept. of Interior Recommended Federal Charges vs. DADT Protesters – 3 Hours Before They Demonstrated". firedoglake. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  32. ↑ Jane Hamsher (September 22, 2011). "Emails Reveal White House Alerted Secret Service to Dan Choi, GetEqual Protests in November 2010". firedoglake. Archived from the original on May 15, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  33. ↑ United States v. Choi, 818F. Supp. 2d79 (D.D.C.2011).
  34. ↑ Robert Feldman (October 11, 2011). "Choi Legal Team Responds to DoJ Petition for Writ of Mandamus". firedoglake. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  35. ↑ aguynamedwayne (September 23, 2011). "Dan Choi Trial: "Dirty Hands"". The WOW Report. World Of Wonder. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  36. ↑ Brian Sonenstein. "Choi Response to Writ of Mandamus". firedoglake. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  37. ↑ "Gay veteran Dan Choi working to re-enlist". CBSNEWS. The Associated Press. October 7, 2011. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  38. ↑ "2010-2011 Year in Review". Lt. Dan Choi. Lt. Dan Choi. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  39. ↑ "CHOI v. BOND et al". Justia.com. Justia. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.