United States v. Choi

Last updated
United States v. Choi
Seal of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.png
Court United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Full case nameUnited States of America v. Daniel Choi
Docket nos. 1:10-mj-00739
ProsecutionAngela S. George
Citation(s)818 F. Supp. 2d 79
Case history
Subsequent action(s) Cert. denied, 566 U.S. 1022(2012)
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Royce C. Lamberth
United States v Choi day 1 United States v Choi day 1.jpg
United States v Choi day 1

United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79 (D.D.C. 2011), was a federal criminal case in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. In November 2010, Choi and 12 other protesters chained themselves to the White House fence in protest of the military "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy, shouting "Let us serve." All 13 were arrested and charged federally. Choi rejected a plea bargain deal, and trial commenced on August 29, 2011, before United States Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola. [1] [2] [3]  It was halted by the prosecution after three days to pursue a writ of mandamus prohibiting the defense of selective and vindictive prosecution. [4] [5] [6] After the writ was issued, Choi was convicted of a single misdemeanor charge on March 28, 2013, and fined $100. [7]

Contents

Charges

On November 15, 2010, a group of 13 gay-rights activists, including former Army Lieutenant Daniel "Dan" Choi stood on the masonry base of the White House fence and handcuffed themselves in protest of the military "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy. [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]  The policy barred openly gay, lesbian or bisexual service members from revealing their sexual orientation. The 13 were arrested and charged with "Failure to Obey a Lawful Order", a United States Park Police regulation, Title 36 C.F.R. Section 2.32(a)(2). [14] [15]

At pre-trial hearings and conferences, prosecutors offered the group a wired plea deal. [16]  In return for pleading guilty to the charge, the group would have all charges dismissed after four months of no arrests upon probable cause. Choi refused to plead guilty, but the deal was offered to the other 12. [17]

Trial

Trial commenced for Choi on August 29, 2011. Prosecutor Angela George filed a motion in limine asking the judge to prohibit the defenses of impossibility and selective prosecution. [18]  Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola ruled against this motion until the submission of all evidence at trial. [19]  Prosecution called witnesses from the United States Park Police including the arresting officer, Lieutenant Robert LaChance, who testified to the existence of Secret Service advance knowledge of the protest. [20]  Defense team led by Robert Feldman (pictured above) filed a motion to compel evidence of Secret Service emails and issued subpoena to directors of Homeland Security and the Department of the Interior. [21]  After Choi himself testified in the defense case, Judge Facciola made a prima facie finding for selective and vindictive prosecution. [22]  Prosecution petitioned for a writ of mandamus to prohibit Judge Facciola from entertaining the defense, and the trial was stayed. [23] [24] [25]

Selective prosecution

Choi asserted pre-trial that the decision to federally prosecute the group of 13 protesters was selective enforcement of the regulations, noting a rally at the White House following the death of Osama bin Laden, where none of the revelers were arrested. [26] [27]  Choi also asserted at trial that he was arrested two previous times, on March 18, 2010, and April 20, 2010, for the same conduct but charged at municipal court. During those prosecutions, all charges against Choi were dropped, without an official statement from the Washington D.C. Office of the Attorney General. [28]  Choi claimed the federal charges were a result of White House and prosecutor vindictiveness, to punish him for successfully asserting his constitutional rights to free speech. [29]  Choi pointed out that he was the only protester in history to stand federal trial for handcuffing himself to the White House fence. [30]  He claimed the wiring of the plea deal was an attempt to punish Choi although several of the others were never previously arrested. At trial, prosecution revealed an email between US Park Police detective Sgt. Timothy Hodge communicating with Department of Interior Solicitor Randolph Myers on prosecuting the group with federal charges. [31]  After evidence of White House LGBT Liaison Brian K. Bond alerting Secret Service, Homeland Security and US Park Police to the protest, three days prior, [32] two of the 12 protesters withdrew their guilty pleas in order to stand trial with Choi. Their motions were denied by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay.

Interlocutory petition for mandamus

On October 7, 2011, a mandamus hearing was held, and on October 11 a federal district court chief judge granted a writ of mandamus against a magistrate judge of the same district court, for the first time in history. [33] In his opinion, Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth expressed the rare nature of this action but granted the writ after finding the defense should have raised the selective and vindictive prosecution claim before trial. Judge Lamberth agreed with the prosecution's claim that responding to a selective prosecution claim would be too costly for the government. [34] [35]

Choi appealed this decision to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and petitioned for a writ of mandamus prohibiting Judge Lamberth's writ of mandamus. He terminated his attorneys and proceeded pro se. [36]

Re-enlistment in the military

During the course of the trial, the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy was officially repealed and Choi, discharged under the policy in July 2010, attempted to re-enlist in the U.S. Army. [37]  However, he was told by recruiters that the federal trial prevented his re-enlistment. [38]

Civil suit

Choi filed a civil suit against the United States Park Police and Secret Service for the wrongful arrest on November 14, 2011. He also filed conspiracy charges against White House officials involved in the arrest and subsequent federal charges. [39]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don't ask, don't tell</span> Former policy on gay people serving in the US military

"Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT) was the official United States policy on military service of non-heterosexual people, instituted during the Clinton administration. The policy was issued under Department of Defense Directive 1304.26 on December 21, 1993, and was in effect from February 28, 1994, until September 20, 2011. The policy prohibited military personnel from discriminating against or harassing closeted homosexual or bisexual service members or applicants, while barring openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual persons from military service. This relaxation of legal restrictions on service by gays and lesbians in the armed forces was mandated by Public Law 103–160, which was signed November 30, 1993. The policy prohibited people who "demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts" from serving in the armed forces of the United States, because their presence "would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability".

Mandamus is a judicial remedy in the form of an order from a court to any government, subordinate court, corporation, or public authority, to do some specific act which that body is obliged under law to do, and which is in the nature of public duty, and in certain cases one of a statutory duty. It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision. For example, it cannot be used to force a lower court to take a specific action on applications that have been made, but if the court refuses to rule one way or the other then a mandamus can be used to order the court to rule on the applications.

<i>Ex parte Merryman</i> United States legal case

Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (No. 9487), is a well-known and controversial U.S. federal court case that arose out of the American Civil War. It was a test of the authority of the President to suspend "the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus" under the Constitution's Suspension Clause, when Congress was in recess and therefore unavailable to do so itself. More generally, the case raised questions about the ability of the executive branch to decline enforcement of judicial decisions when the executive believes them to be erroneous and harmful to its own legal powers.

Free speech zones are areas set aside in public places for the purpose of political protesting. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The existence of free speech zones is based on U.S. court decisions stipulating that the government may reasonably regulate the time, place, and manner – but not content – of expression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri</span> Alleged al-Qaeda mastermind

Abd al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Abdu al-Nashiri is a Saudi Arabian citizen alleged to be the mastermind of the bombing of USS Cole and other maritime attacks. He is alleged to have headed al-Qaeda operations in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf states prior to his capture in November 2002 by the CIA's Special Activities Division.

Beth Ann Wilkinson is an American lawyer based in Washington, D.C. She is a founding partner of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz, a specialty trial and litigation law firm. Formerly, she was a partner in the Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison law firm, where she worked in their Washington, D.C. office focusing on white collar criminal defense. Wilkinson began her legal career as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General's Corps, and she has also served as an Assistant United States Attorney in New York City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sholom Rubashkin</span> Former executive officer of Agriprocessors

Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin is a convicted felon and the former CEO of Agriprocessors, a now-bankrupt kosher slaughterhouse and meat packing plant in Postville, Iowa, formerly owned by his father, Aaron Rubashkin. During his time as CEO of the plant, Agriprocessors grew into one of the nation's largest kosher meat producers, but was also cited for issues involving animal cruelty, food safety, environmental safety, child labor, and hiring undocumented immigrants.

Fong Foo v. United States, 369 U.S. 141 (1962), was a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the protection from double jeopardy by the federal government. While the protection from double jeopardy did not get incorporated to apply to the state governments until 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution prevented the Federal Government from bringing a defendant to trial twice for the same charge. In this case, the court ruled that despite the error of the District Judge, the 5th Amendment protected the defendants from facing a second trial for the same charge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Gleeson (judge)</span> American judge

John Gleeson is an American attorney and judge who served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He is a member of the United States Sentencing Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emmet G. Sullivan</span> American judge (born 1947)

Emmet Gael Sullivan is an American attorney and jurist serving as a Senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

<i>Log Cabin Republicans v. United States</i> Federal lawsuit

Log Cabin Republicans v. United States, 658 F.3d 1162 was a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. § 654, commonly known as don't ask, don't tell (DADT), which, prior to its repeal, excluded homosexuals from openly serving in the United States military. The Log Cabin Republicans (LCR), an organization composed of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Republicans, brought the suit on behalf of LCR members who serve or served in the military and were subject to DADT.

GetEQUAL was, from 2010 to 2018, an American non-profit organization and advocacy group which advocates for LGBT social and political equality through confrontational but non-violent direct action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habeas Corpus Suspension Act (1863)</span> American Law during the Civil War

The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act, 12 Stat. 755 (1863), entitled An Act relating to Habeas Corpus, and regulating Judicial Proceedings in Certain Cases, was an Act of Congress that authorized the president of the United States to suspend the right of habeas corpus in response to the American Civil War and provided for the release of political prisoners. It began in the House of Representatives as an indemnity bill, introduced on December 5, 1862, releasing the president and his subordinates from any liability for having suspended habeas corpus without congressional approval. The Senate amended the House's bill, and the compromise reported out of the conference committee altered it to qualify the indemnity and to suspend habeas corpus on Congress's own authority. Abraham Lincoln signed the bill into law on March 3, 1863, and suspended habeas corpus under the authority it granted him six months later. The suspension was partially lifted with the issuance of Proclamation 148 by Andrew Johnson, and the Act became inoperative with the end of the Civil War. The exceptions to his Proclamation 148 were the States of Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas, the District of Columbia, and the Territories of New Mexico and Arizona.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dan Choi</span> American LGBT activist (born 1981)

Dan Choi is an American former infantry officer in the United States Army who served in combat in the Iraq War during 2006–2007. He became an LGBT rights activist following his coming out on The Rachel Maddow Show in March 2009 and publicly challenged America's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, which forbade lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) service members from serving openly.

Mohamad Anas Haitham Soueid is a Syrian-born naturalized United States citizen and a resident of Leesburg, Virginia who was indicted on espionage-related charges by federal prosecutors in October 2011. Soueid, 47 years old, is accused of passing information about Syrian American protesters in the United States to the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who are thought to have arrested and tortured numerous Syrian political refugees' family members and associates living in Syria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miriam Ben-Shalom</span>

Miriam Ben-Shalom is an American educator, activist and former Staff Sergeant in the United States Army. After being discharged from the military for homosexuality in 1976, she successfully challenged her discharge in court and returned to military service in 1987—the first openly gay person to be reinstated after being discharged under the military's policy excluding homosexuals from military service. She served until 1990 when the Army succeeded in terminating her service after prolonged judicial proceedings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal law in the Taney Court</span>

The Taney Court heard thirty criminal law cases, approximately one per year. Notable cases include Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842), United States v. Rogers (1846), Ableman v. Booth (1858), Ex parte Vallandigham (1861), and United States v. Jackalow (1862).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carmen Ortiz</span> US Attorney

Carmen Milagros Ortiz is an attorney, college instructor, and former United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Killing of Freddie Gray</span> 2015 death of a man in the custody of Baltimore Police

On April 12, 2015, Freddie Carlos Gray Jr., a 25-year-old African American, was arrested by the Baltimore Police Department over his legal possession of a knife. While being transported in a police van, Gray sustained injuries and was taken to the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center. Gray died on April 19, 2015; his death was ascribed to injuries to his spinal cord.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christopher Paul Hasson</span> US Coast Guard officer and white nationalist (born c. 1969)

Christopher Paul Hasson is a former United States Coast Guard lieutenant and self-described white nationalist who pleaded guilty to federal gun and drug crimes in 2019, and the following year was sentenced to more than 13 years in prison. Although not charged with a terrorism offense, prosecutors called Hasson a "domestic terrorist" and accused him of plotting the targeted assassinations of high-profile American politicians, media figures, and others, as well as indiscriminate terror attacks against what Hasson called "leftists in general."

References

  1. ↑ John Riley (29 August 2011). "Choi's Trial Ends Day One, With More to Come Tuesday". Metro Weekly - Poliglot. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  2. ↑ "Federal Trial Begins for Lt. Dan Choi, Over 'DADT' Arrest at White House". Tower Road. 30 August 2011. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  3. ↑ "Dan Choi's Trial Begins". 30 August 2011. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  4. ↑ Lou Chibbaro, Jr. (1 September 2011). "Choi trial halted after challenge to judge's ruling". Washington Blade. Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  5. ↑ Jessica Gresko (1 November 2011). "Dan Choi Trial Over 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' White House Protest Put On Hold". Huff Post - Politics. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  6. ↑ John Riley (31 August 2011). "Lawyers Spar Over Defense as Choi Trial Grinds to Abrupt Halt". Metro Weekly - Poliglot. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  7. ↑ Anya, Callahan. "Why Gay Military Activist Lt. Dan Choi Won't Be Paying His $100 Court Fine". Campus Progress. After more than two years of legal battles, LGBT activist Lt. Dan Choi was convicted of a misdemeanor by a federal judge and fined $100 on Thursday, March 28. Lt. Choi was tried for one count of "Failure to Obey Lawful Order" for a protesting Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) in front of the White House back in 2010. Since the judge ruled in the case, Lt. Choi has stated publicly that he will not pay the $100 fee on moral principle and free-speech grounds.
  8. ↑ Stephen C. Webster (15 November 2010). "Protesting 'Don't Ask', gay activists arrested after chaining themselves to White House fence". The Raw Story. Raw Story Media, Inc. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  9. ↑ SDGLN Staff (15 November 2010). "BREAKING NEWS: 13 people chain themselves to White House fence to protest DADT inaction". SDGLN.com. Hale Media, Inc. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  10. ↑ Steven Thrasher (15 November 2010). "Dan Choi Off To The White House at 2PM: Handcuffs Needed?". The Village Voice. Village Voice, LLC. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  11. ↑ "White House protest". YouTube. Washington Blade. 16 November 2010. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  12. ↑ Steven Portnoy and Sunlen Miller (18 March 2010). "'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Protesters Chain Themselves to White House Fence". abc News. ABC News Internet Ventures. pp. 1–2. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  13. ↑ Kevin Douglas Grant (20 September 2011). "After Don't Ask, Don't Tell: The ongoing battle". global post. GlobalPost. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  14. ↑ "13 arrested during DADT protest". Air Force Times. Gannett Government Media Corporation. 15 November 2010. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  15. ↑ Brad Luna (15 November 2010). "13 Arrested at White House Fence in Protest of DADT". GetEQUAL. Get Equal. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  16. ↑ Joe Sudbay (17 March 2011). "13 DADT protesters in court tomorrow facing more serious charges than standard". gay.americablog.com. ohn Aravosis. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  17. ↑ David Badash (10 May 2011). "Don't Ask Don't Tell: White House Fence Protestors Have Day In Court". The New Civil Rights Movement. The New Civil Rights Movement and David Badash. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  18. ↑ "Omnibus Motion In Limine – August 29th, 2011". firedoglake. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  19. ↑ "Transcript: August 29, 2011 (Morning)". firedoglake. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  20. ↑ "Emails Reveal White House Alerted Secret Service to Dan Choi, GetEqual Protests in November 2010". firedoglake. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  21. ↑ Kerry Eleveld (4 October 2011). "The Government Cracks Down On White House Protests - But Is It Legal?". Equality Matters. Media Matters Action Network. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  22. ↑ "Transcript: August 31, 2011 (Afternoon)". firedoglake. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  23. ↑ Jessica Gresko (1 September 2011). "Choi Trial put on Hold in DC". Military.com - News. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  24. ↑ Advocate.com Editors (1 September 2011). "Dan Choi Trial Put on Hold". Advocate. Here Media Inc. Retrieved 6 February 2012.{{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  25. ↑ Jane Hamsher (31 August 2011). "Transcript of Dan Choi Trial, Day 3: DoJ Files Writ of Mandamus Against Judge Facciola". firedoglake. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  26. ↑ ERIC TUCKER (30 August 2011). "Dan Choi Testifies On White House 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Protest". Huff Post - Politics. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  27. ↑ Michael K. Lavers (18 August 2011). "Dan Choi Blasts Obama, Prepares for Trial". Edge. Boston, MA: EDGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  28. ↑ Jay Kernis (22 July 2011). "Lt. Dan Choi on his arrest in Moscow while protesting the ban on a gay rights parade". CNN. Cable News Network. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  29. ↑ Yusef Najafi (14 July 2010). "Government drops all charges against Lt. Dan Choi and former Capt. James E. Pietrangelo for DADT protests". Metro Weekly. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  30. ↑ Chris Geidner (14 June 2011). "Choi White House Protest Arrest Trial Set for Aug. 29". Metro Weekly. Jansi, LLC. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  31. ↑ Jane Hamsher. "Dept. of Interior Recommended Federal Charges vs. DADT Protesters – 3 Hours Before They Demonstrated". firedoglake. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  32. ↑ Jane Hamsher (22 September 2011). "Emails Reveal White House Alerted Secret Service to Dan Choi, GetEqual Protests in November 2010". firedoglake. Archived from the original on May 15, 2012. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  33. ↑ United States v. Choi, 818F. Supp. 2d79 (D.D.C.2011).
  34. ↑ Robert Feldman (11 October 2011). "Choi Legal Team Responds to DoJ Petition for Writ of Mandamus". firedoglake. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  35. ↑ aguynamedwayne (23 September 2011). "Dan Choi Trial: "Dirty Hands"". The WOW Report. World Of Wonder. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  36. ↑ Brian Sonenstein. "Choi Response to Writ of Mandamus". firedoglake. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  37. ↑ "Gay veteran Dan Choi working to re-enlist". CBSNEWS. The Associated Press. 7 October 2011. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  38. ↑ "2010-2011 Year in Review". Lt. Dan Choi. Lt. Dan Choi. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  39. ↑ "CHOI v. BOND et al". Justia.com. Justia. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.