Michael Billig

Last updated
Michael Billig
Born1947 (1947)
London
Nationality British
Alma mater University of Bristol
Known for rhetorical psychology
Awards Fellow of the British Academy
Scientific career
Fields Social psychology
Institutions University of Birmingham, Loughborough University
Thesis Social categorization and intergroup relations  (1972)
Doctoral advisor Henri Tajfel

Michael Billig (born 1947) is a British academic. He is Emeritus Professor of Social Sciences at Loughborough University, working principally in contemporary social psychology although much of his work crosses disciplinary boundaries in the social sciences.

Contents

Early life and education

Billig was born in 1947 to a Jewish family from London and he went to the University of Bristol to study Philosophy and Psychology. While at Bristol he was taught by Professor Henri Tajfel, a renowned social psychologist, who was to have an enduring and profound influence on Billig. [1] After Billig obtained his undergraduate degree in 1968, he was encouraged by Tajfel to stay at Bristol and work as Tajfel's research assistant in an experimental project on intergroup relations. [2] Billig also registered for a doctoral degree under Tajfel's supervision, and he obtained his doctorate from Bristol University in 1972.

Career

As Tajfel's research assistant, Billig's task was to help design, conduct and analyse the first so-called minimal group experiments which examined how people will favour members of their own group and discriminate against members of an outgroup, even when these groups were deliberately artificial and meaningless. These experiments were to become foundational to the approach of social identity theory. In 1973 Billig was appointed to a lectureship in psychology at the University of Birmingham. Even before he left Bristol, he was moving away from experimental work to considering issues of power, political extremism and ideology. He wrote a series of important books exploring these topics.

His Social Psychology and Intergroup Relations (1976) offered a critique of orthodox approaches to the study prejudice in psychology and criticised approaches that concentrated on individuals and neglected group contexts. Billig became interested in studying the far-right and realised that an experimental approach would be inappropriate. Fascists (1978) revealed the classic fascist and antisemitic ideology underlying the UK's National Front at a time when it was bidding for political legitimacy and electoral success. Billig also wrote a pamphlet, Psychology, Racism and Fascism (1979), published by the anti-fascist Searchlight magazine. In this pamphlet he exposed links between far-right groups and some psychologists who were seeking to prove that there were biological differences between the intellectual capacities of different so-called 'races'. The pamphlet was extended into a full-length book, L'Internationale Raciste (1981), which also looked at European links between psychology and the extreme-right . L'Internationale Raciste was published in French and German, but not in English.

In the 1980s Billig's focus shifted to everyday thinking and the relationship between ideology and common sense (Ideology and Social Psychology, 1982). This strand of work became more pronounced after he moved to Loughborough University in 1985 to become professor of Social Science in the multidisciplinary department of Social Sciences. He became interested in highlighting and reinvigorating the use of classical rhetoric to explore thinking in the context of social issues. For example, he suggests that attitudes are best understood not as individual positions on topics, but as rhetorical stances in argumentative contexts. This perspective was introduced in his book Arguing and Thinking (1987; 2nd Edition, 1996).

Ideological Dilemmas (1988), which was collectively written with his Loughborough colleagues, Condor, Edwards, Gane, Middleton and Radley, argued that if you look closely at the ways people justify and criticise, it is possible to see how common sense and everyday thinking are not marked by consistency as many social psychologists suppose. At Loughborough he was a founding member of the influential Discourse and Rhetoric Group, which included figures such as Derek Edwards and Jonathan Potter. The group, which stressed that psychologists should examine in detail the way language is used, was central to the creation of discursive psychology.

One feature of Billig's work is the variety of topics that he has worked on. [3] For example, he studied views about the British royalty in Talking of the Royal Family (1998, 2nd Edition). Banal Nationalism , probably Billig's most well known, and certainly his most cited book, threw new light on the topic of nationalism, by examining the small and largely unnoticed details of the ways that nation-states are routinely reproduced. [4] His Freudian Repression (1999) reinterpreted psychoanalytic theory in terms of conversation, while Laughter and Ridicule (2005) suggested that humour, in the form of ridicule, had an important, disciplinary function in society. The Politics and Rhetoric of Political Celebration, written in collaboration with Cristina Marinho, examined the language used in the Portuguese parliament.

Billig's work often has a historical and cultural dimension. The Hidden Roots of Critical Psychology (2008) sought to expand conventional histories of psychology by arguing that in the eighteenth century the Third Earl of Shaftesbury and Thomas Reid formulated ideas about the mind that today are being proposed by critical psychologists. Rock'n'Roll Jews (2000) focused on the crucial, creative contribution of Jews in the early years of rock'n'roll. According to Billig, the specifically Jewish dimension is often overlooked by those studying the history of rock music. [5]

More recently, Billig has been critically examining the ways that social scientists write. Learn to Write Badly (2013) criticised social scientists for using too much jargon. Billig argued that, when it comes to describing human actions, heavy technical nouns are, in fact, often less precise than ordinary language. He developed these themes in More Examples, Less Theory (2019), which claims that psychologists and other social scientists today accord theory too much importance. Billig suggests that researchers should try to examine real-life examples directly, rather than through the oversimplifying lens of theory. [6] In this book, Billig proposed Marie Jahoda as the example that psychologists today should try to follow on account of her clear writing, social commitment, scepticism of theory and use of well-chosen examples.

Billig retired in 2017 and was appointed emeritus professor at Loughborough University.

Awards

Personal life

His aunt was the doctor Hannah Billig, MBE.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

Critical psychology is a perspective on psychology that draws extensively on critical theory. Critical psychology challenges the assumptions, theories and methods of mainstream psychology and attempts to apply psychological understandings in different ways, often looking towards social change as a means of preventing and treating psychopathology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric</span> Art of persuasion

Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, which along with grammar and logic, is one of the three ancient arts of discourse. Rhetoric aims to study the techniques writers or speakers use to inform, persuade, or motivate their audiences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prejudice</span> Attitudes based on preconceived categories

Prejudice can be an affective feeling towards a person based on their perceived group membership. The word is often used to refer to a preconceived evaluation or classification of another person based on that person's perceived personal characteristics, such as political affiliation, sex, gender, gender identity, beliefs, values, social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race, ethnicity, language, nationality, culture, complexion, beauty, height, body weight, occupation, wealth, education, criminality, sport-team affiliation, music tastes or other perceived characteristics.

A granfalloon, in the fictional religion of Bokononism, is defined as a "false karass". That is, it is a group of people who affect a shared identity or purpose, but whose mutual association is meaningless.

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is an interdisciplinary approach to the study of discourse that views language as a form of social practice. CDA combines critique of discourse and explanation of how it figures within and contributes to the existing social reality, as a basis for action to change that existing reality in particular respects. Scholars working in the tradition of CDA generally argue that (non-linguistic) social practice and linguistic practice constitute one another and focus on investigating how societal power relations are established and reinforced through language use. In this sense, it differs from discourse analysis in that it highlights issues of power asymmetries, manipulation, exploitation, and structural inequities in domains such as education, media, and politics.

Discursive psychology (DP) is a form of discourse analysis that focuses on psychological themes in talk, text, and images.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Potter</span>

Jonathan Potter is Dean of the School of Communication and Information at Rutgers University and one of the originators of discursive psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genre studies</span> Branch of general critical theory

Genre studies is an academic subject which studies genre theory as a branch of general critical theory in several different fields, including art, literature, linguistics, rhetoric and composition studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">In-group and out-group</span> Sociological notions

In sociology and social psychology, an in-group is a social group to which a person psychologically identifies as being a member. By contrast, an out-group is a social group with which an individual does not identify. People may for example identify with their peer group, family, community, sports team, political party, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or nation. It has been found that the psychological membership of social groups and categories is associated with a wide variety of phenomena.

Rhetoric of science is a body of scholarly literature exploring the notion that the practice of science is a rhetorical activity. It emerged after a number of similarly-oriented topics of research and discussion during the late 20th century, including the sociology of scientific knowledge, history of science, and philosophy of science, but it is practiced most typically by rhetoricians in academic departments of English, speech, and communication.

Cognitive rhetoric refers to an approach to rhetoric, composition, and pedagogy as well as a method for language and literary studies drawing from, or contributing to, cognitive science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henri Tajfel</span> Polish-born British psychologist (1919–1982)

Henri Tajfel was a Polish social psychologist, best known for his pioneering work on the cognitive aspects of prejudice and social identity theory, as well as being one of the founders of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banal nationalism</span> Everyday representations of a nation that build a sense of shared national belonging

Banal nationalism refers to everyday representations of a nation, which build a sense of shared national identity.

Social identity is the portion of an individual's self-concept derived from perceived membership in a relevant social group.

Societal psychology is a development within social psychology which emphasizes the all-embracing force of the social, institutional, and cultural environments, and with it the study of social phenomena in their own right as they affect, and are affected by, the members of the particular society. The term societal psychology was coined by Hilde Himmelweit and George Gaskell in 1990, in preference to sociological social psychology, to avoid a single alliance to one other discipline.

Stephen David Reicher is Bishop Wardlaw Professor of Social Psychology at the University of St Andrews.

Genre criticism, a method within rhetorical criticism, analyzes texts in terms of their genre: the set of generic expectations, conventions, and constraints that guide their production and interpretation. In rhetoric, the theory of genre provides a means to classify and compare artifacts in terms of their formal, substantive and contextual features. By grouping artifacts with others which have similar formal features or rhetorical exigencies, rhetorical critics can shed light on how authors use or flout conventions for their own purposes. Genre criticism has thus become one of the main methodologies within rhetorical criticism.

Self-categorization theory is a theory in social psychology that describes the circumstances under which a person will perceive collections of people as a group, as well as the consequences of perceiving people in group terms. Although the theory is often introduced as an explanation of psychological group formation, it is more accurately thought of as general analysis of the functioning of categorization processes in social perception and interaction that speaks to issues of individual identity as much as group phenomena. It was developed by John Turner and colleagues, and along with social identity theory it is a constituent part of the social identity approach. It was in part developed to address questions that arose in response to social identity theory about the mechanistic underpinnings of social identification.

Rhetoric of therapy is a concept coined by American academic Dana L. Cloud to describe "a set of political and cultural discourses that have adopted psychotherapy's lexicon—the conservative language of healing, coping, adaptation, and restoration of previously existing order—but in contexts of social and political conflict".

Fathali M. Moghaddam is an Iranian-born psychologist, author, professor of psychology at Georgetown University and director of the Interdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science (ICOS), Department of Government, Georgetown University.

References

  1. ↑ For an account of Tajfel's influence, see Billig, M. (1996). Remembering the background of Social Identity Theory. In Social Groups and Identities, ed. P. Robinson. London: Butterworth-Heinemann. See also, chapter 7, Billig, M. (2019), More Examples, Less Theory.
  2. ↑ Haste, Helen (1994). "The thinker as arguer: An interview with Michael Billig". New Ideas in Psychology. 12 (2): 172. doi:10.1016/0732-118X(94)90106-6.
  3. ↑ For more details of this variety, see C. Antaki and S. Condor (eds), Rhetoric, Ideology and Social Psychology: essays in honour of Michael Billig (2014, London: Routledge). The philosopher David Edmonds has described Billig as a "social scientist polymath" who has "written on a dizzying array of topics" https://www.thejc.com/culture/features/from-rock-stars-to-group-dynamics-1.497261
  4. ↑ Banal Nationalism has been described as 'the fourth most cited work on nationalism ever published', (Michael Skey and Marco Antonsich, Everyday Nationhood 2017, London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 1).
  5. ↑ Rock'n'Roll Jews was shortlisted for the Wingate Non-Fiction Prize in 2001.
  6. ↑ For a critical discussion of the influence of theory, see, for instance, Michael Marinetto, 'Why are journals so obsessed by theory? Times Higher Education, 2020, April 29.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.