Montana inferior courts

Last updated

Inferior courts in Montana, also known as courts of limited jurisdiction, refer to those courts of law, established by the Constitution of Montana or authorized by law, with limited jurisdictions. These courts consist of City Courts, Justice Courts, and Municipal Courts. Inferior courts may be courts of record (in that a transcript of all proceedings is made), or they may not. Appeals from inferior courts are made to Montana District Courts.

Contents

Constitutional authority

Montana has had two constitutions in its history, both of which have authorized inferior courts.

The constitution of 1889 explicitly authorized the creation of justice courts (and justices of the peace), [1] police courts (and police magistrates), and municipal courts. [2] None of these courts were courts of record. [3] Justices of the peace were to be elected, [4] but the constitution left it up to the legislature to decide how police magistrates and municipal court judges were to be named. [2] All three courts had very limited jurisdiction. [5] [6] The 1889 constitution also restricted the creation of inferior courts only to state-incorporated cities or towns. [7]

Montana voters approved a new state constitution in 1972. Article VII, Section 1 of this constitution authorized the state legislature to create Justice Courts as well as whatever other inferior courts it deemed necessary. Section 5 specifically required there to be at least one Justice Court and Justice of the Peace in each county, and for justices of the peace to be elected. It also authorized the legislature to give Justice Courts whatever jurisdiction the legislature deemed fit, although the constitution barred Justice Courts from hearing any felony cases except during preliminary hearings. Section 9 allowed the legislature to define the method of selection for non-justice inferior courts, and to establish the qualifications for office for all inferior courts. Section 10 barred any inferior court judge from running for elective office (other than another judicial position), while Section 11 provided for a new statewide Judicial Standards Committee to hear cases of misconduct and recommend sanctions (up to and including removal from the bench) to the Montana Supreme Court. [8]

Trial in all inferior courts may be by judge or by jury, at the discretion of the criminal or civil defendant. [9]

Justice Court

Justice Courts, also known as Justice of the Peace Courts, have jurisdiction over civil suits involving less than $5,000, misdemeanors, misdemeanor charges of driving under the influence, traffic violations, fish and game violations, protective orders, and preliminary hearings. They also act as a small claims court, hearing small claims involving less than $3,000. They generally do not handle cases involving minors, except for cases involving possession of alcohol or tobacco, gambling, fish and game violations, and traffic offenses. Their process covers the county in which they are located. When there is no city or municipal court in a county, the justice court hears cases involving both city and county city ordinances. There is no qualification to be a justice of the peace. The office is elected, and vacancies are filled by the commissioners of the county in which the court is located. [10]

There are 62 justice courts in Montana. Each county has the right to determine if its justice court will be a court of record. Only three counties have done so: Cascade County, Flathead County, and Lewis and Clark County. Both Cascade and Flathead county have two justices of the peace, due to the heavy workload in those counties. [10]

Justice Court Judges, under MCA 46-5-220, can sign Search Warrants. [11]

City Court

City Courts generally have the same jurisdiction as Justice Courts, but their jurisdiction extends only to the enforcement of city ordinances. Their process covers the city in which they are located. There is no qualification for office. Each city determines whether the city court judge will be appointed or elected. [10]

There are 81 city courts in Montana. None of them are courts of record. [10]

Similar to Justice Court Judges, City Court Judges can also sign Search Warrants, as per MCA 46-5-220. [12]

Municipal Court

Municipal Courts generally have the same jurisdiction as Justice Courts, but with some important differences. Their jurisdiction does not extend to the enforcement of city ordinances, and they can hear civil suits involving up to $7,000. Unlike Justice or City Courts, Municipal Courts may issue arrest warrants for felony crimes. Their process covers the city in which they are located. Municipal Court judges must be lawyers, and must be elected to office. [10]

There are just five Municipal Courts in Montana, and all of them are courts of record. [10]

Like with City Court Judges and Justice Court Judges, Municipal Court Judges can sign Search Warrants, under the provisions of MCA 46-5-220. [13]

Appealing the decision of an inferior court

Except as otherwise provided for by law, Montana District Courts act as appellate courts for inferior courts, and must hear cases de novo (as if no evidence or testimony had been heard). [14] [15] Justices of the Peace Courts are not "courts of record", which is why District Courts must try "the matter anew, the same as if it had not been heard before and as if no decision had been previously rendered." [16] Appeals from City Courts [17] and Municipal Courts [18] which are defined as "courts of record" are the two exceptions, and such appeals are limited to a review of the record and questions of law. [19]

Drug courts

Drug courts are not actual courts, but rather a separate docket used by some inferior courts. The docket provides specialized attention to misdemeanors, child abuse and child neglect cases, and juvenile cases which involve individuals addicted to drugs or alcohol. Drug courts provide treatment as well as sanctions, with the goal of treating addiction, reducing recidivism, and improving rehabilitation. Drug courts rely heavily on drug and alcohol addiction treatment programs; frequent, mandatory drug testing; reduced sentencing and other incentives to encourage the individual to stay in treatment; and much more regular, much more frequent judicial oversight. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Article Three of the United States Constitution</span> Portion of the US Constitution regarding the judicial branch

Article Three of the United States Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the U.S. federal government. Under Article Three, the judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court of the United States, as well as lower courts created by Congress. Article Three empowers the courts to handle cases or controversies arising under federal law, as well as other enumerated areas. Article Three also defines treason.

In the United States, a state court has jurisdiction over disputes with some connection to a U.S. state. State courts handle the vast majority of civil and criminal cases in the United States; the United States federal courts are far smaller in terms of both personnel and caseload, and handle different types of cases. States often provide their trial courts with general jurisdiction and state trial courts regularly have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and their subject-matter jurisdiction arises only under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal government of the United States</span> National government of the United States

The federal government of the United States is the national government of the United States, a federal republic located primarily in North America, composed of 50 states, five major self-governing territories, several island possessions, and the federal district and national capital of Washington, D.C., where most of the federal government is based.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justice of the peace</span> Judicial officer elected or appointed to keep the peace and perform minor civic jobs

A justice of the peace (JP) is a judicial officer of a lower court, elected or appointed by means of a commission to keep the peace. In past centuries the term commissioner of the peace was often used with the same meaning. Depending on the jurisdiction, such justices dispense summary justice or merely deal with local administrative applications in common law jurisdictions. Justices of the peace are appointed or elected from the citizens of the jurisdiction in which they serve, and are usually not required to have any formal legal education in order to qualify for the office. Some jurisdictions have varying forms of training for JPs.

In common law systems, a superior court is a court of general jurisdiction over civil and criminal legal cases. A superior court is "superior" in relation to a court with limited jurisdiction, which is restricted to civil cases involving monetary amounts with a specific limit, or criminal cases involving offenses of a less serious nature. A superior court may hear appeals from lower courts. For courts of general jurisdiction in civil law system, see ordinary court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States District Court for the District of Montana</span> United States federal district court of Montana

The United States District Court for the District of Montana is the United States District Court whose jurisdiction is the state of Montana. The court is located in Billings, Butte, Great Falls, Helena and Missoula.

The structure of the judiciary of Texas is laid out in Article 5 of the Constitution of Texas and is further defined by statute, in particular the Texas Government Code and Texas Probate Code. The structure is complex, featuring many layers of courts, numerous instances of overlapping jurisdiction, several differences between counties, as well as an unusual bifurcated appellate system at the top level found in only one other state: Oklahoma. Municipal Courts are the most active courts, with County Courts and District Courts handling most other cases and often sharing the same courthouse.

The Superior Court is the state court in the U.S. state of New Jersey, with statewide trial and appellate jurisdiction. The New Jersey Constitution of 1947 establishes the power of the New Jersey courts. Under the State Constitution, "'judicial power shall be vested in a Supreme Court, a Superior Court, County Courts and inferior courts of limited jurisdiction.'" The Superior Court has three divisions: the Appellate Division is essentially an intermediate appellate court while the Law and Chancery Divisions function as trial courts. The State Constitution renders the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division the intermediate appellate court, and "[a]ppeals may be taken to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court from the law and chancery divisions of the Superior Court and in such other causes as may be provided by law." Each division is in turn divided into various parts. "The trial divisions of the Superior Court are the principal trial courts of New Jersey. They are located within the State's various judicial geographic units, called 'vicinages,' R. 1:33-2(a), and are organized into two basic divisions: the Chancery Division and the Law Division".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government of Oklahoma</span> Government of the U.S. state of Oklahoma

The government of the U.S. State of Oklahoma, established by the Oklahoma Constitution, is a republican democracy modeled after the federal government of the United States. The state government has three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. Through a system of separation of powers or "checks and balances," each of these branches has some authority to act on its own, some authority to regulate the other two branches, and has some of its own authority, in turn, regulated by the other branches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louisiana Supreme Court</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Louisiana

The Supreme Court of Louisiana is the highest court and court of last resort in the U.S. state of Louisiana. The modern Supreme Court, composed of seven justices, meets in the French Quarter of New Orleans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montana Supreme Court</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Montana

The Montana Supreme Court is the highest court of the state court system in the U.S. state of Montana. It is established and its powers defined by Article VII of the 1972 Montana Constitution. It is primarily an appellate court which reviews civil and criminal decisions of Montana's trial courts of general jurisdiction and certain specialized legislative courts, only having original jurisdiction in a limited number of actions. The court's Chief Justice and six Associate Justices are elected by non-partisan, popular elections. The Montana Supreme Court meets in the Joseph P. Mazurek Building in Helena, Montana, the state's capital, an international style building completed in 1982 and named in the honor of former Montana Attorney General, Joseph P. Mazurek.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California superior courts</span> State trial courts with general jurisdiction

Superior courts in California are the state trial courts with general jurisdiction to hear and decide any civil or criminal action which is not specially designated to be heard in some other court or before a governmental agency. As mandated by the California Constitution, there is a superior court in each of the 58 counties in California. The superior courts also have appellate divisions which hear appeals from decisions in cases previously heard by inferior courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montana State Government</span> Government of the U.S. State of Montana

As established and defined by the Montana Constitution, the government of the State of Montana is composed of three branches, the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. The powers of initiative and referendum are reserved for the citizens of Montana.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Spain</span>

The Judiciary of Spain consists of Courts and Tribunals, composed of judges and magistrates (Justices), who have the power to administer justice in the name of the King of Spain.

United States v. More, 7 U.S. 159 (1805), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from criminal cases in the circuit courts by writs of error. Relying on the Exceptions Clause, More held that Congress's enumerated grants of appellate jurisdiction to the Court operated as an exercise of Congress's power to eliminate all other forms of appellate jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Louisiana</span>

The Judiciary of Louisiana is defined under the Constitution and law of Louisiana and is composed of the Louisiana Supreme Court, the Louisiana Circuit Courts of Appeal, the District Courts, the Justice of the Peace Courts, the Mayor's Courts, the City Courts, and the Parish Courts. The Chief Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court is the chief administrator of the judiciary, and its administration is aided by the Judiciary Commission of Louisiana, the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, and the Judicial Council of the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

The judiciary of Ohio is the branch of the government of Ohio that interprets and applies the law of Ohio, ensures equal justice under law, and provides a mechanism for dispute resolution. The court of last resort is the Ohio Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montana District Courts</span> American state trial courts in Montana

Montana District Courts are the state trial courts of general jurisdiction in the U.S. state of Montana. Montana District Courts have original jurisdiction over most civil cases, civil actions involving monetary claims against the state, criminal felony cases, naturalization proceedings, probate cases, and most writs. They may also hear certain special actions and proceedings, and oversee a narrowly-defined class of ballot issues. Montana District Courts also have limited appellate jurisdiction regarding cases that arise in Justice Courts, City Courts, and Municipal Courts as well as Judicial review of decisions by state administrative law tribunals that fall under the Montana Administrative Procedures Act.

Montana Youth Courts are courts of law in the U.S. state of Montana which have jurisdiction over any minor charged with violating any state law or city and county city ordinance, except for fish and game ordinance violations and traffic violations. Appeals from Youth Courts are made directly to the Montana Supreme Court.

BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, 581 U.S. ___, 137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Montana courts lacked personal jurisdiction over a railroad that was not incorporated in Montana and did not have its principal place of business in Montana, even though the railroad had more than 2,000 miles of track and 2,000 employees within Montana. It was the first Supreme Court case argued before a Court that included newly appointed Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.

References

  1. Constitution of the State of Montana, Article VIII, §1, §§20-23 (1889).
  2. 1 2 Constitution of the State of Montana, Article VIII, §24 (1889).
  3. Constitution of the State of Montana, Article VIII, §25 (1889).
  4. Constitution of the State of Montana, Article VIII, §20 (1889).
  5. Constitution of the State of Montana, Article VIII, §§221, 24 (1889).
  6. Elison & Snyder 2001, p. 144.
  7. Elison & Snyder 2001, p. 4.
  8. Montana Constitutional Convention (1972). Proposed 1972 Constitution for the State of Montana: Official Text With Explanation (Report). Helena, Mont. pp. 12–13. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
  9. State Bar of Montana 2010, pp. 3–4.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 State Bar of Montana 2010, p. 3.
  11. https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0460/chapter_0050/part_0020/section_0200/0460-0050-0020-0200.html
  12. https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0460/chapter_0050/part_0020/section_0200/0460-0050-0020-0200.html
  13. https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0460/chapter_0050/part_0020/section_0200/0460-0050-0020-0200.html
  14. Elison & Snyder 2001, p. 3.
  15. Montana Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 5, Part 3, §303.
  16. McDunn v. Arnold,303P.3d1279(Mont.2013).
  17. Montana Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 11, Part 1, §110.
  18. Montana Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 6, Part 1, §110.
  19. Siebken v. Voderberg,291P.3d572(Mont.2012).
  20. Office of the Court Administrator (January 22, 2013). Montana Drug Courts: An Updated Snapshot of Success and Hope (PDF) (Report). Helena, Mont.: Montana Supreme Court. p. 2. Retrieved February 26, 2017.

Bibliography