Montreal Declaration on Animal Exploitation

Last updated

The Montreal Declaration on Animal Exploitation is a manifesto published on October 4, 2022, in which more than 500 scholars and academics specialising in moral and political philosophy declare their support for the idea that an end to all forms of animal husbandry, fishing and exploitation in general is the only collective horizon that is both realistic and fair.

Contents

Context

This declaration refers both in its title and explicitly in its text to the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, released in 2012, establishing the presence in mammals, birds and many other animals of the necessary substrates for consciousness as well as the ability to exhibit intensional behaviour. This initial declaration also inspired a previous response in the field of law in 2019, the Toulon Declaration, defending the legal personality of animals. [1] For columnist and philosophy teacher Sébastien Lévesque, this statement also echoes the Animal Welfare and Safety Act, passed in 2015 by the Quebec National Assembly, stipulating that animals are not property but rather "sentient beings". [2]

This declaration is the initiative of Martin Gibert, Valéry Giroux and François Jaquet, [3] three researchers from the Groupe de Recherche en Éthique Environnementale et Animale (GRÉEA), affiliated with the Centre de Recherche en Éthique (CRÉ), in Montreal. [4] It is published on October 4, 2022 on the occasion of World Animal Day.

Content of the declaration

The signatories emphasise in the preamble that they come from different philosophical traditions and rarely agree with each other. However, they are united in their condemnation of "the practices that involve treating animals as objects or commodities" and the need to transform our relationship with other animals by ending their exploitation. They base their argument on the well-established ethological fact that most exploited animals are sentient, i.e. capable of subjectively feeling pleasant or unpleasant things. They then briefly explain the logical reasoning behind the rejection of speciesism, understood as discrimination that arbitrarily favors the interests of humans over those of other animals. [5]

In favour of closing down slaughterhouses, ending fishing and developing plant-based agriculture, the signatories lucidly admit that, even if it constitutes "the only shared horizon that is both realistic and just", such a project will require "renouncing entrenched speciesist habits and transforming numerous institutions fundamentally".

Initially announced as being signed by 400 academics [6] including some big names such as Peter Singer, Peter Unger, Renan Larue, Carol Adams and Jocelyn Maclure, [7] by the end of October the declaration had nearly 550 signatories [8] [9] from around 40 countries. [10]

Reactions

The text was published in full in national newspapers in France, [11] [12] Canada, [13] Turkey [14] and Spain. [15]

It has also been summarised and commented in many countries and received an enthusiastic response from animal rights groups. [16]

Positive reactions

Anne Crignon, a journalist with French newspaper Nouvel Obs, celebrated "the marriage of intellectual excellence and asserted stand" of signatories. [7]

Various national media outlets, [17] [18] animal rights groups [19] [20] [21] [22] and historian and lecturer of the anti-speciesist movement Jérôme Segal [23] saw this declaration as a turning point in the recognition of the philosophy's support for non-human animals. Journalist Axelle Playoust-Braure notes that this is one of the few consensuses in ethics. [24]

Brazilian online newspaper Fato Amazônico highlighted the fact that this position, once held by a few people who were particularly sensitive to the fate of animals, was for the first time supported by hundreds of researchers who had dedicated their careers to ethical reflection. [25] For philosopher Annalisa Di Mauro, it was a "snapshot of the current situation in which there is a broad consensus among scientists and professionals on an issue that is now on the agenda of our societies, of our civilisation". [26]

Criticism

On the other hand, the tribune of moral philosophers also provoked antagonistic reactions, even within their own camp. French journalist Paul Sugy, author of L'extinction de l'homme Le projet fou des antispécistes (The Extinction of Humankind, the Crazy Project of the Antispeciesists), mainly criticised the lack of neutrality of the signatories, many of whom are known to favour animal rights. [27] With a more alarmist tone, the specialised quarterly Jours de Chasse (Hunting Days) saw in this broad consensus between researchers and university professors the premise of tomorrow's political and legal decisions, notably through the transmission of knowledge to students trained by them. [28]

Confédération paysanne, a French farmers' union that defends family farming, responded in French daily Le Monde by denouncing an "anti-humanist" project and a "manichean posture" that was missing the mark of "the industrialisation of life". They defended peasant farming as a middle ground. [29]  Author and artisan farmer Dominic Lamontagne agrees with this reformist idea, arguing that certain relationships with farm animals can be mutually beneficial. [30]

On the other hand, lawyer and vegan philosopher Gary Francione deplored the fact that this consensus text did not explicitly condemn any use of animals and did not recognise their moral and legal personality. [31] On the contrary, in an interview with Paris Match , philosopher Mark Hunyadi, who signed the text, announced that despite an agreement on the aim of the text, he rejected the idea that animals could have interests that could make them legal subjects. [32] In agreement with philosopher Réjéan Bergeron, reacting to the declaration in a post in Canadian newspaper Métro, [33] he doubted the effectiveness of calling for such profound changes and opted for a more reformist strategy. In the journal Between the Species, [34] philosopher Julian Friedland argues that the language of the declaration represents an anthropomoralist projection of personhood qualities (namely, those of self-consciousness extending into the future) onto beings that are merely sentient non-persons without such capacities. He rejects for instance that fetal pain is equally morally considerable to that of a gestating person.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elme Marie Caro</span> French philosopher (1826–1887)

Elme Marie Caro was a French philosopher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean Joseph Mounier</span> French politician and judge (1758–1806)

Jean Joseph Mounier was a French politician and judge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cinema of Quebec</span>

The history of cinema in Quebec started on June 27, 1896 when the Frenchman Louis Minier inaugurated the first movie projection in North America in a Montreal theatre room. However, it would have to wait until the 1960s before a genuine Quebec cinema industry would emerge. Approximately 620 feature-length films have been produced, or partially produced by the Quebec film industry since 1943.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">André Glucksmann</span> French philosopher, activist, and writer (1937–2015)

André Glucksmann was a French philosopher, activist, and writer. He was a leading figure of the new philosophers. Glucksmann began his career as a Marxist, who went on to reject Marxism–Leninism and real socialism in the popular book La Cuisinière et le Mangeur d'Hommes (1975), and later became an anti-Communist and outspoken critic of the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russian foreign policy. He was a strong supporter of human rights. In later years, he opposed the claim that Islamic terrorism is the product of the clash of civilizations between Islam and the Western world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edgar Morin</span> French philosopher and sociologist (born 1921)

Edgar Morin is a French philosopher and sociologist of the theory of information who has been recognized for his work on complexity and "complex thought", and for his scholarly contributions to such diverse fields as media studies, politics, sociology, visual anthropology, ecology, education, and systems biology. He holds two bachelors, one in history and geography and one in law, and never did a Ph.D. Though less well known in the anglophone world due to the limited availability of English translations of his over 60 books, Morin is renowned in the French-speaking world, Europe, and Latin America.

Clément Rosset was a French philosopher and writer. He was a professor of philosophy at the University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, and the author of books on 20th-century philosophy and postmodern philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacques-André Naigeon</span> French artist, atheist–materialist philosopher, editor and man of letters

Jacques-André Naigeon was a French artist, atheist-materialist philosopher, editor and man of letters best known for his contributions to the Encyclopédie and for reworking Baron d'Holbach's and Diderot's manuscripts.

Chloé Tallot is a French contemporary artist whose medium is video, photography, drawings and installations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Third French legislative constituency for citizens abroad</span> Constituency for French residents overseas

The third constituency for French residents overseas is one of eleven constituencies representing French citizens living abroad. It was created by the 2010 redistricting of French legislative constituencies and elects, since 2012, one representative to the National Assembly.

Marcel Hénaff was a French philosopher and anthropologist. He taught at the Collège international de philosophie and the University of California, San Diego. He was the author of several books, including two about Claude Lévi-Strauss.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adèle Van Reeth</span> French philosopher and radio producer

Adèle Van Reeth is a French philosopher, radio producer and columnist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Day for the End of Fishing</span> International campaign by animal rights activists

The World Day for the End of Fishing (WoDEF) is an international campaign launched by animal rights activists that demand the end of fishing practices. It takes place on the last Saturday of March every year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Olivier</span> Anglo-French activist, writer and philosopher (born 1956)

David Olivier Whittier is an Anglo-French antispeciesist activist, writer and philosopher. He is the founder of the French journal Cahiers antispécistes, the annual event Veggie Pride, and the annual meeting Les Estivales de la question animale. Olivier coined the term "veggiephobia" and has authored numerous articles and delivered many conferences. An advocate of utilitarian and antinaturalist ethics, he identifies politically as a progressive.

<i>Cahiers antispécistes</i> Academic journal

The Cahiers antispécistes, originally called Cahiers antispécistes lyonnais, was a French-language journal published from 1991 to 2019, with the aim of disseminating antispeciesist ideas and stimulating debate on animal ethics, particularly on the distinction between animal liberation and ecology. It was published quarterly during its first years of existence, then annually. Issue 43, the last issue, was published in August 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yves Bonnardel</span> French activist, philosopher, essayist and editor (born 1967)

Yves Bonnardel is a French activist, philosopher, writer and editor. He advocates for antispeciesism, libertarianism and egalitarianism. Bonnardel is one of the founding members of the French journal Cahiers antispécistes and of the events Veggie Pride, Les Estivales de la question animale and the march to close all slaughterhouses.

Thomas Lepeltier is a French independent scholar, essayist and science writer specializing in the history and philosophy of science and applied ethics, known in particular for his contributions to the field of animal law. He is the author of several philosophical works on animal ethics such as L'imposture intellectuelle des carnivores and of science history books including Darwin hérétique and Univers parallèles. Known initially as a science historian, he now mainly advocates in defense of animals in the French media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Valéry Giroux</span> Canadian philosopher

Valéry Giroux is a Canadian philosopher, lawyer and animal rights activist from Quebec. She is an adjunct professor at the Université de Montréal Faculty of Law, associate director for the Centre de recherche en éthique, a Fellow of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, and an author and speaker on animal ethics issues and veganism, with a notable focus on the topic of antispeciesism through her co-editorship of the antispeciesist journal L'Amorce. Her philosophy argues for the equal moral consideration of all sentient beings, objects to the ethical notion that the utilization of non-human animals by humans as being morally permissible, and advocates for the individual right to freedom for all sentient beings, regardless of their species, emphasizing negative or republican freedom over positive freedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jérôme Segal</span> French-Austrian essayist, historian, and journalist (born 1970)

Jérôme Segal is a French-Austrian essayist and historian, lecturer at Sorbonne University and a researcher and journalist in Vienna. He is also known for his contributions in the field of animal law. He is the author of several articles and books, in particular on Jewishness and animal advocacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corine Pelluchon</span> French philosopher

Corine Pelluchon is a French philosopher and professor of philosophy at the University of Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM).

References

  1. ↑ "Une nouvelle "déclaration" d'intellectuels dénonce l'exploitation animale". LEFIGARO (in French). 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  2. ↑ Lévesque, Sébastien (May 2023). "L'animal est une personne". Le Droit (in French). Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  3. ↑ Nietzsche, El caballo de (2022-10-08). "Cientos de investigadores piden poner fin a la explotación animal por "injusta y moralmente indefendible"". elDiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  4. ↑ "400 universitaires du monde entier appellent à la fin de l'exploitation animale". CNEWS (in French). Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  5. ↑ Playoust-Braure, Axelle (2023-04-05). "Un consensus contre l'exploitation animale". www.scienceshumaines.com (in French). Retrieved 2024-05-20.
  6. ↑ "Four hundred philosophers declare animal exploitation 'unjust and morally indefensible'". Le Monde.fr. 2022-10-06. Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  7. 1 2 "La Déclaration de Montréal : 450 philosophes se font les avocats du monde animal". L'Obs (in French). 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  8. ↑ "List of signatories". 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  9. ↑ Jérôme, Ségal (2024). Veganwashing - L'instrumentalisation politique du véganisme (in French). Lux Quebec. ISBN   978-2898331305.
  10. ↑ Bouron, Mégane (2022-10-05). "400 philosophes déclarent "que l'exploitation animale est injuste et moralement indéfendable"". POSITIVR (in French). Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  11. ↑ "Four hundred philosophers declare animal exploitation 'unjust and morally indefensible'". Le Monde.fr. 2022-10-06. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  12. ↑ "L'appel de quatre cents philosophes : " Nous déclarons que l'exploitation animale est injuste et moralement indéfendable "". Le Monde.fr (in French). 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  13. ↑ "Déclaration de Montréal sur l'exploitation animale". Le Devoir (in French). 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  14. ↑ "Hayvan İstismarına İlişkin Montreal Deklarasyonu". www.cumhuriyet.com.tr (in Turkish). Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  15. ↑ Nietzsche, El caballo de (2022-10-08). "Cientos de investigadores piden poner fin a la explotación animal por "injusta y moralmente indefendible"". elDiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-10-23.
  16. ↑ "Revue de presse". 2022-11-01. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  17. ↑ Newsroom (2022-10-04). Εκατοντάδες φιλόσοφοι υπογράφουν τη Διακήρυξη του Μόντρεαλ για την εκμετάλλευση των ζώων. Newsbomb (in Greek). Retrieved 2022-10-25.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  18. ↑ Nietzsche, El caballo de (2022-10-08). "Cientos de investigadores piden poner fin a la explotación animal por "injusta y moralmente indefendible"". elDiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  19. ↑ "It's Official - Animal Exploitation Is Unethical | Scoop News". www.scoop.co.nz. 4 October 2022. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  20. ↑ "Déclaration de Montréal: un appel de 400 philosophes au sujet de l'exploitation animale". preview.mailerlite.com. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  21. ↑ "L214 soutient l'appel de 450 philosophes pour la fin de l'exploitation animale". www.l214.com (in French). 3 October 2022. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
  22. ↑ Ethics, Animal (2022-10-11). "The Montreal Declaration on Animal Exploitation". Animal Ethics. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
  23. ↑ Paré, Isabelle (2022-10-04). "Sauver les bêtes, coûte que coûte". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  24. ↑ Playoust-Braure, Axelle. "Un consensus contre l'exploitation animale". www.scienceshumaines.com (in French). Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  25. ↑ Francylan, Redação (2022-10-04). "Dia Mundial dos Animais: estudos internacionais de bem estar animal expõem injustiça". Fato Amazônico (in Brazilian Portuguese). Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  26. ↑ Mancuso, Maria (2022-10-04). "Basta sfruttare gli animali: la dichiarazione di 450 ricercatrici e ricercatori". Essere Animali (in Italian). Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  27. ↑ "Une nouvelle "déclaration" d'intellectuels dénonce l'exploitation animale". LEFIGARO (in French). 2022-10-04. Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  28. ↑ "Tribune "Déclaration de Montréal sur l'exploitation animale"". Jours de chasse (in French). 2022-10-14. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  29. ↑ "" La végétalisation de l'alimentation n'empêchera pas l'industrialisation du vivant "". Le Monde.fr (in French). 2022-10-19. Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  30. ↑ "Amender, plutôt qu'abolir, les liens qui nous unissent aux animaux". Le Devoir (in French). 2022-11-01. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  31. ↑ Francione, Gary L. (2022-10-05). "Why I Did Not Sign the Montreal Declaration on Animal Exploitation". Medium. Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  32. ↑ "Paroles de philosophes : " Il faut cesser de traiter les animaux comme des marchandises "". parismatch.be (in French). 2022-10-24. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  33. ↑ Naciri, Sliman (2022-10-04). "Le CRÉ dévoile la Déclaration de Montréal sur l'exploitation animale". Journal Métro (in French). Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  34. ↑ Julian Friedland (2024), "Avoiding Anthropomoralism", Between the Species, 27 (1): 150–162
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.